Quantonics' "Understanding the logos enables
judgment." |
Means: New~Revised View Original Bases of Judgment |
||||||||
of Judgment |
|
QTMs |
U A N T U M N T E L L E C T U A L U R I O S I T Y |
Valuation |
CTMs |
CTMs |
||
Emergent Good |
Above Dynamic Good | ·Physial
novel emerscenture ·Requires emerscent linguistics for pragmathinking ·Requires acceptance of quantum evolution as real |
|
Viewed (demoted by MoQ) as a subset of DQ phenomena | Does not 'exist;' dialectically modeled as analytic, heterogeneous synthetic transformation | Does not 'exist;' dialectically modeled as analytic, homogeneous synthetic transformation | ||
Dynamic Good | Above Static Good |
·Physial
absolute quantum
flux; see QTMs ·Requires quantum linguistics for evolute thinking; see QELR ·AKA "quantum simplicity" |
|
Does not 'exist;' dialectically modeled as heterogeneous analytic (stoppable) motion | Does not 'exist;' dialectically modeled as homogeneous analytic (stoppable) motion | |||
Static Good | Above Likelihood | ·Physial
uncertain quantum recursive persistency born of and mediated
by Dynamic Good ·We call these quantum recursive persistencies "quantons" ·Quantons are stindyanic, EIMA both static and dynamic sorsos ·Static Good is above Likelihood since it is nature's quantum~vestal judgment; we and nature together are in quantum processings of ch3ing better nextings |
·SQ SPoVs act in agency
of DQ |
Demoted by CTMs as a dialectical subset of Heterogeneous Truth | Demoted by CTMs as a dialectical subset of Homogeneous Truth | |||
Above Plausibility | ·a priori
(n¤n
classical:
quantum ¤mni prih¤hrai)
·quantum processings of looking at nextings given qualitative nowings ·quantum processings of looking at expected, anticipated nextings given qualitative nowings ·QLOings ·expectation of quantum plausibility omnistributionings ·ensemble nowings coobsfecting ensembling expectationings ch3ing whatings happenings nextings ·wave~emerqancings of ensemblings' nextings |
Pirsig did not discuss 'likelihood' as an evolute of probability and plausibility in his SODV paper. | Does not 'exist' classically since relative classical dialectical 'logic' is heterogeneous yet always looking at relative historical facts to obtain local (relative) decidability. | Does not 'exist' classically since classical dialectical 'logic' is homogeneous and always looking at historical facts to obtain decidability. | ||||
Plausibility |
Above Probability | ·a
iamai (n¤n classical: quantum ¤mni ihamaih)
·quantum processings of looking at both pastings and nowings given qualitative nowings ·evokings of quantum uncertainty given direct experiencings of nowings ·ensemble nowings coobsfecting ensembling nowings ch3ing whatings happenings nextings ·wave~emerqancings of ensemblings' nowings |
Pirsig hints at this via his "many, unlimited hypotheses," "many truths," "many contexts," "Lila has Quality permits inferences of Quality has Lila," "All perspectives are partially right, i.e., 'all schools are right,'" "Mind is in Body and Body is in Mind," etc. Spend some timings studying quantum~memes and ~memeos of quantum~partiality: crucial to Bases of Judgment as enthymemeticity (classically referred as 'partial logic' which Aristotle, et al., claimed 'false.'). HotMeme In quantum~reality, all is partial. HotMeme. All stochastics are only partial! Why? An evolving reality is always partially what it will be. An evolving reality is always uncertain about its own becoming. An evolving reality is indeterminate. An evolving reality cann¤t be dialectical! An evolving reality cann¤t become dialectical! Again, we remind our students of Paul Pietsch's words in his fabulous Shufflebrain, words slightly reordered for our use here, "The principal feature of intelligence is indeterminacy." For more on this essential quantum topic, see Doug's QELR of thought. Doug - 20Mar2008. |
Depends upon relativistic ensembles; yet offers first CR hints of genuine quantum uncertainty. | SOMites who use 'plausibility' aren't truepers. We see a glimmer of SOM denying its own fundamentals. | |||
Probability |
Above Provability | ·a posteriori
(n¤n
classical:
quantum ¤mni
p¤stærih¤raih)
·quantum processings of looking at pastings given qualitative nowings ·ensemble nowings coobsfecting historical ensemblings to predict (actually, we should say "select" here) a probability distribution of what will happen next. ·What is Wrong with Probability as Value? ·wave~emerqancings of ensemblings' pastings |
