Words'
Quantonics' Quantum Remediation
of
English Language Problematics
for
Millennium III
by Doug Renselle
Created: 20Jul2002
|
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2002-2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(
says, "You are here!")|
|
©Quantonics, Inc., 2002-2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
says, "You are here!")| yes | you |
|
|
|
Remediation |
| 'yes' |
<yae-es> Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'yes' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'yæs.' In classical contexts we shall use 'yes.' In Quantonics and quantum comtexts we shall use 'yæs.' Classically 'yes' is the opposite of 'no.' We can show that as dichon(yes, no). 'Yes' is one dyad in a classically ideal EOOO biform. That classical biform engenders classical absolute judgment and hegemony. Any either yes or no biform is close kin of classical 'contradiction,' which allows any practicing classicist to answer ideally "yes" (absolute falsity) or "no" (conditional verity) to a question, "Does our experiment contradict our hypothesis?" Quantumly 'yæs' is a c¤mplement of 'n¤.' We can show that as quanton(yæs,n¤). In quantum reality, both 'yæs' and 'n¤' are subjective terms. Why? Quantum reality's middle is included. Quantum~reality is absolutely changing, too. Quantum~reality evolves and thus all coquecigrues are enthymemetic. Quantons compenetrate one another. Both 'yæs' and 'n¤' c¤mpenetrate one another as a BAWAM quanton. N¤ ideal classical biforms 'exist' in quantum reality. In addition, where classical reality is presumed state-ic, quantum reality is anihmatæ, so all 'uses' | phasicities of both 'yæs' and 'n¤' are Planck rate tentative. More simply, students of Quantonics try to imagine both 'yæs' and 'n¤' as anihmatæ quantons. Quantum 'yæs' Page top index. |
|
| 'you' |
Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt classical 'you' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'y¤u.' In classical contexts we shall use 'you.' In Quantonics and quantum comtexts we shall use 'y¤u.' Where classical 'you' views any Homo sapiens as a lisr dichonic object, quantum 'y¤u' views any Homo sapiens as a quanton. Quantum y¤u is a gn¤stic individual. Quantum y¤u issi n¤t a social 'state.' An evolving, living quantum~y¤u cann¤t have n¤r be dead classical principle. Page top index. |
|
|
|
||
)