For Doug that suggests a hologram Gestalt of four quadrants: Gestalt as chaotic~sea with quadrants as islands. We see islands (quadrants) as quantum~complementary one another engendered by Jung's cosmic Libido autsimilar Aleph in blood. quanton(quadrant_3,quadrant_1) quanton(quadrant_4,quadrant_1) quanton(quadrant_2,quadrant_3) quanton(quadrant_2,quadrant_4) quanton(quadrant_3,quadrant_4) He apparently intuited quantum~holographicity of cosmic~unconscious (Aut: Aleph~Waw~Tav: 1.6.400) middle~including conscious (Hhokmah) islands (Iot: Yod~Waw~Tav: 10.6.400) of actuality! as quantum libido (naturalq selectionq) which Doug QELRs as quantadulation. Then as combinations we, again, see six quantum~complementary interrelationshipings in Triumphant Love. "In Mesopotamian Sumer (land of Abraham...)...Inanna, the goddess~queen was held to be the cup bearer whose sacred essence...was called the Graal... Her symbol, as shown on coins of the era, was the Rosi~crucis -- the Dew Cup -- a cross within a circle, the original emblem of the Holy Grail." Laurence Gardner, in his 2005 Magdalene Legacy, Chapter 9 'Sacred Marriage,' Scarlet Woman, p. 142, Barnes and Noble, first edition. Doug's brackets and ellipses, removal of thelogos as possible, otherwise Gardner's use of 'the' is italicized by Doug. (see Jung's Liber Primus textual descriptions) (compare Jesus~as~son as Wisdom~of~Living~Father as Light) (compare Chaldæan~Gnosis' quantum~emerscitecture... as ...Mother,son,mother,[either_YahWeh (as Yod): dead father, or_YhShWh: living Father (as Aleph)]) (Mother is Em, son is Jesus, mother is Sophia) (compare Em as Lakh, and At vis-à-vis Atah) (compare Pirsig's rt to Autiot's At...) (Doug, somewhat fabulously, in any sense of fable, enjoys cosmic~energyq efforts of Darren Aronofsky (director), Hugh Jackman (protagonist), Rachel Weisz (patient), Ellen Burstyn (Matriarch) and their stellar opus entitled, The Fountain. This is a film about The Tree of Life and its Sepher Yetsiral cosmicq requirementsq for antinomialsq: quanton(lifeq,deathq), quanton(hermaphrodite,dichonq(female,male)), quanton(scintillationq,quantizationq), quanton(peace,terror), quanton(Jesusq,Satanc), quanton(holograq,dialectac), etc. Imagine Cross of Lorraine below with a single vertical and four, instead of two, horizontals. Those horizontals would represent limbs on The Tree of Life and top down they would be labeled: emanations, creation, formation, and action. Imagine Jung's four quadrants analogously. Compare Doug's creatio ex nihilo aperio shown graphically as fuzzonq (Emanationsq) to bosonq (Creationq) to fermionq (Formq) to actualityq (Actionq) ontologyq.
(Another quantum~issue to worry about here: Is cross dialectical? Same answer.) Reference for Suares quote is his Trilogy, Cipher of Genesis, pp. 208-209, Shambhala, paperback, 1976. places [is] in intimate copulation with the world since it constantly bears fresh and unexpected fruits." All quanta, to some extent, scintillate all quanta, so Doug writes and says, "Flux fux flux." Suares' cosmic energy copulation! Classical-reality is linear~continuous~closed-dialectical-dead. Doug inferred too, quantum~individual over classical-society. See p. 4, Introduction, Mark Gaffney's Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes, 2004, Inner Traditions, Rochester Vermont. Both the blood in the artery and the blood in the vein. Both the source of grace [equilibrial] and the clear fountain; And the same artery and the same vein And the same blood and the troubled [chaotic] fountain." Doug's brackets for quantum juxta antinomials quanton(equilibria1,chaos2) - 16Mar2014. quantum~complementary~antinomialism of quanton(Jesus1,Satan2). Compare Jung's quadrants 2&3 vis-à-vis quadrants 1&4. Compare quanton(movementings1,restings2)! Compare quanton(chaos1,equilibria2)!! quanton(quadrant_2,quadrant_2) quanton(quadrant_3,quadrant_3) quanton(quadrant_4,quadrant_4) and Jung's Spirit of this Time (AKA Yod, SQ, classical, etc.): quanton(quadrant_1,Yod) quanton(quadrant_2,Aleph) quanton(quadrant_2,Yod) quanton(quadrant_3,Aleph) quanton(quadrant_3,Yod) quanton(quadrant_4,Aleph) quanton(quadrant_4,Yod)
dichon(quadrant_1, Yod) dichon(quadrant_2, Yod) dichon(quadrant_3, Yod) dichon(quadrant_4, Yod)
adventures struggling with his choice of Spirit of the Depths over Spirit of this Time. New Quantum~Philosophy, et al., are telling autsimilar stories which affirm one another. |
By Doug Renselle ©Quantonics, Inc., 2013-2030 | |||||||||||||
Jung's Quantum Predilections | Doug's Comcision (Other authors quoted, too.) |
Quadrants Described | |||||||||||
Libido |
Love Triumphant! Suares writes, "...faith in immortal consciousness of cosmic reality..." Faith in Love Triumphant! Faith in perpetual, ubiquitous, immortal Libido! An ancient gnostic saying, "...mixing all things in all..." Love Triumphant! Libido! Implication? Monism is deceit...another gnostic saying. Libido implies pluralism reigns! Heterogeneity hyper homogeneity! Love Triumphant! Quantonics says, "quantons(scin,quan)!" Libido! Ubiquitous, perpetual, immortal quantization and scintillation of all quanta in cosmic reality. Love Triumphant! Quantum flux fux quantum flux! Libido! Cosmic copulation of all quanta with and ihn all quanta! Love Triumphant! Livings and Dyings as 1, 2, 3, 4 processings of quantum~interrelationshipings. |
