15Apr2013 - More on signs of a living Father within you:

Suares offers some splendid examples of this meme, including memeos of evolution as uncertainty, indetermination, perpetual~ubiquitous changings, etc.

• An example which we have used elsewhere is "Ben~Adam." Classically this is ciphered dialectically as "son of man."
  When we use Autiot and Qabala to cipher Ben~Adam its Autiot is Bayt~Noun_final Aleph~Dallet~Mem.
  
  Bayt~Noun_final is, in Qabala, "evolution."
  Aleph is what most of us call "G¤d." But Aleph can be 1 and 1000. So Aleph here probably is 1: local to an individual and all individuals.
  Dallet~Mem is "blood."
  
  So, in quantumese Ben~Adam means, "evolution of Aleph in blood."
  That is not even remotely "son of man."
  Unless you complementaroceive son and man quantum, but even then...
  
• Another example, autsimilar, and a very excellent one is "Abben." Classically it is ciphered "Father-Son."
  When we use Autiot and Qabala to cipher Abben its Autiot is Aleph~Bayt Bayt~Noun_final.
  
  In quantumese, then Abben means, "G¤d reaching individually through sentients to find their own inner and its G¤d~like evolving cosmic energy."
  Suares calls this, "reaching for The Principle of Indetermination." Paraphrased.
  See page 67, Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, last paragraph in Chapter 14.
  
  For Doug regarding disciples query, those two examples answer even better, "What are signs of a living Father within you?"

15Apr2013 - More on signs of a living Father within you.

Doug.

We cipher serpent AKA nahhash similarly hhalla(h) as: Noun-chet-seen.

"Serpent"

noun-chet-seen (right to left)

In English: "nahhas(h)."

S[h]een above is actually seen since its symbol has a 'left point.'
Recall left point means "focus," and this is serpent's cipher's most hylic implication.
So, we must ask and remind ourselves frequently (openly, repeatedly: noun), "What is serpent's focus?"
By that we intend paraphrasing Suares, said serpent has a single-minded goal: emersce both
Adam and Eve from concrete state into emergent~evolution using co(n)mduitively Eve
as Adam's energy~enhancing enabler. Enable their grail fecundity!

We cipher serpent AKA nahhash similarly hhallah as: Noun-chet-sheen.

"Serpent"

noun-chet-sheen (right to left)

In English: "nahhash."

Sheen above has a 'right point.'
Where 'seen' is a more hylic (focused) interpretation, 'sheen' is a more pneumatic (diffuse) hermeneutic.
When we hermeneut 'serpent' pneumatically, we see only positive aspects of Eden's serpent as an adept liaison of gnosis' Godhead with both Adam and Eve via Eve's shielding Adam from serpent's exceptional energy. Too, we see in cuneiform symbol of sheen serpent with its mouth and its tail up, suggestive of a noun cyclicity as recursion (...imagine two sheen symbols both with others' tail in its mouth...a kind of double~sheen version of noun hermaphrodicity...). This is very very quantum! Quantum~reality is all positive due its radical stochasticity mandated by any flux based reality. Negative flux simply doesn't exist in quantum~reality.

Our serpent, in this sheen case, isn't hylically 'single-minded.' Rather it is pneumatically multiplexing quantum~Gestaltly its hologram with that of gnosis' Godhead. See Chaldæan Mother, for example. 1(2,3)4 as Mother(son,mother)[Ff]ather.

This nexus (many nexi) holographically channels evolutionary spirit and energy into both Adam and Eve.

It's part of creation's evolutionary ontology.

Without evolution, Adam and Eve have no fecundity.

Absence of evolution is static death! SQ without DQ. (Reversed DQ and SQ - 9Jul2010 - Doug.)

Why did Doug write "Absence of evolution is static death! DQ without SQ" originally?

It's a more advanced, pneumatic way of thinkqing about "absence of evolution."

Hylics claim dialectically "there is no DQ:" DQ doesn't exist to them.

Pneumatics claim DQ exists. They say, "Undifferentiated spirit and energy exist."

Then hylics believe that "SQ is all there is and it is immutable and has always existed," therefore, Hylically, "There is no evolution."

However, pneumatics believe DQ exists therefore evolution is axiomatic. But if somehow hylics could teach all others to believe there is no evolution, then in hylic minds that means there is no DQ, only SQ. But in pneumatic minds, if evolution somehow didn't exist, DQ without SQ is said result (that is, DQ exists...but no SQ can evolve from it). Hylic belief is anti-quantum, and that is why Doug claims "Nearly all of us have been sold a bunch of hylic lies, a BS Bill of Bads:" Hylics say, "Let's all wors[e]ship our 'bill of bads.'"

Long term, quantum reality makes all 'static belief systems,' including hylicism, extinct.

Quantum~Qabalic Gnosis gets us out of this hylic multi-millennia-long stuck-mess, by evolving hylicism out of quantum reality.

Doug - 9Jul2010.

This is what Pirsig means by "Keeping DQ with SQ."

SQ without DQ becomes ESQ: demiurge, dead-father, dialectic, Error, Satan, etc.

Aleph gives semantic to a quantum reality which puts life and death in an evolutionary~devolutionary loop. Biologically metabolisis as anabolisis in a loop with catabolisis is a good example. Apoptosis (cell death; actually a kind of suicide) and cellular resurrection are words we can use in English to describe it.

Qabala calls it "the unthinkable life~death cycle." Qabala uses Autiot to describe it.

Empiritheoretically yod can become ESQ. We can show that many ways:

• ESQ is dichon(ESQ, ESQ),
• ESQ is dichon(SQ, ESQ),
• SQ is dichon(ESQ, SQ),
• etc.

Pirsig, Suares, and Doug agree! Reality needs both Aleph and Yod, both DQ and SQ.

That agreement abets a memeo that reality is quantum.

When Suares, et al., tell their students they must learn to "embrace uncertainty," they abet a memeo that reality is quantum.

Tav's resistance to aleph's absolute change mandate may push yod into ESQ.

Thank you for reading,

Doug - 5Jul2010.

Upper case Aleph is unthinkable life-death; all that is beyond and not.

One of three 'Mothers.' See Mem and Sheen.

Aleph "lives and is timeless." Aleph is perpetual, classically immeasurable, silent, hidden, imperceptible, yet pneumatically intuitive. Aleph is subjective quantum~negationally (cancelably) what we intend by 'not, naught, zed, empty, etc., and what Quantonics represents as "isoflux" and "n¤t."

"Aleph and Bayt are in everything and everything is in Aleph and Bayt." Suares paraphrased. See his Sepher Yetsira.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Aleph:

words -

Explicitly, Aleph is DQ. It corresponds quantum~n¤nactuality as unknown and unknowable.

Yod is aleph's complement in actuality.

Lower case aleph is, apparently, actuality's sentient~perceived quantum~complement ihn DQ, that quantum~partial of DQ which is still unconceivable yet sentients are instinctively and perhaps intuitively Aware of it.

"Aleph is in everything and everything is in Aleph." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009.

Those of you keeping track of Doug's progress omniscribing quantum~ both ~chaos and ~equilibrium AKA chaoequil, know how Doug has made enormous leaps of innovative progress in those areas. As usual Doug looks for complementary assessments of his Quantonics efforts compared to Autiot and Qabala, among others.

Early this morning Doug was looking at a new Autiot font set and learning how it omniffers one Carlo Suares uses.

In that process, Doug realized almost epiphanously how Aleph aligns Doug's recent efforts. Allow me to show you how Aleph aligns Doug's chaoequil efforts. Let's look at Aleph's Aut:

For first time in Doug's life he re cognized Aleph as a multi stroke aut of three basic strokes. Big stroke from top left to bottom right corresponds Doug's quantum ruminations re quantum~gradience. Smaller stroke rising from bottom left to higher gradience corresponds better and worse (quantum~relative) amelioration of durable equilibrium (rest). Smaller stroke falling from top right to lower gradience corresponds better and worse amelioration of punctuated chaos (movement).

In other words Aleph may be omniscribed as...

...in quantonics script.

So Aleph represents pneumatically unlimited potential Cosmic Energy Value (Gematria: Aleph 1000 and portions of it as aleph 1+ (quantized) in lower energies where earth life actually~locally resides.)! Forgive Doug's Earth~chauvinism. 20Jan2012 - Doug.

This hermeneutic, almost cuneiform semasiologically, of Aleph fits all cobenchmarkings Doug has omniscovered and compared so far.

It also fits hermeneutics of Carlo Suares' omniscriptions of a tetrad of Autiot's first four Aut in order of Gematria 1, 2, 3, 4. Those Aut are Aleph, Bayt, Ghimel, and Dallet. Their base hermeneutics may be, in a partial Pirsigean metaphor, omniscribed oversimply as DQ, SQ, movement (chaos), and rest (equilibrium). So Aleph then provides us an overall cosmic energy vital impetus Avatar (see rqfv and rqis as quantum~radicals of vital impetus - Doug - 2Aug2014), a quantum re embodiment, to those first four archetypal Aut evolutionary quantum~hologra[[ph][m][il]]ic~metaphors. Obtain how Doug just added a metaphor and coined a novel term: holograil, and holograilic. This is an important emerscence of quantum~th~ought. We have noticed this several timings prior, but did n¤t then complementaroceive emergent linguistics this way. "Can we relate it, Doug?" Yes! Quantonics' interrelationshipings are holograilic and exhibit holograilicity. Notice (unexpected) autsimilarityings of Aleph and Quantonics' interrelationshipings symbol. Also see Doug's 3D Fuzzons. Doug - 20Jan2012.

