Word

Quantonics' Quantum Remediation

of

English Language Problematics

for

Millennium III

Created

Master Index

Item |
English Language Problematic |
Quantonics' QuantumRemediation ©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2029 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

'equilibria' Etymology - Classical Etymology - Quantum Synonyms - Classical Synonyms - Quantum |
This QELR
of equilibria and equilibrium Begin
a Doug 8Mar2014 Equilibrium vav Classical Definiteness Aside
End a Doug 8Mar2014 Equilibrium vav Classical Definiteness Aside. We have a major challenge here in our attempts to remediate 'equilibrium.' Why? Why remediate equilibrium? Classical 'equilibrium' omniffers
radically quantum~equilibrium. From near end of Doug's online
FEP textbook, Chapter
4, Topic 1, paraphrased for use here, "Key to grasping why
all this is necessary...quantum reality is evolving and all its
relationshipings are n¤nlinear, due quantization
and scintillation, and Classical 'equilibrium' assumes immutable, perpetual, absolute,
Begin a
Doug 26Jul2011 Equilibrium vav Reversibility Aside
End a Doug 26Jul2011 Equilibrium vav Reversibility Aside. Now we know...classical notions of 'state' as equilibrium
Classical notions of 'equilibrium'
All of classical 'science' is like that, however. To do so, Doug has to invoke some quantum~n¤nmechanical
assumptions. Two big assumptions are that - quantum~reality is absolute change born of absolute flux as its core memeo of reality, and that
*all*change involves heterotemporal and heterostochastic quantized quantum~phase~encodings of*all*absolutely changing flux.
Omniqueness(ings) emerge(s) here (thus denying classical notions
of, for example, 'identity') which declares Autsimilarity 'exists,' but there are n¤ identities in quantum~reality! So Doug's challenge here is to remediate static and objective classical 'equilibrium' notions with stindyanic and quantonic quantum~equilibrium memeos. Now, reader, please realize how 'equilibrium' of 'state' appears
simple.
Comparatively, and these are wholly novel memes we are encountering,
æquihlihbria
of absolute change
may appear complex. There are enormous challenges here. That
means our efforts will be incomplete, i.e., quantumly~partial.
We only need rudiments of omniscrimination
twixt classical and quantum, however. Doug Begin a Doug
16Jul2011 Equilibrium vav Stability Aside
End a Doug 16Jul2011 Equilibrium vav Stability Aside. . . . 25-30Mar2011... Doug is using Prigogine's
and Stengers' (P&S') text titled To assist Doug's efficiency, he wants to introduce some new
intra quantonics acronyms P&S' opus associates many other memes with 'equilibrium.'
A key meme is one of reversibility. Their version of reversibility
is classical. Their view of time is classical too. Time to them
is a monism If equilibrium is omnifficult to explain...well, I'm unsure
whether explaining 'reversibility' is as omnifficult, perhaps
more, perhaps less so. Doug has done a QELR of 'reversibility,'
but it is inadequate for issues which arise here. Since these
two memes are so 'intertwined' with one another, Doug senses
he should keep them together here until most unsaids have been
P&S only speak of unitime as ideally reversible near classical
equilibrium. They claim that unitemporal irreversibility (again,
classical) only appears under FFE You may recall that Pirsig used a notion of 'latching.' See Doug's recent Ceod Allow Doug to start a list of issues for further omniscussion
(Doug is showing main issues first, then will go more specific
on reversibility vis-à-vis irreversibility next) - State vis-à-vis flux,
- Basic classical theory assumes 'state.'
- This has immense bogus (low 'value') implications for classical notions of equilibrium and reversibility (and all other classical thing-king).
- N¤n mechanical quantum empiritheory
assumes ubiquitous up to Planck rate flux (isonic n¤n~spins,
plus bosonic zero, integer, and fermionic 0.5 spins).
- This puts Value back into all human think
_{q}ing about reality, including memeos of equilibrium and reversibility. - Ubiquitous quantum~flux,
*hyper*classical notions of state, offers many notable implications for classical vis-à-vis quantum hermeneutics of equilibrium and reversibility.- Classical reversibility implications
**:** - Quantum reversibility implications
**:** - Classical atemporality
implications