1, 2, 3, 4 | |||||||||||
Recursion
Recursion
Recursion
Recursion
Recursion
Recursion |
Compare ' to Jung's Plate 127. Similar but rotated 45 degrees. Compare too ¤ to ' and notice how they complement one another. One which looks like a steering wheel on a sail boat is symbol Doug uses for quanta. If we rotate it 45 degrees it complements Jung's graphic symbolically. 'Monotype sorts' font required to show that comparative symbol of an X in an O. Jung's symbol is a + in an o. Here's a Doug line art rendition of Jung's Triumphant Love: Similar Gershwin's Rhapsody in Blue...mofab mojo... Then linguistically Sophia as Baphomet ATBASH...Aleph~Tav~Bayt~Sheen...5345...forward in reverse... Moon walk? Foward in reverse going n¤where in situ... Recursively Aleph~Yod~Aleph steam rolling sole. Pun intended here. Semantic of former though is Aleph is in existence and existence is in Aleph. Suares might call this "cosmic consciousness." Further, Suares might say, "This is a tell of Faith. Faith as Immortality of Cosmic Consciousness." Re: One of Jesus' 'parables.' Re: quanton(Mother,father). See Gospel of Thomas 55. (Please view Love,Hate as Suaresesque quantum~antinomials as quantonics' complementary duality. Doug - 21Mar2013.) "Quantum~antinomial~dualityings are how Nature assesses and understands Herself." A Quantonics HotMeme Hermeneutic of Carlo Suares Doug is making a nexus that Jung's symbol above represents quantization (Which enables quantum~antinomial~duality assessments of better,worse. 21Mar2013 - Doug.). Jung's reuse of it, recursively, in quadrant two is exceptionally powerful in exposing Jung's predilection for quantal~recursion. Doug believes this is a manifestation of Jung's subliminal nexi with unconscious cosmic reality (e.g., isoflux, QVF, self~canceling hyperspace, etc.) through his individual subconscious which acts like a cosmic grail, a cosmic nexus antinomially~interrelating conscious and unconscious as a quanton(unconscious,conscious). Doug's comma~nospace in that script represents Jung's subconscious as (a) grail. In his Red Book this appears as a nexus to his soul, said nexus Doug infers as Sophia, perhaps Salome, perhaps mother2. Perhaps a serpent as described in original Genesis Autiot acting as a grail to Magdalene3 acting as a grail to Adam...putting Aleph in Adam so the Qabalic games of fecund4 life can begin: an grail~immanence~educed exodus from Eden into Cosmic Reality. Said nexus depends on cosmic~immanence of cosmic~unconsciousness in all and all in cosmic~unconsciousness. These nexi are perpetual, ubiquitous, immortal. Libido in absolute pragma affecting absolute quantal change just as his Plate 127 illustrates. Love Triumphant! Libido! Cosmic libido! Please read Suares' Cipher of Genesis to grasp Doug's esoterica above. A huge affector of Jung's recursion is quite simply: any language which is objective and without symbolic recursion is a dead-the-dead (Mawt~Hamawt) language. Incapable, intrinsically incapable of describing quantum~flux and its cosmic reality. Doug only knows two languages which can be (are capable of) doing this: Autiot and Quantonics. Suares describes Autiot's recursive qua very well. Compare classical 'equals' symbol as a static 'identity' with quantonics' recursive equalings as immortal flux energy. Said language must be describing flux (AKA "cosmic~energy"), period. Only flux can recurse everywhere~included~middling~associationings (EIMA)! Quantum~h¤l¤grams do recurse flux! Autiot does recurse symbols of flux! Quantonics' quantons do recurse interrelationshipings of flux! When holograms (and cosmic reality) are described by objective-static and immobile languages...their Quality~Value evaporates. Libido evaporates (in Jungese: "death of love, death of libido") without dynamic recursion of quanta. That is why dialecticians cannot find their inner, cannot fathom logos. Suares' art above shows finding inner as recursion of a symbol ( a '+' in a 'o') for dynamically interrelating quanta. Again, for emphasis, Libido evaporates without dynamic recursion of quanta. With dynamic recursion of quanta Libido is always quantum~comsciously with us, and Jung emphasizes that presence like this:
We may ostense our emphasis on quadrant two and enlighten selves through its many sema and semasiologies, including:
Doug - 30May2013. Here is Doug's graphic rendition of Suares' Cross Number 8 as an ogdoad: Doug - 2Aug2013. |
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2
focus is on 2 |
|||||||||||
Coobsfection |
Issues here TBD are awareness, flux with and without entanglement, entanglement enabling fecundity of cosmic flux, fecundity of flux as Libido's evolutionary transmutation of cosmic reality. Omniscuss QED, QCD, a little on quarks and fuzzon ontology as aspects of Libidic quantum~transmutation. See Jung's [translators'] footnote 38 p. 232 Liber Primus. Note that classical society cannot coobsfect. Only quantum~individuals can coobsfect. Latter begs heterogeneity hyper monism. Doug - 23Jan2013. |
