The Last Supper

Leonardo da Vinci

Grand Master
Priori de Sion

"And today a large number of 'christians' remain completely unaware
Jesus was never a 'christian,' he was born, and lived a Jew."

Michael Baigent in his The Jesus Papers, page 64, Harper San Francisco, 2006.

Recall that Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln wrote Holy Blood Holy Grail a global best seller.

Doug changed Baigent's Christians to 'christians,' since now we
'christianity' itself is a huge, nearly two-millennia-old, dialectical lie!

For confirmation of what Baigent writes above, read Carlo Suares' The Second Coming of Rab YHShWH.

Doug - 31Mar2010.

Allow us to quote a mind~bending paragraph from Lawrence Gardner's 2005 The Magdalene Legacy re: Forgotten Gospels:

"Blind faith is no longer a viable option for now there are new balances to be weighed. Either we take full account of the evidence to hand, or we ignore it to follow the old courses regardless. What we now have are alternative accounts -- options on which to base considered judgment. One cannot challenge dogma on the one hand, and then introduce a new dogma to override it with the other. Dogma is an obligatory system of acceptance, but it cannot function in an environment of [quantum~] free will and choice." Pages 115-116. Doug's brackets. Doug corrected Gardner's misspelling of judgment.

Barnes & Noble


An Imprint of Harper Collins First Edition

Gardner, here, is exceptionally prescient. His "One cannot challenge dogma on the one hand, and then introduce a new dogma to override it with the other." begs a novel semasiology of quantum~holographic emergence of living body and spirit. Too, it defames and maligns classical dogma and 'canon law' as antithetical Jesus' meme of a perpetually emerging and always enthymemetic 'living~Father.' It is time, for sure, to kick out dialectic and its moribund anti-gnostic 'dead-father.' Quantum~holographically Jesus is spiritually still alive and he has told us " not be afraid..." for all of us who grasp his Autiot and its Essene Gn¤sis, its quantum~gn¤sis, have spirits perpetually immortal.

Beth found this book for Doug, yet she didn't live long enough to read it. Thank you Beth. I love you.

Of all books Doug has read re: Magdalene and 'çatholiçism' this one ranks highest so far.



. . .


Some of our readers are asking, "Where is 'satan' in Leonardo da Vinci's Last Supper?

Carlo Suares makes this abundantly apparent in his Cipher of Genesis and his Sepher Yetsira.

Carlo tells us and shows us that there are actually 'two satans.'

Satan one is hylic Peter, whispering in pneumatic Mary's right ear.

Satan two is hylic Judas, watching hylic Peter and pneumatic Mary.

New Testament scholars already know how at least two Synoptics
and John~Mary narrate Jesus' calling hylic Peter "satan."

Clearly hylic Peter deserves Jesus' appellation of him as, "The bad guy."
Now and for two millennia, hylic Peter is 'da çatholiç 'church's' foundational 'rock.'

Hylic Judas is number two satan, since he "gave Jesus up to the GD Romans."

But hylic Judas and Qabala's pneumatic~sheen Jesus had already planned that.
Read Farewell Discourse below, especially, "What you are about to do."

Thank you for reading,



. . .

Anglican 'c h r i s t' has six letters. An interesting juxtapose is 'c h r i s t' 'c h r i s t' 'c h r i s t' as (masculine) 666.

Some of you are familiar with Doug's recent efforts at his What is Gnosis page, especially regarding utility
of Atbash cipher in encoding Sophia as Baphomet (ref. Lawrence Gardner's The Magdalene Legacy).

Doug wondered why Jesus called Peter "Satan" when Peter referred Jesus as "The Christ."
(Please obtain Suares' excellent coverage of this in Chapters 12 ('Satan') and 22 ('Peter') of his Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.)
Doug as a novice in Autiot, Qabala, and Gnosis wants to do some 'out of the box' quantum~Qabalic thinkqing
about Satan vav Peter by first ciphering 'c h r i s t,' then by Atbash encoding 'c h r i s t' and reciphering that encoding.

Hebraic of Anglican 'c h r i s t' (as ciphered by Doug left to right) has five letter~numbers: Hhayt~Raysh~Yod~Seen~Tav. Our Judaic autsimilar juxtapose then is (feminine) 555.

Please be aware that Doug is doing a simple letter by letter transliteration. If you look in a Hebrew dictionary you won't find 'christ,' (which is Greek) but you will find 'christian,' and it doesn't agree with Doug's transliteration!

Hebrew doesn't transliterate English! But Doug is doing it anyway. His purpose will become clear just below.

Real Autiot is about cultural (according Qabala) energy Letter~Number semantics in Hebrew language, not simple transliteration as Doug is experimentally, empirically doing.

Also be aware that some might argue we use Tayt in place of Tav. This might make sense since Seen~Tayt Atbash encodes as Bayt~Noun AKA Ben as in Ben Adam.
Ben, according Suares, isn't 'son,' rather it is 'evolution of...' In this case Ben Adam means "evolution of Aleph in Blood."

Doug's semasiology of that 'c h r i s t' cipher is something like, "Cosmic spirit plenumed (verb) in a socially certainc and concrete-dead (stopped, limited nous) focus."
Compare that to YhShWh as Jesus (ubiquitous quantum~lightings) as "The Living (Essene Gnostic~Qabalic) Father (Lord)."

Let's use a table to show our Atbash encoding graphically:

8 200 10 300 400
c h r i s t Hhayt Raysh Yod Seen  Tav c h r i s t
encoded Sammekh Ghimel Mem Bayt Aleph encoded
60 3 40 2 1:1000

To Doug that Atbash encoding ciphered...

"Vaginal organic movement of (womb's waters housed~quasi~protecting, endarkening) Cosmos' evolving, partially hidden, and containedq energies."

...shows an autsimilar to Tao's Yin (light) antinomial Yang (dark).

Also recall that a Tao symbol of an S superposed an O:

Notice that white (light) tear drop is Yin (male).
Notice that orange (dark) tear drop is Yang (female).

Said Tao illustrates vividly quantum~antinomialism of quanton(female,male).

In Hebrew's nine archetypes Male is Vav~Waw number six (6). In Jungese this is female's internalizationq of her male archetype Jung calls "Animus."

In Hebrew's nine archetypes Female is Tayt number nine (9). In Jungese this is male's externalizationc of his female archetype Jung calls "Anima."

Compare male 6 to light Tao tear drop.

Compare female 9 to dark Tao tear drop.

Fathom Tao as 69! This is also a semiotic for hermaphrodicity! (among others...)

Let's get sexual in a more explicit manner:

What does a 6 look like? Circle appears as male testes and arc projecting up is penile, agree?

What does 9 look like? Circle appears female ovarian and arc projecting down is labial~pudendal~hemipenitic, agree?

You may fathom how male 6 emphasizes a 'c h r i s t.' Sound like Peter? Six isn't fractalq (doesn't appear in Fibonacci series...).

You may fathom how female 9 emphasizes a 5. Sound like Magdalene? Five is fractalq (appears in Fibonacci series...)!

