
 Equilibria and chaos are positive~energy~wave, and thus stochastic,
quantum~phenomena.
 Equilibria and chaos exhibit stindyanic
both movement and rest wave ontologies.
 Equilibria emerge from lower gradient quantum~scintillationings:
Rest. SQ. Tav.
 Equilibria emerq rest as relative lower change~energy
quiescence (lower energies of instabilityings:
see omnitor).
 Equilibria may rest at relatively higher and relatively
lower quiescent energies.
 Equilibria exhibit quantum~complementarityings of both
adiabaticity and n¤n adiabaticity: quantons(adiabaticityings,n¤nadiabaticityings).
 Equilibria as adiabatic rest (can) happen(s) quantum~atemporally. (I.e.,
zær¤~latæncy c¤~affæctation,
c¤rrælation, an(m)d ahction
at a distance: gl¤bal n¤n~l¤cality.)
 Equilibria as n¤n~adiabatic rest happens quantum~temporally.
(Many quantum~l¤cal timings: positive~wave~energyings'
st¤chastics thereof.)  Doug
3Jan2012.
 Chaos emerge from higher
gradient scintillationings, i.e., radical~instability as
: Movement. DQ. Aleph.
(Re~[Vv]aluings. A tentative movement toward FFE:
system evolution!)
 Chaos emerq movement as relative higher change~energy
systemic~perturbance (higher energies of instabilityings).
 Chaos may move to relatively higher and relatively
lower QTP energies.
 Chaos exhibit quantum~complementarityings of both
adiabaticity and n¤n adiabaticity: quantons(adiabaticityings,n¤nadiabaticityings).
 Chaos as adiabatic movement (can) happen(s) quantum~atemporally.
 Chaos as n¤n~adiabatic movement happens quantum~temporally.
 Movement issi ihn Rest and Rest
issi ihn Movement: quantons(movementings,restings)
nissin quantons(chaos,equilibria).
(Essence of "understanding the logos, the
account.")
 QTP higher gradience applies to both movement~to~higher~energy
(chao~analanche)
and movement~to~lower~energy changes (chao~avalanche).
 Durable lower gradience applies to both rest~at~higher~energy
(equil~analanche) and rest~at~lower~energy changes (equil~avalanche).
 Each chaoequil~scintillationing has myriad affectings (belies
classical causeeffect hylicity:
classical notions of 'causeeffect' are bogus).
 Each QED chaoequil~scintillationing
is (appears to be) adiabatic, that is, quantal
chaos is (appears to be) zeroentropic. Adiabaticity (zeroentropy)
nissin n¤n~adiabaticity (posentropy).
 Equilibria include lower gradience equil~analanchings and
equil~avalanchings.
 Chaos include higher gradience chao~analanchings and chao~avalanchings.
 Chaos onset desnouers itself among sentience (sentience
use is intentional: assume holographic~reality)
as high gradience
analanching of Cognitive
Overburden™.
 Equilibrium
onset desnouers itself among sentience (sentience use
is intentional  Doug's use of intentional_{q} is one of selection~choice_{q} (Jung's Libidic_{q} quantadulation) at quantum~reality's edgings of k~now~ings.
Classical 'intention' begs planning, determinationcertainty, and
predication all of which are bogus in Quantonics. Doug  18,27Dec2012, add Jung's 'Libidic' nexus and quantadulation
 21Mar2014  Doug.) as accelerating
emergence of n¤væl re~cognitionings (re~[Vv]aluings).
 All chaoequil
re~[Vv]aluings in quantum~reality are radically comtext sensitive
(i.e., hologra[[ph][m][il]]ic)
and thus intrinsically quantum~relative. Relativity, [Vv]alue
relativity, is intrinsic in quantum~reality. Doug  21Jan2012.
 Quantum~chaos issi higher gradience
quantum~transmutation.
 Quantum~equilibrium issi lower gradience
quantum~transmutation.
