jihudges, jihudged, jihudging,
jihudgings, jihudgmænt, jihudgmæntings,
Quantonics chooses to remediate classical 'judge'
¤f 'ih' t¤
'jihudge' makæs iht quantum. Iht
ihncludæs quantum mæmæos,
¤f uhp t¤ Planck ratæ
quantum anihmacy amd ænsehmble
¤ur hærmænæutihcs ¤f 'jihudge.'
(That 'i' in 'ih'
should~may be italicized, and that h~bar is an M-T Extra font
'h,' which should look like this: )
Classical reality, due its Aristotelian and Newtonian analyticity
postpones judgment to retrospect. Classical judgment is about
what happened. Classical judgment is homogeneous, retarded, pastistic,
static, latent, lagging, and as Vico says, "without reflection."
Vico calls classical
common sense, "judgment without reflection." Again,
we find CTMs running
in an automatic and mechanical box, SOM's box. Students of
Quantonics may be able to intuit how "judgment without reflection"
ihn quantum ræhlihty! Ænsehmbles
¤f quantum affæct¤rings ihmpinge
¤n ¤ur quantum bæings at
issi that th¤se
¤f us wh¤ d¤ n¤t
run on automatic,
amd d¤ altær amd æmærgæ~æmærse
See our innovative and prescient Bases
of Judgment. That link is perhaps the most important
link for students of Quantonics commencing mid March, 2004.
Quantum ræhlihty, advances 'jihudgmæntings'
t¤ n¤wings. Quantum 'jihudgmænt'
issi ab¤ut ch¤¤sings
'jihudgmænt' issi heterogæne¤us, ihmmædiatæ,
issi a key ænabler ¤f quantum 'jihudgmænt?'
c¤¤bsfective awareness. Kafatos and Nadeau
call it "quantum consciousness."
Ahll quantum ræhlihty issi co~, sælf~, amd ¤thær~awaræ via ¤mnihværsal quantum comsci¤usness.
at uhp t¤ Planck ratæs,
he-rsælf ¤n ahll
scalæs ¤f ræhlihty.
Classical reality is always state-ic-simplistically
(i.e., always adhering 'state rules'), inertially, habitually
looking behind, worrying, afraid, hearing footsteps.
on quantum judgment vis-à-vis classical judgment. Doug's
This may come as a surprise to those of you who view yourselves
as 'scientists.' What does your discipline educate, teach, and
train you to do? Run on automatic!
You and yours call it "depending on first principles."
Those scientific crown jewels are "self-evident" and
"proven" axioms, beliefs, facts and laws which are
classically presumed unquestionable and may be depended on for
any valid 'scientific' judgments you may be called upon to make.
In a "Tragedy of Commons Sense" scientists are trained
to live in and do their judging in a pastistic abyss of stayssys.
In our version of quantum reality we say, "You are worshiping
you are worshiping 'status quo is the way to go.'"
In Quantonics, we call it, "stux sux!"
What we are saying to you is that all (quantum~ensemble plural~present~participle)
judgmentings must be "nowistic, with your fullest capable
(n¤t reflection, rather) pr¤flectionings."
By pr¤flectionings we intend animate, EIMA, ensemble,
a priori nowistic and futuristic thinkings.
What does that mean?
It means you must be affectationally looking at quantum~ensemble
n¤wings and selecting whatings you are wanting as betterings
to be happenings nextings.
"Onæ issi k~n¤wing s~hæ issi d¤ing quantum mæasuræmæntings
whæn ¤næ issi
Doug Renselle - 12May2004,
Revised - 13Dec2005.
Allow us to use our own quantum vocabulary for exegesis:
Resist inept thingking of reality as stoppable, state-ic,
etc. Resist inept thingking of reality as classical!
Ponder, prefer, acquire and adopt adept thinking of reality
as unstoppable flux, semper flux, quantum flux.
To do that, you must accept some dynamic simplicities and
discard some static simplicities (actually, we subsume them as
antique and cliché but useful in helping others learn
to tap into reserve energy and enhance their quantum judgment
Some static simplicities:
- reality is stable, and conveniently holds still ("classical
stability is simplicity itself")
- reality is objective and objects in reality are independent
of one another
- reality's middle is EEMD
- reality is space-time stoppable event 'motion' of objects
- classical reality is absolute stability and truth based upon
pastistic decidability determining what happens next
- classical reality is absolutely stoppable for analytic convenience
and changes only via determinate objective unitemporal motion
(this is what makes classical 'laws' possible)
To classicists, empirical stabile experience is common sense
judgment. Classical judgment is ESQ, "Exclusive Static Quality!"
Some dynamic simplicities:
- reality is quantum flux
changæ issi sihmplihcihty ihtsælf")
- quantum flux quantum flux
- quantum reality's middle is EIMA
- quantum reality is nowistic animate~likelihood n¤vel
- quantum reality is absolute change based upon nowistic ensemble
which select whatings
- quantum reality is unstoppable (in any classical sense; this
is what renders classical 'laws' impossible)
To quantumists, empirical absolutely animate experience is uncommon
sense judgment. Quantum judgment is ADQ, "Absolute Dynamic
In quantonics, empirical experience is uncommonly dynamic.
Tear down SOM's wall!
(Pink Floyd and Dutch Reagan, "Tear down that wall.")
Follow our Bases of Judgment.
Learn what they mean and how they compare. Study our How
to Become a Student of Quantonics.
Move your pastistic classical static thingking to quantum
nowistic dynamic thinking. How? See our What
is Wrong with Probability as Value? See our affectation.
Study that until it is intuitive. Comparing classical
cause against quantum affectation will help you move your thinking
processings closer to nowings.
Many lay folk visit Quantonics and most of those are looking
for ways and means to "tap into reserve energy." One
way to do that is move our personal judgment processings from
pasticity to nowicity! Dynamic thinking implicitly taps "reserve
energy!" Static thingking implicitly denies any "reserve
energy" 'existence.' Static thingking drives out "reserve
For 'scientists' this means that they can no longer run on
automatic, common sense, socially positive 'state' while taking
first principles (common classical social patterns of value)
for granted. Reality simply changes much too fast for that
approach to be "dependable."
Doug's approach is to attempt to be livings at nowings,
and develop n¤vel memeotic
skills which permit a rapid
"recursing over" of as many presumptions as possible
while repeating this restart~reset process over and over, countless
ways with each n¤vel thought.
It seems like too much work, but what Doug has found is that
stages are incredibly powerful and they naturally
compenetrate reserve energy which helps us even better
to accomplish this "recursing over" process as needed.
End 16Jul2004 aside.
Quantum ræhlihty issi ahlways
l¤¤king ahead, ch¤¤sing, selecting,
amd making pr¤gress.
Page top index.