Arches           Art

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

Doug's graphic to assist students of Quantonics better understand
(use command-minus [MAC] and control minus [PC] to fit all text on single lines):

Quantum Adept Descriptors


Classical Inept Comparables

borne of quantum PNFings' stochasticings' Affectiveness (see affectation)

Effectiveness based upon classical cause

Anihmacy (Pendulum unstoppability, Zeno unstoppability, perpetual motion)

Inanimacy (stop, zero momentum)


Mandate for unilateral observation (in lisr)
C¤mplementarity Complementarity/opposition; see in(ex)cluded-middle below
Emergence (quantum-plural awareness/choice) Predicable Determinacy (reality is insensate; "choice is heresy")
Entanglement Axioms of Independence


Network Everywhere~Associativeness (EIMA) Everywhere-Independent-Dissociation (EEMD)
Immergence (also see emerscenture) Immutability (& analytically reducible remanufacturable monism)
Included~Middle (examples) Excluded-middle; Aristotle, Newton, Einstein, Bohr, et al.
Interrelationship Ensehmbles 'Interacting' 'many-body' puzzles
OEDC (also see spin and ontology emergences) Unitemporal 'interactive' 'many-body' motile rearrangement
Physial Quantum Coherings of Quantum Individualings  Anthropocentric Objective Society of Objective Individuals
Qubital Process Interrelationships  Static and Independent Scalar Magnitudes


Addition, multiplication, and other mathematical naïveties
Uncertainty (quantum umcærtainty ensehmblings) Uncertainty (classical dichotomous 'opposites;' see dichon, provisionality of ideal state) Doug - 13Feb2006.
(See Hume's Law: "There is no bridge twixt Value and fact.") Value (See Value.) Truth



Under Value in that table, Quantonic adepts should realize that our Quantonics Description of Reality issi:

SQ issi quanton(DQ,SQ).

When one thinkqs of DQ as quantum~Value and SQ as evolving~quantum~factings,
one re cognizes immediately that Quantonics' descriptionings of reality
implicitly bridge fact and Value.

Quantons bridge fact and Value:

SQ issi quanton(DQ_as_Value,SQ_as_factings).

Even today, 'science' still claims "There is 'no' bridge over fact and value."
Indeed, Pirsig claims that 'science' denies value, outright.

Quantum~reality bridges fact and Value as our quanton shows, and does so routinely.

See Doug's more recent Take Sides with DQ comparison to lesser Take Sides with SQ.

Doug - 30Jan2008, 8Feb2015.


Graphical Weaknesses:

Our graphic is two dimensional. Quantum reality is at least omnimensional and usually described as a ~Hilbert space.

Our graphic is inanimate. Quantum reality is anihmate, indeed it is absolute quantum flux. We ask our students to imagine our graphic anihmated similar to some animations in our Quantonic Symbols, and elsewhere in our Quantonics site.

Graphical Weaknesses continued...

Our graphic shows an emphasis on symmetry.

Quantum reality is, in general, spatially asymmetric.

Consider too that quantum~reality is, in general, evolutionarily atemporal which has manifest implications for asymmetry. Doug - 8Aug2012.

It is asymmetric in countless other ways too, like chiralty, spin (wobble), FPNs, RH's ½ critical line Möbius reversals, etc. To be more exoteric, our graphic shows ellipses of interrelationship compenetration among quanton1 and its tentative preferential quantum c¤mplements. If we estrude (vis-à-vis extrude) those ellipses to circles, we would see a denser picture absent any senses of quantum l¤cality vis-à-vis quantum n¤nl¤cality. In general, some c¤mplements might be absolutely l¤cal, even potentially quantum c¤herent (totally superposed as one c¤herent quantum quanton) with quanton1 while others might appear at arbitrary l¤cal and n¤nl¤cal 'distances' from quanton1. So if we drew our graphic more generally, it would n¤t appear as symmetric and tidy (unreal), rather all our ellipses would appear as omniffering sizes and spatial vertex separations.

