|
'plan'
'planning'
'plans' |
: plan, planning, plans, etc. For classically
concrete specificity use planc, planningc,
plansc.
Classical planning suffers all dialectical faux
pas, error, deceit, corruption, lies, disinformation, etc.
For example: monism, independence, state (stabilityc),
contradiction, temporal monism, globalism, linearity,
predicability (i.e., planningc determinismc
of idealc 'Einsteinian'
probabilityc onec AKA unityc),
certainty, decidability based on dialectic reason,
'truth,' etc. See
Doug's list of classical
state-ic optimisms. Ponder too, Doug's Classical
Bogosities.
All dialectical central 'planning' is bogus. Why? Central
plannersc believe they can y=f(t) planc
a futurec effectc. That's a bogus classical
world view based in dialectic (academe's 'hero').
Central planners' economists use classical dialectical maths
to 'determine' their 'desired' futurec. But it never
works, in general, since their cause-effect, dialectical, classical
maths are bogus. Worse,
their dialectical 'reason' is bogus. As Pirsig wrote, "Dialectic
ia a genetic
defect in human reason." Zen and the Art of Motorcycle
Maintenance, p. 102 of 373 total, Bantam paperback, May 1982.
See crsp.
:
plahn,
plahnning, plahns,
etc. Alternatively for 'classical English' comvenience
use planq, planningq, plansq.
Let's make this really simple: we cannot planc,
we can only guessq. Why? Reality issi quantum. Quantum~reality
issi radically stochastic.
See Doug's quantum radicals: qrup,
rioq, rqcs,
rqfi, rqsu,
rsqs, etc.
Our quantum mandate: "Embrace indetermination. Embrace
quantum uncertainty." Leave CTM's
mythos. Enter QTMs'
emersos.
Doug - 25Mar2014.
Page top index.
|