Arches

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

A Primer on Quantons
—
           


 Isocoherent1

Coherent2

Quantum Reality

Quantons as SONs of Fuzzons of De- & E-merging Quatro-Coherent Interrelationships Among Quantons

Decoherent3

See our 2D fuzzon symbols and fuzzon QLO. Doug - 4Jun2006.

Mixcoherent4

—
We use MT-Extra, rtf, Symbol, and Wingdings fonts throughout.
MAC users will have some difficulties with these. Add appropriate fonts to your User font Libraries.

—
What are quantons and how do we use them in Quantonics?


Quantons are co-metaphors:
both actuality as quantum c¤mplementings of n¤nactuality,
and n¤nactuality as quantum c¤mplementings of actuality, i.e.,

quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality),
n¤nactualityactuality,
etc.

A metaphor is: meta- (changæ-) phor (carrier).

Quantons are quantum changæ carriers/bearers in quantum reality.

Quantons are Dawkinsian (quantum included-middle both 'mind' and 'body') memes.
See Richard Dawkins' book, The Selfish Gene.
Memes are viral/metaphoric/emergent-demergent/changæ-bearing ideas/concepts.
Usually, ideas and concepts are classically perceived as static/immutable/stopped,
and thus incapable of emergent quantum anihmacy and changæ.

Pirsig might say, "Platonic formal ideas and concepts are Exclusive Static Quality.
I.e., stopped thoughts which have lost their Quality. SQ without DQ."

In Quantonics we can show Platonic ideas and concepts, e.g., as dichons(SQ, SQ).
I.e., Static Quality absent any Dynamic Quality.
Analogously, quantum actuality absent any (of its quantum c¤mplementary) quantum n¤nactuality.
(Which is what classicists do to quantum reality when they "zero h-bar" to make reality classical!)

In Quantonics all memes are quantons(DQ,SQ), amd quantons(n¤nactuality,actuality).
Quantonic memes are quantum recursive which we can show thus:
actualityquantons(n¤nactuality,actuality) (i.e., actuality's self-/other-reference while co-here-ing n¤nactuality), amd
memesquantons(n¤nactuality,memes) (i.e., memes' self-/other-reference while co-here-ing n¤nactuality).

We can show any quantons that way too.
These quantonics scripts illustrate quantum reality's intrinsic sophism.
Quantum reality is intrinsically EIMA fractal and recursive.
"But, but, but..., what does that mean for me, as a reader, as a potential student of Quantonics?"
It means that you, as a quanton, in quantum reality, cannot act
without qualitatively affecting both yourself and others.
Similarly, it means that others cannot act in quantum reality without qualitatively
affecting both themselves and you to both greater and lesser extents.

Indeed, quantum realityquantons(n¤nactual_changæ,actual_changæ)

Quantum actuality always carries its n¤nactual c¤mplement
(potential interrelationships to all other reality)
whether a quanton semiotic shows it or n¤t:

quanton(actuality,actuality) (n¤nactuality is intrinsically cowithin actuality even though we do n¤t show it)

quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) (here, we explicitly show actuality's n¤nactual quantum c¤mplement,
which we may also say as, we explicitly show n¤nactuality's actual quantum c¤mplement.)

To be able to see this students of Quantonics and MoQites look at reality like this:

Not as SOMites and CRites (i.e., classicists) view reality similar to this:

SOMites and CRites only see that circle in actuality. Their blinders
(depicted as a brick wall; a classical hypostatic of their anti-memetic, anti-metaphoric, CTM beliefs)
prevent them from 'seeing' quantum n¤nactuality as actuality's quantum c¤mplement.

We offer both above graphics combined with additional comments here.

Every quantum 'thing' in (Quantonics' version of quantum) reality is a metaphor, a quanton, a meme,
therefore we use quantons (as metaphors, and as memes) to describe quantum reality.

But are quantons just metaphors?

Nope! And we can coin some ~n¤vel terms to show you. Quantons are also:

Heterophors - multiplicity/omniplicity everywhere-association carriers,
Interaphors - quantum c¤mplementary interrelationship carriers,
Pragmaphors - action/flux carriers,
Etc.