From a quantum~complementarospective Aleph is quantum~essene~ce of quantization~scintillation as agency of radical transmutative evolution: A Quantum Life~M¤tif™. Latter is a new web page under development in Quantonics.

Much, much more here later,

Doug - 19-20Jan2012, 2Aug2014.

Archetype of all dwellings, all containers. Physical support without which nothing is.

Bayt's double is Vayt. There are seven 'doubles.'

Suares' use of words describing Aut Bayt:

words from SCoRY, p. 51 -

• container,
• continuing process of existence,
• any support of Aleph [absolute change energy which is capable of radical mixings of both chaos and equilibria],
• support of eternal (Hebrew),
  [Doug's memeo: we must keep in mind that 'eternal' as used here is n¤t 'state' as status~quo, rather "perpetual~ubiquitous change,"]
• Bayt is "all that is," [quantumly, Bayt represents actuality portion of reality as quantons(nonactuality,actuality) AKA quantons(Aleph,Bayt), AKA quantons(DQ,SQ),]
• Doug - 15Jun2013.

Explicitly, Bayt is SQ.

"Bayt is with everything and everything is with Bayt." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009.

Organic movement of every Bayt animated by Aleph.

Ghimel's double is Gimel.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Ghimel:

words -

• archetype of all movements that represent biological phenomena [i.e., living phenomena, a radical quantonics implication here is that all quantons, in Qabala, are living...i.e., Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay: Qabala,]
• Doug - 15Jun2013.

Explicitly Ghimel is quanton(DQ,SQ). Quantum~Gn¤stic evolute~redemption. Process of perpetual~evolution.

Biblically, this is referred as a tell of God's presence in sentients, known as, "movement and rest." Çatholiçs deny any presence of 'god' in humans. Çatholiç 'god' is separate from humans and it is çatholiçly "absurd" to thingk and believe otherwise. This is a key reason why Qabalic gnosis went underground. Their gnosis had to be kept secret otherwise Romans would kill them for their beliefs. Carlo Suares claims they became so good at hiding their secrets, it became almost impossible for subsequents to learn about them. Carlo did some assiduous work to revive gn¤stics' autiot and its Qabalic semantics. For Doug, this is a real eye opener! And to find that our quantonics and quantum~theory itself reflect Qabalic gnosis, calls for unbounded cheer.

Doug also shows this quantonically as 1(2,3); note that Qabala shows it as 3(1,2): Aleph-Bayt-Ghimel vis-à-vis Ghimel-Aleph-Bayt. Doug needs to learn how autiot semantics change when letters are reordered. It is already clear that very, very important autiot semantics express as palindromes. Suares offers one example of Sheer and Raysh together. Sheer recurses as Sheen-Yod-Raysh. Raysh recurses as Raysh-Yod-Sheen. Sheer-Raysh then becomes a palindrome as Sheen-Yod-Raysh-Yod-Sheen. Gematria is then (300-10-200-10-300). Its semantic is critically important in quantum~gnosis: "one in two and two in one." Quantum~metaphors here, for example, include bosons and fermions, bosons becoming fermions, fermions as quarks, quarks as nuclei, bosons as gluons, light, and gravity, and so on... Doug - 15Oct2009.

Chaldæan gnosis shows it as 1(2,3),4. Qabala~ramified it is Ghimel(Aleph,Bayt),Dallet. See the ogdoad. Four is humanity's uncertain 'choice, chance, and change' of dialectically either a Roman 'dead father,' or Jesus' "Living Father." Latter is an earthly agent of Ghimel. Former is 'the demiurge,' who denies that "Ghimel even exists." Roman çatholiçs have imbued 10% of humanity with countless 'dead ideas,' borne of Parmenides, Plato, and Aristotle, thence about twelve centuries later Thomas Aquinas, all of whom called Qabala and its innate~gnosis "sophistry." Again, we have a çatholiç issue here. Roman çatholiçs still call 'choice' "heresy." Qabala says all is uncertain, and as a result we have only choice. Determinism and fate are dead Platonic-Aristotelian ideas of çatholiçs' dead-father 'state-ic' demiurge.

One must infer Ghimel's n¤n dialectical middle~inclusionings of Aleph and Bayt.

"Ghimel (movement) is energy and all energy is Ghimel." Page 101, Carlos Suares, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, 1969, 1972. Doug - 6Dec2009. Repair gematria of Sheen~Yod~Raysh~Yod~Sheen. Stupid mistake by novice Doug - 31Mar2013. Suares (First paragraph, p. 47, Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.) claims gematriaic~numbers are about both mental and heart felt emotion (changing, transmuting, evolving levels of quantized~energy). Indeed!

Physical existence as response to life. In nature, all that is organically active with Ghimel. For inorganic structure Dallet is its own resistance, resistance to destruction.

Dallet's double is Thallet.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Dallet:

words -

• Door, (Door_q and door_c, gate, portcullis, etc.)
• any resistance either passive or active, SCoRY, p. 51,
• [status quo equilibrium, e.g., Keynesianism, avoiding its master: chaos],
• Doug - 15Jun2013.
• Doug's use of Dallet ciphering Song of Songs, in Doug's own way, shows Doug that Dallet may be viewed as choice (some call it heresy, Doug views it as free will) which as we know begs chance (and antinomially_q vice versa) and thence subsequent, likely con(m)sequential, change.
• However, Dallet may be chosen by self_c as classical, determinate, either-or, excluded-middle, dialectical, etc., and
• Thallet may be chosen by self_q as quantum, uncertain, both~and, included~middlings, holograilic, etc.
• So Suares tends to describe Dallet as a Door, yet said Door may be door_c and it, by individual free will, may be door_q. Remediated: d¤¤r.
• D¤¤r offers those who have found their inner to follow Qabala's quantum~game of life ontology of choice, chance, and change. It is an adventure whose outcome is always indeterminate. Qabala and its Sepher Yetsira, and Song of Songs refer uncertainty_q "peace." By inference certainty_c (determination) is "hell."
• Doug's view is that classical dialectic and its...
  • mechanical,
  • material,
  • formal, objective,
  • cause-effective,
  • determinate,
  • 'social_c patterns of thought,'
  • etc.

...deceitful accoutrement distill to hypocrisy.

• In Greek hypo means below and crisy means judgment. Over simply hypocrisy is, "bad judgment." All dialecticians whom Doug suffers are perpetually stux sux in a classical 'state' of poor judgment.
• Doug - 17Oct2014.

Dallet is emergent actuality. Its hermeneutics are many. Classicists, as monists, deny that phasement. They claim actuality is n¤n hermeneutic, i.e., there is only one, their, interpretation of actuality. Classicists claim actuality is static, middle-excluded, negatable, dialectical, and determinate-predicable.

Autiot shows us how classicists made huge Errors of assumption and presumption. Indeed, classicists claims are all incorrect. Qabala's gn¤stics knew this thousands of years ago! Gn¤stics' language of Qabala as autiot is recursive. For linguistic remediators of English, Latin, Greek, and other languages, this is a most powerful clue to those languages' inabilities to express nature well. Nature is recursive. Nature's quantum~flux, like autiot, is both self~ and other~recursive! A language which isn't recursive cann¤t express a nature which is quanton(quantum~holographic,flux~recursive)! Ghimel(holographic,recursive)! Doug - 16Oct2009.

Dallet explains SQ as both(organic,inorganic) quantum~entropa. Dallet, organically, is mixtures of pos~, zero~, and neg~entropies. Biological life itself.

Dallet, inorganically, is posentropic adiabaticity. This applies to individual atoms.

Dallet, inorganically, may be posentropic and n¤nadiabatic. This is ensemble inorganic physical reality. Ensembles of atoms are, as an ensemble, n¤nadiabatic and mutable often in an organic sense and often in an inorganic sense.

Dallet's response to life can be life and it can be death as total resistance to life. Metaphors, gn¤stic metaphors then may be Jesus' "Living Father," and (demiurge) as "dead father." In other words [Dd]allet may express dead dialectical ideas, and it may express living quantum~memes. Qabalic~quantum~re~mediation of Dallet gives it quintessential linguistic life. Dialectical SOMitic-antign¤stic disintermediation of Dallet induces deadly state. Doug - 15Oct2009.

Quantum entropa are energy features of quantum~flux.

Archetype of universal life. Conferred upon Dallet it allows Dallet to play game of existence in partnership with Aleph's intermittent life-death process.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Hay:

words -

• Doug wants to start out with, in Doug's opinion, one of most powerful Quantum~Gnostic~Qabalic interpretations of Hay applied. That is:
  
  Yod~Hay~Yod
  
  In his ciphering of Genesis 1:3 Suares says this, "Yod~Hay~Yod: 10.5.10 can only be interpreted-translated as existence~life~existence. It expresses the coming into life (5) of a double existence (10 and 10) and thus describes the distinctive mark of organic life which is always a double process..." Suares uses mind~body as one exemplar.
  