Our graphic is classically spatial. As such we cann¤t show real ensehmble quantum interrelationships. This appears to be a fundamental limitation of quantum actuality.

An analogue of this problematic is a qubit or an ensehmble of qubits. We appear fundamentally limited in our abilities to see all (approaching an unlimited number) of any qubit's (or any ensehmble of qubits') quantum c¤mplements. See our HotMeme™ "What is unsaid is far more important than what is said."™ HotMeme

Qubihts can diræctly sææ their ahctual amd n¤nahctual c¤mplæmænts, but wæ cann¤t (wæ aræ much less capablæ ¤f sænsing quantum n¤nahctualihty than qubihts).


  • all qubits are quantons,
    • quantons at meso and subatomic 'levels' are
      • meso - less qubital: less aware of their animate EIMA interrelationships with n¤nactuality
        • molecules and more comprehensive quantonic modals are less qubital
        • neurons are less qubital, but qubital enough to be capable of straddling(n¤nactuality,actuality) well as evidenced by recent experiments at University of Florida using 25,000 rat brain neurons to successfully comtrol an F-22 flight simulator
        • etc.
      • micro, nano and on down to Planck quantons - more qubital: more aware of their animate EIMA interrelationships with n¤nactuality
        • atoms are more qubital than molecules
        • nucleons are more qubital than atoms
        • quarks are more qubital than nucleons (due their QCD ontological primitiveness and extremely tentative persistencies; quarks are much higher isoenergy than nucleons and electrons; nucleons and electrons are much higher energy (actualized) than quarks)
        • electrons are more qubital than nucleons
        • photons are n¤t good examples of qubits, as far as we are k~n¤w~ing, since they are bosonic; qubits, at this stage of our k~n¤w~ings, need to be fermionic (i.e., decoherent) in order to exhibit themselves as stindyanic quantons(n¤nactuality,wobbling_actuality); bosons do n¤t 'wobble.'
        • etc.

  • n¤t all quantons are qubits, (bosons, e.g., and aggregate fermionic quantons attenuate their isoflux 'sensitivities' as they grow-aggregate; by 'attenuate' we intend 'move away' from DQ-nonactuality and toward SQ-actuality)
    • e.g., humans as macroscopic quantons are
      • macro~consciously aware of (nearly all humans; ideal SOMites 'deny' any notions of n¤nactuality)
        • more actuality
        • less n¤nactuality
      • macro~subconsciously aware of (e.g., narcoleptics, and those who have learned to tap into reserve energy)
        • less actuality
        • more n¤nactuality.
  • similar subemerscitectures describe (QLO modalings) qubital quantons in fuzzonic 'detail,' since fuzzons permit us a quantum complementary description of quantum reality's quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) animate, EIMA included~middle.

    At this level of quantum description, using inanimate 'words,' memeos appear to garner excessive complexity, but it is only a manifestation of actuality (as static) attempting to describe n¤nactuality as isoflux dynamic. From a quantum n¤nactuality perspective flux is simple. From a classical actuality conspective flux is inordinately complex. From a Quantonic straddle(n¤nactuality,actuality) perspective, both isoflux and flux EIMAing each other is more simple than a classical view, but n¤t as trivial as isobeings view it.

    Quantum straddling demands extensive and assiduous study of quantum comjugation memeos.

Given our above clarification, students should be aware that macroscopic fermionic modalings can and do quantum~cohere macroscopically! Our abilities to think, imagine, dream, create all depend upon macroscopic 'above ambient' (!!! - huge quantum tell here) quantum coherence of our quantum stages' neurons. See our review of Mae-wan Ho's Rainbow and the Worm.

This issi what ahll¤ws uhs t¤ d¤ quantum computati¤n basæd uhpon ræhlihty wihth¤ut k-n¤w-ing ahll ab¤ut ræhlihty. Ihn a væry largæ way, this issi a quantum~mihraclæ! Why cann¤t wæ sææ qubihts c¤mplæmænts? They have ¤mnihffering pærcæptual bamdwihdths fr¤m ¤urs. Sææ ¤ur Quantum Sensory Bandwidth Perspicuities and Perspicacities page.

