If you're stuck in a browser frame - click
to view this same page in Quantonics!
See prior generations of this graphic
A Map of a New Reality
A Map of Millennium III Reality
Also, to understand our shasb remarks see our
Quantum Sensory Bandwidth Perspicacities and Perspicuities
To see legacy usage of our two Vs (above shown as reclining and ~asymmetrical), red and blue see our
Quantum Wavelength vis-à-vis Classical Wavelength
There is an immense and extensive library of k-now-ngs to inure here. We intend to do that gradually.
How big is that blue
part, called "actuality" compared to that red
part, called "nonactuality?" Here's a graphic which illustrates an answer:
times what we can 'see,' in Blue
Doug - 30Jan2008.
First we offer our usual caveats: this is a 2D graphic. It is static. Quantonics' quantum meta reality is omnimensional and absolutely animate.
If we showed quantum
, using our graphic above, and all your quantum animate
us ihn iht, iht ihn us(ings)
, also see our
Quantum Ensemble Interrelationships
) using this graphic, we would have a huge number of these graphs.
A guess? A quantum uncertain swag is 10
! I.e., as a rough very iffy wag, a googol.
Remember, in Quantonics' version of quantum reality, you are in It and It is in you!
Almost unlimited, however
quantumly very similar, interrelationshipings
which we refer using a memeo of quantum Value
What's very interesting is that each of your interrelationshipings' processing, we can be m¤daling similar to our graphic above.
Their kinds exhibit extreme similarity. One example is that all of them are quantum
recursive on reality.
First let's share some (perhaps not so) obvious
Our usage of shasb above emerged first in our Quantum Sensory Bandwidth Perspicacities and Perspicuities page.
If you are more classical or perhaps even ideally
, shasb will appear narrower and possibly more to left.
If you are more quantum and Quantonic ("in Quantonics") and tapping reserve energy regularly, your shasb will appear wider and possibly more to right.
circle at center should be familiar from our
MoQ II Reality Loop
When that loop emerges and changes n¤vel matter ¤r energy (isounbecoming to becoming) from vacuum energy,
its ontology looks like our recent (2004)
Notice here that our shasb classically can 'not' directly, classically, 'see' all of that ontology from objective 'physical' measurements.
In fact classicists deny and call "absurd" what we show above.
Quantonics teaches us that we
infer, e.g., quantum meta sææ, that ontology.
In a similar way, we infer quantum~reality of
In a manner that intuition as a
is above intellect,
is a quantum metamemeo above a classical notion of seeing.
here are similar Kurt Gödel's when he used
as a metanotion of proof
an intuitive~intellectual breakthrough preceding many of his accomplishments.)
DMD, one of our most prodigious students, asked a potent question about our Quantonics~
version of quantum reality,
in quantum reality?"
We ask you to QTM~think about that question and CTM-thingk about it and see if you can answer DMD's query.
More, much more, to come here...
Doug - 20Oct2004.
To contact Quantonics write to or call
1950 East Greyhound Pass, Suite 18, #368
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
©Quantonics, Inc., 2004-2009
Rev. 30Jan2008 PDR
Created 19Oct2004 PDR
(12Mar2005 rev - Update page top GIF to show "We are in It and It is in us.")
(9Aug2005 rev - Change 'ippi' to 'ipi.')
(13Jan2006 rev - Update 'interrelates' pull-down menu with 'phase~encodes holographically.')
(14Aug2006 rev - Alter title to include 'meta.' Slight text alterations.)
(30Jan2008 rev - Reformat slightly. Add graphic showing relative 'sizes' of red