 Quantum~gradience offers
many manifesta:
 partial gradience as evidence of becoming and unbecoming
[OEDC phenomena]
 partial gradience of constitua of subsystemsystem ensembles
 gradience of gradience AKA GoG
 GoG recursings  Fractal, SOR (Self~Other~Referent),
with and without entanglement (WAWE), etc.
 frequency of frequency AKA FoF
 FoF
recursings  Fractal, SOR, WAWE, etc.
 Value of Value AKA VoV
 VoV
recursings  Fractal, SOR, WAWE, etc.
 value of Value AKA voV
 voV
recursings  Fractal, SOR, WAWE, etc.
 Value of value AKA Vov
 Vov
recursings  Fractal, SOR, WAWE, etc.
Updates for FoF, VoV, voV, and Vov...Doug  27Dec2012. Students
note all of above under quantum~gradience manifesta are rioq,
rqcs, rqfi, etc. This is Nature as Value, Quality, etc.
 Quantum~mathematical
use of Peircean semiosis and semiosy to assess gradience and
its recursive rates: quanton(gradience_{x},gradience_{y})
where quanton represents Peirce's interpretant, one gradient
as 'subject' and one gradient as 'object.' Note: Peirce's language
is dialectical, however, it begs quantum~interpretation. Doug
did that: "Interpretation
involves according primacy to [quantum] subjectivity over [dialectical]
objectivity." Philip R. Wallace, Paradox Lost. 14Aug2012
 Doug. Doug's brackets in paraphrased Wallace quote.
 etc.
Doug  28Jul2012.
 Measurement of gradience of chaos~analanche, and ~avalanche
and measurement of gradience of equilibrium~rest and movements
away from rest toward equilibrium~analanche and ~avalanche.
 An obvious approach here is to use phase~energy interrelationshipings
to assess evolutionary changings in equilibrium and chaos. To
Doug, there appears an implied requirement for classical stoppability
here...perhaps there are other phase approaches which are viable
under a core quantum essential that  reality is perpetual change.
 To Doug, though, it isn't apparent H5W
to accomplish it. Big issues are: what interrelationshipings
(see important link just above) do we use to assess phase~energyings?
I think (I am k~n¤w~ings) this requires innovation.
 Another apparent approach is to perpetually monitor (being
quantum~omniht¤rings) real
wave functions in real time and assess frequency changes (especially
gradiencings) real time. Higher frequency is higher energy. Higher
gradiencings may be exhibiting changings to~from chaos and lower
gradiencings may be exhibiting changings to~from equilibria.
Changings in gradiencings (a kind of quantum~acceleration assessment)
become crucial aspects (crux) of our omnitorings' qua.
Ensembles , and their
hologra[[ph][m][il]]ic networkings, of these classes of changings
require quantum~Value~assessmentings for stochastic forecastings
in any quantum~sense. Doug  1Feb2012.
An issue of that approach is H5W do we choose to assess gradience
of wave energy changes and instabilityings. Doug believes 'real'
quantum~computing will simplify these monitoring issues.
 Self~other~referent~quantum~recursion appears to be required
along with means to assess omnivergence of radical~autsimilarity
which attends equilibrium at near quiescence. Ability to accomplish
this has value in other sciences than Finance, Economics, and
Politics, like volcanology, tsunamology, and plate~tectonics
wave~energyings.
 Clearly, Doug is narrating
con(m)cerns of new (n¤væl)
philosophies and new (n¤væl) 'sciences'
here.
Readers observe...obtain...how those red
and green quanta can be squeezed (higher frequency, higher energy)
and stretched (lower frequency, lower energy). When we squeeze
quanta gradience and gradience of gradience increase (chaos increases,
equilibrium decreases). When we stretch quanta gradience and gradience of gradience decrease (chaos
decreases, equilibrium increases). Again chaos nissin equilibrium,
"...without contradiction." Complementarity of chaos
and equilibrium! Quanton(chaos,equilibria). Too, quantum~complementarity
of isoflux (AKA "reserve energy")
and evolution reign. In quantonicsese: quanton(isoflux,quanton(chaos,equilibria)),
i.e., evolution itself.
Doug  31Aug2012.
 Etc.
Doug  282930Dec2011, 12,7,21Jan2012, 1Feb2012, 28Jul2012,
14,31Aug2012.

