This is our January, 2006 editorial Go directly to 2006 January News Beware Christians! This entire news segment is about our perceived "evils of orthodox Christianity." Orthodox Christian Rating:

We are delighted with a Pennsylvania federal court decision against 'Intelligent Design.' We have to qualify our opinion, however. Like this: Any system of thought, any system of belief which finds its quintessence, its bases in dialectic is itself quintessentially 'Intelligent Design.' Dialectic is quintessentially 'Intelligent (rational) Design (mechanism).' Quantum really, "anti contradiction does n¤t equal absolute [dialectical] truth." Doug - 20Dec2005. "Orthodox Jews and Christians insist that a chasm [Doug calls it "SOM's abyss of stayssyss"] separates humanity and its creator: God is wholly other. [Dichon(God, humanity)!] But some of the gnostics who wrote these [Nag Hammadi] gospels contradict this: they say self knowledge is knowledge of God; the self [quantum ihndihvihdual] and God are identical [identity is problematic in Quantonics]." Introduction, page xx. Our brackets, bold. By Elaine Pagels (Widow of Heinz Pagels: author of a Doug favorite, Dreams of Reason) in her The Gnostic Gospels, 1979 & 1989 Vintage Books paperback. You may have seen (her) Dr. Pagels with Bill Moyers on PBS. For Doug, this quote is quite profound in its transparent analogy of SOM vis-à-vis MoQ and SOM vis-à-vis Quantonics and quantum interrelationships. We improve on latter via our self~understandings (self~entendres, self~k~nowings) as "Wæ aræ ihn G¤d amd G¤d issi ihn uhs." Adepts can observe how former, i.e., Dichon(God, self), is ideally, concretely, and thus retardedly dialectical. Note that "G¤d" is Doug's QELR of 'God.' Also, take care re: quantum semantics quasi 'identical.' Allow us to remediate Gnostic "...self and God are identical" with "G¤d issi sælf." In Quantonics that too is too "literal," too "normative," so we say, "G¤d issi [ihn] sælf [amd sælf issi ihn G¤d]." Quanton(G¤d,sælf) shows quantonics adepts how quantum~G¤d anihmatæly~EIMA~c¤mplæmænts quantum~sælf and vice versa. See EIMA. You may venture a guess now — as an example of but one of many Gnostic vis-à-vis Catholic disagreements — why Roman 'catholics' hated and still hate (actually, fear) Gnostics and Gnosticism. A Quantonics fanfare and tribute: Some versions of Gnosticism aræ ancient precursors of quantum m¤dalings ¤f ræhlihty!!! Doug - 21-30Dec2005. "Classical dialectic perjures quantum reality." By Doug in our QELR of 'subject.' Bless Great Britain's quantum~humanity, re: gay civil marriage! Doug - 22Dec2005. Recently we have heard claims that there are "two billion Christians" on Earth. Are there? We would more probably concur if that quote said, "two billion Muslims." What is a Christian? Those who adhere faithfully three premises of Christianity. Premises of Christianity are: canon, creed, and structure Elaine Pagels has this to say about that, Since Jesus' resurrrection, "Orthodox Christians have confessed in the creed that Jesus of Nazareth, 'crucified, dead, and buried,' was raised 'on the third day.' Many today recite that creed without thinking about what they are saying, much less actually believing it. Recently some ministers, theologians, and scholars have challenged the literal view of resurrection." By Elaine Pagels, Page 3, of her The Gnostic Gospels. As we just read, many Christians tend, like 'enlightened' 'scientists,' to "run on automatic." Muslims quantum~interrelate with God multiple times each day. However, many view God as dialectically 'other,' lisr from 'self.' So, really, how many "Orthodox Christians" are there? We think, believe, and estimate only about a third of "two billion." Doug's opinion. For example, Bu()sh() is n¤ Christian! How can we say that? He clearly hates his enemies! He loves dialectic! He lies, persistently and consistently! He disinforms, consistently and persistently! He fails consistently and persistently and calls his failures "success." He spins wrong as right, down as up, and evil as good. As a n¤n Christian believer evidenced by his own 'catholic inquisitional' life practices, Bu()sh() appropriately is headed for "Christian Hell!" Actually, he is already in it, isn't he? A living hell he made for himself! Doug's opinion. Read Frances A. Yates' Giordano Bruno too! Doug - 23Dec2005. Anyone who anthropomorphizes G¤d uncovers he-r own lack of authority to expound G¤d. Dialecticians are ignorant and DIQheaded enough to attempt it. Doug - 24Dec2005. Social state-ic orthodoxy manifests social authority as: intellectual rape and abuse of individuals' free thoughts and free wills. Doug - 25Dec2005. Orthodoxy is for SOMynotsee troglodytes. Doug - 29Dec2005. From reading Pagels' The Gnostic Gospels, Chapter IV, re: 'The Acts of John,' and Jesus' dancing (akin Heraclitus..."...those who do not dance do not understand the Logos"...in a sense, the dance AKA absolute change, semper fluxio, is) is the Logos): Since Jesus' crucifixion, Rome, Romans, Roman Catholics turned dancing Christianity rather Essene~Gn¤sis, Jesus' original, ancient Christianity rather Essene~Gn¤sis into 'orthodox' hyperboolean Romaninanity! "And there you have it." Doug - 31Dec2005. (Doug's editorial repair - 29Jul2009.) Crucifixion: crucistuxion, crucistoption, cruciholdstilltion, crucizeromomentumtion, crucistatecion, crucidemoswilltion, crucidogmation, ..., crucidon'tdancecion. Simply, orthodox Catholic political 'Intelligent Design!'

