Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

If you're stuck in a browser frame - click here to view this same page in Quantonics!

Quantonics' Quantum Remediation
English Language
Millennium III
by Doug Renselle
: 20Jul2002


Alphabetical Reference Index Quantonics English Language Remediation Pages
©Quantonics, Inc., 2002-2028

( says, "You are here!")

Master Index

Index to Quantonics English Language Remediated B Terms
Most recent additions-revisions marked add and rev.

be before begin belie born borne both


English Language Problematic

Quantonics' Quantum

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2028


Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'be' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'bæ.'

In classical contexts we shall use 'be.' In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'bæ.'

Classical substance which can 'be' is dichonically objective. To classically 'be' is to be stoppable and to hold still for classical unilateral observation. Classical objects do not, indeed cannot, evolve, change, emerge.

Quantum flux which can 'bæ' is quantonically quantum. Quantum bæing issi animate pr¤cess: always changing amd changing ahll.

See: are. Also see 'do.'

Page top index.


Classical 'before' assumes an analytic 'one universal time.' We call this "unitime." Classical 'before' assumes a classical state variable deterministically prescribes and causes a transformed classical state variable (i.e., n-tuple with a unitime coordinate) effect. Understanding classical 'before' and 'after' inductive logic, and comparing it to its quantum analogue, rather anacoquecigrues, permits one to understand SOM's self delusion that classical measurement is always objective and locus-time (space-time), position-momentum, energy-time, etc. certain.

Quantum 'bef¤re' assumes plural st¤chastic 'many multiversal times.' Quantum 'bef¤re' assumes many/ensehmble quantum prec¤nditions' (Value) phasicities (~qu-'bits,' i.e., quantum 'number' quantons) animately, st¤chastically amd asynchr¤n¤usly affecting amd emerqing reality's next ch¤ices wh¤se ensehmble ¤utc¤mes are thus quantum uncertain. Understanding quantum 'bef¤re' amd 'after' p¤ly-, para-, pragma-l¤gic enlightens ¤ne why quantum measurement will never ¤ffer classically ideal, simultaneous dichonic locus-time, position-momentum, energy-time, etc., certainty.

See dialectic above-below hierarchy and before-after scission manifested in classical 'definitions' of object and subject.

Page top index.


Etymology - Classical

Etymology - Quantum

Synonyms - Classical


Synonyms - Quantum


: begin

Begin, classically, is an event.

Classical events are 'caused' by some other event's effect.

Question is, "In the beginning?"

Of course this begs a sophism: "What begins the beginning?"

State-ic reality, stoppable reality, concrete reality, classical material, objective, dialectical reality claims "the beginning," and "the end."

See our state-event diagrams in our review of Dennett's Chapter 3 of his Breaking the Spell.

See thelogos. See event.

: begin

No such notion as 'begin' exists in quantum reality. Quantum reality is an animate, semper fluxio, absolute flux, quantum~processing reality. 'Begin,' 'end,' 'state,' and 'event' are invalid terms in quantum reality.

Novelty may emerge from ongoing processings, but we can never find a single classical 'cause,' 'effect,' 'begin,' 'end,' 'state,' and 'event' 1-1 mechanically corresponding said emergent novelty. Novelty is quantum processings. Emergence is quantum processings.

Doug added detail here borne of a need in Doug's current (late 2006 thru 2008 and beyond) of Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and his A Treatise on Human Nature.

Doug - 14Dec2006.

See: end.

Page top index.


: belie

Literally-classically 'to give the lie to...' To belie classical dialectic is to show that it is a lie, a ruse, subterfuge, intellectual rape, and academic pogroming of mechanical, formal, objective assessments of 'reality,' etc.

Now ponder classical belief! To have classical belief is to adopt and adapt to lies about logic and reason: dialectic.

Similar for believe!

A classical lie is to believe 'truth' (trooth) based in dialectical CONtradiction: to CONtradict is to belie, to "give the lie" to belief in that which isn't CONtradicted!

Classically, if whatever isn't contradicted, it can stand provisionally as classical 'truth.' However, classicists believe a state-ic 'truth' that contradiction belies classical 'truth.' So classical contradiction belies classical belief. Aristotle got into similar trouble with self-other-reference of his sillygisms, e.g., identity A=A. If A evolves, his identity no longer holds.

Aristotle's contradiction claims, A is either A or it is not A. If A is evolving, it contradicts itself: A belies itself!