Each quadrant coobsfects others. | |||||||||||
Complementarity |
Issues here TBD include: middle~inclusion in a dynamic (fluxing), evolving, rqcs~rioq~rqfi~rqsu, quantized~scintillating quantum~realm. Aleph EIMAing itself with Yod as a spiritual exemplar of complementarity. Aleph steam rolling Yod's dialectic (CTMs) evoking Yod's adaptation toward quantum (QTMs). Quantonics', in agency of Aleph, adoption of quantized~multi~entropic~complementarity putting itself in a steam roller quantized~modality over SOM linear-continuous-methodology. |
Each quadrant quantum~complements others. | |||||||||||
Quantization |
"The spirit of this time in me wanted to recognize the greatness and extent of the supreme meaning, but not its littleness. The spirit of the depths, however, conquered this arrogance, and I had to swallow the small as a means of healing the immortal in me. It completely burnt [Planck quanta are unimaginable energy! Nonconceptual from any classical conspective.] up my innards since it was inglorious and unheroic. It was even ridiculous and revolting. But the pliers of the spirit [gravitas of Libido] of the depths held me, and I had to drink the bitterest of all draughts." P. 230, Jung, The Red Book, Liber Primus, 1st edition, Norton, 2009. Doug's bold green. Doug's brackets. Classicists who worse-ship 'The spirit of this time' AKA YahWeh: demiurge dead-father of state and dialectic, call quantum~reality, "absurd, nonsense, equivocal, prevaricative, incomplete, etc." Even Jung found it so: "...ridiculous and revolting." Spirit of the depths AKA YhShWh, forced quanta on Jung as Jung's "...bitterest of all draughts." Actually belief in dialectical monism is lying to oneself. That is what YahWeh does. He encourages us and propagandizes us to lie to ourselves! YahWeh wants us to believe that he is 'the' One. He dialectically hates quanta and loves concrete: concrete is classically 'opposite' quanta. Doug's Quantum~English~Language~Remediation of believe issi bælihævæ (pronounced roughly "bailee[f]~haavah"). Quanta and scintilla are parents of chaos and equilibria, transmutation and evolution, falling in Error (spirit of this time) and finding one's child inner (spirit of the depths), then finding one's self. Moving away from mankind's 'the christ demiurge' toward God's son 'Jesus the light.' Doug's Jungese from pp. 234-235 of Liber Primus. Quanta scintillate, transmute, and evolve "In the Light." We are Ihn The Light, and The Light issi Ihn Uhs.
All energy~wellings in quantum~reality are quantized and holographically interrelate recursively through quanta called "grails." We are holographically~recursively among quanta and quanta are holographically~recursively among us. Doug's best reference for this among quantum~memeo is Carlo Suares' Aleph in Blood derivative in his Cipher of Genesis, Chapter Seven, Page 88, Shambala Press, 1st edition, March 1970. Doug - 25Jan2013. Jung: "The one who learns to live with his incapacity has learned a great deal. This will lead us to the valuation of the smallest things, and to wise limitation, which the greater height demands." p. 240, Liber Primus. Doug 23Jan2013. |
1, 2, 3, 4 | |||||||||||
Scintillation |
Issues TBD here are quantization by itself, without scintillation, does naught. Scintillation of quanta as interrelationshipings among quanta transmute actuality and thus on a massive scale evolve cosmic reality. Jung's four Quadrants in his Triumph of Love are quantized, but cannot cycle without scintillation among them. Cosmic quantum~scintillation of Yod by Aleph is how Aleph steam rolls Yod. |
1, 2, 3, 4 | |||||||||||
A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network A Self~Other Referent Organizing Network |
Issues TBD here are "The cosmos is a hologram, the cosmos is holographic (Jung's unconscious), holograilic (Jung's subconscious), hologramic (Jung's conscious). That mapping by Doug is an exemplar heuristic by Doug. Begin 11-14Mar2013 Update: This Jungian 'predilection' is most prescient of all in Doug's opinion. Why? Jung's SOrONic predilection begs us to ask and answer profound philosophical questions (Peircean "interrogatives") about reality itself and quintessentials of any holographic (quantum~) reality~m¤dal as expressed in Qabala, Autiot, Gnosis, and quantum~reality. What exegeses may we (can we) offer as partial answers to these profound interrogatives? Jung implies (Doug's inference) that consciousness represents (human perceptions of) actuality, unconsciousness represents an undifferentiated n¤nactuality, and that subconsciousness provides a (dream~image~inary world) nexus twixt consciousness and unconsciousness. Doug has shown you how we script and interpret those terms in quantum~memeos, e.g., quanton(unconsciousness,consciousness) with a complementary quantum~nexus called "comma~nospace" as a Jungian quantum~subconsciousness grail twixt them: simply, in more generic antinomial1,grail,antinomial2 m¤daled scriptings we may proffer: Doug does autsimilars with, for example, Pirsig's m¤daling (inferred by Doug) as quanton(DQ,SQ) with MoQ as