**:** - Quantum atemporality implications
**:** - Classical equilibrium implications
**:** - Quantum equilibrium implications
**:**
- Classical reversibility implications
- This puts Value back into all human think
- Basic classical theory assumes 'state.'
- Certainty vis-à-vis uncertainty (see Doug's quantum
vis-à-vis classical measurement),
- Basic classical mechanical theory assumes ubiquitous certainty.
- Basic classical mechanical quantum theory assumes microscopic uncertainty and macroscopic classical certainty.
- N¤n classical quantum~empiritheory assumes EIMA
holographic Ensemble~Quantum~Uncertainty (EQU):
quantum~uncertainty reigns
all scales of quantum~reality.
- Ubiquitous quantum~uncertainty,
*hyper*classical notions of certainty, offers many notable implications for classical vis-à-vis quantum hermeneutics of equilibrium and reversibility.- Classical reversibility implications
**:** - Quantum reversibility implications
**:** - Classical atemporality implications
**:** - Quantum atemporality implications
**:** - Classical equilibrium implications
**:** - Quantum equilibrium implications
**:**
- Classical reversibility implications
- Ubiquitous quantum~uncertainty,
- Monism vis-à-vis pluralism,
- Classical continuous 'state' informs and immanates
*all*monistic classical thought with dialectical bivalency. - Quantum~flux, with up to Planck rate complementary quantization,
emerqs, pluralizes, and holografies
*all*heterogeneous quantum~think_{q}ing with quantonic~omnivalencyings.- Ubiquitous quantum~pluralism,
*hyper*classical notions of monism, offers many notable implications for classical vis-à-vis quantum hermeneutics of equilibrium and reversibility.- Classical reversibility implications
**:** - Quantum reversibility implications
**:** - Classical atemporality implications
**:** - Quantum atemporality implications
**:** - Classical equilibrium implications
**:** - Quantum equilibrium implications
**:**
- Classical reversibility implications
- Ubiquitous quantum~pluralism,
- Classical continuous 'state' informs and immanates
- Classes of time,
- classical time as temporal monism, time as homogeneous, ideal absence of quantization, Planck's clock intentionally turned off, etc.
- quantum~time
as radical and stochastic quantized~timings as spawn of quantum
flux enabled by Plancks clock's perpetual ticking
- Ubiquitous quantum~timings,
*hyper*classical notions of monistic time, offer many notable implications for classical vis-à-vis quantum hermeneutics of equilibrium and reversibility.- Classical reversibility implications
**:** - Quantum reversibility implications
**:** - Classical atemporality implications
**:** - Quantum atemporality implications
**:** - Classical equilibrium implications
**:** - Quantum equilibrium implications
**:**
- Classical reversibility implications
- Ubiquitous quantum~timings,
- quantization of time (all flux is quantized so then too are mass, space, and gravity, etc.)
- etc.
- What about phase?,
- quantum~phase~interrelationshipings are quintessence of all quantum~evolution, thus all emergent quantum~creation and novelty
- spontaneous (free will; n¤n inert) phase~interrelationshipings
depend intrinsically upon massively plural and ensemble
quantization of all quantum~flux
- gravityings now may be viewed as one quantum~stochastic~holographic kind of quantum~phase~interrelationshipings
- massings now may be viewed as one quantum~stochastic~holographic kind of quantum~phase~interrelationshipings
- spacings now may be viewed as one quantum~stochastic~holographic kind of quantum~phase~interrelationshipings
- timings now may be viewed as one quantum~stochastic~holographic kind of quantum~phase~interrelationshipings
- entanglement
and its partial presence~absence is key to quantum~scintillation's
creative changings, e.g., Higgs boson and
*creatio ex nihilo aperio*and QED and QCD - classical absence of quantization leaves all flux unquantized
(as closed, static-tautological transverse y=f(t) classical sinus
flux) and Bergsonian 'inert,' not spontaneous (absence of free
will
**:**causally determinate; ideal absence of quantum~chance and ~uncertainty)- Ubiquitous quantum~phase~quantization,
*hyper*classical notions of scalar phase, offers many notable implications for classical vis-à-vis quantum hermeneutics of equilibrium and reversibility.- Classical reversibility implications