  For Doug, Suares' 'double existence' is a quantum~complementation of Yod as quantum and Yod as classical: quanton(Yod_q,Yod_c). Doug is saying in this script that Hay complements (verb) all of actuality's 'double existences.' For Doug, then, we are talking-writing Hay as Hologra[[il][m][ph]]. Hay is quantonic! Life is quantonic!
  
  See p. 84 of Suares' Cipher of Genesis, Shambala, first ed.
  
  Another way of saying this is in quanton(Y¤d,Yod), interpreted Y¤d~Hay~Yod, Hay is quantonics' comma~nospace.
  
  Too Hay is always Hay_q.
  
  If we write Hay_c, it would be like saying Hay is dead, Life is dead. I.e., Hay's Planck clock turned off. Hay as Mawt~Hamawt (dead-the-dead; dead-death).
  
  Doug - 7Mar2013.

In reference to reality's cyclic ontology (quantization~scintillation) of evolutionary OEDC; quanton(DQ,SQ), quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality), etc. Quantization~scintillation loopings shown and link added just below - 10Jan2012 - Doug.

Explicitly, Hay is quantized OEDC.

Too, we may view Hay as quantized uncertainty, and quantization uncertaintyings' selection as choice, chance, and change uncertainties.

Quantization~scintillation of quantum~reality may be viewed and hermeneuted with hay as h-bar. All quantum~uncertain choosings, chancings, and changings (CH³ings) in quantum~reality happen at quantized~intervals of Planck's wavelength quanta. This smallest granularity of quantum~energy may be represented mechanically as e = hf. 'e' is energy, h is Planck's 'constant,' and f is frequency. 'h' is very tiny. As a 'spatial' wavelength h may be illustrated as about 10^-43. So, if we want to show 'e' as unity (quantumly, 'omnity'), f must be 10⁴³. But Planck's quantum, durationally, is h. That small increment represents quantum~reality's least energy change. Essentially, this is what omnistinguishes classical reality from quantum reality. Classically change is y=f(t) continuous. Quantumly all change is quantized in multiples of h. If one grasps this quantum essential meme, one may then quite easily infer autiot's macroscopic uncertainty as quantumly valid, i.e., "embrace uncertainty!"

See noun below as reality's cyclicity (rather, open cycloidicity; see graphic at Doug's QELR of equilibrium) of change as h-bar loops. Doug - 5Dec2009, 10Jan2012.

Impregnation. Hay's pragma upon Dallet.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Vav:

words -

Quantonics' middle~inclusion, a quanton's comma~nospace, a tilde as a wave~pragma~function which can commingle another wave~pragma~function.

Biologically, a sperm fertilizing an ovum. Two becoming one. Two haploids becoming a single human cell of life.

As an quantum creatio ex nihilo aperio exemplar, a Higgs boson creating a fermion from two bosons: two spin one boson quanta becoming one spin one-half fermion quantum.

Achievement of (evolution of) every vital impregnation. Unlimited potentia, possibilities.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Zayn:

words -

In quantonics, this is simply, "What is yet unsaid." Clearly this attends an impetus for Qabalic and quantum~enthymemeticity.

Explicitly, it is both said SQ (Qabala views this as SQ's freedom from DQ) and unsaid SQ which can become 'free' from DQ.

Again, çatholiç dogma denies any individual freedom; yet Qabala embraces it; Essene~Jesus embraces it!

Çatholiçs' 'Christ' (the demiurge) denies individual gn¤stic freedom as "apocryphal," i.e., uncertain.

This is very close to what Doug intends by "ascension." Actually, it is quantum~emersos' emerscence. It is emergence in and of actuality. Doug's "ascension" is more akin SQ transitioning into DQ as isob and isoV. Latter is gn¤stically pneumatic. Emergence is gn¤stically more psychic-hylic. Emerscence is gn¤stically more pneumatic. Doug - 15Oct2009.

Undifferentiated energy (and 'substance') as a plenum. Least energy.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Hhayt:

words -

This is quantum~isoflux AKA DQ.

A repository, one which is open (unconserved) with unevolved, i.e., iso~energy.

Quantumly, this is immeasurable, n¤n monitorable. It is apparent absence of any SQ.

Quantum 'mechanics' calls this 'ground state.'

Quantonics permits memeos of iso~entropa, iso~cohera, isobs, and isoVs, which are iso~memeoryings of all quantum~entropa and ~cohera.

Doug infers latter experientially and from Pirsig's comments that, "Pirsig and Iht wrote ZMM and Lila."

Archetype of primæval female energy. Draws its life-energy from Hhayt and builds it gradually into energy ensembles. Suares also describes Tayt as "...simplest primal energy archetype, an energy cell, an archetype of feminine energy..." Doug - 6Mar2010.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Tayt:

words -

In Quantonics, this is Gnosis, Sophia, Wisdom. It is impregnation of quantons with growing Value actualized as SQ.

So we see...energy is feminine. Then, in quantum~reality, nature's femininity is enabled when h~bar is turned on.

So, what happens when h~bar is turned off? Feminine energy and wisdom are disabled. Pirsig's MoQ calls this ESQ.

What are every day exemplars of ESQ? Patriarchy, classical thingking, SOM, d'evil, state, patriarchal socially-planned "ideal absence of uncertainty," and hylic inept-facile quantitative-oxymoronic 'quality controlled' h~bar off 'stability,' event as zero-latency state transition (i.e., process as classically indescribable when reality is stopped), and a superb one: satan. See omniscussion re: satan under Seen~Sheen below. To oversimplify here and for student~reader con(m)venience, Seen turns h~bar off (AKA QE in 'economic' classical maths' theories). Sheen turns h~bar on. In Autiot, as an example, Seen invoked with 'aba,' (Seen Aleph Bayt Aleph) elicits "dead father." By comparison Sheen Aleph Bayt Aleph emersces "living~Father." See ascendant. Compare classical and quantum gradience, measurement, chaos, and equilibria. See Doug's suggestions for quantum~maths.

Thank you for reading,

Doug - 6Mar2010, 18Oct2012, 7Aug2015 (repair a bad right quotation mark).

Yod is aleph's antinomial, aleph's projection in actuality.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Yod:

words -

• Doug has a few words of his own to offer here. As many of you know Doug is still struggling with his standingunder of quantization_q, scintillation_q, chaos_q, equilibria_q, mutation_q, adaption_q, and evolution_q in terms of 'value_c,' and Value_q.
  
  In Quantonicsese Doug claims
  some strategic memes affecting regenesis of humankind:
  • Yod issi quanton(Yod_q,Yod_c)
  • We can script those as Y¤d and Yod.
  • Script too:
    • Yod issi 'value.' 'State: stoppable immutability.'
    • Y¤d issi Value. Flux: CH³ evolutionary_q process.
    • Yod denies Aleph.
    • Y¤d abides Aleph.
• Let's do it too using dichons vis-à-vis quantons:
  • Yod is dichon(Yod_c, Yod_c). Here we see Yod wearing eyemuffs. SOM's Wall blinds it, closes it off, to Aleph.
  • Y¤d issi quanton(Aleph,Y¤d). Here we see Y¤d 's eyes opened to Aleph's quantum~reality.
  • Yod_c quantumly~affected ("steam rolled") by Aleph can evolve into Y¤d.
  • When we see Yod~Yod in Autiot text it is usually hermeneuted as divine. In Hindu what we see is li~la, a divine dance of classical and quantum attempting to become more quantum. Doug claims Yod~Yod is very similar li~la.
  • A quantum requisite for partiality emerges here: Yod's evolutionary QVH ontology from Yod to Y¤d is always partial and in various gradient_q modes of equilibria_q~chaos_q.
• etc.

Doug - 21-22Feb2013.

Suares' words -

• Paraphrased, "Yod is one of 27 names, each name, each Aut an equation regarding innumerable aspects of cosmic energy. It is up to us to solve these equations." P. 47, Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, Weiser Press, English Translation, 1994, 226 total pages.
• Yod is a variant of Bayt. Ibid., p 50.
• Yod is one of two biological fertility agents (e.g., in contemporaneity: X and Y), via Waw, of Bayt. Other is Tav. To Doug, this is essence of intrinsic quantum~complementarity of all containers. Ibid., p. 50.
• Yod expresses—as do all Autiot—self~other~fractal~recursion of cosmic~energy's (energies of) ubiquitous and perpetual immortal repetition of prototypes (essence of evolution). Ibid., p. 50.
• Living~Yod [Y¤d] [YhShWh] complements Living~Aleph. Dead-Yod [YahWeh] contradicts Living~Aleph. Ibid. "Take sides with Aleph, do not take sides with Yod." Y¤d sides with Aleph. P. 52. Paraphrased.
  
  We see an invalid dialectic either-or of Y¤d [living] vis-à-vis Yod [dead]. Yod_q vis-à-vis Yod_c.
• "The mythical Joseph is a dual entity. Being the eleventh son, [by gematria] he is both 10, which is the number of Yod, and 1, the Aleph. The Aleph allowed him to understand dreams [like Jung], and the Yod gave him the capacity to purchase all the wheat of Egypt." P. 23, Cipher of Genesis, Shambala Press, 1st ed., March, 1970, 231 total pages.
• 
  
  Doug - 24Feb2013.

