If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!


A-Z Index to Coined Quantonic Terms




Alphabetical Reference Index Quantonics Coined Terms Pages
©Quantonics, Inc., 2005-2029





Index to Coined Quantonic 'O' Terms
Most recent additions-revisions marked with a pink cell background.
Omniad Omnicide
Omnifferent Omnifficult Omnify
Omnistinguish Omnistribute Omnitor Omnivalence


<Ahbs-fekt'> - A coined contraction of both observe and affect. Quantons may præfæræntiahlly amd n¤npræfæræntiahlly b¤th observe~c¤¤bserve amd affæct~c¤affæct ¤næ an¤thær via their pr¤æmial awaræness~co~awaræness.

Aggrægatæ quantons aræ ihntrinsihcahlly~naturahlly sælf~awaræ. (Thinkq ab¤ut iht... . N¤w d¤ y¤u sææ where y¤ur sælf~awaræness arihses? D¤ug. 3Sep2000q)

Newton's version of gravity as quantum~superluminal co attraction of masses is perhaps our best classical example of what we intend by coobsfection.

Fg = G(m1m2/s2)


  • Fg is force of gravity,
  • G is a gravitational constant,
  • m1m2 is a coobsfective quantum~interrelationship shown by Newton as a classical 'product,' and
  • s2 is a classical mathematical 'square' of our coobsfective interrelationshipings' distance separating m1 and m2.

As interpreted in Quantonics, both masses observe and affect each other. Acceleration of closure of their separation is a symptom of gravity. Recall that Einstein declared gravity to be a symptom of those masses' accelerations. Can you see how Einstein's version demands absolute acceleration-borne relative geometric interval motion and that self-contradicts his own classical first objective relativistic principle of analytic stability, which he called "invariant geometrical interval?" Latter was Einstein's only means of retaining classical objectivity as a first-principle basis of his theories of relativity.

Doug aside 11Feb2007:

Adepts realize that Newton's 'law' as a dyad is classically naïve. No pair of 'objects' may be ideally gravitationally isolated from a massively populated universe's other gravitational bodies.

Actually, both bodies in a pair are also attracted to an unlimited array of other bodies. All of those are in ephemerally varying polycycloidal 'orbital' travel through said 'universe.'

Quantumly, then, our pair has unlimited superluminal and ephemeral interrelationships with all gravitational 'objects' in said universe. Pragmatically, as Dirac said, "Direction is irrelevant."


End aside.

If you are adept you may see how Einstein's hatred of wave-particle BAWAM quantum~(w)holism he insisted had to be EOOO(wave, particle) is incredibly similar his EOOO(gravity_as_a_symptom_of_acceleration, invariant_geometrical_interval). See if you can script the quantonic metanalogues of Einstein's dichonic EOOOs. Particle wave is trivial! Gravity and invariance are a tad tougher. Huge clue: show both as quanton(subjective,only_apparently_objective). Massive (no pun) learning available here. Doug - 24Jan2007.

Etymol¤gihcahlly, wæ ihntændings "¤værahll quantum ihnterrelati¤nship ihnfluænce," dæsiring præfæræntial (e.g., ¤mnihffrahctihvæ) amd n¤npræfæræntial "quantum~c¤mmingling valuæ ihnfluænce," amd "p¤tæntiahlly~p¤tæntialihty through ihnfluænce." A c¤ihned syn¤nym might bæ 'quaffæct.'

I.e., quantum ræhlihty issi pred¤minatæly "qualihtatihvæly affæctihve," n¤t as classicists insist that objective reality is only "quantitatively effective."

Quantum "qualihtatihvæly affæctihve" multihværses (~Hilbert spacæs; æssæntiahlly sælf~¤hrganihzing ass¤ciatihve nætw¤rks AKA SONs) exhibiht b¤th l¤cal amd n¤nl¤cal sælf~awaræness~co~awaræness frææ wihll wh¤se comcomitants ihncludæ:

A classical "quantitatively effective" universe (Euclidean | Cartesian space) exhibits local 1-1 correspondent absence of free will whose concomitants include:

  • inanimate state-icity
  • homogeneity of context and classically absolute, passive | active-voice truth
  • objective certainty (Or, as Einstein said, "God does not roll dice.")
  • analytic determinism (objective property; binary state; cause | effect; "what happens next;" etc.)
  • dichonic, lisr, excluded | middle, unilaterally observable, commutable interactions
  • etc.

Dæar studænts ¤f Quantonics,

Plæase comsihdær cultural ashpæcts ¤f th¤se tw¤ w¤rld vihews.

A quantum w¤rld vihew ¤ffers a (John Forbes) Nash equilibrium win~win ¤f b¤th c¤¤pærati¤n amd n¤nc¤¤pærati¤n~dæfænse wihth multihværsal ræspæct f¤r ihndihvihdual cultural ¤mnihværsihty. We suggest quanton(Peace,quanton(Haganah,havlagah)) as more respectful, restrained (i.e., havlagah), quanton(cooperative,while_capable_of_self_defense) (i.e., Haganah), and peaceful.

A classical world view offers a hegemonist, status quo, one-size-fits-all, lose-lose oppositive mutual denial: "our way or the highway," Neandertalibanic-Ruby Ridge-Waco disrespect for acultural mores (i.e., "you are outside our culture").

D¤ y¤u sææ h¤w ihmp¤hrtant quantonics amd QTMs hlly aræ f¤r Millænnium III?



A coined mutation of 'dyad | dyadic.' Where dyads are monocontextual and bivalent, ¤mniads aræ ¤mnihcomtextual amd ¤mnihvalænt. Quantonic ihnterrelati¤nships as dæpihcted, f¤r eample by v, aræ ihn gænæral, ¤mniadihc. As dichons are dyadic, quantons aræ ¤mniadihc. Where classical systems are usually described dyadically, quantum systæms muhst bæ ¤mniscrihbæd ¤mniadihcahlly.

For a 2004-2010 evolution of omniad into a graphically more apparent omniad see our fuzzon.



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'decision.'

Classical 'decision' is dialectical. It uses bivalence and binary alternative denial (BAD) to make apodictic either-or exclusive decisions.

Quantum~omnicision issi quantum~holographic. Any energy~welling (EWing) ihn a quantum~hologram has many affine nexi with its neighbors both l¤cal and n¤nl¤cal. It is easy to say this as each EWing in a quantum~hologram has several, many, beau coup ephemeral evolving affine nexi upon which said EWing performs quantum~assessmentings we refer as omnicisions.

Adeptsq may surmise, classical-bivalent-decisioning is ineptc compared to quantum~omnicisioning.

Doug - 23Feb2015.


A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'different | difference.'

Classical 'bivalent' difference is unilogical and thus univalent. Classical difference assumes reality is objective, stable, and objects are EEMD independent of one another. (See our prereview notes of Bergson's Creative Evolution.) Classical differences may be state-ic and single valued.

Quantum ¤mnihfferænce issi prægmal¤gihcal amd thuhs (qubihtahlly) prægma~¤mnihvalænt. Quantum ¤mnihfferænce assumæs ræhlihty issi quantonic, anihmatæ~æmærgænt, amd quantons' aræ EIMA. Quantum ¤mnihfferænces aræ ahlways anihmatæ amd nævær sihnglæ valuæd. Sææ mihnus.

Quantum ¤mnihfferænce arihses anihmatæly amd heterogæne¤uhsly fr¤m b¤th ensehmble quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty (EQC) amd ænsehmble quantum umcærtainty (EQU) ¤f quantum ræhlihty.

Wæ can appr¤ihmatæ ænsehmble quantum umcærtainty using classical mathematics like this: ænsehmble  umcærtain, i.e., u1 ( c¤mplæmænt1q· c¤mplæmæntsnq), where ¤ur plurahl uhsæ ¤f "c¤mplæmænts" ræpræsænts hætær¤gæneihty ¤f ¤thær quantum c¤mplæmæntsnq which have ensehmble affective quantum umcærtainty interrelationships wihth c¤mplæmænt1q, ihncluding c¤mplæmænt1q's umcærtainty ihnterrelati¤nships wihth ihtsælf. (Text borrowed from our Topic 25, page 120 comments of Bergson's Time and Free Will.)