2006 TQS News December, 2005 through November, 2006

Month:

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT    OCT SE

NOV

DEC

You are here:

Topics:

Failure of Orthodox Christianity

Google in China, What is Wrong with Democracy, Why Digital is Dead, Gnosticism vis-à-vis Pirsig & Bergson

Scott C. Smith, IBM's High GHz PPCs, Dennett's BtS,

Doug Critiques Sull's 'Difficult Decisions for an Uncertain World'

Doug on novel Millennium III Business Thinking

What will happen in mid-terms? Howard's Movie The Da Vinci Code... Doug's view of 'Opus Dei'...

Free energy!

High Speed Internet, DMD's Quantum Simplicity, Duggeritas™, & Duggerizzas™

Interim energy, N-somy tells, ChouricoGumbo

FPGA patents running out, Collegiate MRSA staph, Classical Sentences, vav Quantum Sentences

Searching Quantonics, Quantonics Top 20 Pages, Why Static Truth is Irrelevant

Nostalgia, MacBookPro C2D, Didactism & autodidactism, Doug's iPod video

January, 2006 News:

On Why Classical Dialectical Christianity is a Failed and Failing Belief System ...

A reminder: all of Doug's work in our TQS News is his opinion based upon his beliefs. Keep reminding yourself, "These are Doug's quantum opinions, and they are n¤t in any classical dialectical, analytic way the opinions.

Elaine Pagels tells us Roman Christians (Irenaeus, ~100-200 a.d., and Constantine, ~300 a.d.) share three premises:

• Scriptural canon
• Apostolic creed (monotheism; literal-orthodox-dialectical death and resurrection of Jesus; one God; one belief system; grammatically-definite-certain-article, dialectical thelogos; etc.)
• Common structure (essentially socially consensed dialectically-logical positivism)

Compare that to Classical Science:

• Discoverable 'scientific' 'truth' as canon law
• 'Scientific' community and its 'disciplinary matrix' (one scientific 'truth;' one grand unifying theory; one theory of everything; dialectical thelogos)
• Common paradigm

For over eight years now, in Quantonics, we have been showing you H5W classical French 'enlightened science' [what Irving Stein calls "Newtonian ontology," which is in its postmodern relativistic form "Einsteinian ontology"] has failed and is failing massively.

We have also shown you how both science and religion share a common intellectual disease: dialectic, especially orthodox social dialectic! We have accomplished this partially through our own innovations, but predominately standing on shoulders of others and leveraging others' titanic thoughts and mentorship. Notice that what we describe here, that which has enabled us and empowered us is what science and religion hate most: philosophy, individual philosophy, quantum individual philosophy! Philo Sophia: Love of sophism, love of wisdom. Love of Heraclitus' logos, love of phi~logos., love [ahavah: Hebrew; Doug calls Beth "Bethahava"] of [feminine, i.e., Spiritual, wisdom] hokhmah [khakhamah; khakhamah ruah; Hebrew ruah, AKA spirit]. By comparison dialectic, basis of both classical science and classical religion, is social wisdom (AKA 'Demos will,' 'common sense,' social 'opinion,' social 'positivism,' state-ic rules, orthodox concrete tradition, 'break the law, get in trouble,' etc.), false wisdom, pseudo wisdom: falsusophy, misosophy, n¤t philosophy!

Why?

Real wisdom is quantum ihndihvihdual wisdom. Quantum will issi coherent ensemblings of quantons(n¤nactuality,apparently_individual_autonomies_in_actuality). Real wisdom is gnostic! Example? Rosa Parks! Explicitly? Evolutionary defiance of social authority be it civil, 'scientific,' religious, etc.! Real wisdom rises above social authority and stands against it. Robert M. Pirsig showed us that this is what "the ancients" called "aretê," i.e., "excellence" in any face of social-state-ic "noble" 'virtue.' When any society declares anything "noble," beware! It is only propagandistic pogromatic mind control! Society isn't noble. Society can't be noble. Society doesn't understand nobility. Society can't think! Thought is uniquely individual process whose only quantum~societal manifestations appear through real quantum~coherence, n¤t via orthodox, mechanical, dialectical, dogmatic, formal "Rules is tules for fules" or "Rools is tools for fools" societal, one-shepherd-socially_{Aristotelian-Classically}-above-one-flock, one-bishop-socially_{Aristotelian-Classically}-above-one-laity 'order.'

