Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

Quantonics' Quantum Remediation
English Language
Millennium III
by Doug Renselle
: 20Jul2002


Alphabetical Reference Index Quantonics English Language Remediation Pages
©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026

( says, "You are here!")

Master Index

Index to Quantonics English Language Remediated V Terms
Most recent additions-revisions marked add and rev.
valid value velocity verb verify verisimilitude verity


English Language Problematic

Quantonics' Quantum

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026


Page top index.



In classical contexts, 'valid' usually means 'true.' Classical synonyms include: verity, veracious, fact, verifiable, positive, certain, unambiguous, real, provable, authentic, genuine, right, correct, etc.

All those classical notions depend upon classical notions of reality as Aristotelian/Newtonian objective, lisr, and delusionally:

  • stable, and
  • independent. (See Bergson's Creative Evolution Topic 39.)

Quantum reality denies, in general, those classical notions of validity.

All Pirsigean latched reality, what we in Quantonics call "actuality," is tentative due quantum reality's mandate of abs¤lute flux/changæ.

We remediate (see QELR) classical 'valid' to quantum 'valihd.'

In quantum comtexts 'valihd' means, simply, better.

Quantum reality's latched actualities (AKA Pirsigean SQ SPoVs) persist tentatively until a valihd, better replacement emerges.

Here our use of better chaperones quantum reality's mandate of abs¤lute flux/changæ via quantum memes amd metaphors of pragmatism/actionism/Planck_rate_fluxism.

Page top index.



Synonyms - classical

  • quantity,
  • materialism
  • analysis, synthesis,
  • state,
  • orthodox order,
  • principles, axioms, laws, truth, validity, proof, etc.,
  • semper fi,
  • etc.

Synonyms - quantum

  • quality,
  • interrelationshipings,
  • creatio ex nihilo aperio,
  • emergence,
  • heterodox omniversity,
  • flux as essence,
  • semper fluxio,
  • etc.

: Value, valued, values, etc.

Classical value is quantity. Classical 'value' is common.

Classical value is determinate.

Classical value is certainty, absolute certainty.

Classical value is a thing (Bergson, Matter and Memory, about 15th paragraph of chapter IV,1896 is first ed. fifth ed. in 1908,). Implications include: value is scalar, stoppable, concrete, analytic, etc. So basic classical measurables like time, space, mass, temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, etc., are scalars, classical things, classical 'objects.'

: Value, valued, values, valuing, valuings, etc.

Quantum Value issi Quality issi absolutely animate, living, EIMA quantum~reality. Quantum Value issi c¤mm¤n. Doug - 5Oct2012.

Quantum Value issi radically stochastic given reality is absolutely animate (instable) and uncertain at all scales of reality.

Quantum Value issi uncertainty.

Quantum Value issi process, absolute and durable flux~isoflux stochastic Value process (See Bergson, Ibid.). Easy inferences are that quantum~Value is durationally unstoppable, quantum~complementary, changing~evolving absolutely both near to~ and far from~equilibrium via quantized gradience of transemerqant scintillation of all quanta at up to Planck rates. We see clearly that quantum~omnitorables like timings, spacings, massings, temperaturings, etc., are durational quantum~processings, quantons. Doug - 4Jun2011.

Students and readers, please read Pirsig's 1974 Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, 1991 Lila, and 1995 SODV paper. In Pirsig's opus, you may read his simple description of Value in every day life: paraphrased, "Sit on a hot stove and experience value. Quickly get off of hot stove and experience Value." Clearly Pirsig is showing us how [Vv]alueings are empirically quantum~relative. Quantum~relativityings are ubiquitously evident and apparent. Doug accomplishes a kind of graphical rendition of what Pirsig writes about in this quantum~cuneiform (basic strokes for quantum folks) graphic:

Doug will offer more omniscriptionings in weeks ahead, since this is so systemically and strategically relevant quantum~cuneiform, equilibrium, chaos (see chance as a metaphor), gradience, etc.

"Doug, Why is quantum~relativity, as you write, 'radical?' " Easiest, however n¤t only, way to answer is, "Quantum~reality, per Doug's New Quantum Philosophy, is radically comtext sensitive." Two Higher quantum~cuneiform strokes in our graphic are in a hyper comtext relative lower two strokes. Autsimilarly two lower strokes are hypo comtext relative Higher strokes. Higher is in lower, and lower is in Higher: quantum~complementarity of [Vv]alue. Even though they complement one another we still assess lower and Higher relatively. An easy way to see this is using a sinusoid:

In our general sinusoid quantum we see that relatively, "up is in down and down is in up:" a quantum BAWAM general antihn¤mial c¤mplæmæntati¤n. Too, we see [Hh]igher is in [Ll]ower and [Ll]ower is in [Hh]igher, again generic middle~included quantum complementation. Relativity of [Vv]alue is like this everywherings and everywhenings we look in quantum~reality.

