|
'potentia'
'potential'
'potentiality'
Synonyms - classical:
- puissant, powerful
- prepotent, almighty
- empowered, influential
- latent possibility
- quantity, magnitude
- etc.
Synonyms - quantum:
-
p¤sihtihvæ æmærqant changæ
-
uhp t¤
Planck ratæ ræcursihve
æværywhere ihncludæd~mihddle ass¤ciatihve
ræcapihtulati¤n
-
quantal selectihvæ
ch¤¤sings~chancings~changings
- etc.
Etymology - classical:
- potential, adj., Before 1398 potencial potential,
latent; borrowed probably through Old French potencial,
and directly from Late Latin potentialis potential, from
Latin potentia power, potency.
From Barnhart's Concise Dictionary of Etymology, p. 589,
Harper & Collins, 1995, hardbound.
Etymology - quantum:
-
p¤tæntial
2005
QELRed from English potential.
|
: Potentia, potential, potentiality, etc.
In Quantonics, we really like change. So we shall take an
omniffering tack on this QELR.
We base this QELR on a query from DMD re: potentia.
DMD liked our answer, so we thought we might use it here.
In a DMD 22Nov2005 email to us, this query was proffered:
"We have read of classical notions of 'infinite potential',
'God as Infinite Potential', 'actualizing one's potential', etc.
How do these notions interrelate to Quantonics memeo that classicists
view Reality as dichon(actuality,actuality)?" Adepts please
fathom DMD's use of
a comma nospace in that dichon.
Doug's answer:
DMD, you already know this quantum~parable, do you n¤t?
Classical 'infinite' is classical 'state,' a global state, a
universal state, a
catholic state, and all scalarbations
which attend state: 1c/0c=1c/(1c-1c)
where all 1cs 'either-or' all 0cs are identical
and same everywhere: classically 'context free.'
Classical 'potential' is classical state,...: classical
actualization is reification. Aristotelian
state: apple
on tree (potentia), thence apple on ground (loss of potentia).
Aristotelian event (potentia release): classically inexplicable
transition from tree to ground.
Classically state-ic 'God.' 'God' as lisr
actuality. DQ as lisr
SQ. Dichon(DQ,
SQ). Interestingly, in SOM
DQ doesn't exist, making a classically 'potential' implication
God 'exists not.' If this is classically so, from whence 'infinite
potential?' How does one pry infinite potential from a closed,
OGC, OGT
dialectical reality?
(By) Being dialectical.
In terms of emergence 'classical state' has no potential!!! State
cannot emerge. Dirac: "Only a system which is left
undisturbed is determinate." (slightly paraphrased) Now
apply that to all semantics which encapsulate 'stat' and 'state.'
If you have Unix, this is easy to do. Simply do a <grep
'[Ss]tat' /lexicon_folder/largest_dictionary_you_have.txt>.
If you append < | less >stat_words.txt>, you can save
them all in a file. A dictionary you can use, e.g., on a MAC
with OS X is at /usr/share/dict/web. It contains ~235,000 words.
Larger ones are available and too it is easy to construct your
own from various online texts which can easily be converted to
word lists. web2 contains 521 words with '[Ss]tat.'
In quantum reality we can throw this word, state, away since
it is innately antithetical quantum reality.
In quantum reality it has no potentia(l). Ponder how Descartes'
axes and spatial 'di' mensions reify, state-ify, scalarbatively,
classical reality.
As you can see, dichon(actuality,
actuality) has lost its quality.
If you really meant dichon(actuality,actuality), then we may
show that affectively as dichon(quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality),quanton(nonactuality,actuality)).
Now, even dichonically inside d' Box, we can SEE (ponder quantum~gn¤stic
Autiot's Sheen
and Seen here.), C, SEA our classically 'hidden' potential, our
"reserve energy." This shows that classical reification
of quantum reality, regardless how carefully connived, cannot
escape absolute flux' impetus.
Classes of quantum~co(¤)n(m)jugation
are incredibly important here and take a lot of effort to grasp.
Too, ~~. See our QELRs of quanta
and select.
(continued...)
:
P¤tæntia, p¤tæntial,
p¤tæntialihty, etc.,
amd their plurahl
amd partihciple æmærqancies.
(continuation...)
An easy way to say what we intend by quantum potentia
is "Quantum potentia is said's unsaid. Quantum potentia
is said's quantum complement as that which may proflectively
and anticipatively, expectedly impend as evolutionary unfoldmentings
in actuality." Doug - 20May2007. Read all of Kuhn's partial
puzzle on enthymemetics.
See partiality.
We offer some quoted text from ending of our enthymemetics
aside at Kuhn's SoSR:
"Quantonics
HotMeme Another very simple
way of describing quantum partiality [as quantum~potentia]
is, "What is unsaid is radically
more important than what is said." All
quantum descriptions can only be partial and their
potential quantum~redemptive fullness exceeds their
partiality. Quantonics HotMeme.
"That is a partial description
of what Bohm meant by 'Hologramic
Reality,' and what Doug, William James, and Boris Sidis mean
by 'Reserve Energy' and our descriptions of How to Tap Into Iht."
Added 20May2007 - Doug. Quantum HotMeme
updated with bracket phrase.
|
Gnostically our view of potentia changes considerably from
what we have described here in a quantum~sense.
It is subtle but Pagels compared two queries using gnostic
topos to offer an exemplar for us:
- What shall we do?
- What shall you do?
We is society. You is an individual.
Gnosis says that we
types have little gnostic potential. Why?
Individuals are living, evolving, aware, wise, enthymemes! Societies, classical ones, are n¤t.
Gnosis says that you types can have enormous, almost
boundless, gnostic potential.
Added by Doug - 1Aug2008. Blue update 12Nov2009.
|
Quantum 'infinite' is animate REIMAR:
1q/0q
whæræ quantum ihnfhinihty t¤¤ issi QLOistic:
umcærtain
quantum~wavæ~functi¤nings.
Quantum 'potential' is animate REIMAR: quantum
æmærgæncæ issi parthæn¤gænætic
flux (parthæn¤fluxic) quanta durati¤nal
¤nt¤l¤gy.
Quantum ihnæffablæ G¤d.
Quanton(G¤d_issi_ihn_us,wæ_aræ_ihn_G¤d). Quanton(DQ,SQ). G¤d
issi quantum ræhl.
Bæing quantum hærmænæutic:
quantum asympt¤tic quantum p¤tæntia:
quantumcumque possum. Obsærvæ H5W
quantum asympt¤tæs d¤ n¤t, cann¤t
classically converge: Arrihval,
ihn any sense of classical radical
finalism, ihsn't ihn
¤ur cards~p¤tæntia!
DMD, you see latter endlessly recurring ihn
Quantonics.
Better Quantum Regards,
Doug - 25Nov2005.
Page top index.
|