**:** - Quantum reversibility implications
**:** - Classical atemporality implications
**:** - Quantum atemporality implications
**:** - Classical equilibrium implications
**:** - Quantum equilibrium implications
**:**
- Classical reversibility implications
- Ubiquitous quantum~phase~quantization,
- etc.
- Thermodynamics,
- As Doug has vociferously explained in Quantonics, classical
thermodynamics theories are mostly and simply bogus
**:**- single class of entropy
**:**posentropy - assumes a single degenerative gradient to posentropy
- entropy as a static scalar classical dialectical
**con**cept - assumption of classical 2
^{nd}'law' as general to all reality (it is only partially specific to material, posentropic reality) - assumes
**con**servation and closure of universality - assumes that mathematics are adequate to describe entropy
- assumes that English, French, German, and other dialectical languages systems are adequate to describe entropy
- etc.
- single class of entropy
- As Doug has vociferously explained in Quantonics, classical
thermodynamics theories are mostly and simply bogus
- Analyticity,
- Positive,
- Negative,
- Entropa,
- Cohera,
- Conservation,
- Closure,
- Scalars of measurables,
- Newton's atemporality as a primrose lane,
- Etc.
Doug - 24-30Mar2011. Chapter 2 Review Summary of P&S' Classical dynamics theory is based in Galileo and Newton, plus a few others' classical notions. That is essence of what P&S narrate in Chapter 2. Doug's assessment re: classical dynamics is... "Doug, what's wrong with classical dynamics?" Doug's
list should seem familiar, and it emerges from his draft review
of Chapter 2 of - objectivity,
- stoppability,
- lisrability,
- quantity,
- negation implying unitemporal reversibility (more important here, though, is an intrinsic that quantum~reality is only positive),
- predication,
- unitemporality implying continuous y=f(t) (big issue with Keynesianism),
- time as homogeneous delta-space/space proxy (no valid 'concept,' no valid understanding of time),
- change as temporal 'motion,' (no valid 'concept,' no valid understanding of change),
- static 'completeness' as easily achievable and assessable under canonic classical dynamics theory,
- closure,
- conservation,
- commutability, commutativity,
- equivalence- and other -relations, (i.e., identity, reflexivity, symmetry, inequalities, associativity, distributivity, normative assignment, signification, etc., re: classical identities 'should be' 'classically Aristotelian-tautologously' 'reversible-commutative,' but they are n¤t due quantum reality's real and absolute change)
- etc.
Classical dynamics canonically assumes all of those. Many of those list items involve even other implicit assumptions too. What is crucial to grasp is that Quantonically and quantumly all of those are "simply and demonstrably bogus." 'Modern Keynesianism' assumes all of those and more. Keynesianism is bogus! Indubitably, Keynesianism is bogus. We may say then, Keynesianism is in its death throes as Doug writes this. It is only a matter of timings. "Doug, can you list quantum~memeotic complementaries
of those classical notions?" Yes, but we must not treat
them as classically bivalent 'opposites - subjectivity,
- absolute change, perpetual change, plural changings,
- holographicity, middle~inclusion, everywhereings~everywhenings~associativityings,
- quality,
- cancellation of positive only fluxings,
- evolution,
- perpetual and ubiquitous quantization of all reality,
- all quanta and all of their ensembles have their own local~n¤nlocal omnique massively heterogeneous timings,
- all quanta and all of their ensembles have their own local~n¤nlocal omnique massively heterogeneous omnivalently evolving changings,
- any quantum~assessment of systemic completeness is always quantum~partial, Links added 10Mar2012 - Doug.
- perpetual and ubiquitous openness,
- quantum~reality's potentia are unbounded,
- autsimilarity of quantum~EWings,
- autsimilarity of EWings' EIMAssociativityings,
- etc.
Neither of those lists is even close to being 'complete,'
and they likely This 1Apr2011 narrative of End Chapter 2 Review Summary of
Chapter 3 Review Summary of P&S' P&S' This chapter is a blunt indictment of classical science. It
repeatedly narrates importance of ditching classical science
and moving on to something better - Kant (a dialectician; Kant bivalently split Subject and Object, noumenal and phenomenal, philosophy and science...Kant is an epic failure: "scientific choice is heresy"),
- Hegel (a dialectician),
- Diderot (though Doug would put him in both lists, for a variety of reasons),
- Descartes (a dialectician),
- Newton (a materialist dialectician mechanist),
- Lagrange,
- Hamilton,
- Duhem,
- Poincaré,
- Kirchoff,
- Mach (minimalism as economy of thought),
- Plus positivists, in general, e.g., Reichenbach (mathematical physics as a last resort of understanding time and reality and denial of nature as our partner since man is above god, rather "there is no god," and man is above nature...this is simply incompetent humanism gone awry, gone amok...),
- etc.
These 'people' shared a common flaw in their thing-king: "Preserve science at all costs. Control nature using 'science.' Humans are above nature and god." Doug loves Prigogine and Stengers mostly since they defy and
deny said views for what they really are: intrinsically flawed.
They challenge classical science as essentially bogus, and they
narrate how classical 'science' is mostly just humanly- Comparatively we may juxtapose a few transitionals, those commencing a quantum~journey: - Bergson (he understands vast problematics of classical science,
he understands
**:**the account, AKA*the logos*, and he appears to say "one must find one's inner before one can even begin to understand nature;" Bergson somewhat like James appears as a gnostic; for Doug that is a prerequisite for grasping a modal of reality as quantum~holographic), - Stahl (Doug lacks familiarity with Stahl),
- Whitehead (essentially process as natural which is implicitly
quantum if we view
*all*processings as quantized), - Diderot (he straddled classical and quantum which puts him in both camps, for a variety of reasons...)
- Plus all quantumists (non dialectical ones) whom Doug attempts
to uncloak in Quantonics (most of these, like Diderot, tend to
straddle(new_quantum,old_classical) so it isn't trivial to assess
them as pure...we may, only as a reference, consider Quantonics,
Gnosis,
*the logos*, and Autiot as nearer 'purety'), - etc.
I highly recommend OOoC as Quantonics student "must reading." Read it over and over and over until you commence grasping much deeper issues here. End Chapter 3 Review Summary of
10,12-13April2011 I do n¤t enjoy saying this, but I feel have n¤ alternative...it must be said. In Doug's opinion, anyone who thingks we can use classical logic to understand economics and equilibrium (in terms of inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation) is just plain retarded. Just to set our tone and tenor for what follows... Prior Doug's continuing his review of Chapter 4 of If you read current pundits' descriptions of inflation vis-à-vis
deflation and hyperinflation, you will hear them talking and
writing about those comparisons using logic, using rational reason.
Doug wants to reiterate: we will Doug has another new graphic to help explain why. He calls
it, "Equilibria (Equilibrium) as Many Interrelationshipings."
All equilibria are quantum~ephemeral. Their comtextings
are multiplicate, quantized
and evolving. Let's take a look
Essentially it is a 'nest,' a network of interrelationshipings. Those interrelationshipings appear as :N¤ classical bivalent 'logic' can do this, period, which is why Doug calls classical logics' pundits "retarded." To claim that classical logic can is to declareoneself, literally,"a moron." I.e., "I...said classical logician...am a moron!" ad
occulos that quantum~coquecigrues is an¤n dialectical 'logic' of quantum~scintillating dynamic~evolving network interrelationshipings. We may choose to squeeze essence here as quantum~omnivalence vis-à-vis classical-bivalence. However, it isn't that simple. More squeezing juices quantum~spontaneity vis-à-vis classical-state. Again, more squeezing extracts quantum~quantization vis-à-vis classical linear continuous thing-king. And so on... Their versions of inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation are impotent. understand.Thæir quantum~versions of inflation, deflation, and hyperinflation are p¤tænt. Why? A quantum~feature of Autiot is holographic cosmic~energy self~other fractal recursion. Doug uses an acronym for that : sorso. Sorso means "self~other
referent sophism."That is what quantum~holograms do.Any 'logic' applied to any sorso reality must be a 'quantum logic.' Quantum~reality has many non classically logical 'features,' including:
without imposing anti~quantum classical 'state,' independence,' 'objective negation,' etc. 10,12-13April2011
15-16April2011 Doug had another of those immense epiphanies last evening. Allow me to attempt a reconstruction of events... I had just finished my evening snack of ripe olives, cattiatore,
and mozzarella with champagne. I decided to restart my rereading
of Chapter 4 of P&S' "...As for the birth of the ' " "Obviously, Transcribed from p. 104, Chapter 4, In spite of its bold violet objective dialectics this segment of text is prescient, to say a least. Prescience is available to us, at a very least, in dark green bold text Doug highlighted. A key surmise by P&S in that text which might easily be overlooked is their claim of "simplicity." Our nexus here is Bergson's, paraphrased by Doug, "...state is complex and flux is simple, since state cannot explain flux but flux can explain state." We see Bergson's implicit claim that exegesis is a hallmark of simplicity in terms of one's being enabled to understand. That nexus becomes a fulcrum for Doug's epiphany! Do you recall Doug's more than a decade-old epiphany which
he described in his web page titled, Essence of that page is this If that is so, What about temperature, and temperature gradience? Yes, temperature and its gradients as plural participling quantons are all quantum manifestations of quantum~flux! All measureables (ømnihtørables in quantumese) as plural participling quantons are all quantum manifestations of quantum~flux! Flux simplicity, as Bergson instructed, rears itself and sparkles in its majesty over (hyper) classical 'state.' "What is such a big deal here, Doug?" P&S describe
all physical measurables above as 'classical scalars Implications of what Doug has written in this 'gradience commentary'
are astonishing! Doug will spend several days here showing you
16Apr2011...continue... In our quotes from beginning of Chapter 4 above, P&S (like
all classicists) treat physical measurables conventionally as
scalars and at best as Newtonian formal motion of stoppable (atemporal) 'state-events.'
Allow Doug to requote those bold green text segments and cipher
them - classical heat flow ciphers
**:**- "...
**classical scalar heat flow is scalar-proportional to****the****scalar****gradient of scalar temperature**..." - "...
**the****classical scalar coefficient of classical scalar proportionality between scalar heat flow and scalar gradient of scalar temperature that is specific to each substance**..." - "...
**the****starting point of a new type of science**..."
- "...
- quantum heat flow ciphers
**:**- "...
**quantum~evolving heat as flux flow is quantum~relatively~phasemental to****fluxing****gradientings of temperaturings as flux**..." - "...
**flux phasemental relativityings among heat as flux flow and gradient of temperature as flux that is specific to each energy wellings' ephemeral fluxings comtextings**..." - "...
**the****starting point of a new type of quantum~flux think**_{q}**ing**..."
- "...
Yes reader,
"There is a new philosophy in town." Quantum~philosophy
Doug's essence here is that classical thought and language
always ciphers reality as 'scalar state.' However, quantum~think
- classical
**thought flow**ciphers**:**- "...
**classical scalar thought**_{c}flow is scalar-proportional to**the****scalar****gradient of scalar thingking**..." - "...
**the****classical scalar coefficient of classical scalar proportionality between scalar thought**..."_{c}flow and scalar gradient of scalar thingking that is specific to each substance - "...
**the****starting point of a new type of science**..."
- "...
- quantum
**th~ought flow**ciphers**:**- "...
**quantum~evolving th~ought**_{q}as flux flow is quantum~relatively~phasemental to**fluxing****gradientings of think**..."_{q}ings as flux - "...
**flux phasemental relativityings among th~ought**rqcs_{q}as flux flow and gradient of think_{q}ings as flux that is**to each energy wellings' ephemeral fluxings comtextings**..." - "...
**the****starting point of a new type of quantum~flux think**_{q}**ing**..."
- "...
If we apply that to Economics Theory, "Equilibria as
flux is More essence
here is that, _{q} issi gradience(EWings_{x},EWings_{z})_{1},fluxings_{N})ømnihtøring evolving interrelationshipings among evolving~energy~wellings.
We may view changes in quantum equilibria, then, as evolving rqcs changings in evolving Value. Quantum~Value evolves. _{q} issi gradience(EWings_{x},EWings_{z})Doug - 21Feb2013.
Classical 'value' seeks state-ic 'stability,' AKA 'state' as 'absence of evolutionary change,' as 'immutability of forms except for linear motional-state-event analytics as change in scalar value.' _{1},
static_scalar_{2})Flux is Value. State is 'value.' Evolving flux Value "middle~includes."
Static immutable 'value' 'middle-excludes.' Quantum coquecigrues
This appears a good time to check our 'equilibrium' QELR progress.
What did Doug write at beginning of this QELR? This "Classical notions of 'equilibrium' are just plain bogus. "All of classical 'science' is like that, however. "To do so, Doug has to invoke some quantum~n¤nmechanical
assumptions. Two big assumptions
are that - quantum~reality is absolute change born of absolute flux as its core memeo of reality, and that
*all*change involves heterotemporal and heterostochastic quantized quantum~phase~encodings of*all*absolutely changing flux.
"Omniqueness(ings) emerge(s) here (thus denying classical
notions of, for example, 'identity') which declares "Autsimilarity 'exists,' but there are n¤ identities in quantum~reality! "So Doug's challenge here is to remediate static and objective classical 'equilibrium' notions with stindyanic and quantonic quantum~equilibrium memeos." How are we doing? Doug is confident we have a partial QELR of equilibrium. This 16Apr2011 segment has taken us a long way toward remediation of classical 'equilibrium' notions. Doug... ...16Apr2011...end
Doug ignored said titles when he first started reading P&S'
Why did P&S' use those titles for Chapter 4? An easy answer is Gravity is Newtonian and also any 'then-new'
theories of heat, entropy, and thermodynamics were 'not' Newtonian.
To a casual reader, that may seem unimportant. However, it is
a Essence here
is crucial to Quantonics' New Way of Think - Balmer happened upon quantization as a wave~flux ladder in 1855, and
- Fourier happened upon heat flow based upon temperature gradience
just prior 1811 (date taken from P&S'
*OOoC*text).
Quantum~flux nissin
ænærgy, n¤n classically mechanical 'energy.'
Very basically said quantum~flux expresses itself as bosons and
fermions. Heat is gradient bosonic flux. Fourier partially 'got'
But we can generalize more than that. We can say that, So 'gradient' as used in this section of our review, is - heat flow is temporal,
- heat (temperature) gradience is temporal,
- acceleration is temporal,
- acceleration gradience is temporal,
- gravity is atemporal (i.e., zero latency 'action at a distance'), and
- gravity gradience is atemporal.
Notice how classical notions of atemporality imply stoppability, zero-momentum, state, reference frames, etc. Quantum~atemporality has to do with memeos of superluminality (zero latency regardless distance of separation) of communications (quantum~correlation) at a distance and action (e.g., gravity) at a distance. Gravity is superluminal, in this case though we say and write, "atemporal." Heat isn't. So heat isn't a rival of gravitation. Doug... ...20-21,24Apr2011...end More...over next several days...Doug. 15-16April2011
metaphor of increasing energy levelings which we 'classically count' as wave number. However, it is generic all quantum~holographic EWing systems. thus so is many EWings emerqing a larger EWing quantized. Quantization scales and we can show (classically rendered Planck) systemic energy as E _{s}Nih._{s} is System Energy, N is essentially
wave number, i is square root of minus one, and h is Planck's
constant.H5Wings~EIMA their comtextings'
quantum~complementary
EWings.H5Wings~coobsfecting
all of their complementary EWings in their comtext.neighbors and their quantum~complementary comtextings. flux~vavings
of 'flux~wavings.' That is their local energy Value,
itself perpetuallyadapting selectively to changes in its local and nonlocal environmentings. :
as quantum~EWings (quantons) in their various m¤dæs
of H5Wings~quantum~equilibra.Revisions too on 13Apr2011 - Doug.
As you may choose to see, Doug has a huge amount of work here to lay foundation for understanding equilibrium in systems theories both from classical and quantum~systems viewpoints. This is going to take awhile. Please be patient. I want to
finish it, but...more...I want to get it as close to Doug - 20Mar2011. Begin 22-24Sep2011 Equilibrium
Update
End 22-24Sep2011 Equilibrium Update. This QELR of equilibria and equilibrium Page top index. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2029 |

Quantonics, Inc.

1950 East Greyhound Pass, Suite 18, #368

Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

USA

1-317-THOUGHT

(1,5,10Apr2011 rev - Add Chapter 2

(12-13,15-16Apr2011 rev - Extend 'equilibrium' QELR's omniscussion re

(27-28Jun2011 rev Update 'equilibrium.' Remove legacy markups. Add classical vav quantum atemporality implications. Add relevant 'atemporal' links.)

(16Jul2011 rev - Update 'equilibrium' with aside on quantum vav Keynesian 'equilibrium' as ' state' and 'planned' as 'perpetually-stable.')

(19Aug2011 rev - Add 'Value is Gradience' anchor under 'equilibrium.')

(12-13,22Sep2011 rev - Repair a segment of text under 'equilibrium.' "Classical notions of state as equilibrium." Add 'dissipation' link. Add update to 'equilibrium.')

(24Sep2011 rev - Add 'Assess Resemblance'

(8Dec2011 rev - Update 'evolution' with complementarities of 'evolution' including equilibrium and chaos.)

(30Dec2011 rev - Add 'Quantum Gradience' anchor to draft review of P&S'

(2Jan2012 rev - Add many to many Value~gradience assessmentings' interrelationshipings graphics under 'equilibrium.')

(21-22Feb2012 rev - Update 'equilibrium.' "Dialectic

(10Mar2012 rev - Add quantum~assessment and systemic~completeness links under 'equilibrium,' discussion of quantum~complementarities.)

(10Mar2012 rev - Add a link to Doug's recent

(7Jun2012 rev - Add some links and repair some punctuation under 'equilibrium.')

(28Jun2012 rev - Add '28Jun2012 Aside' under 'equilibrium.')

(17,24Jul2012 rev - Add link to new 'chaos' remediation under 'equilibrium

(30Jul2012 rev - Add 'Gravity is Quantumly Atemporal' anchor under 'equilibrium.')

(14Sep2012 rev - Add 'Extended Omniscussion on Reversibility Aside.' Add new graphics for 'Energy Wellings Equilibria Gradiencings.')

(3Oct2012 rev - Add 'Jacobs Ladder Modal; anchor under 'equilibrium's' section update 13Apr2012.)

(31Oct2012 rev - Add link to recent QELR of 'latch' under 'equilibria.')

(13Dec2012 rev - Correct 'equilibrium' QELR typos. Add more recent-newer links there too.)

(21Feb2013 - Add 'rqcs' reference links under 'Equilibrium issi Gradience' omniscussion under 'equilibrium.')

(28Jan2014 rev - Make page current. Add quantum~entangled under 'perpetual evolving equilibria.')

(8,21Mar2014 rev - Update 'equilibria' with Aside on equilibria as quantumly indeterminate. Add missing 'reject' word in 8Mar update.)

(27Nov2014 rev - Add 'Qycloid™' graphic under 'Equilibrium.')

(2Dec2014 rev - Add 'Equilibrium Issues Classical vav Quantum' anchor and update that table. Update 'linear change,' 'quiescent conditions,' and 'attraction' issues. Reset legacy markups.)

(5Dec2014 rev - Add 'Another Antinomialism' near "complementarily omniffer." Add 'Another Antinomialism' anchor just prior that change.)

(28Dec2014 rev - Add 'Quantum Time' link to all occurrences of 'Quantum~Time.')

(17Mar2015 rev - Update, slightly, Qycloid graphic narrative.)

(30Mar2015 rev ' Add 'Fourier and Quantum Thought Flow' aside comparing classical and quantum thought flow as essence of What is Consciousness?)

(5Jul2015 rev - Change 'Heat gradience' to 'Heat flow' under Chapter 4 review of OOoC.)

(22Sep2015 rev - Update Qycloidal Flux Diagram lable with 'Cosmic~Metabolic~Quantum.')