Pirsig said in his SODV paper, "Probability is Value." | Exists in relative classical dialectical 'logic' since relativity admits heterogeneous ensembles which may be used to assess probability. |
Does not 'exist' classically since classical dialectical 'logic' is homogeneous and thus no single event can be probabilistically predicted. Probability requires an ensemble of nonunique events, and classical theory denies any heterogeneity in classical reality. See cause. |
|||
Provability |
Above Truth | ·Absoluteness
as quantum uncertainty ·Heterogeneous con(m)texts eliminate paradice ·Solomon Feferman says that Gödel "realized that analogous nonparadoxical arguments could be carried out by substituting the notion of provability for that of truth."1 ·wave~emerqancings of ensemblings' comtextings |
Pirsig apparently knew little of Gödel | Nonconceptual notion in CTMs (i.e., as distinguishable from a dialectic notion of ideal EOOO true | false) | Nonconceptual notion in CTMs (i.e., as distinguishable from a dialectic notion of ideal EOOO true | false) | |||
Quantum Judgment Classical Judgment |
|
QTMs |
L A S S I C A L I A L E C T I C A L N T E L L I G E N C E U O T I E N T |
Valuation |
CTMs |
CTMs |
||
Truth | Above Proof | ·Hermeneutic
subset of Static Good ·Requires quantumists to adhere rhetoric and pragmalogic AKA coquecigrues |
·Heterogeneous
cowithinitness ·Many Truths AKA in Latin, "omniplex veritas" ·Viewed (subsumed) by MoQ as a DQ-agent subset of SQ |
·Heterogeneous
relatively absolute predicate logic delusions ·Polylogical dialectic |
·Homogeneous
absolute predicate logic
delusion ·Monological dialectic ·E.g., both Christianity and Islam believe that morality and ethics may be adjudged dialectically; that's how they absolutely decide who 'the infidels' are that is pure unadulterated fascism! |
|||
Proof | Above Falsifiability | ·Descriptioningsquantons(theoryi,theory_complementsj)2 ·Requires quantum animate, heterogeneous, EIMA rhetoric in place of classical stable, homogeneous, EEMD dialectic ·Replaces classical dialectical EOOO fascism with quantum rhetorical BAWAM sophism |
·Any notion
of ideal proof is nonabsolute; dialectic is deeply flawed and
weak ·MoQ claims dialectic is a subset of [quantum] rhetoric ·Viewed (subsumed) by MoQ as a DQ-agent subset of SQ |
·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute truth based upon an assumption that SOM proof is valid | Provisional classical delusion of a capability to assess absolute truth using a classical notion of proof based upon absolute dialectical falsifiability which depends upon ideal dialectical 'contradiction' based upon dialectically ideal formal and objective oppositional-negation | |||
Falsifiability |
Above Contradiction | ·Only quantum umcærtainty may bæ established, ihn genæral. | ·Pirsig does not say this explicitly, but one may infer that ideal classical falsifiability is impossible without an assumption of ideal classical contradiction. | ·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute truth based upon an assumption that SOM falsifiability is valid | ·Classical delusion that 'scientific' falsifiability may be established based upon ideal classical contradiction. | |||
Contradiction |
Above Negation |
·Only ænsehmble
quantum ihnterrelati¤nships ¤f ænsehmble
quantum c¤mplæmænts may bæ
ømniht¤red
as
anihmatæ EIMA quantum
pr¤cessings. ·Ænsehmble quantum ihnterrelati¤nship m¤niht¤ring is, ihn Quantonics, what wæ mæan whæn wæ sahy, "quantum ¤mniht¤rmænt." Quantum ¤mniht¤rmænt ihnv¤lves what wæ cahll "straddling" since quantum ¤mniht¤rmænt ihnnatæly taps n¤nahctualihty AKA VES. - Compare cancellation. - Consider complementation. - Fathom antinomialism. |
·Pirsig does not say this explicitly, but one may infer that ideal classical contradiction is impossible without an assumption of ideal classical oppositional-negation. | ·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute truth based upon an assumption that SOM contradiction is valid | ·Classical delusion that logical contradiction may be established based upon ideal classical oppositional-negation. | |||
Negation |
Above Lisrability |
·Quantum
nægati¤n issi c¤mplæmæntary amd
thuhs
subqjæctihvæ,
rhet¤rihcal, amd s¤phist.
Why? Quantons aræ
ænsehmble
EIMA pærpætuahlly
ch3ing
pr¤cæssings.