Neelie and I have been comparing notes on Jungian antinomials. Above Doug commentary~narrative blends very nicely, semiotically.


. . .


Allow us to quote a superb paragraph from Michael Baigent's The Jesus Papers re: Jesus' crucifixion:

"First and importantly, crucifixion was historically the punishment for a political crime. According to the Gospels, however, Pilate gave Jesus over to the mobs, who then brayed for his execution on the basis of religious dissent. The Jewish execution for this particular transgression was death by stoning. Crucifixion was a Roman punishment reserved for sedition, not religious eccentricity. This contradiction alone illustrates that the Gospels are not reporting the matter truthfully. Could they be trying to hide some vital aspects of the events from us? Trying to blame the wrong people perhaps?" Page 24, Michael Baigent's The Jesus Papers, Harper San Francisco, First Edition, 2006, total pages including index: 321.

Doug believes Romans were trying to hide their complicity in their murder of their own Christian symbol. Too, they tried to murder John~Mary and her children with Jesus.

Catholicisim's evils are just as repugnant today, and they are still trying to hide. They say, "That happened so long ago, it no longer matters."

Sounds just like neocan't and Republican't fascist political manure today, doesn't it? It was then, and still is today, all about dialectical hatred. We still teach this to our children. We make dialectical fascist 'catholic' patriarchal authority-bound socially-herdable and malleable hive drones of our children. Wake up!

Gnosis shows us that any monism is deceit. Patriarchy is deceit. Dialectic is deceit. Social catholicism is deceit. Jesus called it "Error." He called Peter "Satan" for wanting a 'christian' (social hegemony) church built upon Jesus. Jesus responded vociferously, "I build my church on humanity, and you Peter do not, shall not, build a church upon me." Paraphrased. See Carlo Suares' The Second Coming of Reb YHShWH (The Second Coming of Jesus).

14Mar2010 - Doug.

See five plus six equals eleven and symbolic significance of eleven, i.e., count of
total people shown above minus John~Mary and Jesus issi eleven disciples.
3Feb2010 - Doug.

See 27Jan2010 Adamas Adama and Adamah.

See five and six.

One of Gnosis' greatest enigmas, Gaffney tumbles to it: "Who (~what) is Adamas?"
Doug, via his studies of Suares' Cipher of Genesis found an answer which is better than any other so far...
5Dec2009 - Doug.

Extend Last Supper Symbol Names List on 9Nov2009 - Doug.

Add memeotics of 'mem' on 9Nov2009 - Doug.

Add commentary on Suares' anti-Chaldæan hylicity. 7Nov2009 - Doug.

Add memeotics of 'sheen' on 30Oct2009 - Doug.

More gnostic symbology using cuneiform by Doug - 4Jul2009. See Fuzzon and QCD Graphics added by Doug - 5Jul2009.

Farewell Discourse from John~Mary chapters 14, 15 added 24May2009, with bracketed comments by - Doug.

This picture attends Mark Gaffney's fine textbook, Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes. Said text's subtitle is 'The Initiatory Teachings of the Last Supper.' Doug found this picture on www, and it is apparently a photograph of an altered version of Leonardo's original Last Supper painting. In Leonardo's original that front stone which apparently is a third leg for Last Supper's table, is a carved, curved stone convexly facing view and concavely focusing attendees in picture. Said stone is significant as described below. See Volume I of II, Frank Zölliner's Leonardo da Vinci 'The Complete Paintings.'

Leonardo encoded a huge variety of intellectual symbolism into his version of The Last Supper. Much of it is, apparently, intentionally esoteric.

What Doug enjoys most in this painting is Leonardo's obvious disdain for çatholiç OSFA orthodoxy. Especially as it may be juxtaposed to çatholiçism's immense fear and hatred of gnosis.

That disdain is laid bare by Leonardo's gnosis of 'V' as orthogonal, n¤t as orthodoxy, rather as ophitic~gnosis' hermaphroditic grail.

Those of you who have viewed Brown's The Da Vinci Code movie, recall a meeting at Teabing's estate where Teabing disclosed much of what Doug is redescribing here.

Do you remember Teabing's grail beef analogue? "Where's the cup?"

Then he showed us that it is a geometrical 'V' twixt Mary and Jesus. Now ask symbolism of that and we achieve Chaldæan Mother's hermaphroditic BAWAM. Fabulous!

'V' is female. Inverted it's male. Former is good, while latter is corruption itself: lower case demiurge 'dead-father.' Put them together to make a diamond shaped stone and we are back to stonic hermaphrodicity.

Gnostics took a rod (from cuneiform) like this '|.' Put a 'V' on top and we have a 'Y' which looks like a chalice. Ophites saw that 'Y' as a snake standing on its tail with its mouth open. Snake's venom as a catalyst which assists G¤d's "mixing all things in all." Thence as a circle, as a snake recursively, self~referently, quantum~fractally eating its tail in a perpetual loop of self~renewal: crucifixion and resurrection in an unending quantum metabolisis of mixings of catabolisis and anabolisis, catabolisis and anabolisis...: quantum~reality in unending Planck rate loops.

As that movie, The DaVinci Code, teaches us, the çatholiçs did their damnedest to kill Mary and all of Jesus' ancestors, but they failed. Now a long decline of çatholiçism is underway. Like oil, dialectic, MBO, and digital...çatholiçism is dead!
Thank almighty G¤d! Çatholiçism is dead!

That is just what Gaffney means in this text he wrote, "...we will arrive at conclusions that are utterly subversive to orthodox Christianity and which, I predict, will eventually stand tradition on its head. <...paragraph break here...> We are going to examine powerful evidence that the Gnostic element was present in Christianity from the beginning, and was, in fact, the very heart of the teachings of Jesus."

As The DaVinci Code movie shows, çatholiçs attempted to kill Jesus' spawn and kill his bloodline. Why? Jesus understood that Chaldæan gnosis was real: it placed Mother of all reality at top, and common men as demiurges at bottom. Guess what? Nature is doing that for us now. Men are gradually becoming sterile. Nature is making it happen. Males have foundered and failed. Harken back to Jesus' words where he said that Mary would be his successor, a female founder of his quantum~gnostic church. Roman's hated women then and now and wanted them totally in male control. That is over now! Women are on their way back and nature and a revival of gnosis is helping them. Bravo!

Read Nag Hammadi Gospels. Experience your own journey into self and gnosis.

Too, if you as an gnostic individual do your own due, and read Thomas' (to Jesus' immediate left, sixth from paintings' right) Gospel, you will find even more symbolism which Leonardo expresses for all to hermeneut.

Ditto Philip's (fourth from right) Gospel.

Too, Mark Gaffney's Gnostic Secrets of the Naassenes - 'Initiatory Teachings of The Last Supper.' Gaffney offers many symbols which Leonardo mirrors above. Here is a list for your consideration:

First, a gnostic query which benchmarks Quantonics, from one of Gaffney's chapter 12 mast quotes: "What is the sign of your [living] Father in you?" Doug's sic. Quantonics quantum~included~middlings both~and while~all~and~many answer: stindyanicityings. Read Gaffney's relevant quotes on his dedication page.



