|
S~wordq of Antinomialq~ Complementarityingsq |
|||
as |
|
Uncertaintyingsq |
|
Fathom six quantizations horizontally (Waw). Ponder analogy to Sefirot: four branches: ECFA. Imagine fractal~recursively eyes within eyes (Ayn). Complementaroceive Ayn as uncertaintyq: peaceq. 'vision.' However, it represents an ensemble of sensory human perceptualq bandwidths and their gradiencingsq including, vision, hearing, smell, taste, motion, balance, pressure,etc. classical 'science,' and its Value~free, context-free 'canon facts and laws.' |
|
T[h]av (400) | Hay (5) | Hhayt (8) | |
Cosmic Existence Throttling Life~Death | Life Existence | Spirit as Undifferentiated Energy | |
Exaltation, Cosmic Non Existential Projection of Dallet Archetype | Archetype | Archetype |
on Using Doug's Cloud Study to Study Selected Other Quantum Exemplars Our cloud study here is of great heuristic and innovative Value! How can we generalize our study to similar quantum~evolutionary phenomena? An answer: Apply our learning to other examples of historic (in Quantonics, for example) interest. How can we ostense our memes of cloudsq to educe Value? An answer: One answer to this query is to (heretically, intentionally violating classical dogma and orthodoxy) choose other quantum examples (apparently quantum~phenomenal examples) and apply what we have learned in our cloud study to those other phenomena. What do we observe about clouds and their Aleph~Tav, livings~dyings, resurrection~apoptosis, quantum~evolutionary~cycles? An answer: For Doug, we see, using clouds as our current base~study exemplar, mostly these obvious (perhaps only to Doug) radical quantum~cloud~features: openness, freedom of local action, ease of transmutative change, ease of emergence~immergence (a kind of strange~attractor trope of (e.g., ros~dew~dust to water, cyclic phase transformation evolutionary~) movement and rest), along with most of Doug's quantum~radicals including: rcoc, rioq, rqac, rqcs, rqeh, rhei, rqfi, rqfv, rqis, rqsa, rqsu, rsqs, and so on... We do not see any classical features in that quantum~evolution and that evolution's quantum~radicals. Classical features are mostly dialectical, formal, mechanical, objective, etc., none of which are even remotely quantum...simply because classical features are dead (stux). Quantum features are alive (flux). Clouds do not make sense to any classicist. They cannot understand them without using Newton's mechanics. So, bluntly, they cannot see, they are blind. Newton's mechanics cannot explain: thought, con(m)sciousness, rapid arm flexure (please refer Mae~wan Ho's the Rainbow and the Worm), gravity, time, space, gradienceq of measurables (borne of quantons(scin,quan), etc. As Doug has narrated, just above this blue text box, quantumly clouds' evolutionings make quantum~chaotic~equilibrial sense when we use quantum~memeos to explain them. What other examples of historic interest may we use here in this brief essay? Doug suggests at least three, which to Doug exhibit quantum~autsimilarityings: tsunamis, sonoluminescence, and submarine propeller cavitation (a bedfellowq of sonoluminescence). Doug will spend next (however much) timings on these three Study Exemplars: Tsunamis - Sonoluminescence - Cavitation - Keep an eye out for evolutionary progress here... Doug - 12-13Feb2015. |
|
|
|