Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

Quantonics' Quantum Remediation
English Language Problematics
Millennium III
by Doug Renselle
: 20Jul2002
Master Index
Most recent additions-revisions marked add and rev.


English Language Problematic

Quantonics' Quantum

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026

Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'photon' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'ph¤t¤n.'

In classical contexts we shall use 'photon.' In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'ph¤t¤n.'

Classicists view photons as particles, and thus see photons as classical objects.

Students of Quantonics see ph¤t¤ns as quantons with everywhere-ass¤ciative asympt¤tic anihmatæ pr¤bability distributi¤ns. As such ph¤t¤ns are quantum flux, and thus we view them as anihmatæ and emerging pr¤cesses.

To exemplify how important and omnifferent our Quantonics view of ph¤t¤ns is, comsider how classicists view photons as stable (by that they mean photons have ~infinite 'particle/object' life times) SOM Box, SOM Loop analytic-motion objects.

Recently, mid 2005, borne of our research into David Bohm's holomovement, we have a decent description of what photons are in quantonicsese.

Photons, in quantonics, are fuzzonic attractor ensembles of EIMA, animate holographic interrelationshipings. Quantonically, photons are ensemble attractor phase~encodings of holographic interrelationshipings.

Also ponder how photons quantum tunnel so classical notions of 'light speed' significantly lose 'scientific' semantic. Ask yourself, "What does this do to Hubble's constant?"

Photons phase~encode Pirsigean Value interrelationshipings.

Doug - 31Jul2005. (Beth says 'Hubble' stands for a "hunka, hunka burning love." )


In Quantonics, any ph¤t¤n is an example of ¤ne of at least three of Nature's pærpætual m¤ti¤n quantons: ph¤t¤ns, electr¤ns, and pr¤t¤ns. All three exemplify Nature's own comstituent c¤re pærpætual pr¤cesses. Classicists deny any notions of nascent or manufactured/manufacturable 'perpetual motion,' but in Quantonics we k-n¤w they are misguided by their own CTMs. Ph¤t¤ns are unambigu¤usly pærpætual m¤ti¤n/anihmatæ quantum flux pr¤cesses.

In quantum reality, ph¤t¤ns' pærpætual life pr¤cesses emerge during a quantum pr¤cess called "emissi¤n." They demerge during a quantum pr¤cess called "abs¤rpti¤n." Abs¤rpti¤n ¤f any ph¤t¤n is usually by s¤me c¤mpatible fermi¤n, ¤ften an electr¤n in an at¤m. Between abs¤rpti¤n (Bayt of a photon, 'death' of photon) and re-emissi¤n (Vayt of photon, 'rebirth' of a photon) a ph¤t¤n's energy is 'st¤red' in ¤ne ¤f an at¤m's electr¤ns by quantum jumping an electr¤n t¤ a higher energy shell. (see Vayt to Bayt) Notice that this rebirth isn't bound to a single photon being reborn. Re~emission, depending upon photon's energy level when it was absorbed (Bayt), may be a multiplicate quantum~process. In this scenario, re~emission may be a more gradual pr¤cæss of descending quantized ladder steps (avalanching: a kind of down~energy cha¤s) over multiple quantized~leaps down. We see a kind of multiple~rebirth (many Vayts) quantum~parthenogenesis of one high energy photon's absorption which may be gradience 'dissipated' more~less gradually by multiple re~emissions over multiple 'down~leaps' of quantized~energyings. This partially, enthymemetically explains 'light' being quantum~transmuted into heat. Similar other kinds of scintillation of higher and lower energy transmutationings. Con(m)sider omnissipation of X-rays as parthenogenesis (many Vayts) of a wide variety of lower level 'radiation.' Doug - 24Mar2014.

From a classical viewpoint emergence and demergence are n¤t quantum pr¤cesses, rather they are viewed as stoppable state-ic events. You may thingk of this classically as Aristotle did regarding an apple falling from a tree. Stopped state '1' is apple_on_tree. Stopped state '2' is apple_on_ground. Event '1' is analytic transition from state '1' to state '2.' In Quantonics we regard this classical style of thing-king misguided and unfortunate. Why? It flagrantly fails to describe anihmatæ, c¤mplementary, heter¤gene¤us, everywhere-ass¤ciative, pærpætually-processing (ensehmble BAWAM at up-to Planck rate quantized) quantum reality. See CTMs See QTMs.

Astute readers and students may notice this is what Zeno of Elea was talking about in his first paradox beginning, "There is no motion..." Aristotle essentially said that there are only stoppable states. Aristotle described events stoppably without describing real evolutionary motion-process twixt states.

This is a Mount Everestesque height of bogus CTM thing-king!

Allow us to quote Arthur I. Miller's 1994 Early QED - 'A Source Book,' "Although suitably quantized laws of classical mechanics are used to calculate [an] electron's allowed orbits, or stationary states, classical mechanics can neither depict nor describe [an] electron in transit." P. 4. Our brackets to remove thelogos.

This state-ic classical viewpoint is egregious, ersatz. This exemplar of 'normal, enlightened scientific' thing-king is classicism's legacy: a deign to feign.


When that at¤m's electr¤n falls back t¤ a l¤wer energy level, said ph¤t¤n's energy re-emerges as a pærpætual ph¤t¤n flux pr¤cess. If abs¤rpti¤n ¤pp¤rtunities fail t¤ arise, any ph¤t¤ns' life pr¤cesses run in pærpætuity, e.g., ph¤t¤ns traveling, say ~12.5 billi¤n light years fr¤m a distant galaxy, t¤, e.g., Earth's Hubble Space Telescope or your eyes' retinas. (Take time to contemplate those last three words vis-à-vis a double slit experiment. )

It is w¤rthwhile t¤ n¤te that quantum electrodynamics, QED, classically describes photon-electron 'interactions.'

Further it is w¤rthwhile t¤ n¤te that ph¤t¤ns are spin 1 b¤s¤ns ¤f family Gauge B¤s¤ns, and electr¤ns are spin ½ fermi¤ns ¤f family Lept¤ns.

See OEDC. See QCD. See electron. See proton.

See Schweber on QED.

Page top index.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026

Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026 Rev. 24Mar2014  PDR — Created 20Jul2002  PDR
(29Jan2003 rev - Add an Aristotles Apple near appropriate paragraph under 'photon.')
(7Feb2003 rev - For browser compatibility, substitute GIFs for some Wingdings and Symbol fonts. Reset red text.)
(27Feb2003 rev - Add Arthur I. Miller quote under 'photon.')
(11Oct2003 rev - Reset legacy red text.)
(24Feb2004 rev - Reset legacy add's. and rev's. and red text.)
(18Apr2004 rev - Extend Aristotle's befuddled stoppable apple 'events' parable under 'photon.')
(21Oct2004 rev - Reset red text. Allow all table and cell bounds to adjust freely.)
(28Oct2004 rev - Repair a very bad accidental QELR of some cells on this page.)
(17Jun2005 rev - Reset red text.)
(1,29,31Jul2005 rev - Add 'Queries' anchor under 'probability.' Add How MoQites Monitor Reality link under Ensemble Attractors graphic. Update 'photon.'
(27Mar2006 rev - Reset legacy red text.)
(18Jan2007 rev - Adjust color.)
(5Nov2008 rev - Reformat. Replace wingdings and symbol fonts with gifs. Reset legacy markups.)
(24Mar2014 rev - Add Vayt to Bayt commentary and link.)