Jordan Flow and its Reversal

Primordial Waters



(Moses in Hebrew is Mosheh: Mem [waw] sheen hay...], and note that

  • mem is water,
  • waw is impregnated with...
  • sheen is breath,
  • and hay is life...)

So Mosheh issi water impregnated with breath becomes life...Mosheh(life,(breath,water)) and our middle~including quantum~comma~n¤~space is waw~impregnation.

Notice: to Chaldæans waw's semantic~hermeneutic is son as Logos, Light, Jesus, membrane, etc.
In a way, then, Jesus pneumatically~psychically impregnates us all with our local enthymemes of G¤d: genuinely an immaculate comception!

Hiding (Gn¤ses' silent weapon...)
(Jesus' autiot takes for granted its own cyclic 'death' and 'resurrection' coinside (used as an adverb here)
individual humans...and that is how it hides...and recall William James in his
Pragmatism paraphrasing Jesus' "They cann¤t find~see their inner.")

Elijah and Elisha as human precursors of El-lah (Al-lah)

Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?

(Qabala, loosely interpreted, shows Adama as Pirsigean SQ with potentia to become
dialectically either ESQ's "dead father" or quantum Essene Jesus' "living Father," latter as SQ issi quanton(DQ,SQ).)

(Again, Qabala tells us that Adamah is a quantum~complement of Adama. For Adamas to become 'complete,'
and 'evolutionarily stable and viable,' Adama must learn that he needs Adamah to make him complete.)

...and Hæ~r reversible quantum complement:


These symbols are only analogues. To take them hylically-literally is to commit dialectical Error.
This is a perfect exemplar of what Essene Gn¤stic Jesus meant when he used two terms: Satan and Error.

Peter and nine other disciples, excluding both John~Mary and Thomas Didymos, frequently committed this hylic-literal Error.

Doug - 27Jan2010.

Jesus' Essene Gn¤sis...





Five as,

(Qabala's "seed;" realise that among anthro's two of these, sperm and ovum, become one: zygote.)

Observe our markups of da Vinci's Last Supper. Count disciples to John~Mary's right. Count disciples to Jesus' left.
You should count five to John~Mary's right. You should count six to Jesus' left.

Five is symbolic of a pentagram. Six is symbolic of Star of David.

Since 'pentagram' has been politically re-engineered to represent Satan, Doug wants to re-engineer it back to its original, more ancient, semantics.
(See extensive literature, including Qabala, for original and ancient semantics of a five pointed star..)
(Femininity itself, according Roman Çatholiçs and their dialectical fear-hatred of women.)

Doug wants to offer some better semiotic semantics,
including: Star of Mary, Star of Venus, Star of Magdalene, Star of Sophia, Fleur de Lis, and Star of Feminine Wisdom.



Six as,

(Impregnation; quantum complementation of two 123s, e.g., two evolving equilateral triangles entangled quantumly.)

We need also view this as quantum~complementation of Adama and Adamah as quanton(female,male).

Our greatest exemplar?


Also, an excellent more traditional exemplar:

Star of David.

Quantum QCD ontology.

See our fuzzon to fermion ontology.

See Autiot's Noun too.

Lots more on d' way, folks. Doug - 27Jan2010.


Thence Symbolic Significance of Eleven:

Count of Last Supper attendees is 13. If we subtract John~Mary and Jesus that leaves 11 disciples.

Are you familiar with Plantard Crest?

Are you familiar with a Latin phrase, "Et in Arcadia Ego?" There are many hermeneutics of that phrase,
but here it paraphrases Jesus' "Individually, gn¤stically, you are ihn G¤d and G¤d is ihn you."

Qabalically, "Aleph is in y~our blood." Gn¤sis will help you see that,
help you find your inner,
help you individually find G¤d quantumly~cowithin you~me (QELRed y¤u~mæ),
quanton(~,o), quanton(G¤d,y¤u~Ih).

Dialectical religion proselytizes dichon(God, us-we).

That phrase appears on Plantard Crest:

Count bees. How Many? Eleven.

What is that phrase just under bees? Et in Arcadia Ego!

Who are those bears? Callisto and Arcas. Mother and son.

Where are mother and son in Chaldæan gnosis? Recall Doug's quantonics script? Quanton(Mother,quanton(mother,son),Living~Father).

Doug's "Aleph In Your Blood"
Ogdoadic Aside:

Doug needs to write nearly a whole text book about that Chaldæan quantonic tetrad and its associated ogdoad.
Search for and read text at Valentinius, there. His gn¤stic semantic for ogdoad is what we adhere in Quantonics.
(For more on Valentin[i]us, see, for example, Elaine Pagels' The Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis.)

Key for this commentary, just now, CeodE 3Feb2010, is that Living~Father is "[Aa]leph, individually, in your blood."

That is what Qabala hermeneuts as Jesus' "Living Father." (Clearly Jesus was a master of Autiot. Doug.)

That is what gn¤sis means by "finding one's inner."

Critically, none of us becomes gn¤stic until each of us individually "find our inner."

Society is useless, as always, to individuals here.
They cann¤t help you. They can only thingk in terms of social patterns of value.
Fun-dumb-mentalists, similar global warmists, will tell you that Doug is a charlatan and what he writes here is bogus.
Doug says, "Prove that Doug is a charlatan," and

"If you intend to use dialectic to do your proof, your solution is dead already.
"That is why you cann¤t find your inner!
"G¤d help you."

Your bad!

Doug - 3Feb2010.

End Doug's "Aleph In Your Blood"
Ogdoadic Aside.

Callisto and Arcas are represented there as quanton(mother,son). Sophia (AKA Magdalene and Venus representing Fibonacci's
five~pointed "Feminine Wisdom"), and son (Jesus as membrane's light, AKA 'the logos,' shining on quantum~Jesuit~individualism's gn¤stic humanity).

Take sum of Callisto, Arcas, and eleven bees. Thirteen!

Dates shown on lower banner labeled "Plantard Saint Clare" are 'golden rectangle'
and pentagramic (five) Fibonacci numeric anagrams (1861, 1681) of 1618 (golden ratio).

Fleur de Lis is a symbol of a hermaphrodite, in this case Jesus' "Living Father." See Gospel of Thomas, 15.

Moat is a symbol of circumcision of Error (Satan's hatred borne of dialectic) from one's heart. Tri band around Fleur de Lis
is Jesus' foreskin circumcising hermaphroditically quanton(mother,son), AKA quanton(Callisto,Arcas).

Story of Callisto and Arcas may be interpreted as Jesus' crucifixion, and Sophia's being forced to be stuck in a grail twixt nonactuality and actuality.

We offer more detail hermeneutics here.

3Feb2010 - Doug.

. . .

Meditative Ascent via "Chariot Hymns"
(Essentially, "How to Tap Into Reserve Energy."), Kabbalah, Gershom Scholem, p. 15.


Garment of Lightsee c

"Moment of Creation" See G. Scholem's Kabbalah., p.17.
(Note to readers. Since most monists (e.g., Jews, Christians, and Muslims), adhere a notion of 'eschaton,' there appears a complete
absence of a notion of creation as "gn¤stic process" as cycles of creation, being, discreation, unbeing, creation, being, etc.)