Yod is aleph's antinomial in an quantum~self~other~referent sense that yod complements aleph in a "redemption as process" subjective negational...

...way which depicts n¤nactual aleph in an actual way. Yod is aleph's actual complement's projection in actuality. As Suares puts it, Yod is 'existence,' i.e., differentiated actuality "in reality." Aleph is 'non existence,' i.e., undifferentiated nonactuality "in reality." We see vividly quanton(nonactuality_q,actuality_q) assa quanton(Aleph,Yod) as antinomial_q quantum~complementation. This meme becomes crucially important in Sepher Yetsira and quantum~exegesis of its ten immanent_q quantum~hologra[[il][m][ph]] spheres of Sefirot whose ephemeral_q manifesta_q are in four levels: cosmic flux quantum~emanations, cosmic flux quantum~creation, cosmic flux quantum~emerqancy, cosmic flux quantum~action. Evidently ad occulos quantum~empiritheory cosmically unfolds. Our classical-dialectical-eyemuffs are now off. Planck's clockings_q aræ on. Tick-tock, tick-tock..."Time[ings) keep[s] on ticking, ticking, into [many futurings]." Doug - 6Mar2014.

Antinomial here is used in an unusual way. Autiot declares 'normal reason' wrong: see Gospel of Truth where Essene Gnostic Jesus implied-called classical dialectical 'reason,' "Error." As such then real 'laws' are in n¤nactuality and unreachable via human and sentient 'reason.' Doug derives Jesus' implication from his studies of Gospel of Thomas (Thanks to MJ in Australia for hooking Doug up with this Gospel early-mid 2005. It was Doug's first experience with gnosis!).

Yod and aleph dance a divine dance with each other, and aleph is above yod, since yod as actuality transitions cyclically (goes home) to aleph. Aleph sources yod's tentative posentropy in actuality. Suares leaves an impression that we can refer yod's 'end' as dialectical. (Upon studying Sepher Yetsira, Doug no longer has that 'novice' impression of Suares' dialectical 'yod ending.' See recent Vayt to Bayt. Doug - 6Mar2014.) Doug infers from his quantum~studies that this dance is perpetual and 'endings' are mere sentient delusions borne of psychic ignorance.

Quantum~reality is a dance of absolute~change emerging from dynamic emerscence and immerscence middle~including wave~interrelationshiping twixt n¤nactuality's undifferentiated perpetual isofluxings and actuality's tentative actual entropies which we can show as quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) and quanton(aleph,yod). A biological example which plays out in actuality as a metaphor of quanton(aleph,yod) is cellular metabolisis as quanton(catabolisis,anabolisis). Cells literally 'die' (aka apoptosis) and are resurrected (aka cell [re]birth as cellular~genesis).

See Suares' Cipher of Genesis.

Doug treats 'antinomy' here quantumly, i.e., as quantized~pr¤cæssings. Its dialectical 'immutable-state and zero momentum' interpretation is bogus in quantum~reality.

An interesting facet of this 'dance,' is that some see it as ongoing natural moral and thus gn¤stic~redemption. Yet some see it as a struggle, indeed as a struggle with god. East Indians often view this 'dance' as Li~la.

Isra-el means "struggle with god." Muslims have a similar saying: Jihad, which means "struggle with god." Those semantics aren't classically 'identical,' rather are autsimilar. That is, Jihad doesn't 'equal' Israel. Comparatively Jihad is self and other similar Israel and Israel is self and other similar Jihad. Especially when we ponder both Essene and Arabic gnosis. They are n¤t identical, but carry autsimilar (quantum) semantics. Arabic gnosis of Jihad is primarily Chaldæan gnosis (Aur Kasdeem translated as Ur Chaldees). Clearly, neither is about killing infidels, just that war-mongering hylic dialecticians (of YHWH's bivalent and demiurgic mindset) have made them so. In his Cipher of Genesis Suares describes this OT dialectical opposition is a tool of (dead-father) god to reengender humanity's germ on earth. Violent struggle, god believed, would impose enhanced evolution of humanity's germ of life. Today, CeodE 2009, MoQ's DQ and Quantonics' quantum~isoflux are change agents which impose unending and sometimes radical change upon all of us.

We need recall how Israel and Judaea seceded in 931 b.c. Too we need recall how Jesus was from Tribe Judaea, Beth (Bayt) David, and Essene (implicitly gn¤stic which implies he knew Suares' brand of Qabala and its autiot very, very, very well). Essene Jesus didn't see redemption, moral redemption, as 'struggle,' rather as individual gn¤stic rights to find God within our individual selves. We can show that in quantonic script as quanton(aleph,yod) issi quanton(God,self). Our struggle isn't with God, rather our struggle is a quantum~gn¤stic~process of individual quantized due diligence to "find God in our inner self." When we do that we experience what Jesus meant by "revelation." When students of Quantonics do "self~revelation," they are quantum~phase~encoding emerging reinvented adaptations of selves (see potentia). It is easy to perceive this as a gn¤stic struggle with G¤d. Suares' Qabalic autiot is one of many tools which empower individuals to shine light on our selves so that we can revel in God's presence ihn us individually, gn¤stically.

Doug was watching History channel's hermeneutics of "exodus." Wonderful! Doug noticed, now that he is spending effort on autiot, that a phrase "amo Israel" appears to have been misinterpreted as "God's people." 'People' in Hebrew phonetically is n¤t 'amo,' but "oomah." So "oomah Israel," is "people struggling with god." (Reference is Hayim Baltsan (author), 1992 paperback, Wiley.) Israelites aren't Essene! Israel obeys common social 'law.' Some Judæans are Essene. Essenes obey individual gnosis as redemptively evolving quantum~partials of~and~cowithin God (read Essene Jesus' Farewell Discourse just above to see how and why Doug is narrating this memeo). Israelites, as rigorous dialecticians in general, do n¤t grasp Suares' gn¤stic hermeneutics of autiot. A few Judæans do. Some of us others (from the Pale) are learning it. It's part of our individual quantum~gn¤stic self~due~diligence.

Doug - 21-22,29Oct2009

Kaf's double is Khaf. One of seven doubles.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Kaf:

words -

Kaf (20) is archetype Bayt's (2) antinomial projection into actuality.

Kaf is (autsimilar Yod) translated from Autiot into, e.g., English as cup, hand, and cup of hand.

As Doug has gradually learned (over last nearly ten years, starting approximately CeodE 2005) more about Autiot, Gematria, Gnosis, Qabala, Sepher Yetsira, and Sefirot, Doug has begun to fathom Kaf as having another omniscription: Grail.

When we look semiotically_q at gateways to a grail we see half-stones (sexually haploidal stones: testicles and ovaries) and a pipe like this >-<. That is one way of looking at grail. Another way is middle~inclusion. Another way is holograms being a generic Sefirot whose existence_q is interrelationshipings_q among EWings: all of those interrelationshipings are quintessentially grails_q! Another way is grails as wormholes which are radically important in any sentient's grasp of power and potentia of teleportation_q. We see, we may choose (heretically) to see that Kaf may be semasiologically_q hermeneuted_q countless ways.

Doug has omniscribed_q Kaf as a pipe (e.g., in Unix, whose semiotic is '|.') Another omniscription of Kaf might be an aqueduct autsimilar rain gutters on our homes. Thence too, a simple cup, a chalice, etc.

Grail aspect of Kaf is crux of quantum~middle~inclusion, and hologra[[il][lex][m][ph][view]]ically_q as EIMA. Quantons(scin,quan) cann¤t emerq_q and transmute_q reality_q without this quantum aspect of grail, of Kaf.

Aside on K[h]af's double role in educing cosmic con(m)sciousness:

Recall from Doug's Sepher Yetsiral Hologralexology that the language of Qabala is called Autiot. Autiot means many Aut. Aut means feminine~singular (one) Aut. Iot is feminine~plurality (ensembles of Aut). Any Aut by itself is without holograilic nexi, and so is unconscious. When we evolve many Aut into hologral interrelationshipings we gain cosmic consciousness. (Just for gender comparative reference, usually masculine~singular is Yassod, and masculine plural is Im, as in Elohim. Read about Autiot~Yassod at Doug's Sepher Yetsiral Hologralexology. Ask self, "Self, what could Elohimot possibly mean?")

Thinking about this from a quantum~empiritheoretical complementarospective, we may view Aut as quanton, and Autiot as a holographic ensemble of quantons (quanta). An isolated quanton (quantum), according Sepher Yetsira, then, is without consciousness. However, when multiple quanta interrelate via quantons(scin,quan), a rudimentary consciousness emerges through a quantum process referred "scintillation_q." Quanta as ensembles_q become rudimentarily conscious_q when they scintillate (Jungian libidically quantadulate) one another.

A terrific exemplar of Qabala's Sepher Yetsiral Autiot expression for consciousness is second Sephira's (second Orb's) cipher. Second Sephira (2nd of 10 in Tree of Life) is Hhokmah. Hhokmah: (Hhayt~K[h]af~Mem~Hay: 8.20.40.5).

