
©Quantonics, Inc., 20052033 


Nanology (nEIMA)  Nissin  N¤t 
Nissin  — 
Nissin: nisssin. A coined Quantonic palindrome for 'is in.' Visualize ni si is in. Recall Doug's 'issi' as a palindrome of a both~ways "equals?" Doug appends palindromically an 'n' to both 'ends' of issi as nissin. Nissin then may be used like this: DQ issi ihn SQ and SQ issi ihn DQ. Simply, DQ nissin SQ! This is also quanton(DQ,SQ) as a quantum~holographic evolving (non mechanically stateic) complementary interrelationshiping. To see Doug's first coining of this term, go here. Doug  10Oct2010. Revised 24Apr2011. This coinage is in progress  Doug. 
N¤t N¤ts N¤ N¤n (classical dichonicconjugate complement, i.e., 'non' vis~à~vis quantum quantonic comjugate c¤mplementarity, i.e., nawn'kah) N¤ne 
— 
<Nawt'kah, Nawts'kah, No'kah, Nawn'kah, Nuhn'kah, etc.>  A coined Quantonic replacement for classical 'not.' N¤t ihmpliæs a quantum c¤mplæmæntary ihnterrelati¤nship, where a classical 'not' or 'no' is ideally a formal negation. Pronunciation of suffix 'kah' is for quantum kahmplementarity (c¤mplæmæntarihty). Wæ treat 'non' ¤mnihquæly hæræ. Why? Non is already a classical, and thus closed 'complementary' term. Our ihntænti¤n issi t¤ treat iht as a n¤vel c¤ihned tærm ihn Quantonics ræplacing iht by 'nom,' or 'n¤n,' which ahll¤ws uhsærs t¤ ¤mnistinguish ihts uhsæ as ¤mnihquæly Quantonic~quantum. Quantum c¤mplæmæntarihty issi ¤pæn. Classical theory assumes that all 'objects' have ideal opposites. Classical theory says that object A's quantitative negative is A. Observe how ideal classical objects and their 'property sets' are closed. Their negations are 'identically' closed too. This is necessary classically, formally, ideally in order for A  A = 0. Classicists call it 'logic.' In quantum reality A_{q}'s qualitative negation is its real c¤mplæmænt: potentially all other reality, both known and unknown, both actual and n¤nactual! A's c¤mplæmænt issi ¤pæn! A_{q} _{q} A_{q} omnifferencing(s) issi coquecigrues~ically ambiguous. See phase, rectify, etc. When quantum flux 'cancels' we do not grant a classically ideal notion of 'zero energy,' rather at least double energy immerses as isoflux! Some call it "silence." Some say it is nature "hiding." Key here is that reality is not classically objective, rather reality issi quantum flux and "flux is crux." Flux are intrinsically quantum likelihood omnistributionings, QLOs. See our 3D fuzzon. See quality. Flux is positive! One may 'not' classically, ideally 'negate' quantum flux! Quantum reality is a n¤n negative, wholly positive reality. Philosophical, scientific, and 'logical' consequences of this are simply enormous! That is why Doug says "A quantum tsunami is imminent, digital is dead, classical logic is dead, etc." See subject, subjectiv, and subjective. Doug  3Oct2006. Quantum thæ¤ry bælihæs any physihcal nægati¤n ¤f ræhlihty's com ~stihtuænts which wæ cahll "quantons." Quantum thæ¤ry sh¤ws uhs that quantons d¤ n¤t have nægatihvæs, rather they have quantum c¤mplæmænts (~c¤mplætæmænts). From a classical perspective, n¤t is 'subjective.' Many philosophers, including Henri Louis Bergson, have shown that classical objective negation is subjective. Excellent physical examples you may choose to imagine are:
