Chapter Three "PBings of Innovated
Talking Points Assessing FEP: a move from CTMs to QTMs." |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||||
Real Value Preservation vis-à-vis Fiat 'value' Debasement |
Fiat 'value' Debasement vis-à-vis Real Value Preservation |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
Cosmic Energy Archetypes | Doug's Concision |
Arch 1 |
Cosmic energy its~self as a recursive self~other flux~active parthenofluxic complement of its said and its unsaid. Cosmic energy recurses its flux~quanta of:
|
Cosmic Energy |
Arch 2 |
Cosmic energy recursively "exhales" all of its self~other perpetually emerging saids as individual and ensemble 'islands' of:
|
Being1 |
Arch 3 |
Cosmic energy perpetually "evolves" all of its self~other emerging and being saids as perpetual movement and rest of all saids and islands of saids:
|
Becoming2 |
Arch 4 |
Cosmic energy mortally lives as being of saids and ensembles of saids while tentatively resisting its inevitable return to Arch 1 as perpetual recursions of:
|
Life Quanton(unsaid,said) |
Arch 5 | Cosmic energy's immortal ubiquity of omniversal conscious living as "Arch 5 is in Arch 4 and Arch 4 is in Arch 5." | Omniversal ubiquity of life. |
Arch 6 | Cosmic energy's immortal and perpetual creative pragma imbued by Arch 5's middle~including fertilization of Arch 4; two becoming one. | Impregnation. |
Arch 7 |
Cosmic energy's unlimited potentia via:
|
Unlimited potentia. |
Arch 8 |
Cosmic energy as undifferentiated:
|
N¤nactuality is undifferentiated: unsaid. Cosmic breath of cosmic spirit: pneuma. See topos. Woven bread was ancients' symbol of pneuma. See William James on spirit as energy (ancient cosmic energy). Pneuma (spirit) is undifferentiated. So one, as a quantum~individual, may n¤t logically reify 'spirit.' One may n¤t reify quantum isoflux. |
Arch 9 |
Cosmic energy's expression of saids as primeval female energy, wisdom, and gnosis:
|
Cosmic wisdom is feminine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Quantum~Value hyper value vis-à-vis Classical Social-value hyper Value |
Classical Social-value hyper
Value vis-à-vis Quantum~Value hyper value |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
Note 1: Being, here, is Cosmic Energy' creation of 'being.' In Doug's Quantum Essence web page we describe this as n¤nactuality's undifferentiated~n¤nactualized unsaid~unlatched flux becoming said~latched flux actualized. Doug probably should write, "Becoming Being."
Note 2: Becoming, here, is Cosmic Energy' evolution of 'being.'
Quantum~Pull Terms | Classical Push Terms | |
|
|
|
|
||||
Quantum~Competitive GDP vis-à-vis Classical Socially-Planned GDP |
Classical Socially-Planned
GDP vis-à-vis Quantum~Competitive GDP |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planck rate absolute change emerscing evolution as Value is a valid reality. Students please observe how quantum~grail is quintessence of quantum~awarenessings, quantum~con(m)sciousnessings, and a key enabler of quantum~selection required for quantum~evolution. See QuPo From-To Table of classical to quantum political [Vv]alues. Doug - 23Feb2011. o - In Doug's QVH Table he shows this as quantum~scintillation. To oversimplify, evolution issi quanton(scintillation,quantization). Most surprising essence here is a Doug HotMeme which he shows in detail here. To phasement that HotMeme simply, "Scintillation energy omnitors gradience from~to equilibrium." We can then infer that quantum~grail is a key enabler of quantum~relative~gradience assessment as quantum~pr¤cæss. Doug - 10Jun2011. |
Stability, classicism's lowest 'value' is dogmatic, orthodox, axiomatic, state-ic, an invalid fraud. | |
©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 by Doug Renselle |