Quantum~reality "steam rolls" classical reality! (Doug's use of "steam rolls" is from Suares' opus.) Quantum~reality quantum~bælihæs classical-reality.

Doug - 4Feb2013.

: bælihæ, bælihæs, bælihæf, bælihævæ, etc.

Quantum~bælihæf inures quantum~evolution as an ontology: quantascintillationchaosequilibriaevolution. So classical notions of contradiction and 'belie, belief, and believe' are simply bogus in quantum~reality and any philosophy which attempts its description.

A great quote on classical belief as its own belie is, "There is no greater hindrance to growth than belief." Male protagonist Sydney, p. 13, Seventh Telling, by Mitchell Chefitz, St. Martin's Press, 2001.

Obtain, please fathom, how Sidney is telling, those of us who have ears to listen, that classical concrete belief is Pirsigean ESQ, SQ without DQ, Yod denying Aleph.

Belief turns off Planck's quantum~clock. Belief Thav's the Noun of Yod (belief kills your spirit). It's what Jesus meant by "Sabachthani" in his last moments. Sabach (humanity's dialectical trap) thani (killed my spirit).

Similar as how Sabachthani killed JhShWh's spiritual energy by trapping it in a web of dialectical deceit (state and status quo: as Bergson's first classical delusion), dialectic kills as exemplified by one of Hebraic's most abominable oxymora, 'Ha Qabala.' Dialectic proffers delusions (deceitful veils), of definiteness, state, certainty, and linear-monotemporal-predicability, among countless others. In Hebrew (not in Qabala's Autiot~Gematria) 'Ha' is a classically definite article 'the:' Linguistic garbage borne of adherence to bogus dialectical semantics! Dialectical 'Ha Qabala,' as Jesus' experience of Sabachthani (a web trap, in Thav's killing all Noun of Yodq, forcing Jesus to partially, tentatively, and enthymemetically revert to Yodc). Please visit Doug's Quantum English Language Problematics web page and browser search 'Bergson.'

Use of Ha in Ha Qabala is very similar use of Ha in "HaShyareem" in Song of Songs verse I,1. It means simply, ~Hay~ which in Qabala's Autiot is archetypically Lifeq. So Ha Qabala isn't 'the' Qabala, rather it is Living~Qabala, ~Hay~Qabala~! Spelled~outq it is ~Hay~Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay~. It is extraordinarilyq an expression of Jesus' ~God~words~ in his Farewell Discourse — paraphrased by Doug —

[In response to ten of Jesus' dialectical disciples'
[excluding Mary Magdalene and Thomas Didymos]
queries about 'wanting to see God...' ]

— "Don't you know? Do not you realize that:

  • I am in you and you are in me, and
  • God is in me and I am in God,
  • therefore God is in you?"

Jesus' words as paraphrased are HaQabala! There is n¤t one iota of dialectic's formal causal concrete dead mechanism in that!

Dialectic: "So Dark the Con of Man."

See Elaine Pagels' The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis regarding Jesus' dialectical disciples. Also see her Beyond Belief, and Gnostic Paul.

Doug - 26Dec2014.

Uncertainty, indetermination, peace of embracing vital energy, an incredible holiday gift...

Yes! Doug is saying, "Uncertaintyq, indeterminationq are Qabala." Thinkq about it. Compare Heraclitus' "Determination (borne of dialecticc) is warc and hatec." One must be logicallyc order to hatec and killc.

Have you ever heard someone say, "I know what I believe!" This is the fountc of judgmentc, of dialectical-hatred and -war! "Judge not (dialectically)..."

  • "Either-or no more!" Doug.
  • "Duality is no more!" Suares, Song of Songs, Shambala, 1972, p. 49.

...Belief is stuck, stux sux. Peace is freedom (free will) borne of indetermination. Read Song of Songs, Verse 1, "Shyar HaShyareem Esher LeShalomoh." It means, "Quintessence of Quintessencings witnesses~con(m)firms Hær Peace." We see here Quintessence as Peace borne of uncertainty~indetermination. Peace is living at nowings' edgings without k~n¤w~ings whatings happenings nextings. Song of Songs basic theme is that organic movement and rest perpetually and ubiquitously cycle metabolically. One must, if one is ethical, ask a question, "What must Nature be like in order to do~due that movement and rest diligently?"

