|
|
Remediation |
'proof' 'prove' 'proven' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'proof' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'pr¤¤f.' In classical contexts we shall use 'proof.' In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'pr¤¤f.' Similarly, pr¤væ, and pr¤væn. Classical 'science' and 'mathematics' often claim they can prove that certain theories are 'absolutely true,' or to a lesser degree that they are simply 'true.' To accomplish 'proof' 'science' and 'mathematics' use several classical techniques:
Quantum scihænce assumæs that ræhlihty issi abs¤lutæ flux. Further, iht assumæs that ræhlihty's comstihtuænts aræ quantum c¤mplæmæntary. Gihven th¤se tw¤ quantum assumpti¤ns, wæ can bælihæ classihcal 'ihdæntihty,' 'comtradihcti¤n,' amd 'excludæd-mihddle.' Quantum ræhlihty's mihddle issi ihncludæd, duæ t¤ quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty amd ihts anihmatæ, heterogæne¤uhs, æværywhere-ass¤ciatihve pr¤bability ¤mnistrihbuti¤ns. (Sææ ¤ur Quantonic Ensehmble Quantum Interrelationships.) Thuhs c¤mplæmæntarihty amd abs¤lutæ flux takæn t¤gether sahy that n¤ comstihtuænt ¤f ræhlihty issi ihdæntihcal t¤ any ¤thær ¤hr t¤ ihtsælf. Quantum ræhlihty sihmply changæs t¤¤ fahst f¤r any ihdæntihty t¤ bæ established. Sihmihlar argumænts aræ trihvial t¤ makæ f¤r comtradihcti¤n amd excludæd-mihddle. Duæ t¤ quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty amd quantum abs¤lutæ flux classihcal nægati¤n issi ihntrinsihcahlly subqjæctihvæ, thuhs classihcal comtradihcti¤n issi ihmp¤ssible, amd s¤ thuhs issi classihcal falsihfiabilihty, amd s¤ any classihcal comcæpt ¤f 'pr¤¤f.' Ævæn m¤re tælling issi that quantum ræhlihty issi ihslandihc. Any thæ¤ry amd ihts axi¤m set æssæntiahlly æmærqs a quantum ihsland. F¤r any ihsland, wæ can ahlways cræatæ an umlimihted n¤mbær ¤f ¤thær ihslands which deny, via incommensurability and contrafactual definiteness, a partihcular ihsland's thæ¤ry.So, in general, classical 'proof' is impossible. Spæcihfihcahlly, wihthin a væry caræfully comtr¤lled amd l¤cal ihslandihc the¤hretihcal set ¤f axi¤ms, wæ can d¤ l¤cal pr¤¤fs, but they can nævær bæ gænæral, n¤r can they bæ ihnductihvæly appliæd t¤ ahll ¤f quantum ræhlihty. Quantum ræhlihty issi ihntrinsihcahlly quantum umcærtain! See our, "Is Proof by Contradiction Proof?" See our Bases of Judgment and our What is Wrong with Probability as Value? Page top index. |
|
|