In Hhokmah we see K[h]af's double role enabling ensemble Aut to achieve con(m)sciousness by grailing Autiot's spiritual archetype Hhayt through K[h]af's grail into 'the living waters' expressed as Mem~Hay.

Doug can do a rough QED quantum~analogue of that as Isoflux~EIMA~quantons(bosons,fermions). Here Doug is using bosons (spin 1 insubstantial cosmic energy) as an analogue_q of Hay, and fermions (spin 1/2 substantial cosmic energy) as an analogue_q of Mem.

Doug - 16Jun2014.

Aside on K[h]af's double role in educing cosmic con(m)sciousness.

When Doug first put this web page together, he didn't know about Autiot's seven doubles. He is still learning. However, double~aspect of Kaf is a very big deal from Kaf's perspective affinity with quantum~reality. Especially crucial is quantum~reality's intrinsic openness (QR, as hologral, isn't even remotely closed let alone conservative!).

Kaf represents a 'cup' which holds a fluid, powder, granules, marbles, M&Ms, etc. Kaf will hold that material fairly reliably, discounting spillage and other accidents.

Khaf (Kaf's double) represents something more like a sieve_q. Stuff can flow through it! It is like a permeable membrane! It leaks! It may leak. It may leak in some variably gradient manner like a nozzle on a hose, or a nozzle on an injector. It may leak like a super novae with great chaos followed by some relative levels of equilibria.

A terrific quantum~analogue of Khaf is reality's natural quantization. In any K[h]af sense quantized reality is very leaky (poor metaphor which fits Doug's needs here; poor since QR is islandically coherent~hermeneutic). Compare quanta and Khaf's leakiness in any sense of indetermination and uncertainty. We now grasp how we may use Khaf in indeterminate and uncertain Autiot omniscriptions of quantized reality!!! This is a big deal, and everywhere Doug looks in Autiot he sees boundless big deals in their qua to assess and omniscribe quantum~reality as Quantonics attempts to do.

All Aut doubles have similar quantum aspects (though n¤t 'identical' to Khaf; compare Bayt~Vayt) in any sense of enhancing Autiot's qua to omniscribe quantum~reality.

See Doug's omniscription of Kaf in one of his Advanced Autiot 'nine columnar' tricodons (Archetype, Actual Projection, Nonactual Projection) of Autiot.

Imagine Khaf's grail semiotics as dashed (n¤t solid) lines. Here's a partial: >---------<. We might dash those half stones (haploids) too.

Here's a sinusoidal metaphor shown with and without dashes (quantization):

Dialectical Monism is determinate, linear and closed. Similar Kaf.

Quantum Pluralism is uncertain, discontinuous and open. Similar Khaf.

Observe antinomial~complementarity of quanton(Khaf,Kaf)! Now for real nous~bending compare quanton(Aut,Iot). See Aut. See Iot.

Blewdle your noodle with this too: quanton(Autiot,Yassod); see right most column in that S[YR] Lex Table.

Doug - 15Jun2014.

Control, limit,...

Lammed (30) is archetype Ghimel's (3) antinomial projection in actuality. Doug - 15Jun2014.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Lammed:

words -

From Mead's translation of Chaldæan Oracles I, "Limit the Separator."

Lammed is all projected organic energy in actuality. Doug - 15Jun2014.

Doug's immediate novice exegetic is that this is quasi~quantum~middle~inclusion. It is saying, "Do not allow dialectic's excluded-middle to be hylically ideal."

Lammed is an interrelationship affector. That means it is a 'class' of quanton.

Lammed 'happens' intrinsically in quantum~holograms. Energy wellings in a quantum~hologram both do and do n¤t coobsfect one another, and to any extent they do...their affectationings are gradient (as a English language noun). See our graphic of quantum~network~complementary~interrelationshipings.

Maternal waters,...

One of three 'Mothers.' See Aleph and Sheen.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Mem:

words -

When you read many gnostic gospels, you will see a phrase, "the waters," quite often. Sometimes it can mean people.

An example: aba mem tav means "dead father," AKA "the demiurge," "the Christ." Literally in autiot, it means "father's water is dead still."

Typically Mem is used in a creative sense of regenerative vicissitudinal evolution. But context, as we have shown is critical. Just above we see lammed as Lammed~Mem~Dallet. Mem~Dallet left to itself will run "wild." But Lammed controls it so that its change isn't 'explosive.' From any human Qabalic~quantum complementarospective a super novæ is mem~dallet; however, relatively gradual evolution of humanity is lammed~mem~dallet.

So mem's water can be still, rippling, strongly eddying, tsunamic, and cosmically novæic, etc. Con(m)text is crucial.

Noun (say 'noon') as cyclic~evolutionary being complementing its source Hay as life's seed.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Noun:

words -

• Noun is cosmic reality's Principle of Indetermination,
• Noun represents an inner freedom of life,
• Noun is Qabala's most essential artefact (desnouring self as quantum~uncertainty),
• Life and its cosmic con(m)sciousness based upon stindyanically affine_q quantons(scin,quan) of Noun may never be: 'physically, dialectically, classically, formally, mechanically, objectively' closed n¤r conservative,
• Doug using Suares' Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, p. 55.
• etc. Doug - 16Aug2014.

Noun, quantonically, is animate recursion of self at up to Planck's rate. We may show it as quanton(Noun,Noun). Again, our comma-nospace, AKA Vav AKA Waw, self-fecundates (also "fecundulates" and libidically quantadulates) Noun, and quantum~uncertainty desnouers self (and self, holographically, as other) as vicissitudinal change agency.

Aside - A Note on scin,quan quantadulative Vicissitudinality:

Nature and reality, quantum~reality are vicissitudinal. This is especially apparent in biology. Trees of life sprout new branches, unexpectedly. Vicissitudinally. In quantumese we refer this as "autsimilar n¤nsynonymous omnivergencings." A terrific exemplar happening to homo Sapiens now, CeodE 2009, is aneuploidy...

ana~eu~pl~oidy

...(literally, growing [ana]wellness_q [eu] through evolution_q of...

[...pl as possibly Phay~Lammed] of ensemble_q [multi~somatic: XYY, XYYY, XXYYY, ...]

...chromosomes [emerscitecturings for phemomic [somatic] emerqancyings [ploidings; eidos[ings]])...

Doug - 12Dec2014.

...on most pairs of human chromosomes.

Vicissitudinality is a pan~reality manifestation of quantum~uncertainty's qua creating astochastic Value: Robert M. Pirsig in his ZMM and Lila calls it, "surprise."

End Aside on Vicissitudinality.

Doug's Generation III Quantum Reality Loop shows this graphically:

Quantum gn¤stics who grasp essence of autiot's noun, accomplish at least two major epiphanies:

• tapping into 'reserve energy,' and
• enabling self to see one's inner.

These two sentient capacities are proemial semaphores of one's beginning steps on a real Chautauqua into omniscovery of self's quantum~gnosis. When we look at this using gnosis' topos, we learn that hylics, simply, are self-disabled from experiencing this proemial gnostic redemption. Too, most psychics, via adherence to dialectic (Jesus calls this "Error"), are self-disabled. A few psychics broach these proems via a self~enabling process of rejecting dialectic as a classical means of achieving 'rational reason.' Once dialectic (i.e., anti-gnosis, again Jesus calls this "Error") is rejected, and quantum~gnosis' Light is allowed to shine cowithin one's inner, psychics commence a path (Tao's "the way"), an unending journey, toward pneuma. Doug - 5Dec2009.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Sammekh:

words -

• The female sex, opposite (quantumly: antinomial) partner of Waw (6).
• "The difference between the name Sodom and the name Adam lies in the fact that Sodom has in it no Aleph; this is replaced by Sammekh, with the numerical significance of 60. Thus the blood of Sodom—unlike that of Adam, which is 'Aleph in blood'—is incapable of sublimation." Page 157, CoG.
  
  Literally, then, absence of sublimation, is absence of amelioration. Sodom is 'dead' in any sense of a life having qua to improve, to ascend current ugly circumstances.
  
  Compare Sadam (ciphered in Autiot, n¤t Arabic) as literally Female~Aleph~In~Blood! Here we see mitochondria as Feminine chromosomal intra cellular energy power plant which provides energy of blood in situ its cell's life emerqant. Read about apoptin as a means of cancer control.
  
  Doug - 19Feb2013.
• Sammekh is a 'support.' Suares, p. 419, Trilogy, Sepher Yetsira, 1976.
  
  Doug 21Jun2014.
• etc.
  

Eye, opening, ...

Suares' use of words describing Aut Ayn:

words -

Ayn can Seen-focus. Ayn can Sheen~diffusely. It's Noun begs perpetual quantum~cyclicity.

Yod, as Aleph's antinomial, puts Ayn's duty as dialectical focus initially, and then learn to see diffusely, quantumly.

So we have an unstoppable "eye" which is Doug's quantum~omnitor among all quantum~reality's quantum~energy~wellings. Try this:

EWingAynEWing

Doug's quantum spin on this Ayn. Forgive me if I am off base.

Unevolved energy; primal substance

Phay's double is Pay. One of seven doubles.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Phay:

words -

• Phay means, among other things, 'mouth.' Ibid, Sepher Yetsira.
• etc.
  
  Doug - 21Jun2014.