Quantum ¤mnihfferænce als¤ arihses fr¤m ¤ur Quantonics' ihncluhsihve værsi¤n ¤f comjugatæ ænsehmble quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty lihkæ this:

Quantonics_c¤mplæmæntarihty quantons(c¤mplæmænt1q,c¤mplæmæntsnq),

where ¤ur plurahl uhsæ ¤f "c¤mplæmænts" ræpræsænts hætær¤gæneihty ¤f ¤thær quantum c¤mplæmæntsnq which have ænsehmble affæctihve quantum ihnterrelati¤nships wihth c¤mplæmænt1q, ihncluding c¤mplæmænt1q's ihnterrelati¤nships wihth ihtsælf. Plurahl ¤f quantons ihn ¤ur scrihpt ab¤ve ihmpliæs a ræcursihve frahctal ænsehmble quantum "swææp" ¤f ahll comjugal ihnterrelati¤nships f¤r æværy ænsehmblings' ¤mniht¤rmænt which affæcts a changæ ihn any quantum ænsehmble's animate process ontology. (Text borrowed from page bottom of our August, 2001 QQA on cause and effect.)

This sh¤uld bæ obvi¤uhs t¤ studænts ¤f Quantonics: ¤mnihfferænce ihmpliæs quantum negati¤n (amd ahll ¤thær quantum stage dankenments ihnv¤lving quantons) issi subqjæctih~qualihtatihvæ. Why? Any ¤mnihfferænce is:

  • plurahl (n¤n~ classically polydyadic),
  • prægmatihc~anihmatæ (n¤n~ classically st¤ppæd | stable-inanimate),
  • ihncludæd~mihddle (n¤n~ classically excluded | middle),
  • quantum~phase~canceling (partial, dynamic, EIMA tentative 'quantum~interference' of two positive quantum~waves; canceled wave energies are at least double their 'apparent classical transverse cancelation' and may be restored (restoration isn't quantum~reversible, in general, due quantum~spins (zero, 1/2, 1, 2, etc.), entropa, and cohera of waveform ensembles involved...) in some appropriate manner; this comment desnouers nature's desire to 'hide,' from any quantum~actuality perspective...essentially, quantum~energy never 'goes away,' rather it is there even when it appears to have been canceled...adepts please observe that quantum~isoflux is energy 'hiding' in quantum~n¤nactuality... Doug - 23Jul2008),
  • etc.

See difference.



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'difficult | difficulty.'

Classical difficultis unilogical and thus univalent. Classical difficultassumes reality is objective, stable, and objects are excluded | middle independent of one another. Classical difficulties may be state-ic and single valued.

Quantum ¤mnihffihculty issi prægmal¤gihcal amd thuhs (qubihtahlly) prægma~¤mnihvalænt. Quantum ¤mnihffihculty assumæs ræhlihty issi quantonic, anihmatæ~æmærgænt, amd quantum, pr¤babilihty~¤mnistrihbuted~æværywhere~ass¤ciatihve quantons' mihddles aræ ihncludæd. Quantum ¤mnihffihculties aræ ahlways anihmatæ amd nævær sihnglæ valuæd.

Wæ sh¤uld uhsæ classihcahlly n¤ngrammatihcal plurahl præsænt~partihciple værsi¤n(ing)s ¤f this c¤ihned quantonic tærm whænævær wæ k~now wæ aræ ihn quantum QELR comtexts, e.g., ¤mnihffihcultings.



A coined quantonic replacement for unify and unification.

Classical unification is EEMD quantitative, dialectical, formal, mechanical, analytic, a kind of objective reproduction and assembly of formal objects. Classical 'unification' creates monisms. However, quantum~gnosis shows us that "monism is deceit."

Quantum omnification is EIMA qualitative, rhetorical, quantonic, holographic, animate, a more real emerscenture of quantum phasicityings. Quantum reality doesn't classically 'unify.' Quantum semantics and memeos which carry a sense of 'oneness' are coherence, superposition, middle~inclusion, wavings, holographicity, probability as Value, interference, everywhere~association, entanglement, and so on. Many quantum~semantics of omnification are called "absurd" by hylic-psychics in classical reality. Doug - 25Nov2009.



