What is Gnosis?
(What is Wisdom? What is Sophia?)
Gnosis is wisdom.
In Autiot Gnosis, Wisdom, Undertanding are called "Beenah."
Gnostic wisdom is meaning attended by logos which in
Greek is semasiology. All semasiology is cosmic~consciously
self~other~quantum~recursive awareness, which may be taken as
ubiquity of both holographic~complementarospectionings
(coobsfecting quantum~complementings of one's gnostic inner)
(seeing one's gnostic inner). Everywhere coobsfective holographic
perspectionings. Only individuals can do this. Abram who
fathered both Ishmael (yod-sheen-mem...) (founder of Islam: in
Autiot, yod-seen-lammed-aleph-final-mem), and Isaac (yod-seen-aleph-aleph-chet)
(founder of Israel: yod-seen-raysh...) "possessed Autiot's
understanding of reality." That is what 'Abram' means semasiologically.
Doug wants to compare similarities of 'Ishmael' and 'Israel'
using Autiot ciphers. Doug isn't an initiate yet, so keep that
in mind. Compare yod-sheen-mem-ayn-aleph-lammed () vis-à-vis
yod-seen-raysh-ayn-aleph-lammed (). If we use
Autiot to semasiologically
hermeneut 'Ishmael,' we have some meme like this, "human
diffuse flow of evolution seeing a limited reality." In
Doug's Autiot hermeneutic of 'Israel,' we have "human focused
energetic emergence-struggle viewing a limited reality. Ishmael's
evolving semasiology of reality sees both forest and trees in
a limited way. Israel's interpretation of reality narrowly sees
trees. This is a kind of Autiot foreboding of what we, those
of us who care, see unfolding in our world today. In Pirsigese,
using Doug's Autiot hermeneutics, Ishmael issi
quanton(DQ,SQ) and Israel is
dichon(SQ, SQ). Israelis may
someday awaken to their need to reevaluate how they apparently-currently
thingk (without Autiot)
vis-à-vis how, perhaps, they may-might be thinkqing.
Notice that yod in Autiot may be both quanton(DQ,SQ) and dichon(SQ,
SQ). Dichon version of yod is closer to what yod means as aleph's
antinomial. Pure aleph issi quanton(DQ,DQ). Aleph in actuality
(~impure) issi quanton(DQ,SQ). Yod without aleph is ESQ.
If you want to know a good reason why Judæah seceded from
Israel in 931bce, Doug's last few sentences offer one (an) exegetic.
An important memeo emerges here which Doug has to, is obliged
to, exegetize: Suares and Quantonics HotMeme
"Without Autiot, without quantum~thinkqing,
understanding reality's bases (what ancient Egyptians meant by
Ram), is unachievable via our current dialectical thingking methods."
Suares and Quantonics HotMeme.
See Suares' Cipher of Genesis, p. 19, 'Ha Qabala,' for
more detail on Ram and Ab~ram. Abram of course is Father of both
Ishmael (Islam) and Isaac (Israel).
One interesting note here is an apparency that Arabs (and
Hindus) invented negation as dialectical (and thus dichonic).
See Simon Singh's Fermat's Enigma pp. 81-84.
Doug - 12Jul2010.
Gnosis is sophia. Gnosis
A most remarkable and recent meme is Laurence Gardner's omniscriptionings
of how Templars encoded Sophia as Baphomet.
They did it using what is called "Atbash cipher."
This cipher is well known among cryptographers and spooks who
like to keep information hermetically 'sealed.' How does it work?
Hebrew Autiot without finals has 22 consonants. Atbash cipher
simply takes first eleven letters (Aleph through Kaf) and exchanges
them in reverse order for last eleven Aut (Tav through Lammed).