Another massively affine fuzzonic point we should make here is, "This is an astonishingly fabulous way to think about William James Sidis' short paper on consciousness vis-à-vis subconsciousness." (As a ruse against his father, and classically pretentious (via their naïve realism and naïve localism) academics, employers and media pundits) His paper says they are isomorphic. Can you see now why they are, from a Quantonics' quantum~perspective, n¤nisomorphic? Our quantum actual_complement sensory bandwidth is a tiny 'part' of our quantum n¤nactual_c¤mplementings aggregate sensory bandwidths. See you as a quanton below. Follow links there.

Graphical Weaknesses continued...

So here, in this nice little depiction of a quantonic montage of quantum reality we come upon a most basic 'fact' of quantum reality: actuality cann¤t wholly 'describe' quantum reality. Actuality cann¤t be completely describings both itself and its quantum c¤mplementings which we call "quantum n¤nactuality."

An analogous Pirsigean metaphor might appear as SQ cannot wholly describe DQ. Static Quality cann¤t be completely describings both itself and its quantum complementings which we call "Dynamic Quality."

How can we say that? First, 'describe' offers us some philosophical challenges. Usually those of us who are Occidental culture tend to view descriptions as classically axiomatic. N¤ such entities exist in quantum reality since quantum reality issi abs¤lute flux. N¤ 'description' can hold indefinitely. It can hold tentatively, but n¤t for an arbitrarily long 'time.'

Now if by descrihpti¤n we intend "quantum pr¤cess," then we can say that "we can partially descrihbe quantum reality," and indeed that issi what we say in Quantonics.

Graphical Intent:

Our graphic shows quanton1 described by its anihmatæ ensehmble quantum interrelationships among itself and quantons2-13. Numbering of quantons is for our graphical purposes arbitrary. In quantum reality, depending upon how we choose to appellate quantons specifically, we find that every quanton, and thus its appellation, is quantum-n¤mbær-unique and anihmatæ/changing. (Now we glimmer how important quantum computers and qubits are: they are capable of tracking anihmatæ quantons in quantum reality. For direct evidence and experience of this quantum 'fact,' do an internet search on <rat brain flies F-22>. Read about that quantum breakthrough at University of Florida and how they did it.)

Our graphic shows ellipses of compenetration among quanton1 and its tentative quantum c¤mplements.

Our graphic shows both quantum n¤nactuality and quantum actuality compenetrating one another.

Dark-dark-green dashed lines illustrate each quanton's and our entire ensehmble's compenetration of both quantum n¤nactuality and quantum actuality. Just as quanton1 shows its describing anihmatæ ensehmble quantum interrelationships, we could superpose similar anihmatæ ensehmbles on quantons2-5 and quantons11-13 to show their own other describing anihmatæ ensehmble quantum interrelationships. Were we to do this, our graphic would be almost impossible to view. Also, be aware that fluxors6-10 may isoflux-compenetrate up to and potentially all quantum reality.

Heterogeneous Tihmings
and Sensory Bandwidths

Our graphic shows a subportion of our MoQ II Reality Loop to remind students of Quantonics how absolute (up to) Planck rate parallel and asynchronous fluxes are animating and mediating change among our 13 quantons.

Any classicist might l¤¤k at ¤ur graphic and presume that all th¤se quantons aræ sharing OGC, but ¤ur quantum intent is that they d¤ n¤t. Æach has its ¤wn l¤cal quantum comtext. T¤¤, æach has its ¤wn sens¤ry bandwidth.

A better way t¤ describe what we mean by that last sentence is t¤ comsider:

  • a ph¤t¤n
  • an at¤m
  • a bi¤l¤gical cell
  • an am¤eba
  • a chimpanzee
  • a planet
  • a star system
  • etc.

