|
|
(~SOM) |
INTERRELATING QUALITIES EXIST AS FUNDAMENTAL REALITY (MoQ~Quantum) |
(CR) |
(SOM, ~CR) |
(~SOM) |
(See Morton White.) |
|
|||||||
Realism:
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Dualism |
|
|
Idealism:
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
LAWS ARE REALITY |
IDEAS ARE REALITY |
IS REALITY |
C¤MPLEMENTARY VALUE IS REALITY (Value is Ensehmble Probability) ("Probability is Everything!"1) |
IS REALITY |
DICHOTOMY IS REALITY |
IS REALITY |
REALITY IS IRRATIONAL |
Hylicism |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|||||
CAUSE IS REALITY |
ENSEhMBLE VALUE AFFECT IS REALITY |
ANTHROPOCENTRIC VIEWS IS REALITY |
|
|
|||
|
Gnostically this is what Diablo, "ESQ" Quantumly, all substance |
Quantum~Gn¤sticism |
(Consensus, "Tragedy of Commons Sense," Demos Will, "Herd Mentality," "Hive-Droning," Social Somnambulation, Agreement, Concord) |
|
|
||
OBSERVATION ASSESSING TRUTH IS REALITY |
SELF-AWARENESS ASSESSING VALUE IS REALITY Ponder omniplex veritas and Thence that as what we mean by quantum~holographic |
IS REALITY |
|
PREEXISTENCE AND SUBSEQUENT ESSENCE IS REALITY |
|||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
Unilogism |
|
|||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
(~SOM) |
INTERRELATING QUALITIES EXIST AS FUNDAMENTAL REALITY (MoQ~Quantum) |
(CR) |
(SOM, ~CR) |
(~SOM) |
(See Morton White.) |
Note 1 - John Forbes Nash, recall-quoted in Sylvia Nasar's A Beautiful Mind, p. 243, from Nasar's 23Mar1996 interview with Jerome Neuwirth. Note 2 - Max Jammer, in his The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, asks us to check out these folk: Ibn-Rushd, Duns Scotus, and Siger of Brabant. |
Reader, please note how our green column begs Pirsig's MoQ as an extrapolation of James' evolute empiricism. In our green column title we use Pirsigean, Bergsonian, Jamesian 'Qualities/Value.' Also, in our green column, our use of 'self-awareness' is our own quantum extrapolation of their philosophies and metaphysiques.
Importantly, we deny Pirsig's MoQ as an ISM! Why? It subsumes all classical ISMs as exclusive Static Patterns of Value (Aristotelian excluded-middle objective interactions.). MoQ is n¤n-exclusive, it is rather, quantum inclusive with admission of included-middle Value interrelationships.
![]() DQ v SQ |
||
We see Value instances as quantons(DQ,SQ) |
MoQ's SPoVs are: Intellectual, Social, | |
Blue is Pirsig's DQ, and dark green/black is Pirsig's
SQ |
Biological, and Inorganic. |
|
You may find it both interesting and worth your while to compare
our use of Quantonic semiotics here on Pirsig's DQ and SQ to
our dual of it applied to Bergson's I-cubed: Intellect,
Intuition, and Instinct. Thank you for reading, Doug. (8Apr2000) |