Footprintless Docentismsee a and b

An exemplar of anti Essene Jesuit Gn¤sis: "He is not a God who is near, but a God Who is afar,...," Kabbalah, Gershom Scholem, p. 16.

"Ascending Spirit," Ibid, p. 17.

All terms and phasements in this list will receive full attention, as apropos individually, appended to current Feuilleton, below.

This list will commence more rapid expansion, CeodE 2009-2010.

13Sep2009 - Doug.

Carlo Suares' Qabala is much more quantum than Scholem's Kabbalah.

Doug is working on a Quantonics' hermeneutic of Suares' Hebrew autiot.

Autiot is Hebrew as a semiotic~hermeneutic~linguistic quantum~gematria.

This class of Hebrew is what Essene Jesus' of Judæa used to pneumatically describe reality. This Hebrew code is what 10 of his 12 disciples couldn't understand.

If you want more of this, read Carlo Suares' Song of Songs, his Cipher of Genesis, and his Sepher Yetsira. As a group this is referred Suares' Trilogy.

This takes us ever so close to da Vinci's real codes, real gnostic codes, real quantum~gn¤stic codes of Pirsig's "ancients."
Classicists called them, denigratingly, "Sophists." See "Jesus as sophist" near bottom of that QELR.

Autiot is amazing! It is self~other~recursive. It is an almost perfect analog of Quantonics, quantum~reality, and quantum~empiritheory.

17Oct2009 - Doug.



Doug wants to show you a quantonics memeotic of mem, i.e., water, using cuneiform:



Jews do n¤t, as far as Doug knows, view mem as cuneiform. However, Doug has just shown it that way.

As you can see, Doug made first cut cuneiform out of all myriad font upper case Vs.

To show both cuneiform rod '|' and 'V' Doug used simple line strokes. We like these better since stones and grail interrelationships are more apparent as illustrated (e.g., <-->, and >--<) elsewhere in this page.

Imagine if our cuneiform 'E' were duplicated and reflected on vertical: you would see a hermaphroditic 'stone' with a horizontal line interrelating its two lazy 'V's. Try playing other arrangement 'games' with that pattern.

Observe how upper version looks like waves (water waves). Check your Webster's too. Roman Majuscule of 'M' appears as actual transverse waves! That is remarkable, and its etymology would be fun to assess.

Does our cuneiform make Egyptian pyramids? Tetrahedra? Quantum~bi~tetrahedral molecules, like ammonia, are intrinsically, but compressibly, superpositive!

If we stretch our hermeneutics on lower version, we can still see waves but their shapes are weird. Our 'E,' though, to Doug, shows water as liquid 'stone.' Now thinkq "rogue waves," "tsunamis," and "quantum~superposition" of vertically~incompressible fluid wavings!!! Now, ask yourself this question, "How can humans as bags of ~97% fluids: water (varies with individual: ~80%), oils, lipids, fats, sugars, etc....stand up?" Never thought about that before, eh? Remember those silicon based lifeforms on an ancient Star Trek episode who referred humans as, "Bags of water [liquids, fluids]?" What about "super liquids?"

9Nov2009, 6Sep2012 - Doug.


Doug wants to show you a quantonics memeotic of sheen (sheer) using cuneiform:




Jews do n¤t, as far as Doug knows, view sheen as cuneiform. However, Doug has just shown it that way.

Now what are sheen's cuneiform hermeneutics? Countless and radically important!

We may look at it as two Vs recursively quantization~extruded to east.

We may look at it as a reclining grail (snake) with its mouth open and its stem (tail) partially level and partially inclined.

Clearly it represents MoQ's Quality! That is V and V extrudings...V as Value, evolving, living, transuding quantum~holographically said membrane "son's" Light.

Vividly it represents a partial hermaphroditic chalice. Potentially and recursively, a cup within a cup, a vagina within a vagina, immaculate quantum~comceptionings as quantum~recursive. Copula over copulum.

Its unrecursed left side is a feminine V (vagina) lower half stone.

For Doug it is Magdalen looking back at whoever is looking at h~er. Gn¤stic recursion of logos as Light. A way of becoming...enlightened.

In Hebrew, sheen is breath[e]. Breath of [Spirit of] G¤d. Chaldæan Gn¤stic G¤d is a feminine hermaphrodite AKA Mother. Viz. Mother,son,mother,[Ff]ather. (1(2,3))...4.

Suares, in his Cipher of Genesis, Shambala 1st ed. 1970, writes, "The [dialectical] cabalists have always had a horror of the magic of the Kasdeems [Chaldæans]." Doug's brackets. See p. 21, second full paragraph.
Doug doesn't yet fully understand what Suares is saying here, but it sounds an awful lot like paternal-patriarchal-dialectical çatholiçs' and protestants' fear and hatred of Qabalic and quantum gn¤ses.
Essene Jesus abhorred dialectic as Error, and his Essene gn¤sis aligns well Naassene, Peratæan, and Chaldæan gn¤ses.
In all gn¤ses Doug is aware of, patriarchy is an illusion of dialectical mind, and takes its demiurgic hold as Error (dialectic) in what Jesus referred, "the dead father."
Jesus depicts "dead father" as dialectical concrete AKA 'the christ,' AKA n¤n-living-Error. That is, MoQ's ESQ.

Doug - 17,30Oct2009

Doug - 7Nov2009

Doug is sampling Suares' Cipher of Genesis. In his process he is offering some of his own opinions (just as Doug does; we must keep in mind that, as LeLoup wrote, we have little alternative to interpretation, hermeneutics and heuristics of what we read). One of Suares' opinions is that Chaldæans' mystical views of history are lesser Autiot's views. This disturbs Doug greatly. Why does Suares see Chaldæans as lesser ancient Hebrew? Doug thinks~believes there is an answer which puts many great biblical issues in quantum~perspective, better and meliorative perspective.

Suares' Cipher of Genesis describes Genesis as a Old Testament (OT) story of worry that "human germ (DNA)" is and has stagnated. Old Testament (OT)'s solution, according Suares, is to put Jews in relentless trouble and force them to struggle according God's mandate (Isra-El, literally). At first blush this appears a good meme, an improvement regime for humanity. Now ponder King Saul in this 'light.' Then revive your memories how Saul became Paul who marketed Jesus as 'The Christ." Paul did that for Romans who were middle-east's hegemons at that time. This was Çatholiçism's birthplace and birthtime. Paul did that even though Jesus insisted that anyone who called him "The Christ," worked for Satan. "The Christ" essentially means "hegemon," and Jesus was no hegemon!

There is a tendency among dialectical Semites to worship material reality and thus flesh. Doug and Chaldæans refer this as hyle, hylic, and hylicity. We and those who agree with us (which agrees with what Jesus taught) believe that worshiping material and flesh is Error. It is Error borne of dialectical and hylic thought. It is worth while to observe, CeodE 2009, that most 'science,' 'religion,' and western 'culture' are both dialectical and hylic. Implication is, and this matters little to most people alive today, that most of us are still living in Error borne of Romans' hegemonic dogma which merely continued and polemicized prior (antecedent) Israeli-Semitic canon and other dialectical dogma.