a mediating~immanent grail twixt DQ and SQ: DQ,MoQ,SQ. Quantum~reality (in quantonicsese) is autsimilar both Jung and Pirsig (and Bergson, Suares, James, Danah Zohar, Mae-wan Ho, etc.). For Doug, these powerful benchmarks are also autsimilarly immanent Qabala, Autiot, and Gnosis among others. For Doug, all of this is philosophical "street cred." It lends gravitas of abundant self~other credence to quantum~reality n¤ other philosophy of which Doug is aware offers. We still haven't answered those interrogatives! Systemically, our largest query might be, "How do those cobenchmarking m¤dalings do what they do? How can those m¤dalings represent Jungian flavors of consciousness and be living?" Answering those queries, for Doug, offers "street credence" to why Doug claims "Quantonics is strategic." How can these cobenchmarking m¤dalings be living? For Doug this answer is simple: all of those m¤dalings depend upon base memeos of flux and flux autsimilars. Absolute change. Absolute, up to Planck rate, changings. Change is essence (quantum~essence) of life, light, logos, measurement~omnitoring, standingunder, movement and rest, chaos and equilibria, perpetual quantum~complementarity of both living and dying, mixing all things in all, middle~inclusion, quantization, scintillation, transmutation, etc. Therein lies a weakness, however. Some memeo is yet missing. A mystery, an enigma. A Gnostic secret. What secret? Allow Doug to lay an autsimilar groundwork for purposes of easing your quantum~stagings into a comtext which will grease a pathway to your fathoming of Doug's words omniscribing said Gnostic secret. In Doug's Finance, Economics and Political Chautauquas (1, 2, 3, ..., so far...) you may recall he spent much time on Bergson's very gnostic and paraphrased by Doug, "Change is simple, state is complex." Doug took an approach there similar his approach comparing Pirsig's quanton(monism,pluralism) and Bergson's quanton(pluralism,monism). Bottom line our answer to understanding Bergson's "Change is simple, state is complex" quote is a paraphrase version of Bergson's own exegesis: "Change can explain state, but state cannot explain change." From that answer we surmise change hyper state. Doug claims absolute~perpetual pluralistic quantized~scintillating change is a prerequisite for a living reality. Doug claims absolute-perpetual monistic-mechanically~determinate state dialectically hypothesizes (verb) and axiomatizes (verb) a Mawt-Hamawt (dead-the-dead) reality. Then we further surmise living hyper death. Now death, a dead reality, and worseship of dead things, all demand state and absolute perpetuation-continuity and maintenance of state. Maintenance of state demands there may be 'no' 'choice.' All 'measurement' of 'state' is 'identical' 'everywhere-everywhen-everywho-everywhat-everywhy-everyhow,' perpetually. State doesn't change! Quantum~ch¤ice changes whatq (H5Wq) happænings, and in a classical state-ic determinate y=f(t) reality, therefore, change borne of choice is an abomination: "heresy." Jung calls this absolutely static reality "temporal." Doug infers Jung means a y=f(t) reality where time is a monism and conveniently stoppable for purposes of classical 'state' analysis (up cutting of actuality; cuisinarting actuality). So part of our secret answer is to claim simply that absolute change requires choice, requires heresy. Quantum~reality forces us to guess given these assumptions:
(Do you see how Keynesians 'catholically' attempt to force stability by classically controlling change, by limiting change? And Keynesians do it by upping heat on a confined boiler. Some call it a 'bubble.') Now here's the rub: Reality's Gnostic~secret is that quantum~reality makes choices intrinsically at all levels of reality -- perpetually and ubiquitously. Secret is "How?" How can reality make choices locally and globally, always and every~H5Wq perpetually? Doug, here-now, isn't offering his answer. Doug didn't have an answer until Neelie sicced him on Jung's Red Book. Associated research in Suares' Qabala using Autiot led Doug to a best answer Doug has to offer now 11Mar2013. Jung and Suares did it for Doug: they taught him a way to fathom said secret. This answer isn't trivial. Doug needs to take a plethora of approaches and make 'real' analogies to basic quantum~theory to offer exegeses which you may potentially~possibly fathom. Pirsig "Just did it." He understood, but didn't explain. James too. Bohm. de Espagnat, et al. Bergson partially explained. Jesus explained (Mark Gaffney calls Jesus' Last Supper exegesis, "The lost Naassene Gnostic Secret"), but if Jesus' audience (excepting Mary and Thomas) didn't know Autiot it was impossible for them to understand, and they called his words "parables." Indeed, as yee shall see. Suares provides answers, but only if you do your due in understanding Autiot. For Doug, understanding what is to follow opens many doors and windows in one's Memeory Palace, one's Quantum~Stagings. Allow Doug to remind you that Doug's Logo is 1,2,3. For Good 'reasons.' 123 is 'everywhere and everywhen' in living quantum~reality. In quantum~reality 1 usually represents "spin 1," AKA bosonic (e.g., light itself) quantum~reality. 