 A coined quantonic replacement for bifurcate and bifurcation. Consider in economic theory, political theory, biological theory, etc., "nonsynonymous 'di'vergence," both classically continuous and quantumly quantized.

In classical bifurcation a single branch turns into two 'di'fferent branches.

In quantum~omnifurcation a single, quantized branch may omnifurcate into an ensemble of omniffering branches. We may refer this, "n¤nsynonymous omnivergence."

Quantum~omnifurcation is a crucial meme in Doug's examination and exegesis of a Quantonics remediation of both Keynes' and Minsky's economic theories of financial (Minsky), and investment (Keynes) cycles.

Doug is worried that both Keynes and Minsky may view their theories as classically J. C. Maxwellian '2nd law of thermodynamics' closed continuous y=f(t) repetitive monotemporal circular cyclicity. Quantonics' approach uses n¤nconservative open and quantized polytemporal quantum~autsimilar cyclicity:



In Doug's economic, investment, political, etc., each of those quantized enthymemetic cycles can, will, and shall omnifurcate. As we have directly observed in financial markets recently nature offers abundant avenues for omnifurcative "geometrical avalanchings." More of that to come, you betcha!

HotMeme"Quantum~reality, financially and otherwise, offers n¤ 'zero sum' games."HotMeme

Doug - 22May2010.



A coined quantonic replacement for unique and uniqueness.

Classical uniqueness is objective, unprecedented one-of-a-kind, holds still, immutable, anti-evolution identity. We use 'identity' here in a classical sense of complete absence of any shared similarity with any other objective entity.

Quantum omniquenessings are quantum~holographic energy~wellings omnique ihn their and via their animate quanton(coherent,autonomous) coobsfective Value interrelationshipings. Plural present participlings are key here to ensemble omniquenessings.



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'distinguish' and its various classical forms.

Classical di-stinguish implies a dialectical and thus dichotomous (dichonic) conparison of ideal (lisr) classical objects in OGC.

Quantum ¤mnistinguish bægs (¤mnistinguishings bæg) n¤vel emerqant pr¤cessings' hærmænæutihcs ¤f anihmatæ EIMA amd c¤¤bsfecting quantum ensehmbles ihn massihvely parallæl amd c¤mplex quantonic ihnterrelati¤nships. See A Network Ensemble of Wave Functions.

Also see I2APTSO2.

Aside - 24,27Nov2012 - Doug:

Nuances of this quantum~coined semantic are subtle and evocative. Doug wants to spend more time here in further exegeses of 'distinguish,' vis-à-vis 'omnistinguish.'

'Distinguish' is a classical dialectism.

Etymology of 'distinguish' is di stinguish: 'di' means 'apart,' and 'stinguish' means to prick: distinguish...'to prick apart.' In formal systems theory this is what we intend by formal decomposition (dialectical ana lysis: cutting up with SOM's Knife AKA Pink Floyd's The Wall...) of objects and objective problem spaces. It is a child, perhaps a parent, of Ockhammism AKA classical reduction as an objective means of 'simplification.'

Doug's quantonic script for classical 'distinguish' is dichon(A, B) which allows a third party (hegemon controller, dialectical 'teacher') to formally 'prick apart' said problem...said problem space. Notice that each of A and B are singular, static, implicitly per se.

A third party is required to assess distinguishment of A and B, since as objects they are canonically, dogmatically, axiomatically: stable, independent, and capable of 'other contradiction' by observation by said hegemon. Objects are dogmatically dumb: fun dumb mental. Ditto dichons and hegemons who use dichons to do their dialectical thing-king.

'Omnistinguish' is a quantum~coined~remediation of its classical predecessor.

In Doug's coining of omnistinguish he retained 'stinguish' to keep a recognitive partiality in said coined word. It should be easier for noviciates to realize it is a coining of distinguish.

In script one of many wayves we may narrate issi quanton(Aings,Bings).

In a sense, in quantum~reality, quanta may be viewed as intrinsically pricked apart as tiny packets of wave~flux~energy. Where classical objects may cause-effectively-collide with one another, quanta co~affectively~scintillate one another. Doug cann¤t overemphasize necessity of your careful reading of his 'affectively' link! Objects are not intrinsically aware and have no means to selectively scintillate one another. Quanta are coaware and have qua to selectively~scintillate one another.

