Selected Quantons as Interrelationship
Models
Here we are using several distinct notations to evolve
a new model, a model we call our new Millennium III Quanton
Meme. We assume a 2D representation of quantons which are
probably omnimensional.
(Note: Eigenfunction | eigenvalue projection operator
results are classically only bivalent, either | or, and unidimensional.
Compare that to quantum reality which is omnivalent, both/and,
and omni-dimensional, -harmonic, etc. We see bivalent projection
operators as quantum science's classical legacy, i.e., turning
bits of reality into classical, either FALSE or TRUE, assessments.
Quantum field theory performs essentially similar operations.
When quantum computing and thinking displaces classical | digital
| von Neumann computing and thinking methods, current need for
classical over-simplicity will diminish. We visualize good old
classical dipstick Ockham turning just now.  )
—
We start with Dirac's SOMitic bra-ket notation.
—
Next we evolve it to our Quantonic equivalent using our special
symbol for quantonic interrelationships.
—
Then we evolve our Dirac wingding 'v' quanton to a new prototype
quanton meme, using a Tao symbol as a quanton.
We show both DQ in blue and SQ in green (~black), with both blue
and green commingling.
We imply solid green latches from dashed blue.
We show two arrowheads on blue.
They point nonpreferentially in both directions and thus cancel
their energy
(i.e., DQ flux is isotropic),
from which we may infer why DQ is not apparent except when it
creates, grows, diminishes, changes, and/or discreates SQ.
We show one DQ arrowhead in black and one in blue.
Black suggests which spin our latched SQ will assume:
right/clockwise or left/counterclockwise.
Note how SQ latches opposite to DQ's suggested spin.
Try to understand how a Tao quanton may induce
a latched state.
Try to imagine how it might undue a latched state.
Compare this notation to other Quantonic art, including our:
Quantum Egg Arial
C, and our
Quantum MoQ Egg.
Our blue dashed lines in this interrelationship artwork correspond
to waves below center line in our two egg models.
—
Finally we make a unified, latched Tao Quanton.
We show both DQ and SQ copermeating each other.
In MoQ/Quantonic reality we can see SQ and DQ's affects on SQ,
but we cannot directly see DQ.
Note: DQ's blue vacuous energy is ~unlimited, but
isotropic/nonapparent.
By comparison SQ's green (~black) actualized energy is ~limited,
but nonisotropic/apparent.
—
|
Grasp bottom line essence and quintessence:
our graphics depict quantum~reality
and its islands, however small, as animate ensembles of Tao waves,
as stochastics, as probabilityings,
plausibilityings, as likelihoodings,
as Value, as quantum~real absolute change, as microscopic-mesoscopic-macroscopic
selective yet always
uncertain evolution,
as con(m)sciousnessings' and uncon(m)sciousnessings' pr¤ceæsings
of attentionings:
"...Perhaps the clue is to be found in the two-edged
character of all mental activity, at
once uniting and distinguishing. Attention, strictly speaking,
does not single out separable items one-by-one. It organizes
the field as a whole, and the components which become more definite
in the focus are never simple
but are themselves always [classically] complex structures. The
'transcendence' of consciousness may well be its inherent [quantum~holographic] holism;..."
Page 333, Errol E. Harris' The Foundations of Metaphysics
in Science, 'Consciousness,' Sec. 2 - Attention Process,
Humanities Press, 1965. Doug's brackets.
Observant readers may assess how Harris describes
a hologramic field quantum holism.
Doug - 8Aug2007.
|
—
Thanks for reading. We hope you enjoyed this little
modeling adventure.
Many truthings t¤
y¤uings,
Doug Renselle
—
|