As we describe near page top, a quantum is an energy~packet or a packet of energy. We can show "energy~packet" as "Merets Ma~Atafah." In Autiot, left to right, "Mem~Raysh~Tsadde Mem~Ayn~Tayt~Phay~Hay."

Our Hebrew Dictionary shows 'of energy' as using Autiot to just express phenome spelling, like this: Aleph~Noon~Raysh~Gimmel~Yod~Hay. Doug chose to use more original Autiot to achieve his translation of 'quantum.'

Very over simply, Tayt when scaled to its minimum is a 'quantum.' Notice its implicit femininity. Energy is feminine!

Doug - 30Mar2010. (In response to a web visitor early today.)

Midway through feminine progression of quantum~energy spectrum: 9, 90, 900. Tayt, Tsadde, Final Tsadde (Gnostically this is Mother, the God Head. Doug.)

Suares' use of words describing Aut Tsadde:

words -

Autiot for energy, as best Doug can tell is Mem~Raysh~finalTsadde. Doug, at this juncture can Seen~Sheen n¤ 'reason' to avoid writing Mem~Raysh~Tsadde as a higher level of energy. But then it may or may n¤t be a quantum, which is a least energy manifestation of quantum~reality. Latter appears to require use of Tayt.

Doug, too, is uncertain how to view Yod as part of Tsadde's Autiot cipher. Big con(m)cern for Doug is plethoric issues of adiabaticity at much higher energy levels. Unsure Yod is compatible with quantum~memes of adiabaticity.

Doug - 30Mar2010, 24Nov2014.

"The Qof is the most difficult symbol to understand. It includes Aleph exalted in its principle, yet acting through its projection, against itself, and thereby being cosmically deathless." Carlo Suares, Sepher Yetsira.

Suares offers us a glimmer of how to understand Qof better. He says, "It is best seen in Qaheen (Cain), that mythical destroyer of illusions." What does Suares semasiologically intend by "destroyer of illusions?" Allow Doug to make a list of relevant "illusion issues" in Qabala and Doug's version of rabbi YhShWh's quantum~gn¤sis:

• psychics' and hylics' inabilities to see their inner,
• psychics' and hylics' inuring middle-exclusion,
• psychics' and hylics' dialectic thought,
• psychics' and hylics' rejection of uncertainty as apocryphal,
• etc. (list is long...)

YhShWh teaches us those issues amount to Error, especially dialectic. Suares shows us that Qaheen (somehow) destroys them.

Qaheen is Qof~aleph~hay~yod~noun in Autiot letters right to left.

Cain is symbolic of perpetual isoflux (Aleph: 1000) creating and discreating quantum~life (hay) in a tentative (up to) Planck rate cyclic (noun) actuality (yod AKA UD). Suares describes this in his Cipher of Genesis (page 82) as "Aleph steam rolls Yod," in a Qof quantum process of Yod amelioration. Qof annihilates status quo as dialectical Error! Cain as an Aleph henchman taking out classical 'state' and elitist sociopathic exclusion as absolute stuckness. Dexter calls this, "Taking out the garbage." Doug - 31Jan2013, 2Feb2013.

It appears that Cain offers (ciphers) a genuine "story of reality," (a Qabala) which destroys all psychic-hylic illusions and self-delusions.

As it turns out, Qof, then, abiding that last paragraph's essence...in a way...is Genesis I which shows us in Autiot that we, each of us as individuals, must side with Aleph and reject Aleph's antinomial per se status quo of Yod. Genesis I shows humanity that it must be Always Faithful ihn Aleph (Doug's Epitaph). We see metaphorically Cain as Aleph and Abel as Yod, that which per se must be rejected: reject Error! Doug - 31Jan2013. Note 31113!

Doug - 22Jul2010, 31Jan2013, markups 31Dec2015.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Qof:

words - Qof as Qaheen (Cain) -

• timeless, pp. 22,23, 55, 64, 65, CoG,
• indeterminate,
• killer of Abel (i.e., n¤t, but as a test of humanity which YahWeh adopted),
• resisting 'the kill' as a success metric,
• as a mythical archetype, n¤t human,
• psychical abstract formula of cosmic energy,
• Qof as Cain as an exemplar of Aleph becoming Yod,
• mythical destroyer of illusions, i.e., Cain sides with Aleph to destroy exclusive (deluded) Yod,
• Cain as a principle of indetermination where life (Yod) itself is at stake (when Yod takes sides with itself: deluded social_c and individual_c arrogance, e.g., humanism_c), Doug - 8Sep2014.
• as an archetype testing human psyches on behalf of Aleph and with Aleph's motives which humans cannot understand (see Jung, Liber Primus, Red Book),
• Cain too falls for life as static 'existence' and becomes static-Yod and -YahWeh and falls in love with himself as a demiurge God aspect of Yod,
• ultimately Cain (Qaheen) understands the riddle as saying "side with Aleph," and he does, p. 137, (Cain's discovery is called "the key of life," p. 138),
• Cain as Aleph in life's existence grows stronger and stronger... p. 141,
• Cain's mission is to make Yod fecund, to fecundate Yod's vicissitudes! p. 142. (Our Yod today CeodE 2013 is Mawt~Hamawt, dialectically dead. Doug - 31Jan2013.)
• Paraphrased, Gematria 100, "Qof quantum~holographically '...mixes all in all..." a complementary quantum~middle~inclusion of Aleph and Yod." Page 52 of 226 total pages, Carlo Suares, in his Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, English translation, Weiser Press, paperback, 1974.
  
  In other words, Qof amounts to all semasiologies, Peircean abductions, and hermeneutics of nexi Aleph and its 'antinomial' Yod.
  
  See Doug's Jan~Feb2013 efforts Scripting Aleph~Yod.
  
  As we may inure, Qof embraces Aleph in Yod and Yod in Aleph as did Jesus in his Farewell Discourse.
• Doug, using Quantonicsese, scripts Qof issi quanton(Aleph,Yod_q).
  
  Doug - 19Feb2013.
• etc.

This is isoflux finding ways to "work against itself" to achieve noun's life~death perpetual quantum up to Planck rate cycles.

Qof kills old Yod to make wayves for new Yod. Compare cellular apoptosis and cellular resurrection. Doug 31Jan2013.

In QCD it is TBCSUD. See Gen III Reality Loop above. Notice creation and annihilation (as discreation in any sense of Nietzsche's nihilism) in same loops.

Aleph (paraphrased) "works against itself through its [always~tentatively] declining isoenergy evolutionary~creation projections" we show in their QCD OEDC ontology above:

• T - top quark,
• B - bottom quark,
• C - charmed quark,
• S - strange quark,
• U - up quark, and
• D - down quark.

TBCS are all Aleph tentatives which Quantonics refers "Isots."

UD (Yod) are both Aleph~antinomial Yod 'projection' preferentials which Quantonics refers "Isops." Isoflux preferentially becoming Yod's actualized bosons and fermions, both of which are in Aleph and Aleph is in both of them.

UD "includes Aleph exalted in its principle," (i.e., Pirsig's "...keeping DQ with your SQ...") which Quantonics scripts as quanton(Aleph,UD), AKA more generally quanton(DQ,SQ). This quanton(Aleph,UD) quantum~holographic~projection evolves into quantons(Aleph,quantons(inorganic,organic)). Note that inorganic (rest) is in organic (movement) and organic (movement) is in inorganic (rest) . In a sense noun and hay are ubiquitous agents of aleph. YhShWh teaches us the sign of our Father's presence in each of us is, "movement and rest."

Visualize Aleph~Yod~Aleph and Yod~Aleph~Yod, and compare "Aleph in blood" AKA A~dam. Ponder San Graal, and Sang Ral. In Genesis how is this described? How did Adam acquire Aleph in blood? Read Suares' Cipher of Genesis. Read about Eesh and Esh. Read about Nahhash. Eesh and Nahhash emerq a grail twixt Esh and Aleph allowing Aleph in blood to enter Esh who becomes A~dam. Eesh becomes Eve. They enter Yod with Aleph. Their spawn, in dialectical Error, take sides with Yod. Voila! The System Problem! Doug - 31Jan2013, 2Feb2013.

Readers may see why Suares calls Qof, "...the most difficult symbol to understand." However, with quantonics' ability to do Autiot double~benchmark, self~other~benchmarking, we have a way to at first recall, and then recollection~evolve novel understandings.

We may now view Qof ihn its ("quantum~steam~roll") process of putting Yod back ihn Aleph by reversing above QCD description, "taking sides with Aleph:" Fixing The System Problem! Quantonics' strategy...kinda like Bill Murray in Groundhog Day...

• D - down quark,
• U - up quark, and
• S - strange quark,
• C - charmed quark,
• B - bottom quark,
• T - top quark.

Doug - New - 20,22Jul2010, 31Jan2013. (It's new, but familiar too...iff you are a student of Quantonics.)

Raysh is existence's, quantum~existencings', open cosmic con(m)tainer; it is isoflux (final~Tsadde) as a dynamic~plenum, but it is open and thus perpetually evolving...

Raysh's double is Raysh. One of seven doubles.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Raysh:

words -

• Raysh is 'poverty.' Ibid., Sepher Yetsira. Doug is unsure about this, however 'poverty' has a sense of vulgate Ayn taken literally as "there is n¤t." We may infer "having n¤thing." In this case we might spell Raysh, Raysh~Ayn~Sheen. Again, uncertainty_q reigns.
  
  Doug's sense is that we must treat Raysh quantumly and avoid classical literalism when we interpret any Aut. Why? If uncertainty_q aka "indetermination" reigns, cosmic~energy reigns. Quantum flux reigns and quantum~flux evolves_q radically_q, perpetually_q, ubiquitously_q.
  
  See Ayn in Doug's recent Hologralexology.
  
  Doug - 21Jun2014.

Space is a conceptual n¤n~quantum classicism. It is localable, isolable, separable, reducible AKA lisr.

Autiot's Raysh is quantum! It is partially (see topos levels of con(m)ceptuality) con(m)ceptual, quantum~partially complementaroceptual. (con is hylic; con(m) is psychic; com is pneumatic)

Isospace as a hypomeme (i.e., an undermeme vav hypermeme as an above~over~super~meme) of classically-hylically non conceptual isoflux.

Autiot's Raysh offers perpetual and unlimited room for unlimited emergence, emerscitecture, and emerscenture.

Doug - 27Mar2010.

Breath of life. Spiritual Energy. Spirit as focused is Seen. Spirit as diffuse is Sheen.

One of three 'Mothers.' See Aleph and Mem.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Sheen:

words -

• "Sheen is atemporal_q~Aleph's temporal agent in actuality..." paraphrased from page 65, Suares' Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, Weiser, 1994 republication of original French, 1975.
  
  We see eidetically quanton(Aleph,Sheen) as quantum~antinomials ('not' classical 'opposites.' Doug - 18Aug2014.
  
  Fathom quanton(Sheen,Seen) as self~antinomials_q quanton(diffuse,focus), quanton(broadband~light,laser).
  
• etc.

Allow Doug to quote Suares' page six of his The Second Coming of Reb YHShWH, after quoting II Corinthians 5:17, "This quotation and the words 'If any [hu]man be in Christ [n¤t catholic 'Satan,' but Essene Jesus], lead me to emphatically declare myself being in Reb YHShWH, the Rabbi called Jesus. Consequently, I obstinately obey his injunction to his disciples to 'Tell no man that he is Jesus the Christ. Matthew 16:20. This clear statement means to me that he strongly objected to being taken for a Christ."

To Jesus, anyone who calls him a Christ is in Error! Doug has said many times prior in Quantonics that his mentors and his own autodidactic learning have discovered that: to call Jesus "Christ" is Christian dialectical Error! Christians are in Error! Peter, Catholicism's rock called Jesus "the Christ." Error! Catholicism built 'the church' on Jesus' so called rock. Error. Jesus, according Suares, builds his church on us, and emphatically we do not build our churches on him! Thus we see Christianity as a Babel of Error! Christianity is Satan's Babel!

How could this happen? Why? Who? What? When? Where?

If you want to own your personal due diligence of all those H5W, start studying now, and expect to take balance of your life moving a little bit nearer a partial understanding.

Trouble is, we are immersed in this enormous holographic omnispatial and omnitemporal holographic reality. And if you do not grasp that, and further grasp its quantumness, you will stumble indefinitely. So we must lay foundation prior understanding. Even then, you and Doug will still be uncertain. Always uncertain. So what do we need? Faith! Suares' brand of Faith, "Faith is direct experience of the immortality of consciousness." Page 5 of TSCoRJ.

Faith is immortal quantum~energy. In a way, it is Aleph in blood, a direct expression that "G¤d is in us and we are in G¤d."

Suares seldom uses one of Doug's fav words, dialectic. Like Jesus, Suares uses words like Satan, Contradiction, and Error as surrogates of Error. That's fine. But Doug's auto~opus says those other words are simply Pirsigean subspecies of reality's actualized "bad guy:" dialectic.

Doug has been looking for tells of our "bad guy" in Suares' works and in his cherished Autiot and its countless energetic Autions.

This one, Seen~Sheen, is a great exemplar. Doug wants to use his own cuneiform aliases to show you why and slightly how Seen~Sheen symbolically carries "dialectic, rather antinomialism_q, in its soul...side~by~side with living Con(m)sciousness and Aleph becoming in us via our blood." See Merovingians, Plantards, and Plantagenets. See Plantard (St Clare) crest. Read Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln's Holy Blood Holy Grail. Latter, pay extra to get an illustrated version. Re Plantagenets rent BBC's Pallisers series, and look both up in Wikipedia.

Before we omniscuss symbols, let's look at memeos more familiar.

• YHWH
  • aka YAHWEH
  • aka Yod-Hay-Waw-Hay interpreted means actual being as life copulating life without spirit
  • aka dead life, dead living, dead livings, hylic-psychic life, dialectic-living...
  • aka demiurge
  • aka dead father
  • aka YHShWH without SH, without Sheen
  • aka dichon(YH, WH)
  • aka dialectic, Satan, Contradiction, and Error
  • etc.
• YHShWH
  • This is Hebrew Autiot for 'Jesus'
  • aka YHWH with SH (Sh), Sheen (Shææn), quantum~middle~included
  • aka actual life with spirit quantum~middle~including iht
  • aka spiritual life, pneumatic life, quantum~living
  • aka Living~Father
  • aka quanton(YHShWH), i.e., with Shææn as a quantum~middle~including comma~nospace
  • aka quantum~sophism, Wisdom, Sophia, Gn¤sis
  • etc.

Suares shows us that Satan is pronounced Sah-tahn. It is spelled in Hebrew Autiot Seen-Tayt-Noun. Seen is Sheen without our quantum~h. Seen isn't quantized. Its h-bar is turned off. It's dead. It is SOM's knife of dialectic which çatholiçs used to put words in Jesus' mouth "I bring not peace, but a sword." Matthew 10:34.

Tayt is a cell. An atom, a human, a mouse, etc. Noun is uncertainty. Classically, as Seen, we see dialectical certainty as dichon(Sheen, Seen). Either Sheen or Seen. Quantumly, as Shææn, we see quantum~uncertainty as quanton(Shææn,Seen).

So Satan is a dialectically certain cell of ideal classical either-or certainty. Error! Dialectic itself! War! Hate! George Bush! Dick Cheney. Bibi Netan..! Rope a dope popes! Classical science! Classical religion! Classical thought! Classical epistemology!

Doug made some cuneiform graphics of Sheen~Seen variations:

This version of Sheen-Seen is "pointless." In original archaic Hebrew and Autiot (as Abraham learned it from an angel), may not have had consonant markings. Doug is unsure, so his naked version may or may not be Autiot 'valid.'

This is left pointed Seen whose point is black as Doug's choice. It is focused classical energy, spirit, breath[e], life, cell behavior, etc.

This is right pointed Sheen whose point is violet as Doug's choice. It is diffuse quantum~energy, spirit, breath[e], life cell behavior, etc. Comparing Seen and Sheen, and realizing after abundant due diligence that Jesus name as YHShWH describes him as quantumly~diffuse, everywhere, in everything, always changing, always evolving...but Satan is without Sheen, left-pointed, dead, and dialectically-endlessly-state-perpetually in Error!

Carlo Suares may be one of Earth's greatest geniuses. If Doug could be an amalgam of his sheroes and heroes Suares would be part of that holographic amalgam.

He makes it clear to us that it is incredibly easy, once you grasp those last two symbols, to make them a dichonic either-or. That would be just another Satanic Error.

Carlo does not tell us this, and Doug feels really good that Quantonics has already anticipated it, but we really need both! We need a quanton of Sheen and Seen, like this:

In Doug's Hodgepodge he has been showing it more quantum~physially as quanton(~,o), but we can show it like this too:

		quanton	(		,		)

It may be inappropriate for Doug to view that is his own innovation in Quantonics. But it shows a, to Doug, valid hermeneutic of Jesus saying, "Seen is in Sheen and Sheen is in Seen." Agree? Yes?

Tilde as Sheen. Closed and dead vicious circle as Seen. Sheen as open, ubiquitous, and diffuse unseeable spirit (aka quantum isoflux). Seen as focused analysis of seeable actuality.

Doug - 21Feb2010.

Tav and Tahv is cosmic resistance to reality's perpetual cyclicity of ~living~and~dying~and~lving~and~etc.

Tav's double is Thav. One of seven doubles.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Tav:

words -

• "Tav is the exaltation of the entire cosmic existence in its utmost capacity to resist Aleph's perpetual life~death cycles." See p. 17 of 161 total pages of Suares' Song of Songs.
• In its resistance, Tav as a double can be formidable and it can be leaky (permeable) as Thav (its double).
• "Formidable Tav" echoes Aleph during life's Aleph~Tav cycles.
• "Leaky Thav" partially_q echoes Aleph. We see Thav offering one kind of real_q included~middlings_q. Too, we offer a grasp of Doug's "straddling_q."
• Too, this echo may be viewed as a mirror which makes a nexus_q to Mem as water and Mem~Tav as death (end of this individual_q cycle_q of life_q, n¤t an final_c end_c to life_c of an individual_c).
• Doug - 8Sep2014.
• etc.

