![]() vis-á-vis Presence and Absence of Particle-Particle Spin C¤rrelation to emulate DQ's ubiquitous interpenetration and commingling of SQ. isononpreferentially and isopreferentially and tentatively latching our four 'particles.' and just below shows blue waveness of both quantons as dashed isoflux in DQ. Since we wish to show entanglement, isoflux is shown isopreferentially c¤rrelating both quantons. Note how we show both quantons as arbitrarily separated, spatially, from one another. This arbitrary separation is an aspect of quantum n¤nl¤cality. Also note how any change in 'A' reflects with zero latency in 'B.' This was a core problem in EPR's paper which declared (incorrectly) "absurd, unreasonable incompleteness" of Quantum Theory. Comsider how 'A' and 'B' can be on opposite sides of our Earth, Solar System, Galaxy, or Universe and still change instantly! It is well to fathom nature's own clock whose leading edge rises in zero time. Nature's Planck rate clock probably has zero latency leading and trailing edges! (What's a poor, Platonic mathematician to do with all these discontinuities in nature's soul?) ![]() named 'C' and 'D.' As you can see, their isoflux is l¤cal to each and 'separate,' i.e., n¤nentangled and n¤nc¤rrelated. notations to align their DQ-SQ c¤mplements to our graphic representations of SQ and DQ. We put DQ c¤mplements of our quantons ihn DQ, and we put SQ c¤mplements of our quantons ihn SQ. Quantum MoQ Egg Tao Quanton Quanton Thread Quantum Logic Planck Quanton Bergsonian Duration Quanton MoQ Quanton Quantum Spin Emergence Ontology |