One of Song of Songs' many interpretations issi Residue of Residues (Suares). Doug has already used one of them, Quintessence of Quintessencings. Allow us to focus briefly on Residue of Residues.

In quantum~reality, all issi evolving always. All wave functionings are always evolvingq. An enormous philosophicalq ramification is that n¤ evolvingq waveq functioningq (qwf) is identicalc to itself, quintessentially, ever. So if we omnitorq a qwf with itself delayed, there will always be a signature, a residual. Always! That residual, its quintessence, its songq is a omnitoring of uncertaintyq, thus a omnitoring of peaceq!

That residual is what we mean by "quantum~uncertainty." It may be shown as quanton(selfnow,selflater) issi a dynamic signature greater than or equal to h~bar. We seeq howq uncertaintyq measuresq ramifications of situationingsq in chaoequil changing~evolvingq environsq. Doug's quanton of self is classically shown as a Poisson Bracket (PB). Any two qwfs may be thus complementarityq antinomializedq. "Why would we want to do that, Doug?" We gain an assessment of what a(many) system(s) is(are) doingq in real timingsq (with evolvingq thermodynamicq) classes of entropa and cohera), and that allows us to teach said system (or have it learn~adapt, itself, per se) to make artificially intelligent (using evolvingq rqcs stochasticsq) choicingsq, which themselves may be PBed in evolvingq quantonic~interrelationshipings. Physical (physial) comsequences of quantonic~complementarilyq~antinomialismq include: torque cancellation quantiques always have residuals, super conduction quantiques always have residuals, and so on.

Doug, "How can you say that, write that?"

Con(m)trol systems, especially classical ones, predefinec and mechanically reifyc (turn to stux) all (actually a limitedc set of) choicesc. Why? To insure determinismc of said systems' actions and behaviors. This 'defines' a classical mechanism, a predicablec machine. A machine which can only doc what it is designedc to do in very carefully 'controlled' situations and 'contexts.' Said machine cannot, is incapable to act outside of its design parameters (classicists refer this 'quality design,' it is actually quantitative design, classicists view quantity as a metric for quality much as Einstein viewed acceleration as gravity). It is classically 'designed' to be "generally incapable." Is it specifically capable? Yes! But only to do what it is designed to do. It has no life. It cannot adapt to changings in comtextings. It is a classically dumb machine which runs on a tautology of automaticity. It is a closed system. It is a linear system. It is an exclusive system. It is a dead system!

Peace as uncertainty begs systems which we emerscitect and emerscenture to have many choicesq, potentially unlimited choicesq to adapt to situations (environsq) by evolvingq its systemic roleq given chancings~changings in comtextings.

When one, as an individualq, realizesq one's choicesq are unlimited and have unlimited potential, oneq experiencesq peaceq of uncertaintyq, Song of Songs, Residue of Residues, Quintessence of Quintessencings.

Embrace indeterminationq. Embrace uncertaintyingsq. Why? Paul Pietsch said it best, "Indetermination is the principle feature of intelligence." Shufflebrain.

"What will you do?" Embrace peaceq. (Eschew classical determinism.)

Doug - 24,25Dec2014.

Quantum~bælihæf is faith in immortality and perpetuity of cosmic consciousness born of quanta and their scintilla.

Quantumists must learn to "take sides with" (Suares) quantum~complementarity and evolution. One must reject-belie classical contradiction. As you may grasp above classicism does this to itself!

Doug - 4Feb2013.

Page top index.


Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'born' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'b¤rn.'

In classical contexts we shall use 'born.' In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'b¤rn.'

See Are You Alive or Dead?

See end.

Classically we all experience what Quantonics calls "One life centricity." SOMites believe that we are 'born' once, live once, and die once.

Quantum reality denies SOM's one life centricity. We are always both isobeing and being. In Quantonics notation:


We are all experiencing an endless quantum ¤nt¤l¤gy which we may depict like this:


Where ¤ur wingdings f¤nt '' (l¤wer case 'v') means "in Quant¤nic interrelati¤nships with." Quant¤nic interrelati¤nships are quantum, included-middle, c¤¤bsfecting, co-inside-nt, etc. interrelati¤nships. Our n¤tati¤n sh¤ws h¤w all ¤f quantum reality is always b¤th is¤being and being while simultane¤usly b¤th bec¤ming and unbec¤ming. S¤ when we say 'b¤rn' in quantum c¤mtexts we mean b¤th is¤being and being, b¤th bec¤ming and unbec¤ming.