...
Classical philosophy and science assume reality composes
different classes of inanimate, excluded-middle stuff 1, and humans must unify reality.
Outcome? Classicists implore pursuit of GUTs 2 and ToEs 3.
...
Quantonics phil¤s¤phy amd science assume reality is
¤ne class ¤f included-middle, anihmatæ b¤th stuff amd n¤n-stuff 4, amd reality is intrinsically unified.
Outc¤me? A New Way ¤f Thinking f¤r Millennium III.

1 I.e., dichons. 2 I.e., Grand Unifying Theories. 3 I.e., Theories of Everything. 4 I.e., quantons.

...
Innate unificati¤n n¤t required!
Reality is intrinsic unificati¤n!
...
Bottom line: N¤n-unified dichons represent SOM/classical reality. Unified quantons represent MoQ/Quantonic reality.
...
In a 1999 email t¤ a Quantonics visitor, Doug used some Pirsigean comcepts t¤
illustrate why quantons are s¤ very imp¤rtant:
"Zeno,
Pirsig tells us that if we drive a motorcycle intellectually rather than intuitively we will crash.
If so, we might infer SOM/classical science is headed for a major accident.
We can add that if we drive a motorcycle as though there is no static reality, we will crash too.
We need quanton(Dynamic_Quality,Static_Quality) to avoid crashes!
"
...
Quantonics Uncertainty Principle ¤n Truth - quanton(comsistencyvcompleteness):
"It is imp¤ssible t¤ think ab¤ut truth with¤ut perturbing it." Doug.

Doug Renselle, October 27, 1999

Primer:

Quantons
Attractors
Threads
Quantonic Reality

Reference:

Acronyms
Coined Quantonic Terms
A Quanton's Quantum Emergence
A Quanton's Ontology
Symbols
A Quantonics Remediated English Language for Millennium III
Quantonics English Language Problematics for Millennium III

Quantons:

  1. Quantons are a Quantonic means ¤f ev¤lute m¤deling (metaphoring) ¤f dynamic Value interrelati¤nships.
    (By "ev¤lute m¤deling," we intend a semantic which educes use ¤f     QTMs am¤ng practiti¤ners ¤f
    Quantonics. Th¤ugh, f¤r c¤nvenience, we craft amd assemble 'static' semi¤tics amd f¤nts,
    ¤n ¤ur     quantum stages we anihmatæ them. With practice, we c¤mmence tapping ¤ur reserve energies
    t¤ perceive reality as dynamically ev¤lute. We begin t¤ see reality as dynamic, included-middle
    quant¤ns ¤f quant¤ns, like ¤ur flux¤r graphic bel¤w.)
  2. Quantons pr¤vide general n¤tati¤n, i.e., reality itself may be expressed (b¤th largest amd smallest scales).
  3. Quantons innately pr¤vide self-similar n¤tati¤n, i.e., quant¤ns similarly represent all scales ¤f reality
  4. Quantons are fluxors: they are dynamic Valuati¤ns ¤f c¤mplementary pairs ¤f fluxing attract¤rs:

  5. Multiple quantons may sh¤w unlimited Value interrelati¤nships.
  6. Quantons may be shown thus:
    1. quanton(DQ,SQ)
    2. quanton(SQ,SQ)
    3. As Bergson's I-Cubed,

      quanton(

      		)
      Belying SOM's detending deign of feign.
    4. DQ SQ
    5. SQ SQ, and in m¤re c¤mplex, extensible emerqants (~f¤rms) like this:

      SQ
      SQ SQ DQ DQ
      DQ SQ DQ SQ SQ DQ DQ DQ
      DQ SQ SQ SQ SQ SQ
      SQ


      If you have been keeping up with Doug's studies on Pribram, Sherrington, and Quantonic versions of neurons, you may have qua to make some prescient nexi of your own here, re that diagram and its symbols:
      1. Each SQ may be thought of as an energy well which emerqs holographic interrelationshipings with other energy wells,
      2. Each DQ is a quantum reminder that DQ is ubiquitous and compenetrates all SQ~quantum~actuality,
      3. Each '' may be thought of as representing omnirectional holographic nexi in our 2D hologram,
      4. All symbols are quantum, and thus quantum~comtextually sensitive and omnique (Qese for 'unique') to all (there is an issue with quantum~fractal antennæ wavelengths here, re Doug's usage of all...) quantum~wavings in any quantum~environment,
      5. All symbols are dynamic BAWAM REIMAR coobsfecting (omni~obsfecting) holographic interrelationshipings,
      6. Energy wellings are like fuzzonic attractorings, any pair of which, becomings quantons, and they may 'nest' omnivalently in any omnimensional hologram,
      7. Energy~wellings, we infer, heurist, and hermeneut quantumly, emerq layers~levelings of quantum~wave hololanguage~holocommunicationings which pretty much adhere our quantum~bandwidth~perspicacities~and~perspicuities. Here is a slimmed~down version of that much larger page version:


      8. All comstituents sorso adapt relentlessly as quantum~evolving both novel and ensemble peaQLOs in said holographic omni~environment,
      9. etc.

        Doug - 5Dec2008.
    6. Tao symb¤ls may be used t¤ symb¤lize quantons.
    7. Mobius strips are excellent quanton symb¤ls (surface amd edge unificati¤n).
    8. Fuzzons are powerful quantonic~quantum means of doing genuine quantum modaling; see point, line, circle, fermionta, latter shows a fuzzonic SON emersing a fermion.
    9. Quantons may appear in alm¤st unlimited n¤tat¤ns amd symb¤l¤gies.
  7. Quantons are usually sh¤wn as c¤mplementary pairs ¤f attract¤rs.

Return to Index

Attract¤rs:

  1. Attract¤rs represent b¤th MoQ's Dynamic Quality amd MoQ's Static Quality.
  2. Attract¤rs may be pure DQ or mixed SQ:
    1. DQ attractors:
      1. DQ attract¤rs may bec¤me SQ.
      2. DQ attract¤rs may changæ SQ attract¤rs.
    2. SQ attract¤rs:
      1. SQ attract¤rs may unbec¤me DQ.
      2. SQ attract¤rs c¤mmingle, interpenetrate, c¤here, amd are c¤within DQ (i.e., they are mixed).
      3. SQ attract¤rs are seld¤m exclusive (i.e., seld¤m permanently latched, with¤ut DQ mixing).
      4. SQ attract¤rs may be temp¤rarily latched.
      5. SQ attract¤rs may changæ.
      6. SQ attract¤rs changæ at Quality Events, QEs.
      7. SQ attract¤rs may changæ in QE threads.

Return to Index

Threads (A potentially better way to visualize our Quantonics' quantum "threads" is as many-to-many affine Greek actin, i.e., EIMA spreading NN axon "rays." Our current description below, unfortunately, carries some of Doug's latent ~1999 SOM baggage. Our intended 'threads' are quantum omnimensional, not classically two dimensional. We were at Hap & Amy's Stone Hill Inn in Stowe, Vermont when we wrote this. Doug - 13Dec2002):

  1. Threads may affect changæ within l¤cal Quantonic/quantum systems.
  2. Threads may affect changæ acr¤ss multiple Quantonic/quantum systems.
  3. Threads may tunnel. (via DQ/VES)
  4. Threads may bifurcate.
  5. Threads may oscillate. (E.g., neutrino planet~tunneling.)
  6. Quality Eventings, QEs, may initiate threads.
  7. Threads pr¤pagate QEs. (in b¤th DQ amd SQ)
  8. Threads in DQ are is¤n¤npreferential (see Stein's quantum rand¤m walk)
  9. For an quantum ontological thread example of a fermion's emergence see our 2004 fermionta.
  10. Threads are quantum processings of fuzzonic emergence.

Return to Index

Assumpti¤ns ab¤ut Quantonic reality:

Quantonic reality:

  1. reality quanton(DQ,SQ), i.e. reality is ¤ne en¤rm¤us DQ/SQ quanton. We can sh¤w it like this, t¤¤:
    reality      quanton(is¤flux,mass-energy).
  2. DQ quanton(DQ,DQ), i.e., pure DQ, its c¤mp¤siti¤n is pure flux.
  3. SQ quanton(DQ,SQ), mixed DQ amd SQ, i.e., DQ commingles all SQ.
  4. reality's m¤st primal Value (SQ) comstituents may be represented sub- thr¤ugh mes¤-at¤mically. Primal examples.
  5. reality's bi¤l¤gical Value (SQ) may be represented via Quantonic n¤tati¤n. Bi¤l¤gical examples.
  6. reality's intellectual amd s¤cial Value (SQ) may be represented via Quantonic n¤tati¤n t¤¤. S¤cial amd intellectual examples.

Return to Index

Quanton primal reality examples:
  • quarkquanton(DQ,SQ); (up, charmed, top, down, strange, bottom):
    • quark2•upquanton(quarkup,quarkup),
    • quark2•downquanton(quarkdown,quarkdown),

      Note: We are showing our quark quantons as quanton(SQ,SQ)
      where our comma-n¤space acts like a gluon and thus indicates
      intrinsic compenetration of DQ/      isoflux. Our graphic at right shows
      Quantonic n¤nactual-actual       comjugation, where our quanton(SQ,SQ) shows actual-actual conjugation. Consider that William Hamilton, between his birth (1805) and death (1865), developed his theory of quaternions. Physicists today use quaternions to show and manipulate classical concepts of actual-actual conjugation. See our own Quantonics quantum remediation of Hamilton's classical quaternions. You will also find it fascinating that Hamilton was a child prodigy much similar to William James Sidis.

      Quantum n¤nactuality is always present even though both conjugates of a quanton are actual. We show two 2D graphical quantons as
      up quarks (hinting that quarks, too, have 'finer structure') in this script:
    • quark2•upquanton(,);
      quarkup_blue, quarkup_red, and

    • quark2•downquanton(

      		 , );
            
            
      quarkdown_red, quarkdown_green,
  • b¤s¤nquanton(DQ,SQ),
  • fermi¤nquanton(DQ,SQ),
  • ph¤t¤nquanton(DQ,SQ),
  • electr¤nquanton(DQ,SQ),
  • nucle¤nquanton(DQ,SQ) amd mes¤at¤mically:
    • protonquanton(quark2•up,quarkdown)
    • neutronquanton(quark2•down,quarkup)

      Note: nucleon colors are always neutral. Each nucleon must have
      three quarks one each of color Red, Green, and Blue.
  • at¤mquanton(DQ,SQ) amd then superat¤mically,
  • m¤leculequanton(DQ,SQ), etc.

Aside:

Dear reader, we can see essence here in distinguishing aspects ¤f MoQ and SOM:

  • MoQ - Quantonic Think-king Modes, QTMs, and
  • SOM - Classical Thing-king Methods, CTMs.

For example, SOM sees quark, boson, etc., only as labels (significates) for a quanton's right, SQ part. SOM claims only dichons exist. SOM denies quantons exist, because SOM denies any quanton's left, DQ part. SOM denies DQ's reality. SOM says DQ does not 'exist.'

MoQ sees quark, b¤s¤n, etc., as a b¤th/and c¤mmingling/interpenetrati¤n ¤f b¤th DQ amd SQ. Using QTMs we can readily ¤bserve their en¤rm¤us advantages ¤ver SOM's CTMs.

SOM uses objective CTMs to reason: Classical Thing-king Methods.

MoQ uses h¤listic, inclusive QTMs t¤ reas¤n: Quantonic Think-king M¤des.

Als¤ see m¤re rig¤r¤us, in depth c¤mparis¤ns ¤f MoQ, CR & SOM.

Doug

End aside.

Return

Quanton bi¤l¤gical reality examples:

Return

Quanton s¤cial amd intellectual reality examples: (Students of Quantonics should view each of these as quantum, plural, animate, c¤mplementary, included-middle quantons. Grammatically, e.g., using plural anihmatæ present participle qualogos, we should say "truthings.")

Return

Arches

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730
USA
1-317-THOUGHT

©Quantonics, Inc., 1999-2022 — Rev. 31Dec2012  PDR — Created 7Oct1999  PDR
(17Nov99 Rev. Added a quanton reality analog using isoflux and mass-energy. )
(26Nov99 Rev. Modified intro comments at page top.)
(2Dec99 Rev. Add Zeno quanton justification note.)
(3Dec99 Rev. Add item to quanton list on self-similarity of quantons.)
(6Jan2000 Rev. Add isononpreferential to threads. Need SQ-DQ thread distinction here. Expand later.)
(16Jan2000 Rev. Add quanton(isoflux,latched_flux) graphic, and CTMs vis-à-vis QTMs comment, to primal reality examples.)
(19Jan2000 Rev. Added link to new Table of Quanton Complements and Their Interrelationships.)
(10Apr2000 rev - Moved Quantonics Uncertainty Principle on Truth here from top page.)
(30May2000 rev - Add Tao symbol link.)
(27Aug2000 rev - Add Quantonics Uncertainty Principle link to 'Absoluteness as Quantum Uncertainty.')
(25Dec2000 rev - Add our animated Planck quanton as another example. Add Bergson's I-Cubed as a quanton.)
(25Dec2000 rev - Revise and extend our description of quantons as modeling Value.)
(30May2001 rev - Add 'references' link to Quantonics' English Language Remediation for Millennium III.)
(16Jul2001 rev - Perform Quantonics English Language Remediation of this web page.)
(17Aug2001 rev - Change 'Classical Thinking Modes' to 'Classical Thinking Methods.')
(6Dec2001 rev - Add top of page frame-breaker. Add a quantum reality top of page description.)
(16Dec2001 rev - Alter top of page texts slightly for clarification/typos. Belatedly add Problematics reference.)
(16Dec2001 rev - Add two new reference links: quantum quanton emergence, and quanton ontology.)
(8May2002 rev - Change 'Networks' to 'SONs' and link SONs to our acronyms in our top of page Quantum Reality script.)
(8May2002 rev - Add extra/ultimate level of recursion to our top of page Quantum Reality script.)
(8May2002 rev - Add link to our How to Tap Into Reserve Energy.)
(23Jul2002 rev - Change QELR links to A-Z pages.)
(22Aug2002 rev - Add some QCD scripts to our primal reality examples: extend 'quark,' and show nucleons as 'quarks.')
(22Aug2002 rev - Add note to social and intellectual reality examples.)
(13Dec2002 rev - Add top of page "quanton as metaphor" text. Link some words to recent remediations.)
(27Dec2002 rev - Add coined terms at page top.)
(4Feb2003 rev - Add a clarifying GIF of our Quantonic Script of Quantum Reality at page top.)
(12Feb2003 rev - Add quaternion comments under quarks.)
(31May - 1Jun2003 rev - Reset most red text. Add new red text starting "Analogously, " and add new 'how we see reality graphics.')
(20Dec2003 rev - Revise some ugly embedded h-bar GIFs with MT Extra fonts.)
(25Apr2004 rev - Add "zero h-bar" comment with link to Dirac's Hamiltonian quote.)
(2-3Oct2004 rev - Add red text and links to update for fuzzons.)
(4Jun2006 rev - Add fuzzon level of recursion to our top of page Quantum Reality script. Add GIFs in place of HTML wingdings arrows. Minor page reformatting.)
(31Oct2006 rev - Correct a grammatical error. Reset legacy pink cell markups.)
(10Apr1008 rev - Reformat slightly.)
(5Dec2008 rev - Change some fonts to gifs. Reformat. Reset legacy markups. Add commentary and links under 'extensible emerqants.')
(31Dec2012 rev - Add 'representing omnirectional holographic nexi' link to 'A Reservoir of Wave Functions' graphic in A Quantum Cuneiform Primer.)