Doug's simple hermeneutic opinion is that said struggle isn't one of hylicity, rather one of psyche and pneuma: as gn¤stics, quantum~gn¤stics, we have little alternative to struggling with G¤d pneumatically using our quanton(n¤nactual,actual) psyches. Doing it hylically is Error, and will fail massively, as we see society failing massively today, CeodE 2009. If one reads gn¤stic gospels about Jesus in that light of "logos as toposical," one hears, suddenly, Jesus agreeing with Doug's derivative opinion. Johannine Gospel is a great exemplar here, one of the greatest. "In the beginning was the w¤rd"...a pneumatic w¤rd whose esoterica can only be understood by psyches coinsiding pneuma as what we refer quantized living~father "bettershipings," n¤t concrete, dead-father worseship. Fluxic vis-à-vis stuxic! Quantum~gn¤stic!

Doug believes then that Suares' Autiot hermeneutics of Old Testament (OT)'s Genesis is valid when interpreted hylically, but invalid interpreted using topos' other two levels: psychically and pneumatically.

Until now, Doug couldn't explain his dis ease with Suares' remarks...but now Doug sees real gn¤stic light and logos in topos' extended hermeneutics.

Paul couldn't understand this. Romans couldn't understand this. Çatholiçs and Protestants, even today, do not understand this.

Suares' narrations of Autiot appear to not fathom logos' topos. To Doug, that means they, however great they are, lack gn¤stic perspective...and that is very dangerous. It is dangerous since Old Testament (OT) failed humanity. It is dangerous since hylic-dialectical society is failing humanity, now, CeodE 2009.

Thank you for reading,

Doug - 7Nov2009, 6Sep2012.

Continuation ... 12Nov2008 - Doug.

We ask you to expect to see that list grow. We want to capture all of Gaffney's both explicit and implicit symbols here and add symbols here, as are apropos The Last Supper, from other authors.

Doug is doing stream of consciousness descriptioning here, so there may be some redundancy. Clearly Doug will describe 'stone' and 'Logos' countless ways in a kind of spiritual, especially gnostic, symbol feuilleton serial.

Similarly primordial flow and waters as waves, and quantumly as precursive thinkqing of quantum~waves, quantum~flux, and quantum~isoflux.

Our biggest message here which has become more important in Quantonics since 2005 can be elucidated in two bullet items:

o Christianity is classical 'state:' dichon(ESQ, Christ_as_ESQ), and
o Gnosis is quantum~pr¤cess: quanton(movementings,restings).

Latter, of course, is essence of Quantonics: quanton(DQ,Jesus_as_SQ_ihn_DQ),
with SQ as pneumatically stindyanic.

Doug can imagine how curious those of you, who are interested, must be re Doug's overlay of DaVinci's Last Supper. So let's start by describing painting's included~middlings first.

Allow Doug to show symbols encompassed by our two largest 2D geometrical ellipses and a vertical arrow flowing both ways through them.

Quantonics aficionados should immediately recognize a energy flow rendition of Doug's generation III quantum~reality modaling:

Regular students recognize that graphic. However, can you see its analogous symbolism of flow to DaVinci's Last Supper with assistance of Doug's vertical red bidirectional arrow and ellipses?

Now grasp this: Doug wasn't gnostic when he drew that! It took Doug more than a decade of quantum~studies and two prior generations of reality loop graphics to get there. Too, Doug wouldn't have drawn that graphic without DMD's relentless interrogatories begging Doug to make quantum~reality "simpler." Thank you DMD, profoundly, I thank you. Something wonderful was lying just ahead and I couldn't see it, perhaps you did. Again, thank you! Thank you for that very first email which appeared on my tiny little Jetbook 6.66 years back in time on March 6, 2002. I was sitting in room 204 of Overleaf Lodge in Yachats, Oregon, looking out at Pacific's vastness and thinking of something else entirely when that submarine tone emitted and dotted my deep thoughts.

Now (12Nov2008) Doug sits here using this incredible Apple Computer company's equipment (10GHz, 10Gbytes and a 30" cinema) and asks himself, with great humility, "How could this happen?"

Some of you are k~now~ings...

Permit Doug just a tad more nostalgia... Doug went to electronics school first. He got a first class radiotelephone operator's license. Realized he needed more education. Did a baccalaureate starting in EE, and after a huge argument with a truly incompetent 'professor' switched to 'mathematics' in desperation. All that while though, philosophy was gently prodding my amygdala. In late 1970s and early 1980s Doug read Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Now you talk about a "whack on the side of the head" book! ZMM said to Doug, "Pirsig is right! There is a genetic flaw in humankinds' current ways of reasoning." Then in 1992 Doug read Pirsig's Lila. Lila did it! She said to me, "Doug, pursue philosophy at all costs." And if we back up to Doug's baccalaureate, Doug recalls a Japanese professor of physics who said to Doug, "You should be in physics! You are a natural for physics. Come to my department and I will teach you." I didn't. But now I understand what that man meant. He could see something I couldn't. Belatedly, "Thank you Dr. M." Trouble is, right here in river city, Philosophy covers all, and that's what Doug wanted, an opportunity to, as best one single human's finite intellect could do it, attempt to see it all. End tad of nostalgia.

After a career in software engineering, Doug decided to do, no — live, philosophy. That is what Robert M. Pirsig told us all: "We need to do it, to live it, otherwise we are all just philosophologists..." and philosophology is for those who want their lives to "just happen." To scientifically and religiously "run on automatic."

Doug's own quantum studies led him right back to gn¤stic Jesus. And guess what? Essene Gn¤stic Jesus was teaching quantum~reality over two millennia ago.

"Doug, you are full of it!"

I am happy to receive your thrown gauntlet, and I throw it right back. You are prohibited from saying that to me and having it accepted by me, until you do your own quantum~gn¤stic due diligence. When you show Doug that you can do what he can do, then Doug will be willing to talk about who is full of what. But you won't will you? You are too busy running on automatic chasing status quo as your ultimate classical qua.

I just love guantlets.

Back to our Last Supper's included~middlings.

Doug views ceiling's pattern as a portcullis, a gate. A gate to where? To heaven, AKA isoflux. Notice that Thomas is pointing at it, and he and others refer it, "The narrow gate." Narrow gates are hard to find and hard to get through.

Our red arrow flows through it vertically. Compare our quantum version in our Gen III reality loop. That arrow is more like part of a wave and it flows, arbitrarily, West. Doug labeled it, somewhat conventionally, "unbecoming." It shows us leaving actuality and returning to n¤nactuality. Symbolism? Jesus is Logos, Light exegetising and enlightening reality's included~middle twixt heaven and earth. Recall Chaldæan gnosis and Doug's quantonic explication of it:

quanton(Mother,quanton(son,quanton(mother,dichon(living_Father, dead_father)))).

For a great and exoteric view of that, in a fairly fledged tabular emerqancy, see here.

Take a breather ... 12Nov2008 - Doug.

Doug will continue with this list and exegeses of it in subsequent installment efforts...