|
||||
Quantum~Evolutionary Individual
Competition vis-à-vis Classical Social Planning for Status Quo |
Classical Social Planning for
Status Quo vis-à-vis Quantum~Evolutionary Individual Competition |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Quantum~Evolutionary Projection
of Potentia vis-à-vis Classical Social Status Quo as Intentional Repetition of History |
Classical Social Status
Quo as Intentional Repetition of History vis-à-vis Quantum~Evolutionary Projection of Potentia |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|||
|
|
||||
Equal Individual Opportunity vis-à-vis Equal Socially Planned Results |
Equal Socially Planned Results vis-à-vis Equal Individual Opportunity |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
Quantum~Social and ~Political Memes ©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 |
||
|
||
©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 |
|
||||
Quantum~Islandicity of Individual
Choice vis-à-vis Classical Social Dogma |
Classical Social Dogma vis-à-vis Quantum~Islandicity of Individual Choice |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 | |||
Key Quantum~Enabler | Quantonics' Linguistic Remedy | Detail | |
1 | Planck's Clock | 'ings' | Plural participle as absolute quantum~changings. This absolute quantum~flux is a metaphor of Bergson's 'vital impetus,' and Pirsig's DQ. Both are pure quantum~agents of selective awarenessings and ubiquitous cosmic~con(m)sciousness. |
2 | Quantization as Flux Packetization | 'quanton,' '¤,' and '~' |
Quanton as ¤mniht (least energy packet) and ensemble (Nih) energy assemblies in quantum~reality. '¤' as explicit marking of 'o' words as quantization and quanta. 'o' represents classical cyclical closure AKA classical 'circles.' '¤' represents packet energy quantization as quantum openness AKA quantized cycloids. A closed reality cann¤t, due its canonic 'conservation,' evolve and thus believes in its own 'state.' An open reality can, due its omniffering Nash~esque kinds of always~adaptive equilibria, evolve and thus believes in its own perpetual changings, mutabilityings, and transmutabilityings. CTMs vav QTMs. '~' as quantum~wave empiritheoretical reality. Each '~' may be thought of as a packet, possibly a packet of packets... Quanton(~,¤) then can be a packet and an entire assembly of quantons of quantized quantum~wave energies, whose total energy isn't self-relativity-theory-violatingNote 1 E=MC2, rather issi E Nih. |
3 | Middle~Inclusion | 'comma~nospace' |
Classical 'state' requires a notion of 'middle-exclusion' to sustain itself. Classical 'middle-exclusion' is an wholly exegetic oxymoron in quantum~reality. See Aristotle. Quantum evolution requires a memeo of quantum~holographically~open self~other~aware~coobsfective and self~other~referent middle~inclusion to enable absolute and perpetual selective mutability of all of quantum reality, always. Quantum open middle~inclusion is an inexplicably 'absurd' oxymoron in classical-reality. |
©Quantonics, Inc., 2010-2030 |
|
||||
Quantum~Complementation vis-à-vis Classical Formal Opposition |
Classical Formal Opposition vis-à-vis Quantum~Complementation |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
Note 1: Violation here is GR's canon that no object can exceed speed of light velocity vis-à-vis said classical law's C2. Readers must accept a quantum caveat that classical relativity theory uses time as a symptom of space rate (Delta-space/space as an objective 'change' motional proxy), not as it claims "a geometrical and 'invariant' space identity." Talk about oxymora! Either assumption, though leads to failed classical thought since it is in a most rudimentary sense dialectical. Einstein was a dialectician! Doug - 27Jan2011.