A ph¤t¤n's sens¤ry bandwidth 'center frequency' is en¤rm¤usly higher in nature's spectrum than a chimp's. A ph¤t¤n can 'see' and 'feel' electr¤ns amd at¤ms amd ¤ther subat¤mic, at¤mic, amd mes¤at¤mic spectra, where a chimp cann¤t. A planet can 'see' amd 'feel' ¤ther stellar stuff like planets amd aster¤ids, but essentially cann¤t 'see' amd 'feel' chimps amd ants, etc.

Similarly, a ph¤t¤n's perspective ¤f heter¤gene¤us tihmings is en¤rm¤usly ¤mnifferent fr¤m a human's amd a planet's, amd etc. A ph¤t¤n still cann¤t detect a Planck cl¤ck's tick, t¤ck, tick,..., but it pr¤bably can 'detect,' 'see' amd 'feel' flux several ¤rders ¤f magnitude ab¤ve amd bel¤w its 'center frequency.' Pr¤bably an Earth cl¤ck, t¤¤, is meaningless t¤ a ph¤t¤n, appearing pærpætually 'still.'

S¤ we ask y¤u, student ¤f Quantonics, t¤ imagine æach ¤f ¤ur n¤mbæred quant¤ns ab¤ve as having ¤mniffering temp¤ralities amd bandwidth sensitivities.

More to come...

You as a Quanton:

Imagine yourself as quanton1. Imagine you as anihmatæ and moving through some comtext, e.g., a restaurant, a theatre, your bedroom, etc. Imagine your ellipses as some of them wax while others wane; n¤vel quantons and fluxors dynamically OEDC (verb) tentative and preferential interrelationships with you as you move and observe your surroundings.

Now, opportunity for quantum epiphany! Imagine you as realized by and realizing all those interrelationships. Realize that without that immense number and vast array of anihmatæ Gestalt interrelationships you and they would n¤t "be." (However, you always "isobe.") This is what we mean when we say you are being in It and It is being in you. You are describing It and It is describing you. You and It are being quantum Gestalt! See our Stairways of Evidence for Quantum Stages' Affects co-with-in Perceptual Changes.

Those anihmatæ quantum Gestalts fundamentally describe what our 'use' of quanton means semantically.

Now you may perceive how quantum reality is n¤t propertyesque objective, independent, and state-ic, rather codescribing, coobsfecting Gestalt interrelationship quantonic and anihmatæ.

For more quantum youesque descriptions and stimulating questions, see our recent, 2004, Ensemble Attractors under our QELR of probability.


TBD. See our August, 2001 QQA. See affectation.


TBD. See Bergson's CE Prereview Comments, "...two great classical illusions..."


TBD. See obsfect.
C¤mplementarity: TBD. See c¤mplement. See two types of c¤mplement. See omnifference.
Emergence: TBD. See spin emergence. See ontology emergence. See more recent Fuzzons to Fermion Emergence Ontology. Doug - 30Jan2008.
Entanglement: TBD. See included~middle_1, included~middle_2, etc.
Fuzzon: See point, line, circle, fuzzon.
Network Everywhere-Associativeness: TBD. See SON. See Quantum Egg. See Quantum Connection. See Bergson's TaFW Topic 17, right column comments. See EIMA, REIMAR, etc.
Immergence: TBD. Also 'classical absolute, final death,' demergence, devolution, unbecoming, isobecoming, etc. See OEDC.
Included-Middle: TBD. See Aristotle.
Interrelationship Ensehmbles: TBD. See Quanton Primer. See Ensemble Attractors. See QLO. See general. See Quantum Ensemble Free Will. See Bergson's Time and Free Will Conclusion on 'multiplicity.'
Physial: TBD. Quantum 'Societyings' emerqs animately EIMA network naturally without state-ic, 'group' ESQ rules and 'laws.' Any biological is a good example of what we intend here. See law. See our October, 2003 Feuilleton Chautauqua inaugural installment.
Qubital: TBD. Photons, (bosonic photons are n¤t qubital in any sense of fermionic omnitoring (moni replaced by omni in 'monitoring') behaviors, however, they are essential in any qubital process since they participate in all QED energy transformations (some would say, e.g., Richard P. Feynman, this is essence of quantum~actuality); what we mean when we say "photons are n¤t good examples of qubits" is that they probably would n¤t be usable as 'bits' in a quantum n-qubit 'register'), electrons and protons are good qubital exemplars, due their 'spatially' arbitrary spin 1/2 fermionic 'actualizing,' wobbling QLOs.