Quanta and Doug's scripting of them as quantons, given their intrinsic holographic~coawarenessings, quantum~complementarily~omnistinguish one another without hegemonous outside direction and control. And key here: without classical contradiction! Read about quantum~holographic~simplification.

Aside - 24,27Nov2012 - Doug.



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'distribute' and its various classical forms.

Classical di-stribute implies a dialectical and thus dichotomous (dichonic) conparison of ideal (lisr) classical objects in OGC.

Quantum ¤mnistrihbute bægs (¤mnistrihbutings bæg) n¤vel emerqant pr¤cessings' hærmænæutihcs ¤f anihmatæ EIMA amd c¤¤bsfecting quantum ensehmbles ihn massihvely parallæl amd c¤mplex quantonic ihnterrelati¤nships.

See our QELR of probability, and our What is Wrong with Probability as Value?



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'monitor' and its various classical forms.

Classical 'monitoring' is essentially repetitive metric measurement: scalarbation. Classical 'monitoring' requires "zero momentum" of objects being 'monitored.' Classical 'monitoring' requires 'state' for verifiable 'measurement.'

Quantum omnitoring is qubital, quantal, animate, EIMA, QLOistic, holographic~phase~encoding direct experience of quantum reality. Real quantum computers 'omnitor.'



A coined quantonic replacement for classical 'bi value,' and bivalence.

Classical 'value' is dialectically two-valued. Classically reality is EOOO-valued. Either true or false. Either up or down. Either right or wrong. Either good or bad. Either black or white. Its technical term is 'dialectic.' All children in western cultures c. 2008 are taught that reality is dialectical.

But dialectic is bogus! Why? See our CTMs. Reality is quantum, and quantum reality isn't bivalent, rather quantum~reality is omnivalent. Another way to say this is using David Bohm's quantum~reality metaphor: "reality is holographic." We agree with Bohm, except Bohm's major reality 'divisions' are implicate order and explicate order. He describes them as dichon(implicate, explicate). In Quantonics that is wr¤ng.

Begin aside by Doug on why "dialectic is bogus:"

Some really big tells of Doug's words above are showing up massively now. Quantonics all of a sudden is becoming globally economic, of extreme economic import and Value.

Two superb examples show powerfully how dialectic is "stupid reasoning."

  1. David X. Li's 'formula' which 'caused' 2007-2009's global financial meltdown, and
  2. Al Gore's phony claim that global warming is anthropocentric.

Li treated derivative assessment as single valued, scalar. Quantonics calls it "scalarbation." Further, Li , treated pairs of scalars as 'state' correlatively bivalent. Bankers everywhere adopted this CTM and got killed-financially for it. They took us down with them! Bastards. See Doug's Hodgepodge on David X. Li.

Al Gore treated warming assessment as single-valued, scalar ("scientific"). Again, scalarbation. Too, Gore, treated pairs of global CO2 scalars (human and internal combustion) as correlatively bivalent. See Doug's Kyoto Accord on Al Gore.

In both cases all values are massively omnivalent and must be assessed quantumly as h¤l¤graphic quantum~wavings with that in mind. Indeed we need to manage memes like these using wMBU™. Essentially reality is holographic (unlimited quantal interrelationshipings changing at Planck rates and subharmonics thereof). Quantonics Omnivalence HotMeme™ "Hologra demand omnivalence of interrelationshipings for both expression and assessment."™ Quantonics Omnivalence HotMeme™. Both Li and Gore ignored essentials of genuine reality's massive ephemera, their evolution, their expression and their omnifficulty of perpetual~changes' assessments. Both are wr¤ng. Worse, both are literally stupid! Why? Dialectic is wr¤ng. Dialectic is stupid! Both have been wr¤ng for a long time. Society, in just another exemplar of its unbounded ineptness, went for a political and dialectical ride which has cost conned-stituents horrendous anguish and suffering. Yet society still wants to keep taxing us for its political 'competence.' Their end is nigh...

Key enablers here include your abilities to grasp quantum QELRs of negate and positive. Quantum reality issi flux, and omnivalent occurrencings of ubiquitous quantizationings of flux. Flux is positive. That's how it may be directly referred "stochastic." Classical dialectical negation, simply, quantumly is bogus. Flux cancels. Cancellation issi NØT classical negation: it IS phase~encoding! CTMs teach us dialectically that flux may be both dialectically negative and dialectically positive. That means CTMs claim we may add-subtract flux.Wr¤ng! Using classical maths on quantum flux is wr¤ng, gnostically unwise. In a real sense quantum~omnivalence bans classical maths. Iht bans dialectic. Iht bans CTMs. Doug - 9Mar2009.

Doug - 8-9Mar2009.

Doug - 3,7Apr2009 (add anchor and 'assessment' link).

Doug - 5May2009 (add links to recent QELRs of change, occur, phase, wave, and wisdom).

End aside by Doug on why "dialectic is bogus."

Quantonics major reality complements are n¤nactuality and actuality, i.e., very similar Pirsig's DQ and SQ.

We show quantum_reality issi quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) with its middle~included. Ditto Pirsig's quanton(DQ,SQ).

Every pixel in a hologram partially describes every other pixel in said hologram. That sentence offers us an opportunity to show two incredibly Valuable quantum memeos:

  • quantum middle~inclusion — any hologram issi in each of its pixels and every pixel is in its hologram, and
  • quantum bridging of fact and Value — quanton(n¤nactuality,actuality) issi quanton(DQ,SQ) issi quanton(Value,fact) which vividly illustrates how quantum middle~inclusion's holographic everywhere~associativity IS quantum~reality's bridge twixt fact and Value! Doug - 31May2008.

Every photon in quantum reality, partially but omnivalently, describes its view of other quantons in quantum~reality. Every photon's view of a quantum~reality, in which it is immersed, is omnivalent. QELRed ¤mnihvalænt.

So, in general, HotMemeIn quantum reality, every quanton's view of a quantum~reality, in which it is immersed, is omnivalent.HotMeme™.

As you may surmise, classical bivalence compared to quantum omnivalence is simply naïve.

Classical bivalence is statically EOOO EEMD.

Quantum omnivalence issi animately BAWAM EIMA. Why 'animately?' Quantum~reality issi absolute flux, absolute change. Reality is made of quantum~waves of animate, absolutely changing thus stochastic, emergent, and uncertain ensemble happenings.

See our Poisson Bracketings page for some graphics which illustrate quantum~omnivalence.