1/2 usually represents "spin 1/2" AKA fermionic (e.g., decoherent material itself) quantum~reality. 2, it is thought, represents "spin 2" AKA materially~coherent (e.g., gravity itself) quantum~reality! 3 has abundant ensemble spin utility, and one meme is coherence (say 1) and decoherence (1/2: 2 fluxoids becoming 1 fluxoid and 1 fluxoid becoming 2 fluxoids) and gravity quantum~cohering (say 3: 1/2 and 1 and 2 and 3) multiversally and cosmically "mixing all in all." Personally inure, "1/2,1,2,3 are all absolute flux." (Ponder importance of that in solubility of Riemann's conjecture, and Riemann's 1/2 critical line.) Their quantized interrelationshipings, via choice~chance emerse absolute transmutative~evolutionary change! I can answer, at this juncture, very simply now...however, if you do not understand quantum~theory it won't make much sense and you will (may) say, "That's absurd." "Choice is complementary." There, you have it. A core 'reason' why is without quantum~complementation an implication arises that intrinsic duality is absent which prevents reality from comparing two aspects of itself together as a complementary whole. Simply, a static monism cannot explain itself. A dynamic dualism can explain itself. From a quantum complementarospective without that comparative (an intrinsic vis-à-vis) duality, reality cann¤t select (naturally select) better and thus transmutatively evolve. Complementarity expresses quantum~reality's intrinsic dual nature! Suares calls complementation, paraphrased by Doug, "...the dual nature of a living, conscious cosmic reality." There, you have a bit more... Latter explains why Gnostics say, "Monism is deceit." Monism has 'no' dual nature and thus has 'no' means to exegetise itself. Monism, like state and state 'rules,' disables itself. "What about 'state rules' Doug?" Gnostics expose innate monism of state rules and laws and principles: They say, "Principle rules something not itself." A law is a classically consistent ('always states the truth') monistic axiomatic edict. What did Gödel say about that? Paraphrased from Hofstadter's GEB by Doug, "All consistent axioms in classical theory include undecidable propositions." That belies consistency of classical dialectical rules and principles. Doug's exegesis here abets his provocative, "Rools is tools for fools." Brussels Belgium and 'the' EU come immediately to mind. One World Order comes to mind. See GRS Mead for Doug's Gnostic quotes. All of this begs Doug's coining of stindyanic: a quantum~complementary duality of both DQ and SQ. Red text update 13Mar2013 - Doug. Gnostics should also say, "State is deceit." Why? State cannotc explainc change let alone explain its own 'state.' Other than to positively-imperialistically declare 'state' "fact:" Bogus from any getgo. In any absolute change reality there is n¤ absolutec statec, tentative rest yes, absolutec statec, n¤! But Doug, "Does this have anything to do with explaining How quantum~reality makes perpetual and ubiquitous ch¤¤sings?" Yæs! Key Queries:
Bear with me. I shall explain Suares' Qabalic Autiot semasiologies much more diligently below. (view consciousness as unconsciousness' antinomial) (view hologramicity as holographicity's antinomial) (view SQ as DQ's antinomial) (view Yod as Aleph's antinomial) (view Actuality as QVF's antinomial) (view Impure~Flux as Pure~Flux's antinomial) (view Flux as Isoflux's antinomial) (view Actuality as Nonactuality's antinomial) "Hey Doug, What about that word 'antinomial'?" Too, "What about antinomialism?" 'Antinomy' means literally 'Against' 'Law.' 'Antinomian,' usually has a 'religious-social' interpretation that "One isn't bound to obedience to moral law especially that established by any social institutions." Doug btwsds that individuals are above (hyper) society, therefore individuals are antinomial society which puts itself above individuals in said society. Doug agrees with an inference which was made by Pirsig that intellect is more highly evolved than society. Doug further infers classical society has n¤ social intellect, only individuals in that society have intellect thus individuals are more highly evolved and evolving than said classical society. There are many ways to show this: society creates 'laws' to control individuals essentially claiming lawsc are above individualsq, for example. Such societies self proclaim their own social sovereigntyc above individualsq. John McCain't' and GW Bu()sh() come to mind immediately. HLS comes to mind immediately. Catholic dogma, patriarchy, and canon 'law,' come to mind immediately. Sociopathy of, by, and for societyc against individualsq comes to mind immediately. All bogus. All hogwash. Doug's opine. Gnostically "individualismq begs antinomialism." Now why is that important in our omniscussion here? That answer is simple: dualityq of societyc and individualq. That dualityq offers all individuals a means to ch¤¤se bættær. That is our Gnostic Secret! We have a very obvious way to assess better, and when many grasp this, then radical change will commence! Doug - 12-14Mar2013. (12Mar...123...)