In order, then Aleph is swapped for Tav (At) then Bayt is swapped
for Sheen (bash: Atbash) and so on. See Doug's "What
Gardner refers Dr. Hugh Schonfield's research which found
that Templar's Baphomet (right to left in Hebrew: Tav~Mem~Vav~Pay~Bayt)
deciphers using Atbash as Sophia (right to left in Hebrew:
Aleph~Yod~Pay~Vav~Sheen)! This is, at least for Doug, startling!
A smiling ogdoad?
A vertically mirrored five candle menorah which is spatially
Candle light whose Aura are antinomial?
A metaphor of how cosmos self~exegetizes?
Keep in mind that all Aut are additively prime similar
Fibonacci series terms. Aleph appears to break this 'rule' with
two factors 1.1000.
Considering quantum~reality is stochastic, Doug wants
Aleph to be stochastic too. Doug does not understand that intuition,
Note that Baphomet ends in Mem~Tav: death.
Note that Aleph~Tav~Aleph~Tav...
is cosmos' perpetual living~dying (being~unbeing, apoptosing~resurrecting)
Krebs cycle twixt quantum~isoflux~flux.
Doug - 5Apr2013.
Many authors, like David Wood in his Genisis claims
that Baphomet is "the worst devil of all." Paraphrased.
Clearly, Schonfield's research belies Wood's deep ignorance.
Essenes were good at ciphers like Atbash. Read Gardner's impressive
prose on pages 97-101, 'The Baphomet Cipher,' The Magdalene
Legacy, Barnes and Noble, 2005.
Why did they do this? Read Gardner.
Bottom line: we now have another term for gnostic wisdom -
Gardner references Schonfield's The Essene Odyssey,
Element Books, Shaftesbury, 1984. See Gardner's The Magdalene
Legacy, Chapter 6, notes 36-37.
Until Doug read Gardner's text, he was wholly unaware of this.
Simply, this is awesome. It shows how Roman coprolytes were made
fools by living Essene brilliance! Bravo!
If you are still a 'ç h r i s t i a n' after
reading this, you need a brain transplant. Gardner brings that
point home, less savagely, in his The Magdalene Legacy.
Doug - 18Sep2010.
||Gnosis is individual.
Gnosis is quasi~unlimited individual potential:
Gnostically our view of potentia
from what we describe,
in that link, in a quantum~sense.
It is subtle but [Elaine] Pagels compared two queries using
to offer an exemplar for us:
- What shall we do? (Pagels infers Essene Jesus did
n¤t ask this.)
- What shall you do? (Essene Jesus asked this.)
We is society. You is an individual.
Gnosis says that we
types have little gn¤stic potential. Why? Individuals
are living, quantum~coinsiding
Societies, classical ones, are n¤t. Why? Classical societies
wors[e]hip dead, and decoherently dialectical 'state.'
Gn¤sis narrates how you types can have enormous,
almost boundless, gn¤stic potential. Why? You
types can see their inner! They understand
how, as Essene Jesus proclaimed, G¤d
issi ihn them and they are ihn G¤d.
They bettership G¤d's abs¤lutæly animate,
Added by Doug - 12Nov2009. Taken from Doug's 1Aug2008 update
to Quantonics' QELR
is Essene Jesuit love. Doug
claims it useful here to compare Jung's Amor
Triumphat, Love Triumphant, Triumphant
Love which is Libido. Doug claims that Libido corresponds
quantal~scintillation in quantum~reality. This n¤væl
mæans of viewingq quantum~reality issi~assa quantum~hologra[[il][m][ph]]icity.
Source of Libido in Aut's Qabala is Aleph. Too, comsider holoviewicityq. Doug
||Gnosis views dialectic as Error. Essene Jesus taught that dialectic
Gnosis views any monism
Begin Aside 8Apr2013:
Let's compare gnosis to Christianity and Islam.
- Christianity is a monism. Their God (El, Eli, Elle, etc.)
is the God. All others are "infidels."
Monism! Emphasis on "One 'christian' Society Fits All."
- Islam is a monism. Their Allah is the Allah. All others
are "infidels." An other monism. Emphasis on
"One 'islamic' Society Fits All."