|
|
||||
Quantum~Affectation vis-à-vis Classical-Effect[u]ation |
Classical-Effect[u]ation vis-à-vis Quantum~Affectation |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
Value nissin 'value.' DQ nissin SQ. (Just for you Stephen, "...just sayin'." ) we should study and learn to gnostically bæliheve, thinkq, and d¤ (as due~pragma) them. entirely destroys and decimates dialectic's SOM Wall canonic Either-Or! stoppably, Keynesian-stably, state-ically, status-quoically, and canonically 'value' dead. We follow Pirsig by writing and saying, "Always keep DQ (Value) with your SQ ('value')." We bæliheve, think, and d¤ that. |
hypothesis | quanton(interrogation,hypothesis) | interrogation |
|
||||
Peircean Abductivism vis-à-vis Deduction-Induction |
Deduction-Induction vis-à-vis Peircean Abductivism |
|||
Better |
|
|||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Quantum View as Exegetic |
|
1 | Classical Law of Posentropy | A type 1 to 3 problematic: Classical posentropy as 'the [one, monistic] entropy' maps onto three quantum classes of entropy and their mixtures. | See entropa. |
2 | Classical Law of Decoherence | A type 1 to 3 problematic: Classical decoherence as 'the physical decoherence' of material reality maps onto three quantum classes of coherence and their mixtures. | See cohera. |
3 | Aristotle's Three Syllogisms | A type 3 to 1 problematic: Aristotle's three syllogisms as the logical laws of substantial reality map onto a single quantum phasement of quantum~coquecigrues. | See Aristotle. See Doug's bold green text at CTM. |
4 | Maxwell's Three Laws of Thermodynamics | A type 3 to 3+ problematic: Maxwell's three laws of thermodynamics of substantial reality map onto a multiplicity of quantum phasementings of quantum~thermodynamics. | See C. P. Snow. |
5 | Classical Law of Probability | A type 1 to 3 problematic: Classical probability as 'the statistical' statement of all classical stochastics maps onto three quantum~stochastic phasementings of quantum~stochastics. | From classical static and immutable past to quantum stindyanic and evolving pastings, nowings, and futurings. See PNFings and PPLings. See Doug's QELR of probability. |
6 | Classical Law of Unitemporality | A type 1 monism to 3 pluralisms problematic: Classical unitime as a master 'light cone' flow through physical actuality (which classicists refer 'reality') maps onto three quantum~stochastic phasementings of massively multiplicate~plural~heterogeneous quantum~temporal stochastics. | See Doug's QELR of time. |
7 | Classical Law of a 3D1T Monism | A type 1 monism to many pluralisms problematic: Classical state-ic space-time monism maps onto many quantum phasementings of many stindyanic spacings~timings' quantum~evolutionings. | See Doug's QELR of law, and monism. |
8 | Classical Law of Dialectical Bivalence | A type 2 dualism to many pluralisms problematic: Classical state-ic either-or dialectical immutable bivalence maps onto stindyanic quantum~both~all~while~and~many everywhere EIMA evolving omnivalencings. | See Doug's coining of omnivalence. |
|
|
||||
A Priori vis-à-vis A Posteriori |
A Posteriori vis-à-vis A Priori |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Quantum~Awareness vis-à-vis Classical Mechanical Thought |
Classical Mechanical Thought vis-à-vis Quantum~Awareness |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
(16Nov2011 rev - Add 'scintilla' link to quantization~scintilla~evolution tricodon in PBing 6 table.) |
Note 1: Literally Doug's proemial nascence means "before the song being born." Here Doug views quantum~awareness as evolutionary flux which is easy to hermeneut as music and song of quantum~nature's perpetual emerscence. In Hebrew Autiot it is (for English readers, left to right reversed) Lammed~Phay~Noun~Yod (before pronounced 'leefney') Ha (the pronounced 'ha') Sheen~Yod~Raysh (quantum~diffuse song pronounced poetically 'sheerey') Hay~Vav~Vav~Yod~Hay (being pronounced 'havayeh') Yod~Lammed~Yod~Dallet (born pronounced 'yeleed'). Again, left to right reversed, "Leefney ha sheerey havayeh yeleed." One Autiot hermeneutic for Doug's proemial nascence. For me that is beautiful, incredible, awesome. And if we know Autiot's energies it becomes extraordinarily quantum~real. I think Heraclitus might offer, "A genuine cosmic~energy accounting." Doug - 21Jan2011.
|
||||
Quantum Uncertainty AKA Quantum Indetermination vis-à-vis Classical Determination |
Classical Determination vis-à-vis Quantum Uncertainty AKA Quantum Indetermination |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
|
||||
Quantum Consciousness vis-à-vis Classical Mind |
Classical Mind vis-à-vis Quantum Consciousness |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Absolute Change vis-à-vis Absolute State |
Absolute State vis-à-vis Absolute Change |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Planck's Clock vis-à-vis Immutability |
Immutability vis-à-vis Planck's Clock |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
(19Jan2011 rev - Doug adds 'scintillate' and 'essence' links. Doug adds 'quantum~ontology' better.) |
|
||||
Quantum Pluralisms of Monisms vis-à-vis Classical Monism |
Classical Monism vis-à-vis Quantum Pluralisms of Monisms |
|||
Better |
|
|
||
Worse |
|
|
||
|