End 11-14, 19-21Mar2013 Update. Doug - 11-14, 19-21Mar2013. |
1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. 1,2,3,4 are SOrONic. |
|||||||||||
Hologra | Issues TBD here are Gnostics' "mixing all in all" ubiquitously, perpetually. | All quadrants are intro~extra self~others. | |||||||||||
Living and Dying Living and Dying Living and Dying Living and Dying |
Issues TBD here include Living as movement and Dying as rest. When Doug first inferred and wrote this particular Jung predilection, Doug was restating one of his oldest and most durational quantum~axioms: BAWAM: Both~All~While~And~Many as pairwise dualities cowithin~coinside realities'q hologra[[il][m][ph]]icq EIMA quantonic interrelationshipings. I know that phasement is omnifficult for you to fathom, to ponder, to grasp ihn its fullness, to weigh ihn your quantum~stagings. But it is, in a way, the Song of Songs, the Residue of Residues, the Quintessenceings of Quintessenceings: The Qabala! It is Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay. And like quantum~theory itself, as Richard P. Feynman remarked, "It is almost impossible for anyone to understand," paraphrased by Doug. Doug has spent more than half of his life trying to understand (standunder). Standing under issi omnifficult. It begs a greater humility. It begs Jung's "embracing the small..." It begs a quantum~philosophy based upon quantum~dust: quanta. That is another way of saying, "Tree of Life is hologra[[il][m][ph]]icq!" Suares agrees! Doug has studied countless quantum~textings. More recently Doug is studying Qabala, Autiot, Gematria, and Gnosis. Why? They all deliciously and rather provocatively benchmark what Doug learned about quantum~reality and Doug's home grown autodidactic quantum~philosophy. They all desnouer, they belie profound Roman orthodox-dogmatic lies, corruption, and deceit against Jesus' love of and for individualq humanityq! (Compare Romans' "The Christ" as blatantly for hylic-social humanity and society'sc resultant hatred of gnostic~individuality.) Recently, CeodE 2013-2014 Doug has been dipping his quantum~stagings in Sepher Yetsira and its Sefirot (Tree of Life) as eruditely~autodidactically omniscribed by Carlo Suares in his Trilogy. Sepher Yetsira is to Qabala as I Ching is to Tao, as Zohar is to Talmud (Doug's inferences, n¤t normatives...). Doug has made further inferences for comparative purposes too: genome is to phenome as holograph is to hologram...and so on... What is Quantonics about? What is Quantonics' raison d'etre? Why does Quantonics self-refer, "A scihænce and philosophyq of interrelationshipings?" Why is Quantonics strategic for humanity? Quantonics' capabilities and capacities (qua) answer those queries by omniscribing this Jungian predilection and other Jungian predilections under narration here. In Qabala's Tree of Life Quantonics' qua is called, "formation [Yin] and action [Yang] borne [chün tzu] of emanations [Tao] and creation [te]." And it applies to all of reality and all quantons in reality. This is what Doug intends when he says, "Quantonics is strategic." Ihn Qabala, according Sepher Yetsira, "Living and Dying" memeotically shows a omnistinct aspect of Qabala's seven doubles. Seven of Autiot's 22 Aut are doubles: Vayt~Bayt, Djimel~Ghimel, Thallet~Dallet, Raysh~Raysh, Thav~Tav, Phay~Pay, and Khaf~Kaf. They have double pronunciations and double semantics. First of each pair in its symbolic representation is unpointed and second of each pair is pointed. Using Vayt~Bayt as an exemplar of an "omnistinct aspect" we omniscribe Vayt as a life~beginning "trajectory" which ends in Bayt. In Autiot Vayt is saying "Hhaim (Life)" and Bayt is saying "Schalom (Peace, Rest, Transition)." Vayt begins a life trajectory and Bayt ends it and that loop repeats for all seven doubles perpetually and ubiquitously autsimilar Doug's Gen III Quantum~Reality Loop. Suares brilliantly uses an egg shell analogy to illustrate Vayt~Bayt: egg shell protects beginning trajectory of a germ of life until that germ is ready for birth. Bayt ends shell's life cycle of germ protection and begins a new cycle of newborn's Vayt (another life trajectory) until that newborn's maturation ends in Bayt, and so forth, over and over and over...perpetually and ubiquitously scaling from isoflux to quarks and gluons to eukaryotes to multiverses...over and over and over. There is much more to this than Doug can cover in this narrative on Jung's predilection of Living and Dying. See Suares' Sepher Yetsira, 'Seven Doubles,' Chapters 9 and 12. Bottom line, 'Living and Dying' is Essence of (tree~of~)life itself and we show that as quantum~antinomial~complementarity using quantons like this, Life issi quanton(Livings,Dyings). Depending on your worldview you may exclaim, "It's that simple," and n¤t... Need to further omniscuss doubles in terms of duality of antinomialism relevant Doug's memes of swords as s~words as quantons(words,words)...re: Jesus' "I bring not peace (Bayt), but a sword (Vayt)." Amazing, eh? (View 'S' as a wayve, as in Tao: s~words become wayve~words. Vayt is quantized in livingq waveq packetsq up~cutting, anaq lysingq cosmicq energyq.) Doug - 18Mar2014. (Late that night...Doug added more links, some italics, and some braces to show rough correlation of Sepher Yetsira's Tree of Life to Tao's I Ching. I feel Carla Park's August, 1999 answer to our QQA query is appropriate here. Query: What does all this have to do with yin and yang? Carla's answer: "Old
and new; As strands of thought
have evolved the shortcomings of the previous manner of distinguishing