Rather than a quick return to Gaffney's text, Doug has chosen to commence a review of Jean-Yves LeLoup's The Gospel of Philip prefaced by Jacob Needleman. TGoP is somewhat unique in how LeLoup's approach is similar Doug's. LeLoup is a hermeneuticist. He admits we are all constrained to that, perhaps at best, given limitations of our potential understanding of a distant past.

LeLoup introduces us to some text and symbols which are valuable here, in Doug's own hermeneutics of The Last Supper.

Let's start with the cross.

Çatholiçism treats 'the cross' as an dialectical either-or: a machine of death. Philip, LeLoup, Needleman, et al., treat the cross memetically as symbolic of G¤d's own Planck~flux~dynamic OEDC creation~methodology: quantum~both~while~all~and~many~everywhere~associative~included~middlings! Redemption itself as gn¤stic pr¤cæssings. Latter resembles Doug's graphic complement of DaVinci's Last Supper.

Review our markups of DaVinci's Last Supper. Notice that V twixt John~Mary [Doug added previous link 26Sep2009] and Jesus. It is Philip's cross, at least it is cross' North~West quadrant. Imagine rest of cross fledged in red from Doug's partial emerqancy of it. LeLoup's quotation of Philip's hermeneutic of said cross:

"Here, Philip appears as scriptural hermeneuticist, and as a baptist. Both of these qualities recur in the Gospel that bears his name. It is also interesting that the person whom he teaches is an Ethiopian royal official. Can it be mere coincidence that it is in Ethiopia that we find, even today, richly ornamented crosses with a representation in the center of a man and a woman joined closely together? For this is one of the most important themes of the Gospel of Philip: the union of man and woman as revelation of the Love of the creator and savior." Full paragraph at page top 11, Introduction. LeLoup is writing about Philip, fourth from right in DaVinci's Last Supper.

Please ponder Jung's circle~cross quantumly like this:

We see tetrad which was already four quadrants apparent.
Now Ogdoad is readily eidetic (add four enthymemetic outer 'circles'), "mixing all things in all."
And Aleph as dotted blue and sky with bosonic~gluonic quantum~reality evident.
Yod is apparent as red, and may be thought about as dialectically either dead (static, stable, status quo) or
living (evolving, transmuting life existence itself: Hay). Now re cognize Qabala: Aleph~Hay~Yod~Hay.

Using Qabala recapitulatively (quantum~antinomially) fathom ben Adam: "...indeterminate evolution of Aleph in blood."

Fold said eight: see a 2D rendition of a Möbius (spin 1/2 fermion). Blue circles are spin 1 bosons.
Dotted circles are (Heraclitus' "nature likes to hide") isoflux.

Doug views white 'stars' as ubiquitous and perpetual immanence of ben Adam. Jesus as (transmutative QED) Light ihn all of us. 123.

Doug - 2Aug2013.

(Doug - 2...8...0123)

See if you can feel Jesus~John~Mary's gnostic~cross of love in Her description of their farewell discourse:


Farewell Discourse - Last Supper - Chapters 14-15

Jesus Washes His Disciples' Feet

John~Mary 13 1-38

1It was just before the Passover Feast. Jesus knew that the time had come for him to leave this world and go to the Father [gnostically, living~Father]. Having loved his own who were in the world [actuality], he now showed them the full extent of his love.

2The evening meal was being served, and the devil [gnostically, dead-dialectical-father also known as 'the patriarchal demiurge'] had already prompted Judas Iscariot, son of Simon, to betray Jesus.

3Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God;

4so he got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist.

5After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples' feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.

6He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, "Lord, are you going to wash my feet?"

7Jesus replied, "You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand."

8"No," said Peter, "you shall never wash my feet." Jesus answered, "Unless I wash you, you have no part with me."

9"Then, Lord," Simon Peter replied, "not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!"

10Jesus answered, "A person who has had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you."

11For he knew who was going to betray him, and that was why he said not every one was clean.

12When he had finished washing their feet, he put on his clothes and returned to his place. "Do you understand what I have done for you?" he asked them. 13"You call me 'Teacher' and 'Lord,' and rightly so, for that is what I am. 14Now that I, your Lord and teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another's feet. 15I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you. 16I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him [Jesus' Essene~Judaic gnosis disavows social, dialectical, management; some refer this gnostic~antinomialism. This is why Jesus denied being 'a, or the Christ.']. 17Now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them."

18"I am not referring to all of you; I know those I have chosen. But this is to fulfill the scripture: He who shares my bread has lifted up his heel against me."

19"I am telling you now before it happens, so that when it does happen you will believe that I am He [This probably narrates that Judas Iscariot was acting as part of Jesus' plan; complicit in it -- with Jesus. Only disciples should own this gnosis. See Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln, in their Holy~Blood Holy~Grail.]. 20I tell you the truth, whoever accepts anyone I send accepts me; and whoever accepts me accepts the one who sent me [Verity, as subjective evidence, of our surmised probability.]."

21After he had said this, Jesus was troubled in spirit and testified, "I tell you the truth, one of you is going to betray me [according to plan]."

22His disciples stared at one another, at a loss to know which of them he meant.

23One of them, the disciple whom Jesus loved [John~Mary], was reclining next to him. 24Simon Peter motioned to this disciple and said, "Ask him which one he means."

25Leaning back against Jesus, she asked him, "Lord, who is it?"

26Jesus answered, "It is the one to whom I will give this piece of bread when I have dipped it in the dish." Then, dipping the piece of bread, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, son of Simon. 27As soon as Judas took the bread, Satan [dialectic, also known as pure hylic-material-objective thought; absence of pneuma] entered into him.

"What you are about to do, do quickly," Jesus told him, 28but no one at the meal understood why Jesus said this to him.

29Since Judas had charge of the money, some thought Jesus was telling him to buy what was needed for the Feast, or to give something to the poor.

30As soon as Judas had taken the bread, he went out. And it was night.

31When he was gone, Jesus said, "Now is the Son of Man glorified and God is glorified in him."

32"If God is glorified in him, God will glorify the son in himself, and will glorify him at once."

33"My children, I will be with you only a little longer. You will look for me, and just as I told the Jews, so I tell you now: Where I am going, you cannot come."

34"A new command I give you: love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another."

36Simon Peter asked him, "Lord, where are you going?"

Jesus replied, "Where I am going, you cannot follow now, but you will follow later."

37Peter asked, "Lord, why can't I follow you now? I will lay down my life for you."

38Then Jesus answered, "Will you really lay down your life for me? I tell you the truth, before the rooster crows, you will disown me three times."

Jesus Comforts His Disciples

John~Mary 14 1-14, 15-31

1"Do not let your hearts be troubled. Trust in God; trust also in me. 2In my Father's house there are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there, to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. 4You know the way to the place where I am going."

5Thomas said to him, "Lord, we don't know where you are going, so how can we know the way?"

6Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life [All gnostics grasp an essential here: way~truth~life are redemptive processings which some of us refer evolution. Evolution is creation! It is how G¤d creates: creatio ex nihilo aperio.]. No one comes to the Father except through me. 7If you really knew me, you would know my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."

8Philip said, "Lord, show us the Father and that will be enough for us."

9Jesus answered, "Don't you know me, Philip, even after I have been among you such a long time? Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, 'Show us the Father?' 10Don't you believe that I am in the Father, and that the Father is in me? [Jesus, here, is teaching quantum~included~middlings.] The words I say to you are not just my own."

"Rather, it is the Father living in me, who is doing his work. 11Believe me when I say that I am in the Father and the Father is in me [quantum~included~middlings]; or at least believe on the evidence of the miracles themselves. 12I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father. 13And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. 14You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it."

15"If you love me, you will obey what I command. 16And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor [...gnosis says said Counselor can straddle n¤nactuality and actuality as creation's middle~inclusion...this is gnostic wisdom whose emersos dwells in Sophia...] to be with you forever 17the Spirit of truth. The world cannot accept him because it neither sees him [...Jesus is showing us how dialectic induces concrete blindness in its practitioners...gnosis repairs dialectical blindness...] nor knows him. But you know him, for he lives with you and will be in you. 18I will not leave you as orphans. I will come to you."

19"Before long the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live."

20"On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you."

What is Adam[as]?

Who is Jesus describing here in his, "I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you?"

Qabala, Carlo Suares' Qabala, answers for us.

Suares writes in his Cipher of Genesis, "...Adam is aleph [co]inside [one's] blood."
See last sentence, paragraph five, page 32.
Sentence begins, "All this is easy to understand [according to Qabala]..."

What does that mean?

Adam can see hæ~r Gn¤stic inner, which means Adam has established, at least partially, hæ~r pneuma with Jesus and G¤d, as our quote of Jesus makes explicit.

Recall that aleph is autiot's dynamic flux which middle~includes all material (hylic) reality. Recall that yod is aleph's antinomial. So aleph corresponds Pirsig's DQ and yod corresponds Pirsig's SQ and ESQ.

In Pirsigese, "Adam has Quality!"

In Quantonicsese, Adam issi quanton(DQ,SQ).

In SOMese, "Sadam has lost he~r quality."

In Dialectic, Sadam is dichon(SQ, ESQ).

So now we have a real test for any gnostic, and whether any gnostic can see hæ~r inner.

Simply, "Are you in DQ, and is DQ in you?"

Simply, "Is aleph in you and are you in aleph?"

Deeper fathoming of Adamas in quantumese permits Doug to heuristq:

quanton(Aleph,Blood) as a specificq of quanton(DQ,SQ).

We may choose then to viewq, just as DQ and SQ are quantum~Qabalic~antinomials of one another, Aleph and Blood as quantum~Qabalic~antinomials of one another. We can showq it also as:

quanton(A,Dam) which is even more specificq: Dallet~Mem is antinomialq Aleph!

Some authors, e.g., in Hugh Schonfield's Essene Odyssey, also refer Dama. What about Damah and Damas?

Doug heurists this (his personalq hermeneuticq choiceq) specificallyq as "Blood in Aleph," and "female Blood in Aleph."

This heuristicq offers greater Ihn Quantum Lightings to Jesus' Farewell Discourse ellipsis, "and...God is ihn you." Of course and indeed dogmatically that ellipsis is heretical apostasis intra 'çatholisçhism.'

Doug - 25Feb2014.

Doug - 5Dec2009.

21"Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one who loves me. He who loves me will be loved by my Father, and I too will love him and show myself to him."

22Then Judas [not Iscariot] said, "But, Lord, why do you intend to show yourself to us and not to the world?"

23Jesus replied, "If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching. My Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home with him."

24"He who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me."

25"All this I have spoken while still with you. 26But the Counselor [Sophia], the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you. 27Peace I leave with you; my peace I give you. [Compare Jesus' quantum~phasement here to words put into his mouth by Irenæus in Matthew 10:34. Doug 25Jun2009.] I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid."

28"You heard me say, 'I am going away and I am coming back to you. If you loved me, you would be glad that I am going to the Father, for the Father is greater than I."

29"I have told you now before it happens, so that when it does happen you will believe. 30I will not speak with you much longer, for the [dialectical] prince of this world is coming. He has no hold on me, 31but the world must learn that I love the Father and that I do exactly what my Father has commanded me."

"Come now, let us leave."

Biblical text taken from The NIV Study Bible, and commented by Doug in brackets.

Doug italicized 'this' just above as "...this world."

You may wish to carefully study Doug's QELRs of several relevant terms. You may n¤t take Jesus' words hylically-psychically. See our Topos Table. These QELRs will assist your abilities to read and understand them pneumatically:

In place of Jesus' use of happen see our QELR of occur.

In place of Jesus' use of truth see our QELR of truth.

In place of Jesus' use of understand see our QELR of understand. Also fathom 'understand' as Beenah. An example of Beenah from OT, Proverbs IV: 1 word 7 has been translated by Doug using Suares' genius and Doug's quantumese: See Beenah in Proverbs and in Doug's Sepher Yetsiral Hologralexology™: Beenah. Doug - 7May2015.

In place of Jesus' use of blind see our How SOMites View Reality. Pneumatics see reality more like this.

Doug - 24May2009. We'll keep looking for typos...

(A very Good wayve to spend a Sunday!)

More to come imminently...Doug...24May2009...


If you want a heads up on what is imminent, you should start a serious recapitulative re~reading of Appendix 1 of Gaffney's GSotN.

That appendix contains Gaffney's version of The Naassene Sermon.

Doug is about to disclose here symbolic essence of Chapter 3's 'grail' as a quantum~gn¤stic included~middle.

Expect to see this sometime during first half of July, 2009.

Priori de Sion used 'Y' and its inversion often. See this sword's handle:

Observe sword's handle: especially handle's cap and thence handle's hilt. Cap shows recursive 'Ys.'
Hilt shows recursive 'Ys,' and a lazy grail of two 'Ys' combined horizontally. Notice two stones at grail's ends.
A direct implication of stone,grail,stone is humanity as hermaphroditic via grail's middle including nexi among all in heaven and earth.

Recall Ophitic implication of grail as vessel for Adamas' mixing of all things in all.

This symbology is just astonishing once you grasp its quantum~Jesuit~gn¤stic~Essence!

This symbology isn't just Naassene~Essene! It is Chaldæan too! It is ancient beyond human belief!
Recall Doug's 1(2,3),dichon(Living_Father, Demiurge_Dead_Father).
Doug often shows that dichon as a 4 representing Dead_Father as state-ic middle-excluded, and Living_Father as EIMA~dynamic.

Adepts will educe immediately cuneiform's '|' and '^'. '|' is an erect pudendum. '^' is feminine vaginal half~of~a~stone hermaphrodicity.

Now compare Doug's use of wingdings font lower case 'v' as an open stone of stones:

End atlantes here are stones opened and juxtaposes grail absent vertical 'stem.'

Middle atlante is opened stone extruded horizontally. Remove top and bottom cap lines and we see something like this: >--<,

That symbol is on sword's hilt as a lazy grail. Stand it up. That is said grail,with vertical stem, which mixes all in all.

