[in] interrelationships [with] Wingdings font l.c. 'v'
|is an omniad which replaces classical dyads. We use a wingdings lower case 'v' symbol, , as an omniad to replace and extend other Western culture dyads like +, -, x, /, and, or, etc. Omniads do not assume dyadic, lateral, bifunctional, bivalent, unidimensional, monocontextual functor operation, but assume omnivalent, omnimensional, omnicomtextual (see 'comtext') fluxor operation. In Quantonics, we use omniads and attractors to build Value interrelationships.|
Imagine those green waves with Bergsonian durational 'con(m)tinuity. How could we 'design' our graphics to enable vertical and diagonal (and thogonal) quantum~interrelationshipings' emerscenture? Do we need polymorphism? Why? Why not? Doug - 5Aug2007.
Nearly five years ago, when Doug strung those symbols out like that, Doug had no idea, no meme of what he was showing innately. Do you see it? Those interrelationshipings are quantized! Gaps represent quanta and endless opportunityings for ubiquitous and perpetual everywherings~everywhenings scintillationings which make and unmake actuality as we know and sense it.
Since then Doug has done bundles of work on quantization, scintillation, Plateau II of our quantum~philosophy's omniscriptions of a Quantum~Value~Hierarchy and how it mutates and transmutes. On top of all that Beth (she passed 26Jul2010) led Doug to gnosis and Doug has been learning Autiot and Qabala as cobenchmarks of quantum~m¤dalings of reality. More recently Doug has spent, so far, nearly a year on quantum memeos of chaos, gradience, and equilibrium and using a Quantonicsesque quantum~cuneiform as a tool to omniscribe quantum~chaos and ~equilibrium systemically.
Above uses Doug's quantum~cuneiform to show a quantized locality both quantum~chaotically ana~ and ava~lanching into two evolved locales of relative quantum~equilibria.
Above stretches it. Gradience is quantum~relatively half what was stretched. Doug - 4Sep2012.
Symbols you see above are relevant all of these n¤væl quantum topic~issues.
Readers please view smaller red diamonds as gnostic~cuneiform symbols for grail. Recall that ^ is penile, and v is vaginal (notice too how Wingdings 'v' is a four stones Qabalic holograilic~tetrad: ). Together they symbolize a cuneiform stone, also in gnosis meaning hermaphrodite: haploidally both male (top) and female (bottom). Spiritually this 'stone' symbolizes a grail. A grail, pneumatically, is a quantum~interrelationshiping. Observe how Doug's original quantization of interrelationshipings left quantum~holograil and ~holograilicity out! To see Doug's original coining of those terms see Aleph updated.
Use Holograilic Stones to Help Make Choices!
That last one may be most enigmatic for you. It is Doug's first cut showing radically uncertain quantum~awareness intrinsic omnicisionings. I will explain this more involved graphic over next several days and weeks. Hint: Doug is using his own quantum~cuneiform to illustrate stochastic nature (question marks) of quantization and scintillation. You may grasp now why Doug has used lightning bolt segments to show this as a more classical, but stochastic 'path.' This diagram takes us much closer to quantum~essence. Compare chance.
Doug - 20Jan2012.
Island of Uncertainty attractor. Our title for this symbol is a take-off on Nick Herbert's "Quantum Island of Truth." This is a generic symbol for our quantonic isoflux notation. It represents any actual c¤mplement of reality. This is latched flux, and in Pirsig's MoQ we call it SQ. It shows 'omni-'dimensional latched flux as vectors of uncertain length and phase.
Adepts may notice this symbol, primitively as Light,
from ancient Hermetic traditions. Jesus
It is also a symbol for Hermes Trismegistus: Thrice Great Hermes.
Other versions of this symbol include a cross with two horizontal bars, one shorter, on top, representing, again Light.
Ancient heretics and mystics used symbols like this to shroud optimistic (what we call "quantum") Gn¤sticism. What amazes us is how these ancient symbols correlate and coinside more modern quantum n¤n (i.e., wave) 'mechanical' 'science,' 'metaphysics,' and philosophy.
Here is our latest, 2005, version of this memeotic shown as 3D peaqlos:
Classical Square Root:
Quantum Square Root:
Quantum numbers are waves and as such are n¤t scalar. Quantum numbers as waves are all, from any classical conspective, positive. Energy is all positive. We can quantumly phase~cancel phase~shifted waves, but we cann¤t negate their energy in order to perform a classical, mathematical negation. Energy cancellation does not create a null, empty wave~cancellation result! To offer a transverse example two positive energies may cancel, but their cancellation itself is at least double energy present in both uncanceled waves. HotMeme Caveat: "Treat quantum~waves dialectically, and penalize yourself by a return to classical stuckness." HotMeme Caveat. Thou shalt n¤t scalarbate waves! Another caveat: Classical reality is assumed to be 'transverse.' Quantum reality is multiversal, omniversal. Waves are not 'bi.' Waves are omni.
When we scalarbate waves we force quantum~waves to become classical 'state.' There is no 'state' in quantum~reality. Quantum reality is wholly flux and flux~mediated absolute change. Quantum reality, simply, does n¤t classically hold still. Zero momentum may n¤t be classically induced in quantum~reality.
Doug is prompted to add this red text given some of you are Googling Quantonics with this search pattern, "probability that a quanton in a box is in state n." Quantons are animate waves and ensembles of animate waves. Animate waves are unstoppable! It is impossible for a wave to have 'state.' Instead of classical dialectical state scalarbation, Quantonics is showing you and telling you that quantum~measurement, real quantum~measurement involves durational process omnitoring.
Classical theory canonically assumes that reality may be stopped! It is a bogus assumption.
Doug - 25Feb2008.
We show a double sized dotted blue circle with one arrow suggesting bosonic quantum~spin 1.
We improved it by showing its Möbius quantum~spin 1/2 wobble as a deep red fluxoid (say 0) and a deep green fluxoid (say 1).
We also show some spin zero flux superposing our fluxoids.
Too, we show our fermion's EIMAing n¤nactual isoflux quantum~c¤mplæmænt.
If you follow arrows you will discover all fermions' pendular 720° quantum sophist self~recursive hermaphrodicity similar Schrödinger's hydrogen atom:
We are doing this work for our review of Banesh Hoffmann's The Strange Story of the Quantum, Act II. That review is underway now and still needs another 2-3 months of diligent effort. We thought you might like a tease, though which shows our usage of these novel bosons and fermions. Perhaps you may guess what our topic is by carefully perusing this graphic:
See whether you can guess what we are doing in that graphic...hint: bosons are phonons.
Doug - 2Jul2007.
(Inanimate) Planck Quantum attractor. This symbolizes our Quantonics Planck quantum. It is Planck's least action or least pragma. This is our smallest 'quantum island of (um)certainty.' All actualized positive entropic reality builds from packets of energy or mass (i.e., latched actual patterns of value) this 'size' and greater.
It represents he2h. (2 and here, used with our Quantonics Equals may/should be memetically visualized as anihmatæ Quantonics' quantum n¤mbærs. (Per Richard Dawkins of The Selfish Gene fame, a meme is a living idea, a living concept. As such, in Quantonics, a meme is a quanton, a meme is a physial quantum amd memes aræ quantons amd also amalgama of physial quanta. In Quantonics, memes aræ physially scalable emerscents capable of emerscitecture amd emerscenture.) This paragraph revised 14Jan2003 - Doug.
All quantum measurements can be n¤ more certain than this increment and greater. All quantum measurements must assume that reality's actual comstituents may be changing at this (Planck) rate or slower and (Planck) wavelength or greater.
As students of Quantonics, we learn to think of this as our smallest actual Quantonic comtext. We can say that, when comsidered as a single, minimum comtext, its positive entropy comsistency is unityq (I.e. we can think of it in a much oversimplified manner: it always (abs¤lutely) changes at ~1043 unit spatial reference flux.). Its actual l¤cal comtextual c¤mpleteness is a quantal minimum, which we can envision, again, as equantum_2 * quantum_ * quantum_h. (I.e, as far as we know, 'e' represents reality's least c¤mplete and most comsistent quantum comtext. Quantum ChromoDynamics appears to be uncloaking even smaller comtexts!)
As reality assembles massive aggregates of Planck quanta and their emergent spawn, its number of comtexts approaches infinity. Total reality's comsistency (We use comsistency here do you see why?) decreases, but simultaneously reality's c¤mpleteness increases. See Absoluteness & Uncertainty.
(An Inanimate) Pirsigean Metaphysics of Quality Quanton. This is MoQ reality's (i.e., both DQ's and SQ's) least unit of both ethical and moral behavior. This version is a latched MoQ quantum depicted in latched SQ, while compenetrating DQ's absolute flux. In SQ actuality we show Pirsig's four levels of Static Quality: Inorganic, Biological, Social, and Intellectual. Our order of listing in our last sentence is Pirsig's order of increasing evolution. By that we mean Inorganic levels invent Biological levels which invent Social levels which invent Intellectual levels which invent... Our MoQ quanton shows that, just as DQ possesses intrinsic capability to emerse both proto and new (i.e., emerqed) SQ, all quantons at all scales of reality intrinsically possess capabilities to evolve Pirsig's four levels.
(An Animate) Planck Quanton. Here we see how our use of symbols latch our concepts (Platonic ideas) objectively. Our intent is for students of Quantonics to see or imagine our inanimate symbols as animate like this graphic. As Pirsig might offer, "Always keep Dynamic Quality with your latched, Static Quality intuemes. Try to prevent your memes from losing their Dynamic Quality (which is analogous to losing their Quality)."
This is Quantonics' version of minimum quantum uncertainty shown symbolically as (best we currently know how) durational quantum flux (one least action, least energy quantum: one of many quanta). Mathematical physicists show it 'state' ically, metrically as ih. Real quantum uncertainty is almost always larger than least quantum uncertainty and we show and classically-noodle that 'state' ically like this: Nih.
If you need more direct evidence of reality of macroscopic quantum uncertainty see Planck's total energy of a system and compare notation there to what we show here. Macroscopic quantum~uncertainty uncloaks itself eidetically ad oculos. Compare Nih and Nvh. When you compare nih and nvh macroscopic quantum~uncertainty erupts its actuality. Too, see nih as hin and then shin. Doug - 31Jan2009.
For more detail, see Planck Quantum above.
Please comsider how this symbol depicts Riemann's Hypothesis. See our recent comtrarotation as quantum square root. Also see our review of Sylvia Nasar's A Beautiful Mind on "quantum Nash," for more Riemann nexuses. Blue-dotted comtrarotation corresponds square root part of Riemann's
Also see our 7Jun2002 Möbius 3-Primæ Fermion.
A superb practical example ¤f ¤ur animate quanton semi¤tic is a pendulum. L¤¤k at ¤ur quanton's actual c¤mplement. Y¤u will see a pendulum's peri¤d flux in s¤lid ¤uter circle. Y¤u will see a pendulum's directi¤n flux in its tw¤ inner circles. In this exemplar ¤ur quanton m¤dels a pendulum as a fermi¤n with a (Feynmanesque)
Y¤u may als¤ intuit h¤w ¤ur quanton semi¤tic can/d¤es m¤del any physical scaled aggregati¤n ¤f quantum reality.
First may we recommend that you carefully read all of Bergson's Time and Free Will, Topic 35.
Here is a list of QELRs and other relevant links which are quantum~descriptive of Planck quanta phenomena:
Planck quanta are quantum reality's ubiquitous agents of absolute change. They are perpetual, unending, always changing, and always changing all.
24Apr2002 - Doug - Inserted step 5. Step 4 is an inanimate, BAAM, and normalized quantum square root, unless one imagines a quantum square root recursion on i (which is fine, indeed it is, and as we originally intended). But step 4 is normalized by an assumption that 'r' is ideally, classically '1.' We know that state-ic is comstant for all circle radii, but as an animate quantum recursion, physically, those radii are changing from h, i.e., a minimum Planck length, to infinity. Step 5 generalizes, BAWAMs, and animates step 4 by replacing our assumed Quantum square root iterator which defaults to a normalizing '1' with a physical 'r' (which has a minimum limit radius h, and maximum radius unlimited). Now we can imagine more robustly how our Quantonics square root generates all possible Riemann (isotropic) comjugate (n¤nactual, isoimaginary, and quantum isocoherent) isoflux. Key here is to distinguish a classical 'r = 1' single-valued, inanimate physical reality assumption from a quantonic/quantum rall_values from minimum Planck length to infinity animate quantum physial reality.
Please make a best effort to visualize this Riemann Quanton as animate like our animate Planck Quanton just above. Also, try to imagine our blue-dotted comtrarotating circles as animate, omnimensional, and having omnivalued radii as described above. That imagined comjugate quantum n¤nactuality is what Quantonics appellates "quantum isoflux." See our map of Millennium III Reality. Doug - 25Apr2002.
In this sequence of graphics we show our Quantonics interpretation (hermeneutic) of Riemann's Hypothesis as a depiction of fermionic quantum reality. It is a special case of Riemann's zeta function, for h = ½, and quantum_square_root of -1 where we substitute ei for -1. (Here we are assuming a classical form of s = h + iv which is often shown in typical classical complex notation as s = u + iv. We did not intend for our use of 'h' here to confuse readers with our use of 'h' elsewhere as Planck's 'constant.' Please excuse our unintended possible confusion. Students of Quantonics will view any c¤mplex n¤mbær anihmatæly more like this, where we intend our squaræ r¤¤t symb¤l as quantum vis-à-vis classical. Doug - 4Dec2002.)
Note that column three above may be interpreted as what we call quantum fermionic spin "chiralty."
Our top three rows show Riemann's special classical case of a Real ½ (i.e., fermionic) Critical Line. Rows four through six show our Quantonic depiction of that special case. In each of those rows we show both classical actuality's EOOO predicate and quantum n¤nactuality's BAWAM predicate in c¤mplementary interrelationships forming a Quantonic 's' case for a quantum Riemannian zeta(s) function. Latter case represents all quantum real (odd, half-integer spin fermi statistics) fermions! See our QELR of number. Look at bottom of that page segment.