between the phenomena collectively named reality
have become apparent so dynamic
insights are trying to incorporate themselves into the static structure of 'recognized'
philosophy so as to define
and utilize terms which offer more accurate descriptions as to
the structure and nature of reality. Thus the divergent and convergent
nature of the discussion and the agreement and disagreement between
the static body of thought
and the dynamic insights
trying to offer greater clarity to the Questions traditionally
wrestled with, to me resemble the nature of 'yin and yang', moving
forward with balance." |
All quadrants and their posentropic constitua perpetually
and ubiquitously openly (classical conservation n¤t allowed)
cycle living~dying~living~dying, etc. Zero~entropic constitua
are perpetual motion quantons. All quadrants and their posentropic constitua perpetually and ubiquitously openly (classical conservation n¤t allowed) cycle living~dying~living~dying, etc. Zero~entropic constitua are perpetual motion quantons. All quadrants and their posentropic constitua perpetually and ubiquitously openly (classical conservation n¤t allowed) cycle living~dying~living~dying, etc. Zero~entropic constitua are perpetual motion quantons. |
|||||||||||
Movement and Rest |
Issues TBD here include chaos and equilibria; absolute change animacy of cosmic energy, etc. For Jung anima is feminine and Li~la dances middle~inclusively through subconsciousness antinomially twixt conscious and unconscious. In Autiot's Gematria highest energies are all feminine: Tayt~Tsadde~final~Tsadde: 9.90.900, another kind of 1~2~3. On a personal note, Doug has almost autsimilar experiences. These commenced ihn Doug with his 13 year marriage to Beth. Apparently Jung's commenced powerfully during his moral lacuna with Toni Wolff. Over many years Doug's psychic~pneumatic anima (feminine quantum~energyings) have had names, including:
From any dialectical conspective, none of these is 'real.' Quantumly, for Doug, they are very realq. Where Jung's images are oil and water, Doug's are lingual... 21-22Mar2013 - Doug. |
This is cosmic~reality's perpetual~ubiquitous cycle of cosmic flux. Even when cosmos hides! It is quantized "smaller" as Noun, and "larger" as final~Noun with majestic cosmic~indetermination. | |||||||||||
Aleph~Tav Tav~Aleph | Movement and rest. Breathing out, rest, breathing in, rest,... | Autiot for cosmos' flux. | |||||||||||
Aleph~in~Blood | Issues TBD here, Qabala's Aleph~in~Blood and Jesus' Farewell Discourse affirming Qabala's Aleph~in~blood. | Qabalic Autiot for Iht nissin us. | |||||||||||
Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod Aleph~Yod |
Doug was reading Suares' Aleph~Yod chapters in his Cipher of Genesis, studying Jung's Red Book, and attending a Jung study group when Plate 127 was referred during class. Prior class Doug had just finished reading last few paragraphs of Chapter Five of Cipher of Genesis. Imagine all of this coming together as a blinding flash of insight near end of that class! Allow Doug a quote of last two paragraphs of that Suares' Chapter Five: Suares is describing reality's cosmic "game of life" in terms of Aleph~Yod... "The process concerning the player Yod is obviously entirely different from that concerning Aleph. Yod is always, so to speak, between the hammer and the anvil. We mentioned that process already, giving the egg as an example. If the shell is not hard enough, the germ dies for lack of adequate protection; and if it is too hard, the germ dies from too much protection. Therefore Yod must always be in possession of two contrasting qualities; strength and softness. Yod must be very earnest and single-minded and yield to the delicate hint of the weakest life within it. It must be totally still, yet quick in following the movement of all that is transient. If Yod insists on one of these qualities against the other, what happens is a 'dead death.' (This expression, Mawt-Hamawt, will be used in a later description of Adam in Eden.)
"Thus the so-called Spirit of God acts like a steam roller every time Yod does not play the game properly. And that action is one of the facts of life that we know best: wars, destructions, disasters of all sorts, both in the outer world and in our own inner life; our frustrations and failures; the annihilation of our achievements; and the terrible refusal of life in response to our hopes and our projects. But from these ruins, these misfortunes, rise triumphs of ever-fertile life. In order that the new [Vayt] may spring forth without ceasing, must not the old, also without ceasing, be destroyed [Bayt]? This destructive aspect of life is essentially the activity of Aleph: the action of non-temporal life against the continuity of existence, with its resulting violence and despair." Doug's red brackets - 30Mar2014. Pp. 81-82, Cipher of Genesis, 1st edition, March, 1970, Shambala Publications, Inc., Berkeley. English translation by Vincent Stuart and John M. Watkins, Ltd., 1970, London. Text unsullied by Doug. That text explains quadrant 2 better than Doug ever could. A graphic illustrating some Essene~tials:
of Aleph's Hammers and Anvils in Aleph's quantized Living~Wayves. When we do our due on that memeo, Dew as Ros, then fathom Dew and Aleph as Ros i crux. Clouds as Ros i crux. We see our quantum's circle~cross as both quantized and quantizing reality just as Aleph does: TBTF: Yod 's social worse-ship of 'Minskyian Ideal Centrally-Planned Stability' becoming extinct! Doug - 22Jan2013. Allow Doug to quantumly parse Suares' last sentence of that first paragraph: "If Yod insists on one of these qualities against the other, what happens is a 'dead death.'" Let's start by ciphering it in Pirsigese~Quantumese. "If SQ insists on one (monistically) of these qualities in contradiction other, what happens is ESQ." ESQ autsimilar utopian-political 'state' roughly corresponds dead-death of 'Tree of Life.' Pirsig writes, paraphrased, "SQ without DQ issi ESQ." Suares writes, paraphrased, "Yod without Aleph issi Mawt-Hamawt." Jung implies (Doug's opine), paraphrased, "dialectic as hero issi consciousness without unconsciousness." In Jung's paraphrase Doug intuits without subconsciousness, one cannot understand the account: "dialectic as hero issi consciousness without unconsciousness." Heraclitus wrote, "On this account which holds forever men prove uncomprehending, both before hearing it and when first they have heard it." Refer Diels Kranz B1 quote. Please attempt to perceive Jung's unconscious as Spirit of the Depths' plenum of the small, plenum of quanta. When we refuse to fathom that (our quantum~inner, Jung's small) aspect of the logos, the account...Aleph (DQ) steam rolls (See Jung's Triumphant Love quadrant 2.) our Yod (SQ): "...bitterest of draughts." Simply, dialectic kills: Tree of Life, Libido, Triumphant Love! Dialectic is Satan's, the Demiurge's, YahWeh's dialectical hatred of evolution (of quanta, of the small) as creation. Çatholiç-patriarchy dialectically (dialectic is 'the church's 12th century Aquinas (bogus) logic based in Aristotle') hates women and feminism for that reason: women have the power of quantum~evolution: Libido's ultimate feminine wisdom! Jung offers a way out of this. He says we must kill dialectic! Doug agrees! Pirsig agrees! Heraclitus agrees! Bergson agrees! Quantum~thæ¤ry agrees! Jung's code word for dialectic is "hero." We must kill our hero. Academia's contemporary 'hero' is dialectic. Academia must kill its hero. Academia's hero self claims an ersatz Mawt-Hamawt 'Tree of State, Tree of Dialectic 'reason.' ' Doug sees Pirsig's 'Church of the Minorites' as stuck-state symbolic of Mawt-Hamawt's dead-death born of dialectic. Again, Pirsig refers dialectic, "A genetic defect in human reason." Quantum~thæ¤ry: theory of Jung's small. Doug - 24Jan2013. |
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 |
|||||||||||
Apoptosis~Resurrection Apoptosis~Resurrection Apoptosis~Resurrection Apoptosis~Resurrection Apoptosis~Resurrection Apoptosis~Resurrection |
Issues here TBD include cellular cycle as a Jung m¤dal of Triumph of Love. Viewing humans and other life emerqants as 'cells,' a case for a similar modal can be made. Begin Belated 9Sep2013 Aside re Quadrants 1, 3, 4 Apoptosis~Resurrection:
End Belated 9Sep2013 Aside re Quadrants 1, 3, 4 Apoptosis~Resurrection. |
All quadrants and their posentropic constitua perpetually and ubiquitously openly (classical conservation n¤t allowed) cycle living~dying~living~dying, etc. Zero~entropic constitua are perpetual motion quantons. | |||||||||||
By Doug Renselle ©Quantonics, Inc., 2013-2030 |
Notes:
Note 1 - Doug's use of 'perpend' here is n¤n classically standard. Perpend, for Doug, is like poking your finger through a doughnut hole (fathom finger and doughnut as quantons). A kind of classical 'penetration,' a la cuneiform's V and | where | perpends V. But Doug takes it into a quantum~realm, an emersos of V and | as fluxing~middle~including quantum~wave~functions: wave as unda and small wave as undula. So Doug's quantum~perpend (QELRed pærpænd) is more like perpendunda and perpendundula. Mortars of our quantum~futurings will perpendundula! Mortar's flux fuxing brick's flux! Libido! Panpneumatic Libido! Doug also refers this quantaldulation. Quantal Libido! This somewhat exemplifies Doug's memeo of moving from CTMs (perpetual static 'rest:' status quo) to QTMs (perpetual and ubiquitous 'movement and rest'). See Doug's QELR of 'select.' See A Primer on QuPo.
Note 2 - It is worthwhile to understand Chaldæan Gnosis here. Abraham, about four millennia ago was a Chaldæan Gnostic. In Chaldæan Gnosis Sophia (a grail) is mother. Chaldæan Gnostic Emerscitecture looks like: Mother,son,mother,choice of (living Father, dead father). Dead father is Mawt~Hamawt father: YahWeh, the demiurge (absence of Aleph in blood). Living Father is Libido: YhShWh, Love Triumphant. (Doug is a quantum Chaldæan Gnostic by self proclamation.) Understanding this is part of understanding the account and finding one's inner. Ponder Adam as Eesh (before becoming Adam). Eesh needs Aleph in his blood to become Adam (literally "Aleph in blood"). However Eesh can't handle Libido's immense energy directly. Eesh needs both Eesha and Serpent to channel that high energy to him. Ponder Eesha as Eve prior Eesh becoming Adam. Eesha with serpent's higher energy channeling of spirit (Libido) provide a grail channel to Eesh to evolve him into Adam! Suares offers detail exegesis of this as remediation through re~ciphering of Old Testament Autiot text. See Suares' Cipher of Genesis. See Suares' The Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.
Note 3 - A Doug misnomer, a chronological quantum~leap, to provoke you: ponder Eesha (with Eesh) evolves into, then Eve (with Adam) evolves into, then Magdalene (with Jesus)...
Note 4 - In a hybridization of Greek and Latin fecund [fec (to make) und (waves, unda, undula)] means, literally, "to make [quantized] waves." A concise description of the account, the logos, Libido, Love Triumphant: