|
An author named Heinz R. Pagels (now deceased) who was a premier
physicist and quantum specialist, published a book titled The
Dreams of Reason in 1988.. Heinz' wife (Elaine Pagels, Harvard
chair and professor) is a renowned specialist in world religions.
Doug found a Heinz Pagels' text, fresh off some hot printer about
3rd quarter of 1988 and finished reading it prior year end. While
Doug was reading this fine work, Dr. Heinz Pagels transitioned
into some other omniverse...
It hit Doug hard. Doug became aware of Elaine's work via her
'specials' with Bill Moyers on Moyers' Journal PBS. At that time,
Doug was just commencing his serious obsessions with anything
quantum. Doug couldn't assiduously work his quantum obsessions
then. He owned (January, 1978- December, 1992) a small (about
35 employees) but very successful embedded-real-time software
engineering firm (then called SCS, Inc.). Heinz wrote about quantum
memes of real process,
of stuff which evolved, and he berated physics for having such
a non-evolutionary,
static and illusionary dialectical approach to studying reality.
What Heinz wrote...always had, at least for Doug, an almost
spiritual sensibility to it. Heinz wasn't totally qualitative
in his writing, but he was at least thigh deep in quality. Doug
liked that, having been a student of Robert M. Pirsig's opus
(ZMM and Lila) for about 10 years at that time.
As Doug read Heinz' books and watched Elaine on PBS, little
did Doug realize how Elaine's works on gnosis
and Heinz' works on physical
reality were telling autsimilar
stories: tomes of a Bergsonian, Pirsigean, Heraclitean,
Chaldæan~Essene~Naassene~gnostic, Planck~occurrence~quantized almost wholly~qualitative
wave~change~based
EIMA fluxing~reality.
On Heinz' death Doug wrote this
poem and sent it through an intermediary at NYAS (Heinz was
then-Director of the New York Academy of Sciences which
at that time published a great journal, The Sciences...)
to Elaine.
Today, CeodE 13Jul2009, Doug pulled Heinz' first
edition TDoR off a book shelf, blew dust off it, and opened
it. It fell open to this:
|
"Undoubtedly there is evolutionary survival value
in our representing the world in terms of myth, metaphor, and
scientific theory. We are evidently unique among species in our
symbolic ability, and we are certainly unique in our modest ability
to control the conditions of our existence by using these symbols.
Our ability to represent and simulate reality implies that we
can appropriate the order of existence and bring it to serve
human purposes. A good simulation, be it a religious myth or
scientific theory, gives us a sense of mastery over our experience.
To represent something symbolically, as we do when we speak or
write, is somehow to capture it, thus making it one's own. But
with this appropriation comes the realization that we have denied
the immediacy of reality and that in creating a substitute we
have but spun another thread in the web of our grand illusion[s]."
Page 88, paragraph 2, by Heinz R. Pagels, in his The
Dreams of Reason, Simon and Schuster, 1988.
|
If "Dreams of Reason" isn't qualitative, subjective,
middle~included and animate...Doug doesn't grasp what is!
Heinz tells us two major memes here: Language symbols are
illusory, and reason
based upon symbols which are both static and lisr
objective excluded-middle
is pure illusion. Adepts will see immediately how Heinz is regurgitating
Pirsig's "...always keep DQ with your SQ."
Doug calls this page, this Quantonics web page, "A Quantonics
Remediation of Millennium III English Language Problematics."
Doug's Quantum Remediations of English Language do just that:
keep DQ with SQ via linguistic scriptings of quantons(DQ,SQ).
It has taken Doug nearly 30 years to get here. If Doug took
that long, he believes it will take another three to five millennia
to make progress where about 10 percent of Earth people understand
issues involved: classical
vis-à-vis
quantum.
It shouldn't take that long, but classical hylic-psychic humans
are thick-headed (essentially programed-retarded by academe which
adheres and inheres pure classical dialectic). If Doug could
just get one simple message out, regarding this real MIII problematic,
it is this, "Dump classical dialectic!" It is deadly
of and deadly to human thought
and human mentality. It is, as Pirsig wrote, "A genetic
defect in human reason."
We see progress... This summer countless professors are diligently
studying Quantonics. Are their kids (students) challenging them
in their own classrooms re: evils of dialectical thing-king?
Doug likes to imagine that happening.
Truth be known,
every professor in academe CeodE 2009 should be scared silly!
That they apparently are n¤t is a symptom of their own
extinction, similar what USA classical society is doing to itself
nowings, as global people are watchings...
If you are a professor, and if you teach objectivity based
in classical dialectic...you are extinct! If you are a student
and professors are pushing dialectic into your brains, you are
inheriting their disease and its imminent extinction. Let's curtail
this hylic-psychic
metastasis of dialectic,
NOW!!!
Thank you for reading,
Doug Renselle - 13Jul2009.
PS - One way Doug became obsessed with problematics of dialectic
is an issue of Aristotle's excluded-middle. See commentary by
Heinz Pagels about 'excluded-middle' on pp. 288-9 of TDoR.
Of course, since then, Quantonics has shown irrevocably that
Aristotle's three 'laws' aren't just bogus, Aristotle
was using sophism to enunciate
them! Doug.
|
' (i.e.- "h-bar")
over 'h.
' 
'
add
and