Gnosis isn't a monistic OSFA
'religion.' It is a faith system, based upon cosmic consciousness,
which claims all of us are individuals. Those who attempt to
'organize' us into monistic, common-social-dead-classical sense
religions represent evil itself, d'evil. Gnosis is quantum, Qabalic.
Ha Qabala means in Autiot, "Aleph~Hay, Yod~Hay."
That is, Aleph is life, life is in Yod. Hay
means "life existence." By comparison, classical religions
(monisms) worseship dead things: material reality. Gnosis
is about life and living quantum~holographic~energy. Classical
religion is about materialism and belief in hylic-dead-stoppable-analytic
objects: 'golden idols.' Gnostics reject all idol
worseship. They have faith in a perpetual~ubiquitous quantum~fluxing
living Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay reality. Classical monistic religions
believe in idols:
Yod without Hay!
In Gnosis, terms respectful~other and ~others are implicit.
Gnostics recognize that all individuals may have omniffering
views of reality including whether 'god' exists 'or' (and) n¤t,
whether individuals have rights to their individual beliefs,
and deny monistic classical societies any rights to constrain
or attempt orthodox-dogmatic-canonic control of
what individuals believe, think, write, say and do. To any gnostic
others have rights too as long as they do not infringe individual
rights. Doug calls this "quantum~ego."
Those socialc control-fanatics (e.g., Keynesian
'elites') are source and attempted purchase of "One World
Order," "Our Way OR the Highway,"
"Theory of Everything," and "Grand Universal (catholic)
Other is a perpetual and evolving heterogeneity of all sentients,
not a classical-monism.
Gnosis is ubiquitous evolving ensemble perpetuity of radically
omniffering individuals learning to get along together. No one
can define it. We can make attempts to describe it. It
isn't socialç monismc!
Doug - 8Apr2013.
End Aside 8Apr2013.
||Gnosis is evolution. All redemption
is a process of evolution toward self~gnosis.
||Gnosis views self as sovereign self
and no individual, in general, is sovereign any group of gnostic
Gnosis on God and Individual:
- God is in Individual and Individual is in God. See The Last
Supper's Farewell Discourse, especially John~Mary, Chapter 14
11, 17, and 20.
- God is n¤t separate from Individual.
- God is n¤t identical Individual.
- God is n¤t identical any group of Individuals.
- Essene Jesus asked, "What will you do?"
Jesus did n¤t ask "What will we do?"
Gnosis on Law:
- "Principle rules something not itself."
- Social rule of law is deceit.
Gnosis on Society:
- Society depends upon 'laws' so that it can "run on automatic."
- Society values rule-based action
without individual thought.
- Society wants individuals to inhere and inure social dogma.
- Society values war as means to enforce social principles
upon individuals and other societies.
- Society whose bases of thought rest in dialectic are
sociopathic. This is gnostic essence of 'decline and fall of
Roman Empire, ' fall of Third Reich, etc. Say "goodbye"
to classical dialectical politics, folks.
Gnosis on Christ:
- A 'christ' is a social manager.
- Social management of individuals is an abomination against
God and God's creation.
Jesus referred those who called him "the christ,"
Satan. Peter is our best exemplar.
How many kinds of gnosis are there?
- Many, including Chaldæan, Peratæan, Mandæan,
Manichæan, Valentinian, Essene, Naassene, Ophitic, Cathar,
Merovingian, Judaic, Mithraic, etc.
- Doug is in a process of building a quantum~version based
upon better aspects of all those.
How many pretenders of gnosis are there, and how may we recognize
- They refer 'Jesus' as 'Christ.'
- They adhere dialectic.
- They adhere social 'order.'
- They adhere notions of 'Rule of Law.' (True gnostic individuals
have no 'sovereign,' except Essene Jesus.)
- Freemasons are a good example here. They call Jesus 'Christ.'
They practice dialectic routinely. They socialize on a huge scale
routinely. Read their Secret
Instruction of the Ninth Degree. There is some really good
stuff in there, e.g., Tobias Churton's reference to 'Fable of
Samson' re: Aleister Crowley. Crowley too called Jesus 'Christ'
and used dialectic enough to make us question his depth of gnosis.
Another interesting observation here is that freemasons worked
with stone and stone is hermaphroditic. From any gnostic perspective,
stone is hermaphroditic~feminine (see descr. below) and represents
G¤d as Mother, n¤t living~Father and unambigously
n¤t 'dead-father.' Either-or of male-female is dialectical
and thus gnostically bogus.
descr. - Classes of hermaphroditism: looks female, looks male,
looks neutral, looks some stochastic combination of neuter~female,
looks some stochastic combination of neuter~male, etc. Much of
this is referred "aneuploidy," and dialectically viewed
as 'abnormal,' from any classical dialectical conspective.
What are gnosis' bases
- A key (core) base of gnostic reasoning is understanding what
we mean by, "Gnosis is Wisdom, is Sophia,
Gematria is gnostic, and (Read and reread fifth paragraph
down recapitulatively. "Cosmic wife" ciphers marriage
of Jesus and Magdalene. "Casting out all resistances to
indetermination" vavs Doug's "embrace (quantum~)uncertainty."
- HG describes how gnosis shows us we can only move to top
of gnosis' topos,
- Casting out all resistances to (quantum~)uncertainty.
- Gnosis' core basis of reason
then becomes, embrace uncertainty!
Many women have this gift of gnostic reason (through Sophia and
Magdalene). Most men do not, thus suffer 'the thorn' [Paul-Saul's
thorn] of dialectic's ills, its Error,
- Gnosis embraces quantum~uncertainty
as Essene~tial Wisdom.
- If you read that Hebraic Gematria link
fifth paragraph down, you will read that Magdalene can be symbolically
represented as 'a prostitute.' Why? Magdalene, Sophia, Femininity
represent what Gnosis intends by Wisdom.
From p. 213 of 231 total pages of Carlo Suares' Cipher of
Genesis second and third full paragraphs:
"One of the most important Gnostic archetypes is Mary Magdalene.
Of its many names we will mention Myriam M'Gadola. The
root Mareh (Mem~Raysh~Aleph~Hay) in Hebrew means image,
appearance, vision, mirror (whence derives the English word:
mirror). Iam is always a reference, to the sea or to a
still water acting as a mirror. G'Dola means big.
"The Mary Magdalene out of whom Jesus had cast seven devils
(Mark xvi, 9) is the female element transfigured by this 'casting
out' of no. 7. This archetype is visionary in a real sense; it
is, in its symbolical form, the woman exorcized by her cosmic
spouse and sanctified by the expulsion of the seven resistances
to the sacred no. 7 of indetermination. She is the necessary
witness, the only possible witness to the resurrection of Aleph.
She is the eternal prostitute, eternally redeemed and regenerated:
the human psyche. Mary Magdalene is symbolically and alas
only symbolically the final act of a drama that the mind
dreams for fear of losing itself in its completion."
How can her cosmic spouse "cast out no. 7" and then
refer "the sacred no. 7?" This is one of most prescient
queries one may ask about that text, in Doug's opine. Why? It
clearly exhibits Gnosis' quantum~complementarity
as quanton(sacred7,devil7). Quanton(indetermination_of_change_as_living,certainty_of_state_as_death).
What does Autiot's cipher of Genesis teach us about this? Allow
Doug, again, to answer in Quantonics' script: quanton(Aleph,Yod).
Recall that Yod is Aleph's antinomial. But quantumly,
'antinomial' has its own complements: quanton(antinomialq,antinomialc).
Autsimilarly "devil no. 7c" is "sacred
no. 7'sq" antinomial. Quanton(Jekyll,Hyde).
That should help you a lot, noodling Suares' esoterica.
When we script quanton(Aleph,Yod),
as we may see below, Yod may be classical and Yod
may be quantum. Classical Yod is Yod without Aleph.
(SQc without DQ issi ESQ) Quantum Yod is Aleph
with Yod. (SQq is SQ with DQ) It may be apparent
to you now that Gnosis, Autiot, Qabala
are quantum memeos of cosmic energy~flux (f~lux).
In Doug's view we may observe Yodc as our 'devil'
here on Earth. Yod
is what "...the mind dreams for fear of losing itself in
its (Yodishc) completion (without Aleph)."
Nearly all earth humanity take sides with Yodc
and deny Aleph. That's a huge affector of fear:
fear of literal extinction: mortality's eschaton.
Why? Few side with Aleph!
Recall Pirsig's "...we must always keep DQ with our SQ."
Pirsigean autiot would read, "...we must always keep Aleph
with our Yod." A terrific hook for your memeory palace.
Doug has come to adhere a m¤dal of th~¤ught which follows a Suares~Genesis topos:
1 - Aleph
2 - Aleph with Yod
3 - Yod without Aleph
"Doug, why do you call it a topos?"
It corresponds an ancient Greek topos:
1 - pneuma
2 - psyche
3 - hyle
Grasping those correlations assists us in ciphering Suares' esoterica
above regarding Magdalene. Now we have another hologra[[il][m][ph]]ic
(set of) viewpoint(s) of his use of psyche.
Fathom Suares use of 'completion.' It begs finality, end,
stoppability. Those terms are all from dead minds of Yod
without Aleph. Those of us who side with Yod, thus,
you may noodle, claim our own mortality our own "completion."
When we believe socially in YahWeh (dead father) our minds are
Mawt-Hamawt (Yod's eschaton dead). When we individually
believe in YhShWh (Aleph''s perpetual life) our
minds are alive! In his farewell discourse Jesus was saying,
"Each of you Aleph~individually, n¤t Yod-socially,
side with Aleph and do n¤t be afraid." Notice
that Peter sided with Yod! Note that all dialecticians
(implicitly) side with Yod!
correspondences to topos:
1 - elect
2 - called
3 - lost, extinct, always afraid (a deadly paraphrase,
Those who side with Aleph and have faith in Aleph's
perpetuity of unending change never reach their "completion."
Suares and Doug offer an exegesis of Autiot's cosmic energy description
of Magdalene's role and semasiology. Doug - 14-15Feb2013.
In gnostic topos: pneuma, psyche,
and hyle, psyche is 'intellect' AKA Beth Wisdom.
But wisdom can be mistaken, and gnostic reason explains how.
To make it simple, let's have our quantum~stage hologramings
hermeneut Wisdom phasementally
- Hegemonic state-ic monism's psyche as Error
AKA dialectic. Doug refers this "intellectual rape."
- Voluntary monism-dualism's psyche as Error
AKA dialectic. Doug refers this "voluntary intellectual
prostitution," selling one's mind to dialectical "thought
cops," usually culture and society. Often religion and science
both of which are major CeodE proponents of dialectic
as a way to prostitute one's psyche-intellect.
- Gnostic dynamic pluralism's emergent self~redemptive quantum~pneuma
as Wisdom. Gnosis and its quantum~metaphors are about individualism
first thence individual freedom earned via due diligent individual-by-individual
hermeneuted practice of gnosis and its respect for Wisdom, Free~Will,
and all Individuals and their rights. See Doug's quantum~ego. See Doug's CeodE 2013 Tools
of Wisdom. Doug - 14Feb2013.
(See Doug's CeodE 2013 Tools of Stupidity)
catholics including progenitors Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and Constantine
(editors of current New Testament's antecedent) couldn't understand
Hebraic Gematria of Magdalene. Why? They were all psychic-hylics,
dialectical bottom feeder-dwellers. They turned Magdalene, Jesus'
Gnostic (cosmic) wife, into a prostitute and applied full metal
denigration. They even tried and failed to hunt her down and
kill her! Any memes that didn't fit Roman monism they called
"heresy." Of course heresy means choice. Roman
monism doesn't allow any choice, only strict Borg like assimilation
and adherence to their monism. Roman catholicism:
Hylic, anti-gnostic, intellectual-dialectical garbage.
Roman catholics worship, even today, what Essene Jesus implied
as "dead father." Of course "dead father"
in Quantonicsese is ESQ
borne of dialectic thing-king. To Essene Jesus, 'the Christ'
represented in Hebrew aba met
(Aleph-Bayt-Aleph (father) Mem-Tav (dead)) said "dead
father." That is why Jesus called Peter "Satan"
when Peter told Jesus, "you are the Christ."
Jesus sets things straight, gnostically,
in many texts and gospels, by intentionally referring his
and our gnostic Father as, Hebrew
aba payl (Aleph-Bayt-Aleph (father) Pay-Ayn-Yod-Lammed
(living 'as active')), "the Living Father."
Former omniscription of 'Living Father' appears to be one for
'living (active) earthly Father.' Autiot offers us another phrase
for "The Living G¤d," as in Jesus' "I am
in G¤d and G¤d is in me," Omniffers "Living
Father." In that case we say phonemically, "Eleh She
Ba Kayeem." Spelled out left to right it is Aleph~Lammed~Hay
(Living). Re cognize "Eleh" as "El," "Eli,"
and "Elle." Update by Doug - 20Sep2012. See John~Mary's
Discourse. To put all of this in a larger con(m)text, Doug
Gnosis' depiction of our Hermaphroditic
Godhead as: Mother(son,mother)Living_Father. Doug
oversimplifies Iht as
1(2,3)4, AKA G¤d ihn all
and all ihn G¤d which
is a Quantonics quantum~reality's Life
Motif. All numerics
- Much more advanced than Gematria, is Qabala's autiot.
Doug is amazed that, somehow, Quantonics is an almost perfect
quantum~anal¤g of gematriac~hermeneutics of autiot! It
evolved that way, and on Doug's part it was clearly unintentional,
but it happened and Doug is happy about that. Autiot's immediate
and profound simile with quantonics is Ghimel(Aleph,Bayt) which
jibes quantonics' quanton(DQ,SQ) and 1(2,3), which when mapped
linearly appears as Aleph(Bayt,Ghimel) which in autiot should
be Ghimel(Aleph,Bayt). It may appear obvious, after some individual
due diligence, that Hebrew autiot is
gn¤sis' genuine basis for reason (judgment).
What is beautiful here is that quantonics script offers an alternative
way to express autiot in a quantum~empiritheoretical
- In a con(m)textings of quantonics, easiest way to answer
- Reality is evolutionary, thus
of dynamic stuff whose middles include one another (waves).
- Holographic Light uses individual gnostic wells
of energy to h¤listically
fathom nature and G¤d.
- Holographic flux of all spectra interrelate to make and unmake
- Gnosis is subjective, feminine; it admits Quality is above
- Gnosis views objective masculine thought as bogus, faulty,
pseudo, ersatz, facile, etc.
- Gnosis is complementary.
- Gnosis is inclusionary, open, both~and, etc.
(You will read how Catholics
murdered countless Cathars and part of Church's flock too
as a result of gnosis' inclusion of good~neighboring catholics.)
- Gnosis is, Quantonically, quantum~intellect.
(Doug - 13Oct2009.)
Gnosis on Grail:
- Grail as hermaphroditic
Godhead and Jesus and Mary's Merovingian bloodline.
- There is a whole book to write here...See Baigent, Leigh,
and Lincoln's Holy Blood, Holy Grail. See Dan Brown's
fabulously popular Angels and Demons, and Da Vinci
- I cannot over emphasize importance of all students of Quantonics
thorough reading of Lawrence Gardner's 2005 The Magdalene
Legacy, Barnes & Noble Books. Doug - 11Jan2011.