In lines four through six, our quantum_square_root of ei represents a BAWAM (Quantum Vacuum Flux) "manifold" quantum comjugate vis-à-vis a classical_square_root of -1 is an EOOO "2D" dichotomous classical conjugate.
What this shows rather dramatically, is that we can view ±½ Riemannian reality, compenetrating Quantum Vacuum Flux, quite trivially as a Quantonics quanton!
For more Quantonic memes on The Riemann Hypothesis see these other links: Quantum Contrarotation as Square Root, Quantum Square Root as Comjugation, John Nash's Correlation of quantum reality and The Riemann Hypothesis.
Some of you may be asking, "Well what does all this have to do with prime numbers." (As The Riemann Hypothesis does...) We can only speculate; however, we do know something important about physical reality which appears relevant. N¤ two fermions in quantum reality are identical to one another. (E.g., just comsider animate phasicities of any two electrons. Ditto our Planck quantons above. Also comsider how classical reality assumes identities abound. E.g., Aristotle's A=A as a classical tautology! ) Now comsider aggregations of those. Do we see any aliases? Does reality have any real clones? Is it 'possible' to clone anything in quantum reality, or is cloning just another classical reproduction/manufacturing delusion?
Also comsider Fibonacci numbers and their predominance in natural physical reality. What do they share as somewhat analogous primes? Each prime is unique in that it has n¤ n¤nprime factors or factor aliases. Similarly, each Fibonacci number is unique in that it has n¤ sum aliases based on addends from prior terms in its sequence. Now, can you see how uniquenesses of primes and Fibonaccis appear as crucial physical/natural memes for absence of fermionic identities in decoherent quantum reality? Also can you now see why, in Quantonics, we say there are n¤ identities in physical/natural quantum reality?
Doug - 8Feb2002.
7Jun2002 - Doug - Also see our 7Jun2002 Möbius 3-Primæ Fermion.
After thought: You may find it worthwhile to ponder how our quantum integer-radius-modulated, anihmatæ, EIMA, interpretation/heuristic/hermeneutic of ei as -1 offers one of an unlimited number of metaphors of how negation is subjective. Now blend that quantum Bergsonian metaphor with Philip R. Wallace's (very slightly paraphrased), "...interpretation involves according primacy to subjectivity over objectivity," and we may more adeptly admit abetting analogies among "unlimited number of metaphors" and quantum subjective "interpretation." Proceed comfidently another quantum increment: whenever we see a 'minus' 'one,' let's substitute ei and re-think our interpretations of any local quantum comtext where any 'minus' 'one' may appear. 17Oct2002 - Doug.
Preferential Isoflux attractor. Or 'isop.' Our title for this symbol tells us that any quanton connects (i.e., comnects) to n¤nactuality via an isoflux attractor. Isoflux attractors may be as shown, i.e., preferential, tentative, and n¤npreferential.
Tentative Isoflux attractor. Or 'isot.' Our title for this symbol tells us that any quanton connects to (i.e., comnects) n¤nactuality via an isoflux attractor. Isoflux attractors may be as shown, i.e., tentative, preferential, and n¤npreferential.
Here are examples using our symbols above:
Equivalently we can show both examples like this:
Our Quantonics font symbol used throughout our Quantonics site looks like this full size:
It replaces Western culture's classical legacy, Aristotelian equals sign, '=.' It acknowledges and reminds us actual quantum systems (i.e., Static Quality) may coobsfect each other at Planck rates of ~1043 spatial (n¤t temporal) flux, i.e., cycles/changes per unit spatial reference. Reference units are arbitrary; however, classical science has 'settled' on some specific unit references which we tentatively adhere. It is important to understand that classical 'time,' as used by 'science' today, is naught but classical space and classical space 'rate.' Classicists, today, at Millennium III's beginning have n¤ coherent understanding of time. Ditto mass. Both, like 'real' numbers, are proxies of spatial extensity. Why? Classical Greek concepts invented by Parmenides, Aristotle, et al., and further manipulated by Descartes, Newton, Einstein, et al., have disabled modern humankinds' abilities to view time as Bergsonian quantum-qualitative and "durational." This is mostly what Zeno's (of Elea) paradice are about. Doug - 4Dec2002.
|Tao, Way, harmony, MoQ's DQ SQ, li-la dance, S & O unified, reality loop, fecund circle, wave, wayve, wave-c¤mplement, wayve c¤mplement, comtinuum, perpetuum of life, path of life, interpenetration, co-within-ness, commingling, non-individuated both/and, dynamic union of polar opposites, conjugate/comjugate, 2D-quanton, 2D-qwf, two h-bar least actions, two quanta, balance of forces, left brain & right brain, fermions & bosons, yin & yang, orient & occident, <0, 1, 2, 3, ..., n>, 'contraria sunt complementa,' (i.e., 'opposites are complementary,') etc.|