But that grail symbol is more. See Last Supper pix at page top. Vertical arrows...superpose them with grail.

Guess what! Grail symbolizes hermaphroditic middle inclusion of heaven and earth: Heaven as hermaphroditic(Mother,son) and Earth as hermaphroditic(Sophia,Living_Father).

Use your hermeneutic imaginations to extend this as Doug shall attempt in next segment of this Gn¤stic Chautauqua.

Gnostic masters of Priori de Sion used combinations of cuneiform primitives to make an huge library of Essene symbols.
Doug will show several which he derived from Gaffney's Appendix 1, The Naassene Sermon, Chapter 3.

. . .

Doug - 4Jul2009.

. . .

Doug - 5Jul2009.

Doug has taken nearly all of 5July to do these graphics.
As you can see they attend Gaffney's The Naassene Sermon rather well.
Let's look at just graphics to begin.
In next few days, Doug will add material from Gaffney's opus to clarify graphics and attend them apropos TNS' words:

Fathom quantum~fractal~recursion of serpent eating its tail as a tell of gnostic wisdom. Doug - 10Dec2012.

Doug also sees quantum~superposition of both quantum~gn¤sis and quantum~scihæncæ in these symbols and offers anacoquecigruegies of them here:

These are quantum QCD quarks which appear during unbecoming to becoming QCD transmutation of nonactual TBCS quark energies just prior to emerqing UD quark phase~encoded neutrons and protons in actuality.

Notice stone bottom vaginal cuneiform on left.

Notice stone top pudendum cuneiform on right.

We can stonic (hermaphroditically) merge them vertically sort of like this:

Very interesting, eh?

We see immediately gn¤stic essence of quantum reality as quarks!

Compare dotted chalices to template symbology shown above.

Doug - 5Jul2009.

We can do something similar with QCDs of neutrons and protons, like this:

Our original neutron shown as UDD on left was an attempt to follow standard scientific notation of up-quark, down-quark, down-quark.

In order to show a full hermaphroditic combination of neutron as upper (often shown lazy on left) 'gate,' and proton as lower (often shown lazy on right) 'gate,' we had to invent a DUD version of our neutron shown on right.

Here is a lazy version of our hermaphroditic neutron~proton actuality 'gates:'

and larger, 4x:

In both graphics, green highlights what we mean by 'gates.'

A gnostic hermaphroditic 'stone' should lie somewhere close to these quantumly narrow 'gates.'

Hope these comparisons are as vivid and epiphanous for you as they are for Doug.

Beth said, "I almost can't believe it! Awesome and awe inspiring!"

Doug - 5Jul2009.

This is a never~ending story, folks...

Quantum~gn¤stic~reality is like that...

Doug - 5Jul2009.

. . .

To contact Quantonics write to or call:

Doug Renselle
Quantonics, Inc.
Suite 18 #368 1950 East Greyhound Pass
Carmel, INdiana 46033-7730

©Quantonics, Inc., 2008-2028 — Rev. 7May2015  PDR — Created 10Nov2008  PDR
(18Feb2009 rev - Add a 'What is Gnosis?' link.)
(24May2009 rev - Add Last Supper Farewell Discourse with bracketed commentary.)
(25May2009 rev - Add Farewell Discourse, Chapter 14, verse 10 anchor. Correct a typo.)
(1Jun2009 rev - 'the' to 'they' and add a missing '
of' in farewell discourse ch. 15: Doug's original transcription errors and typos.)
(25Jun2009 rev - Add link to Matthew 10:34 comparative in our TQS November, 2007 News. Matthew says Jesus brings a sword, not peace.
Essene Gn¤stic Jesus would not have said that! Doug.)
(4-6Jul2009 rev - Repair Gaffney's textbook title in red text. Extend symbology opus near page bottom. Add cuneiform graphics and QCD analogues...Add a BAWAM link and corrected two typos.)
(15Jul2009 rev - Add Ancient Gnostic Symbology graphic link back to Pagels' Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis' cuneiform symbols section.)
(18Jul2009 rev - Add 'Compare Gnostic Symbolism to Quantum' link under recent novel graphics added above.)
(29Aug2009 rev - Add 'QCD as Grail Symbolically' anchor to apropos graphics set.)
(13Sep2009 rev - Extend list of symbols (names of symbols) attending 'Last Supper' both explicitly and implicitly.)
(26Sep2009 rev - Add 'John~Mary' link to Hebrew Gematria of 'M. Magdalene.' Add 'Kabbalah' link to Qabalah lexicon.)
(17,30Oct2009 rev - Add a Carlo Suares Qabala autiot update. Repair typos. Add memeotics of 'sheen.')
(7,9Nov2009 rev - Add commentary on Doug's criticism of Suares' anti-Chaldæan hylicity. Add memeotics of 'mem.')
(3Dec2009 rev - Repair a missing parenthesis.)
(8Jan2010 rev - Add 'Adamas' anchor to relevant text box. Correct some minor typos.)
(27Jan2010 rev - Extend Adamas symbols with Adama, Adamah, and Hamada. Add symbols for five and six, using some gematria.)
(3Feb2010 rev - Illustrate and narrate symbolism of eleven in The Last Supper painting.)
(14,31Mar2010 rev - Add Michael Baigent quote from his The Jesus Papers, p. 24. Add page top Michael Baigent quote from his 2006 The Jesus Papers, p. 64.)
(12Apr2010 rev - Change all SH in YHSHWH to S
h as YHShWH.)
(8May2010 rev - Add 'Aleph In All Blood' anchor to Farewell Discourse.)
(24,26Jul2010 rev - Add 'Two Satans' descriptionings. Add <Dr. M.> link to Dr. Kozaburo Miyakawa's obituary.)
(28Sep2010 rev - Add page top proto quote of Lawrence Gardner re Magdalene and çatholiçism.)
(14Mar2012 rev - Add '...neither sees him..." link under Farewell Discourse where Jesus is explaining God's gn¤stic Immanence in all humanity.)
(7Apr2012 rev - Repair redundant 'of.')
(6Sep2012 rev - Correct 97% fluids issue borne of a misnomer '97% water.')
(10Dec2012 rev - Add 'serpent' link with cuneiform gnostic symbology graphic.)
(4May2013 rev - Enhance as bold-green first text occurrence of 'Farewell Discourse.' Reset legacy markups.)
(23Jun2013 rev - Add 'Hermaphroditic Stone Marks Gateway' anchor.)
(16Jul2013 rev - Add 'Atbash Cipher of Christ' commentary.)
(2Aug2013 rev - Repair some minor typos. Add Jung's crossed~eight ogdoad graphic and narrative.)
(25Feb2014 rev - Update narrative re Adamas.)
(22Dec2014 rev - Repair 'two satans' link.)
(29Jan2015 rev - Update Thomas Gospel link.)
(1Apr2015 rev - Repair 'resurrect' typo.)
(7May2015 rev - Move Farewell Discourse anchor to very start of Farewell Discourse. Add 'Beenah' (Understanding) links to Proverbs IV:1 word 7, and to Doug's Hologralexology of it.