Doug [Vv]alue update 13-15Nov2013: To evolve our quantum~description of [Vv]alue based upon a general quantum~memeo that up issi in down and down issi in up (See Diels Kranz B 60 quote of Heraclitus,), we must thinkq of upq and downq as complementary~antinomial quantum~memes and remediate them accordingly. Let's do it in a bullet list:

  • unremediated up and down:
    • up, down, then (ideal 'oppositional' classical either up or down)
    • upc, downc. (show classical script explicitly)
  • quantum~remediated up and down:
    • upq, alternatively uhp, then
    • downq, alternatively d¤wn.
  • compare quantum antinomial c¤mplæmæntarity of both uhp and d¤wn: quanton(uhp,d¤wn), "without comtradihcti¤n "
  • to classical analyticity of either up or down: dichon(up, down), which begs innate oppositive contradiction

Now we can script [Vv]alue both unremediated and quantum~remediated similarly in another bullet list:

  • unremediated Value and value:
    • Value, value, then (ideal 'oppositional' classical 'value' as absolute bivalent quantitative either verity or falsity)
    • Valuec, valuec. (show classical script explicitly)
  • quantum~remediated omnivalent Value and value:
    • Valueq, alternatively Valuæ, then
    • valueq, alternatively valuæ.
  • compare quantum antinomial c¤mplæmæntarity of both Valuæ and valuæ: quanton(Valuæ,valuæ), "without comtradihcti¤n "
  • to classical analyticity of either Value or value: dichon(Value, value), which begs innate oppositive contradiction

Simply then, unremediated script is classical and remediated script issi quantum.

Now allow Doug to do our process again on opposition and antinomy using very similar bullet lists:

  • unremediated opposition and antinomy:
    • opposition, antinomy, then (ideal 'oppositional' classical objective opposition and antinomy)
    • oppositionc, antinomyc. (show classical script explicitly)
  • quantum~remediated opposition and antinomy:
    • oppositionq, alternatively opp¤sihti¤n, then
    • antinomyq, alternatively antihn¤my.
  • compare quantum antinomial c¤mplæmæntarity of both opp¤sihti¤n and antihn¤my: quanton(opp¤sihti¤n,antihn¤my), "without comtradihcti¤n "
  • to classical analyticity of either opposition or antinomy: dichon(opposition, antinomy), which begs innate oppositive contradiction

Let's show a quantum~theoretical classic now for comparison.

Show classical either position or momentum vis-à-vis quantum b¤th p¤sihti¤n amd m¤mæntum:

  • unremediated position and momentum:
    • position, momentum, then (ideal 'oppositional' classical objective position and momentum)
    • positionc, momentumc. (show classical script explicitly)
  • quantum~remediated position and momentum:
    • positionq, alternatively p¤sihti¤n, then
    • momentumq, alternatively m¤mæntum.
  • compare quantum antinomial c¤mplæmæntarity of both p¤sihti¤n and m¤mæntum: quanton(p¤sihti¤n,m¤mæntum), "without comtradihcti¤n "
  • to classical analyticity of either position or momentum: dichon(position, momentum), which begs innate oppositive contradiction

One more classic:

  • unremediated wave and particle vis-à-vis wave and wavicle:
    • wave, particle, then (ideal 'oppositional' classical objective wave and particle)
    • wavec, particlec. (show classical script explicitly)
  • quantum~remediated wave and wavicle:
    • waveq, alternatively wavæ, then
    • wavicleq, alternatively wavihcle.
  • compare quantum antinomial c¤mplæmæntarity of both wavæ and wavihcle: quanton(wavæ,wavihcle), "without comtradihcti¤n "
  • to classical analyticity of either wave or particle: dichon(wave, particle), which begs innate oppositive contradiction

More to come...


Doug - 13-15Nov2013.

Page top index.




 : Velocity, etc.

Classical velocity integrates, so ideally classical velocity can be zero, since a platform can ideally return to its 'starting locus.'

A car which we drive in an ideal classical circle, which returns to its starting location, has accumulated 'zero velocity.'

Ponder classical acceleration.

Ponder classical time. Define it. (No! It's not dx/x!)

Ponder classical distance. Define it.

Classically, m, l, t and thus g are undefinable 'primitives.' We 'model' them by imposing some classical convention like 3D and 1T on them. But why not 3D and 3T? Why not ND and NT? Classicists will say, funda mentally, "simplicity. We always use Ockham's razor, whenever we can. We always place a brick wall twixt us and reality whenever we can."

What is time? What is distance-space (spatial extensity)? Is velocity really dx/dt? Is it really <px/pt,py/pt,pz/pt>. Why are all those n-tuple's partial 'times' 'identical?' Hmmm...