To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 1999-2029
Rev. 2Sep2015  PDR Created 3Aug1999  PDR
(2Feb2000 Rev. Added novel definition: obsfect.)
(5Feb2000 Rev. Extend novel definition: obsfect. Add 'potentiality' to potentially.)
(2Mar2000 Rev. Change CTModes to CTMethods. Actually, Classical Thinking uses Methods, n¤t Modes.)
(23Aug2000 rev - Change 'obsfect' definition: change 'thorough' to 'through.')
(5Oct2000 rev - Repair typos.)
(19Oct2000 rev - Typos.)
(27Oct2000 rev - Change Classical Thinking Mode to Classical Thinking Method. QTMs are modal, CTMs are less so.)
(22Mar2001 rev - Repair our remaining, known, legacy misuses of 'con.' Partial progress against SOM's great'Con' job.)
(21Apr2001 rev - Reformat page top. Add link to English language remediation. Update 'comjugate' with graphic.)
(11Nov2001 rev - Remove legacy 'red' text.)
(6Dec2001 rev - Add plurals to list under 'Obsfect.')
(15Feb2002 rev - Extend and quantum comtextually remediate 'Obsfect.')
(16Feb2002 rev - Add more varieties of 'Obsfect' in left-most column.)
(20Feb2002 rev - Add more word-emerqant usages to 'Obsfect.')
(18Apr2002 rev - Add 'omnifferent.')
(7Jun2002 rev - Extend 'omnifference.')
(23Jul2002 rev - Change QELR links to A-Z pages.)
(7Sep2002 rev - Add 'omnifficult.')
(26Sep2002 rev - Upgrade 'omnifferent' with EEMD and EIMA acronyms.)
(3Feb2003 rev - Extend 'omnifference' with a link to remediated 'minus.')
(6Feb2003 rev - Minorly extend/repair 'obsfect.')
(15Feb2003 rev - Typos.)
(8May2003 rev - Typos.)
(16May2003 rev - Update 'omnifferent' for subjective negation, and correct some fonts to GIFs for compatibility.)
(7Jul2003 rev - Correct some typos and spelling mistakes.)
(10Aug2003 rev - Update links to our review of A Beautiful Mind.)
(11Sep2003 rev - Add general 'definitions' anchor to page bottom def's.)
(5Oct2003 rev - Add 'omnistinguish.')
(20Jan2004 rev - Typo, 'ominad' to 'omniad.')
(20-31Jan&1-5Feb2004 rev - Many text alterations and upgrades. Not marked in red!)
(22-28Feb2004 rev - Minor text edits.)
(13Jul2004 rev - Add Stairs Satinover link under 'obsfect.')
(8-10Aug2004 rev - Repair unintended QELR of classical text under 'obsfect.' Repair a QELRed 'link.')
(18Nov2004 rev - Repair QELR of Hilbert. Add affectation, included~middle, probability and truth links under 'Obsfect.')
(6Jan2005 rev - Reformat page top index.)
(8Feb2005 rev - Remove numeric test patterns under 'omnifferent.')
(12Mar2005 rev - Add 'omnistribute.')
(14May2005 rev - Reset red text boxes.)
(20Jan2006 rev - Add 'omniffer' anchor.)
(13Jun,3,27Jul2006 rev - Add 'omnitor.' Add 'phasicity' link under 'obsfect.' Repair 'phase' link under 'omnitor.')
(9,19Sep2006 rev - Update 'omniad.' Reset pink update. Add 'omniffering' anchor.)
(24Jan2007 rev - Update 'obsfect.')
(10Feb2007 rev - Repair some major and extensive stream editing errors. Update 'Obsfect' with blue text aside.)
(16Mar2007 rev - Reset legacy red text. Add 'Two World Views' anchor.)
(24Apr2007 rev - Repair a minor typo under 'Omniffer.' Add red text and bold violet markups.)
(3Aug2007 rev - Add 'omnify,' and 'omnique.')
(29,31May2008 rev - Add 'omnivalue,' AKA 'omnivalent.' Update 'omnivalent.')
(23Jul2008 rev - Update 'omnifference' in terms of its quantum~real semantic of tentative wave cancellation.)
(18Aug2008 rev - Repair typos.)
(31Oct2008 rev - Replace wingdings and symbol fonts with gifs. Reset legacy markups.)
(10Nov2008 rev - Update 'Omnitor,' with four more word emerqs of this term.)
(8-10Mar2009 rev - Update 'Omnivalence' with Li and Gore dialectical failures. Add 'Holographic Omnivalence HotMeme™'. Repair David X. Li's name spelling.)
(23Mar2009 rev - Add 'stupid' and 'reason' links under 'Omnivalent' 8-9Mar2009 aside update. Change 'night' to original authorship intent: 'nigh.')
(3,7Apr2009 rev - Add 'omnivalence' anchor to 'omnivalue.' Add, under 'omnivalent,' 'assessed quantumly' link to Doug's PBings of Bailey and Monastersky.)
(5May2009 rev - Under 'omnivalent' add links to recent QELRs of change, occur, phase, wave, and wisdom.)
(20Sep2009 rev - Add intra page links to recent QELR of 'wave.')
(25Nov2009 rev - Update 'omnify.')
(7Dec2009 rev - Add a missing question mark under 'obsfect.')
(3Jan2010 rev - Show other word emerqancies of 'omnify,' e.g., 'omnifies, omnifyings, etc.')
(22May2010 rev - Add 'omnifurcate.')
(10Sep2011 rev - Add 'ubiquitous quantizationings of flux' link to our recent (Ceod
E 2011) 'QVH Table' under 'Omnivalent.' Reset legacy markups.)
(24,27Nov2012 rev - Update 'Omnistinguish' with more comprehensive comparisons 'distinguish' and 'omnistinguish.')
(23Feb2015 rev - Add 'omnicide.' Make page current. Reset legacy markups. Adjust color.)
(2Sep2015 rev - Reset legacy markups. Make page current.)