Now ponder classical belief! To have classical belief is to
adopt and adapt to lies about logic and reason: dialectic.
Quantum~reality "steam rolls" classical reality!
(Doug's use of "steam rolls" is from Suares' opus.)
Quantum~reality quantum~bælihæs
classical-reality.
Doug - 4Feb2013.
A great quote on classical belief
as its own belie is, "There is no greater hindrance to growth
than belief." Male protagonist Sydney, p. 13, Seventh
Telling, by Mitchell Chefitz, St. Martin's Press, 2001.
Obtain, please fathom, how Sidney is telling, those
of us who have ears to listen, that classical concrete
belief is Pirsigean ESQ,
SQ without DQ,
Yod
denying Aleph.
Belief turns off Planck's quantum~clock. Belief Thav's the
Noun of Yod (belief kills your spirit). It's what Jesus meant
by "Sabachthani" in his last moments. Sabach (humanity's
dialectical trap) thani (killed my spirit).
Similar as how Sabachthani killed JhShWh's spiritual energy
by trapping it in a web of dialectical deceit (state and status
quo: as Bergson's
first classical delusion), dialectic kills as exemplified
by one of Hebraic's most abominable oxymora,
'Ha Qabala.' Dialectic proffers delusions (deceitful veils),
of definiteness, state, certainty, and linear-monotemporal-predicability,
among countless others. In Hebrew (not in Qabala's Autiot~Gematria)
'Ha' is a classically definite article 'the:' Linguistic
garbage borne of adherence to bogus dialectical semantics! Dialectical
'Ha Qabala,' as Jesus' experience of Sabachthani (a web trap,
in Thav's killing all Noun of Yodq, forcing Jesus
to partially, tentatively, and enthymemetically revert to Yodc).
Please visit Doug's Quantum English Language Problematics
web page and browser search
'Bergson.'
Use of Ha in Ha Qabala
is very similar use of Ha in "HaShyareem" in
Song of Songs verse I,1. It means simply, ~Hay~ which
in Qabala's Autiot is archetypically Lifeq. So Ha
Qabala isn't 'the' Qabala, rather
it is Living~Qabala, ~Hay~Qabala~! Spelled~outq it
is ~Hay~Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay~. It is extraordinarilyq
an expression of Jesus' ~God~words~ in his Farewell Discourse
— paraphrased by Doug —
[In response to ten of Jesus' dialectical disciples'
[excluding Mary Magdalene and Thomas Didymos]
queries about 'wanting to see God...' ]
— "Don't you know? Do not you realize that:
- I am in you and you are in me, and
- God is in me and I am in God,
- therefore God is in you?"
Jesus' words as paraphrased are HaQabala! There is
n¤t one iota of dialectic's formal causal concrete
dead mechanism in that!
Dialectic: "So Dark the Con of Man."
See Elaine Pagels' The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis
regarding Jesus' dialectical disciples. Also see her Beyond
Belief, and Gnostic Paul.
Doug - 26Dec2014.
Uncertainty, indetermination,
peace of embracing vital energy, an incredible holiday gift...
Yes! Doug is saying, "Uncertaintyq, indeterminationq
are peaceq...in Qabala."
Thinkq
about it. Compare Heraclitus'
"Determination (borne of dialecticc)
is warc and hatec." One must be logicallyc
certainc...in order to hatec and killc.
Have you ever heard someone
say, "I know what I believe!" This is the fountc
of judgmentc,
of dialectical-hatred and -war! "Judge not (dialectically)..."
- "Either-or no more!" Doug.
- "Duality is no more!" Suares, Song of Songs,
Shambala, 1972, p. 49.
...Belief is stuck, stux sux. Peace is freedom (free
will) borne of indetermination. Read Song
of Songs, Verse 1,
"Shyar HaShyareem Esher LeShalomoh." It means, "Quintessence
of Quintessencings witnesses~con(m)firms Hær Peace."
We see here Quintessence as Peace borne of uncertainty~indetermination.
Peace is living at nowings' edgings without k~n¤w~ings
whatings
happenings nextings. Song of Songs basic theme is
that organic movement and rest perpetually and ubiquitously cycle metabolically.
One must, if one is ethical, ask a question, "What must
Nature be like in order to do~due that movement
and rest diligently?"
One of Song of Songs' many interpretations issi Residue
of Residues (Suares). Doug has already used one of them, Quintessence
of Quintessencings. Allow us to focus briefly on Residue of Residues.
In quantum~reality, all issi evolving always.
All wave functionings are always evolvingq.
An enormous philosophicalq ramification is that n¤
evolvingq waveq functioningq
(qwf) is identicalc
to itself, quintessentially, ever. So if we omnitorq
a qwf with itself delayed, there will always be a signature,
a residual. Always! That residual, its quintessence, its songq
is a omnitoring of uncertaintyq, thus a omnitoring
of peaceq!
That residual is what we mean by "quantum~uncertainty."
It may be shown as quanton(selfnow,selflater)
issi a dynamic signature greater than or equal to h~bar. We seeq
howq uncertaintyq measuresq
ramifications of situationingsq in chaoequil
changing~evolvingq environsq. Doug's quanton
of self is classically shown as a Poisson Bracket (PB). Any two
qwfs may be thus complementarityq antinomializedq.
"Why would we want to do that, Doug?"
We gain an assessment of what a(many) system(s) is(are) doingq
in real timingsq (with evolvingq thermodynamicq)
classes of entropa
and cohera),
and that allows us to teach said system (or have it learn~adapt,
itself, per se) to make artificially intelligent (using
evolvingq rqcs
stochasticsq) choicingsq,
which themselves may be PBed in evolvingq quantonic~interrelationshipings.
Physical (physial) comsequences of quantonic~complementarilyq~antinomialismq
include: torque cancellation quantiques always have residuals,
super conduction quantiques always have residuals, and so on.
Doug, "How can you say that, write that?"
Con(m)trol systems, especially classical ones, predefinec
and mechanically reifyc (turn to stux) all (actually
a limitedc set of) choicesc. Why? To insure
determinismc of said systems' actions and behaviors.
This 'defines' a classical mechanism, a predicablec
machine. A machine which can only doc what it is designedc
to do in very carefully 'controlled' situations and 'contexts.'
Said machine cannot, is incapable to act outside of its design
parameters (classicists refer this 'quality design,' it is actually
quantitative design, classicists view quantity as a metric for
quality much as Einstein viewed acceleration
as gravity). It is classically 'designed' to be "generally
incapable." Is it specifically capable? Yes! But only to
do what it is designed to do. It has no life. It cannot adapt
to changings in comtextings. It is a classically dumb machine
which runs on a tautology of automaticity. It is a closed system.
It is a linear system. It is an exclusive system. It is a dead
system!
Peace as uncertainty begs systems which we emerscitect
and emerscenture
to have many choicesq, potentially unlimited choicesq
to adapt to situations (environsq) by evolvingq
its systemic roleq given chancings~changings
in comtextings.
When one, as an individualq, realizesq
one's choicesq are unlimited and have unlimited potential,
oneq experiencesq peaceq of
uncertaintyq, Song of Songs, Residue of Residues,
Quintessence of Quintessencings.
Embrace indeterminationq. Embrace uncertaintyingsq.
Why? Paul Pietsch said it best, "Indetermination is the
principle feature of intelligence." Shufflebrain.
"What will you do?" Embrace peaceq. (Eschew
classical determinism.)
Doug - 24,25Dec2014.
Doug - 4Feb2013.