See time.

: Vel¤cihty, vel¤cihties, vel¤cihtyings, etc.

Ihn quantum ræhlihty classical velocity of 'zero' issi ihmp¤ssible! N¤ 'platform' (quantumly, platæmærq) 'or' 'particle' ævær ræturns t¤ ihts ¤riginal 'starting locus.'

Ihn quantum ræhlihty ¤nly spææd 'exists.' Quantum spææd issings quantum lihkælih¤¤d ¤mnistrihbuti¤nings.

See QLOs, peaqlos, ensemble attractors, circle, positive, quantum pi, etc.

See Quantum Essence.

Page top index.



Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'verb' and 'verbal' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'prag,' and 'pragmal.'

Classically 'verb' means a word which expresses:

  • classical actual (classically 'real') being
  • persistent continuation of being
  • motion
  • excluded-middle interaction
  • event-ic, state-ic, objective y=f(t) process of doing, acting
  • actual 'taking place;' consumption of spatio-temporal extensity; actual measurable 'locus' and 'volume;' "semper fi;" "stux is crux;" "status quo is the way to go"

Quantumly 'prag' means a quantum w¤rd (a quanton) which EIMA anihmatæs:

  • quantum BAWAM n¤nactual amd actual bæihng
  • emergence ¤f quantum bæihng
  • quantum changæ, wavings
  • ihncluded-mihddle ihnterrelati¤nships
  • quantal multihvariate (pragmap¤ly-tehmp¤ral, -spatial, -parametric, -etc.) hermeneutics amd heuristics
  • abs¤lute anihmacy, semper flux, flux issi crux

We can simplify all that by saying that classically a word is EOOO a subject or an object and that word-subjects (ideally) always represent classical objects. Simply: a classical 'word' is an ideal lisr object.

A quantum 'prag' is a quanton.

Page top index.



TBD. See proof. See Pirsigean Problematic Proof. See 'Scientific' Method.

Page top index.



TBD. See truth.

Page top index.



Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'verity' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'verihty.'

In classical contexts, SOMwits believe dichon(falsity, verity).

Ihn quantum c¤mtexts MoQwits bælieve quanton(fahlsity,verihty), where our quanton's c¤mplements aræ quantum negati¤nally subjectihve. Why? Quantum realihty issi anihmatæ EIMA. Quantons have arbihtrary ~Hilbert ¤mnispatial pr¤bability ¤mnistributi¤ns.

Ihn quantum realihty there aræ n¤ Platonically ideal and absolute verities and falsities. Why? Ihn quantum realihty there aræ n¤ ideal EEMD classical objects.

See falsity. See truth.

Page top index.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026

Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2026 Rev. 15Sep2014  PDR — Created 20Jul2002  PDR
(30Jul2002 rev - Add 'verify,' 'verisimilitude,' and 'verity.')
(4Jun2003 rev - Add 'valid.')
(1Oct2003 rev - Extend 'verity.')
(13Oct2003 rev - Reset legacy red text.)
(20Dec2003 rev - Add 'verb.')
(2Feb2004 rev - Correct grammar-typo-dyslexic 'simply fall' to 'simplify all' under 'verb.' Doesn't happen often.
(19-20Dec2004 rev - Add 'velocity.' Release cell and table width constraints. Adjust colors. Reset legacy red text color.)
(10Feb2005 rev - Reset colors. Add page top indices.)
(14,20Jan2006 rev - Reset red text. Reformat page top.)
(19Mar2006 rev - Add 'value.')
(15Aug2006 rev - Add 'use Ockham's razor' link to classical vav quantum simplification under 'velocity.' Add QELR links to 'positive,' and 'Quantum Pi,' under 'velocity.)
(18Dec2007 rev - Add 'Problematics' link at page top.)
(20Sep2009 rev - Make page current. Add intra page 'wave' link to recent QELR of 'wave.')
(20Jul2010 rev - Reformat page. Make page current.)
(4,27Jun2011 rev - Update 'value.' Make page current. Add page index link under 'value.')
(21Jan2012 rev - Update 'Value' with quantum~cuneiform graphic showing intrinsic quantum relativity of [Vv]aluings.)
(10,18Jul2012 rev - Reset legacy markups. Add 'chaos' link under 'value.' Add classical etymologies to all remediated 'V' words.)
(5,11Oct2012 rev - Update 'value.' Add 'changing~evolving' link back to Chapter 4, Topic one 'Evolution [Vv]alue Comparisons.')
(13-15Nov2013 rev - Add antinomial vis-à-vis 'opposite' PBings under [Vv]alue.)
(18Jan2014 rev - Minor updates to 'Value.')
(15Sep2014 rev - Reset legacy markups. Make page current.)