·Quantum nægati¤n's c¤mplæmæntarihty issi pærhaps bæst exhibihted via mæmæs amd mæmæos ¤f quantum~wavæ p¤sihtihvæ ænærgy cancællati¤n. ·See our QELR of oppositional-negation. |
·Viewed
classically, this notion of ideal oppositional-negation
based upon ideal lisrability
and ideal stability is what Pirsig calls "SOM's genetic
defect in reason itself." ·MoQ sutures SOM's knife cut defect in classicism's "Church of Reason." |
·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute (i.e., relative) truth based upon an assumption that SOM oppositional-negation is valid |
·Classical delusion that oppositional-negation is 'objective.' Classical objectivity depends upon two more fundamental delusions:
|
|||
Lisrability | Above Stability |
·Quantons ihn
quantum ræhlihty
aræ
n¤nlisrable
amd ¤nly apparæntly lisrable. ·Quantons ihn quantum ræhlihty have arbihtrary spathial, tehmp¤ral, ænærgy~matærial, gravihtati¤nal, sæns¤rial, etc. pr¤babilihty ¤mnistrihbuti¤ns. ·Quantons ihn quantum ræhlihty have anihmatæ EIMA ihnterrelati¤nships which pærhaps may bæst bæ ¤mniscrihbæd as Poisson Brackets (AKA P.B.s). |
·Pirsig's MoQ denies SOM's objective schism thus denying general validity of any classical notions of lisrability. | ·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute truth based upon an assumption that SOM lisrability is valid | ·SOM's
next to most fundamental classical delusion: 'objects
in reality are independent of one another.' ·Assumes reality adheres Aristotle's three syllogistic (rather, sillygisitic) 'laws.' |
|||
Stability |
·Quantum
ræhlihty
¤ffers n¤
ideal classical stability. ·Quantum ræhlihty issi abs¤lutæly anihmatæ. ·Quantum flux is sihmplæ. Update - 10Jul2007 - Doug. ·See Doug's What is Simple? What is Complex? |
·Pirsig's MoQ says that reality's essence is Dynamic Quality which denies any classical notions of ideal stability. | ·Relative classical delusion of locally absolute truth based upon an assumption that SOM stability is valid | ·SOM's
most fundamental classical delusion: 'reality is stable.' For example, 'A=A' implies ideal constancy unless reality is quantum~animately EIMA~sophist~recursive. ·SOM's 'concrete reality.' ·AKA 'classical simplicity.' ·Juxtapose change as 'classical complexity.' ·See Bergson on static simplicity vis-à-vis dynamic simplicity. |
||||
|
QTMs |
Valuation MoQites View Reality |
CTMs CRites View Reality |
CTMs SOMites View Reality |
||||
(25Mar2004 rev - Extend MoQ Valuation Column.) (27Mar2004 rev - Restore Pirsig-Godel cell's red background.) (5May2004 rev - Add 'falsifiability,' 'contradiction,' 'oppositional-negation,' 'lisrability,' and 'stability' to Bases of Judgment Table.) (10May2004 rev - Minor unhighlighted corrections and additions near page bottom.) (11May2004 rev - Add 'likelihood,' and 'probability' to Bases of Judgment Table.) (12May2004 rev - Add link-anchors to footnotes. Add "quantum simplicity" bullet item to QTM's Dynamic Good.) (12May2004 rev - Extend QTM's Static Good. Add a 'concrete' bullet item to SOM's Stability.) (17May2004 rev - Refine non classical quantum memeos of a priori and a posteriori.) (23May2004 rev - Add wave~emerqancings to provability, probability, and likelihood.) (13Jul2004 rev - Remove legacy red update marks. Add some extended red text.) (2Sep2004 rev - Reformat table. Reset red text and arrows.) (18Sep2004 rev - Slightly alter Quantonic 'oppositional-negation' description.') (25Dec2004 rev - Add column titles at page bottom. Reset legacy marks.) (13Feb2005 rev - Upgrade CTM SOM Probability.) (14Feb2005 rev - Add column titles at page middle.) (1Mar2005 rev - Add 'coquecigrues' link.) (17Mar2005 rev - Add quantum monitor link under 'contradiction.' Add six new links in bottom title row.) (29Jun2005 rev- Add blue and yellow intellectual bars.) (8Jan2006 rev - Repair 'lisr' link.) (23Feb2006 rev - Add 'plausibility.' Needed for exegesis of PNFings QLO temporalings.) (4Sep2006 rev - Add 'omnitor' link. Reset red text updates.) (18Oct2006 rev - Add Bergson 'delusion' anchors.) (17Nov2006 rev - Add 'lisr' link under 'Lisrability.') (14Jan2008 rev - Add link to our new QELR of 'partial' under 'plausibility.' Add comments on partiality as enthymemetic. Add 'Plausibility' anchor.) (12Mar2008 rev - Update Quantonics QTM cell under oppositional-negation. Reset legacy red text. Updated that same cell even more.) (19Aug2008 rev - Add 23Apr2006 update text from list below to this list for clarity of actual table maintenance.) (6Feb2011 rev - Repair link to Doug's recent "What is Simple? What is Complex? Why? Explain.") (22Aug2012 rev - Add 'cancellation' link under 'contradiction.') |