Page top index.


Quantonics ch¤¤ses t¤ c¤¤pt a classical interpretation of 'borne' amd remerq all quantum comtextual ¤ccurrences with 'b¤rne.'

In classical contexts we shall use 'borne.' In Quantonics/quantum comtexts we shall use 'b¤rne.'

In classical contexts, 'borne' means among other concepts, "to objectively carry or support."

In quantum c¤mtexts 'b¤rne' means Quantonic interrelati¤nships ¤f tentatively persistent systems ¤f fermi¤nic quantum dec¤herence. Quantonic systems ¤f fermi¤ns are n¤t wh¤lly quantum c¤herent. As such they 'latch' ¤r 'gravitate' their is¤v¤lumes ¤f is¤spatial is¤flux and simultane¤usly resist ('bear') ¤ther fermi¤nic systems' sharing ¤f their tentatively latched is¤v¤lumes.

Y¤u may ch¤¤se t¤ see h¤w this is an extremely inn¤vative way ¤f viewing quantum reality. Cutting a fermi¤nic system (a b¤ard, ¤r steel beam) in tw¤ is a very simple subclass ¤f anti-gravitati¤n.

Classicists (SOMwits) call this quantum view of reality, "insane, nonsense, incredulous, ridiculous, nutso, silly, absurd, deconstructionist, etc."

Page top index.


As preposition, see of. In quantum comtexts, use 'b¤th.'

In classical contexts 'both' implies singular, dichotomous, biformal objective interactions (conjunction, pronoun, adjective, preposition) which are analytic and thus by classical convention always unilogical deterministic cause-effect interactions.

In quantum comtexts 'b¤th' implies quantonic, plural, quantum interrelati¤nships which are always paral¤gical st¤chastic affects-¤utc¤mes interrelati¤nships.

Any comtextual uses ¤f 'b¤th' beg inferences ¤f quantum c¤insident multiplicity am¤ng plural, b¤th l¤cal amd n¤nl¤cal, quantum islands ¤f vari¤us amd varying comtexts. When using 'b¤th' comtextually, it is g¤¤d t¤ think "all-amd," amd "many-amd," as distinguished from a more classical "both-and," where 'both' is classically dialectical-dichotomous-bivalent.

We shall use single qu¤tes when referring these terms, respectively, "¤ut ¤f con-comtexts."

Page top index.

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2028

Return to Quantonics English Language Remediation Index Page                                  Arches

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
1950 East Greyhound Pass, Ste 18, # 368
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2001-2028 Rev. 2Mar2015  PDR — Created 20Jul2002  PDR
(17Apr2001 rev - Add 'both.')
(15May2001 rev - Extend 'both' rem. Add anchors to some rem's.)
(20Jun2001 rev - Add 'be.')
(4Oct2001 rev - Add 'before.')
(26Sep2002 rev - Remediate all quantum comtextual occurrences of 'ensemble.')
(11Oct2003 rev - Reset legacy red text. Replace wingdings arrows with GIFs for browser compatibility.)
(13Jan2005 rev - Update 'be.' Reset page width constraints. Add page top indexes.)
(2Nov2005 rev - Update 'before.')
(14,20Jan2006 rev - Reset red text. Reformat page top.)
(14,24Dec2006 rev - Update 'begin.' Minor corrections-updates to 'begin.')
(20Sep2007 rev - Reset legacy red text. Reformat.)
(18Dec2007 rev - Add 'Problematics' link at page top.)
(23Apr2009 rev - Routine maintenance. Replace some wingdings with gifs. Replace some slashes with dashes.)
(20Jul2010 rev - Reformat page. Adjust colors. Make page current.)
(4,13Feb2013 rev - Add new 'belie.' Add 'Quantum Belie' anchor under 'Belie.')
(18Mar2014 rev - Reset legacy markups. Make page current.)
(24-25Dec2014 rev - Update 'Belie.' Repair some typos. Add Doug's Ha Qabala comparison to HaShyareem commentary.)
(12,27Jan2015 rev - Add reference to Suares quote, "Duality is no more." Add 'Why Peace is Uncertainty' link under 'Belie.')
(2Mar2015 rev - Add link to quote of Song of Songs Verse 1. Reset legacy markups. Make page current. Adjust color.)