One complement of this perpetual cycle is Mem~Tav and Mem~Vav~Vav~Tav as death. Doug likes to view double~Vav here is impregnation~impregnation which is what actuality (with quantum~complementary cooperation, i.e., Sheen~Yod~Tav~Vav~final~Phay, with n¤nactuality) has to do to unbecome. Here we see[n] (Shee[n]) Doug's quantum~ontology as beingunbecoming (Vav)isobeingbecoming (Vav).

Another complement of this perpetual cycle is birth as Lammed~Lammed~Dallet~Hay: "To give birth."

Another complement of this perpetual cycle is create as Lammed~Yod~Tsadde~Vav~Raysh: "To create."

Another complement of this perpetual cycle is creation as Yod~Tsadde~Yod~Raysh~Hay: "Creation."

As we mention near page top, "Now we have real Qabalic semantic for "Aleph~Yod~Qof~Qof." Qabala's recursing immortality of grail's perpetual life~death, living~dying cycles." AKA "~living~and~dying~"

So with 'death' as Mem~Tav, we see a metaphor of death as Tav antinomially~altering Mem's flow, holy waters' flow.

Now fathom how — of three greats of YHShWH's Mem history, Elijah, Elisha, and Jesus — only Jesus had qua to "reverse Jordan's (Mem's) flow." N¤t classically 'stop' it, rather quantumly~quantally "alter it; reverse it." How could that be? Recall how a pendulum's swing is unstoppable in any classical analytic sense? Our metaphor gains immense power here! Reversal is what a pendulum's swing does as a perpetual sinusoidal pattern. Jordan's reversal was, indeed, "sinusoidal." Flux is crux! Flux uncertainty is essence! Pneumatic wisdom is grasping that quantum~essence, a mandate of absolute~change.

Doug - 27Mar2010.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Final Khaf:

words -

Suares' use of words describing Aut Final Mem:

words -

Suares' use of words describing Aut Final Noun:

words -

• "...the Principle of Indetermination." P. 67, Second Coming of Reb YhShWh, Weiser, 1994, paperback, 226 total pages.
• "The schema Beyn or Veyn (2.10.700) does not mean 'divide' ... [rather] 'between' 'among,' ... [which are of far greater significance: quantonic hologra[[il][lex][m][ph][view]ic interrelationshipings significance]. Its letter~numbers...unfold a cosmic 700 which is the first and ultimate principle at stake in the universe: the freedom of indetermination." See page 88, Cipher of Genesis, Weiser, 2005. Doug - 1-2Mar2015.

Quotation of Suares' used just left, is part of his text 'The light that is darkness,' chapter 7 of Cipher of Genesis.

In that text, pp. 88-89, Suares describes, in second part of Genesis I,4, quantum phenomena of creation and existence and their interrelationshipings.

Topics he interrelates include:

• Awr - light, light~flux, packets of hologra[[il][lex][m][ph][view]ic light~flux, photons, more generally pho_xons, etc.
  
  
• finalNoun - indetermination as freedom (a cosmic principle: Suares claims the cosmic principle); Song of Songs verse 1 omniscribes existential assessment of indetermination, quantum~uncertainty as not just freedom but peace itself. finalNoun is cosmic source of this freedom. Freedom's nemesis is containment whose doors may be open, may be closed, may be partially open~closed. Autiot archetypes of energy~packet containment interrelating with finalNoun are Beyn, Veyn (2.10.700).
  
  
• life~death cycles - of cosmic life happen in an organic sphere of endless, sempiternal repetitions which Doug exemplifies symbolically with , notice how loop backs are quantized and thus open. This is crucial to fathoming Doug's meme of quantized~cycloids AKA qycloids. These life~death cycles never stop (i.e., sempiternal). Their demarcations are many, but here we can use Beyn and Veyn to show them. Dialectical stoppability (similar Bergson's mechanical finalism) doesn't 'exist' in a perpetual~ubiquitous sempiternal quantum~Qabalic~reality.
  
  

  . . .

  Veyn

  Beyn

  Veyn

  Beyn

  Veyn

  Beyn

  . . .

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  ... Veyn Beyn Veyn Beyn Veyn Beyn ...

  ... Veyn Beyn Veyn Beyn Veyn Beyn ...

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  \   \     \

  
  We may think, biologically, of Veyn as a womb, as an egg's shell. We may think, again biologically, of Beyn as a life's trajectory which has experiential duration in temporality. Doug's illustration intends we view Veyn as living~dying (shell) and Beyn as living~dying (a life's trajectory). Quantum~fractal recursion (essence of Autiot and Qabala), begs our standing~under a meme that each Beyn, each Veyn has within it, fractally~recursively internal living~dying quantum~processes which animate internals of each Beyn, each Veyn. All actuality, all Yod is subject to this life~death cyclings quantum~fractally~recursive~hologra[[il][lex][m][ph][view]ic vital impetus from tiniest quanta up to big bangs and black holes. Again, we see apoptosis as our best cellular example of quantum~fractal~recursion of Veyn~Beyn in biological life~death cycles.
  
  Classical ideas of finality simply aren't present notionally, memeotically, philosophically! Eschaton is n¤ more! Identity is n¤ more! Duality is n¤ more. Dialectic is n¤ more!
  
  
• Hhosheykh - (Hhayt~Sheen~Khaf: 8.300.500) Suares, "It designates the immeasurable reservoir of undifferentiated energy (8) in relationship with the cosmic metabolism (300) and the cosmic life (500). This 'darkness' is swarming with all that could be, and its living power transcends all human thought." Page 88, CoG. In Doug's New Quantum Philosophy this is isoflux. Obtain Doug's interpretation of finalKhaf is "a quantum grail of life," in a sense one way of saying 'A Quantum~Life~Motif™.' We see finalKaf grailing actuality and n¤nactuality, differentiated and undifferentiated, flux and isoflux. We can show a script which desnouers quantum~antinomial~complementarity~organic~sphere~evolution of one of those pairs as quantons(isoflux,flux). That is an oversimplified way of omniscribing reality, quantum~reality. These perpetual~ubiquitous quantum~metabolic hologral~interrelationshipings may be m¤daled, using quantum~stochastics, via Poisson~Bracketings: Quantum~Assessment! Clearly we obtain better results using quantum~languages to do~due that. Only two Doug issi k~now~ing CeodE 2015 are Qabalic~Autiot and QELRed (Quantonic~)English.
  
  
• Antinomialism - Though Suares' uses some ugly dialectical language like 'opposition' and 'contradictory,' we can show how a new quantum~reality better omniscribes what Suares is trying to say. Instead of classical 'opposition,' quantumly we offer quantum~antinomialism. Instead of classical contradiction we offer quantum~complementarity.
  
  
• Etc.

There is beau coup more to write here. Doug will d¤ that as long as he is ihn his current Beyn trajectory.

Doug - 1-2Mar2015, 18Jan2016.

Suares calls this, "...unfathomed, undifferentiated, unstructured reserve~energy..." p. 18, The Song of Songs, Shambala Press, 1972.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Final Phay:

words -

In Quantonics this is Pirsig's DQ. In quantum~reality this is VES, QVF, vacuum~energy, Casimir flux, and Quantonics' isoflux.

When Doug writes Quantonics script which says, "Wæ aræ ihn Iht and Iht issi ihn uhs," Iht issi Autiot's Hay~Phay~Final~Phay. Of course many others have issued that gn¤stic~phasement, including Essene Jesus, and more recently Eugen Herrigel in his (1953) Zen and the Art of Archery, namesake of Pirsig's even more recent (1974) Zen in the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

Boris Sidis probably knew of Final~Phay, and Doug is confident Boris would have intended his hermeneutic of "reserve energy" to include Hay, Phay, and Final~Phay. Did William James? Did Henri Louis Bergson? (latter, probably)

Doug - 27Mar2010.

Suares' use of words describing Aut Final Tsadde:

words -

If we follow Suares' shared memes common to most other columnar energy descriptions, in this case, 9.90.900. For Aleph it's 1.10.100, and so on...

For Aleph, Suares writes that Qof 100 is a non existential cosmic exaltation of Aleph 1. Suares, especially in his Cipher of Genesis 'Ha Qabala' writes Qof alternatively as Aleph(100). So let Doug do that, too, for Tayt 9.

For Tayt, Suares (Doug infers) writes that finalTsadde 900 is a non existential cosmic exaltation of Tayt 9. So Doug surmises we might choose to write finalTsadde alternatively as Tayt(900). That is just a guess, perhaps a wild one, on Doug's part.

finalTsadde, as apparent by its Gematrium 900, is highest Aut energy (Gematrium) in Autiot just below Aleph 1000.

Tayt 9 is cell, feminine unit of structuration of all formations in Qabala's cosmos. Tayt's existential projection in actuality issi Tsadde 90. All structures in actuality (actual existence) are archetypical of Tayt and structured via ensembles of Tsadde. Keep in mind, Doug is still a novice, so Doug is regurgitating what he thinks he has learned from Carlo Suares. This description will improve as Doug learns more.

It isn't too bad, con(m)sidering...Doug is a novice.

Gematria numbers (I think_q) are qualitative, like wave_q n¤mbærs...much more ordinal_q and subjunctive_q than a mentally-addled Platonically brain-washed dialectician might impose.

Doug - 24Nov2014.