TBD. See Quantum Coherence. See superpose. See Awesome Dirac Note.
Uncertainty: TBD. See Ensehmble Quantum Uncertainty. See uncertainty. See duration.


See What is Wrong with Probability as Value.

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2002-2028 Rev. 8Feb2015  PDR Created: 28Jul2002  PDR
(29Jul2002 rev - Correct some typos. Add some red text updates.)
(31Jul2002 rev - Add etc. line to vis-à-vis table.)
(4Aug2002 rev - Add anchor to our Quantum Adept Vis-à-vis Classical Inept Table)
(4Aug2002 rev - Add '(verb)' to and change 'descriptions' to 'animate quantum Gestalts' in 'You as a quanton.')
(17Aug2002 rev - Update page top graphic to show Everywhere Association via Self-Organizing Networks.)
(19Sep2002 rev - Add Heterogeneous Timings/Bandwidths section to our Issues/Discussion table.)
(26Sep2002 rev - Remediate all quantum comtextual occurrences of 'ensemble,' and 'animate.' Add some links.)
(2Nov2002 rev - Add link to QSBP&Perspicacities under Timings/Bandwidths.)
(12Jan2003 rev - Add discussion on "...why actuality cannot wholly describe reality.")
(8Feb2003 rev - Convert some Wingdings fonts to GIFs for browser compatibility.)
(27Feb2003 rev - Update page top graphic for h-bar/2.)
(23Sep2004 rev - Reset legacy red text and dates. Add links to 'animacy' and 'inanimacy.')
(23Sep2004 rev - Add Physial, Qubital, and Value rows to Adept vav Inept table.)
(13Oct2004 rev - Reset red text boxes.)
(20Oct2004 rev - Add 'Quantum You' anchor.)
(11-24Dec2004 rev - Add examples link under Adept Included-Middle Descriptors. Change 'omni[di]mensional' to 'omnimensional.' Add 'quantum coherence' link and red text.)
(28Dec2004 rev - Expand prior change.)
(12Jan2005 rev - Change 'is[]flux' to 'isoflux.')
(11Dec2005 rev - Add 'qubit' anchor. Reset red text. Add How SOMites Measure Reality link under 'qubit' description.)
(13Feb2006 rev - Update table of Quantum Adepts vav Classical Inepts. Minor page reformatting.)
(23-4,30Jun2006 rev - Major edits to page bottom table. Massive respell. Add 'Summary Table' anchor. Minor typo.)
(18Jul2006 rev - Add "Flux is Simple" anchor under 'qubit' description.)
(10Nov2006 rev - Add quantum~unsaid HotMeme™ link under qubit discussion.)
(14Dec2006 rev - Update Quantum Adept Descriptions 'Affectiveness.')
(21May2007 rev - Update page top adept vav inept comparables table for Hume's Law.)
(30Jan2008 rev - Reformat slightly. Add an ontology description near page bottom under 'Emergence.' Add markup under top table.)
(6Mar2011 rev - Add 'neuron' link at "neurons are less qubital..." Make page current. Reset legacy markups. Adjust colors.)
(8Aug2012 rev - Add 'atemporal' caveat under 'graphical weaknesses' regarding quantum~symmetry and quantum~asymmetry.)
(8Feb2015 rev - Add 'affectation' link in top of vis-à-vis table.)

Arches           Art