Dialectic's bases are naïve localism (essentially Cartesian metric locale) and naïve realism (essentially stabile independent objectivism). Classical religion and classical science used dialectic's naïve localism and naïve realism to construct their canon, creed, structure, law, community, and paradigm(s). Result? Both classical religion and classical science 'hate' individual wisdom...they love social 'wisdom' which is, sadly, only ESQ dialectic. That classical social hatred is what produces such vitriolic reactions when said classical social system of thought perceives itself threatened by n¤vel memes.

Why?

Individual~wisdom, ~philosophy, ~intelligence neuters both religious and scientific 'common' social hegemony over all individuals. It's as simple as that.

Our recent tsunami of philosophical individualism is in a process of inverting society over individuals to individuals above society. See our 2003-2004 quantum Pirsigean feuilleton Chautauqua.

Imagine a quantum society where births of n¤vel individual memes are as exciting and blessed as birth of a newborn individual human...

But what do today's (early 2006) science and religion love? Social doctrine, social dogma, social commonism, OSFA, catholic universalism, monism, monasticism, ESQ 'truth,' stability, immutability, concrete thought, and so on... What do they hate? Individual thought, multiversal thinking, individual free will, etc. They hate individualism. They hate individual extraordinary memetics.

Quantonics shows us that a better, quantum society of quantum individuals coheres all individuals as ensemble QLOs and their quantum~holism of many individual wisdoms is vastly more capable, evolving, and safer than classicism's one managed, the societal doctrine, OSFA hegemonous social doctrine, AKA classical 'culture.'

Let's take those two sets of bullet items and distill them:

• 'law'
• 'society'
• 'objective architecture'

What does Quantonics show us about those distillations when they are perceived using our Quantonics' quantum pince nez?

• classical 'law' based upon perpetual immutable 'truth' is an invalid notion
• classical 'society' which views society above individual is an invalid notion
• classical 'objective anything' is an invalid notion

Quantum reality shows us, at least in Quantonics it does, that:

• classical catholic 'Christian' dialectic pushes, proselytizes, markets, missionizes, convinces, and enforces social adherence
  
  
  • Affirming what we have just listed, Elaine Pagels in her The Gnostic Gospels concludes her Introduction like this,
    
    "In simplest terms ideas which bear implications contrary to 'Christianity as an institutional religion' come to be labeled as 'heresy;' ideas which implicitly support 'Christianity as an institutional religion' become 'orthodox.'" Page xxxvi of TGG.
    
    We see a catholic Christian dialectical either one or the other of 'heresy' or 'orthodoxy.'
    
    Is 'heresy' really an ideal dialectical opposite of 'orthodoxy?' Vice versa?
    
    Isn't negation of 'orthodoxy' subjective? Ditto 'heresy?'
    
    But, but, but, ideal dialectical negation is axiomatic, canonic in catholic 'Christian' dogma and doctrine. (We base our remarks here on Aquinas' quite transparent, at least in our view, adherence to Aristotle's syllogistic logic.)
    
    Absent 'dialectical negation,' thence absence of 'classical contradiction,' one may 'not' establish 'classical absolute truth.' Without 'classical absolute truth' one may 'not' judge 'ideal opposition' of either 'heresy' or 'orthodoxy.'
    
    So what does 'orthodox' mean for students of Quantonics. 'Orthodox' means only one 'right' way to think (OSFA), only one 'right' way to believe (OSFA), only one 'right' religion 'exists' (OSFA). 'Orthodox' means the way to thingk, believe and wors(e)hip! 'Orthodox' preempts pluralism, multiversity, interpretation, and quantum hermeneutics! 'Orthodox' disables quantum reality! 'Orthodox' zeroes Planck's h-bar! 'Orthodox' shuts down quantum flux and insists dogmatically on dogma, doctrine, and a concrete, holds-still reality. Quantonics teaches its students to think, understand, and emancipate their lives from orthodoxies' chains, detentions, oppositions, and dialectics. Quantonics teaches its students that quantum reality is both heterodoxical (plurality and animate evolutionary freedom of wisdomatic philo sophia cal understandings) and heretical (plurality of choosings, chancings, and changings). Quantonics teaches its students that classical society is 'orthodox,' and that we need to learn how to emerscitect and dwell cowithin quantum societies which are quantum~heterodoxyings. Simply, dump any system which declares itself 'orthodox.' Satanism IS orthodox!!! Hatred (of 'the infidels') IS orthodox!!! Speak out regarding anti quantum aspects of 'orthodoxy!'
    
    What is an example of Quantonics' own heterodoxy in this regard? This: Quantum reality doubts anyone's capability to "understand quantum reality" when they believe that any single human or any group of humans has authority over any individual or any group of individuals. Quantum reality, via MoQ philosophy, shows us that individuals are above society and above any individual who claims societal authority to control other individuals. Societies serve individuals, they 'cannot' and must 'not' attempt to control individuals. Any individual or groups of individuals who claim they know better what is right for others based upon their own self judgment that they are trustworthy to believe and to know what is better are innately 'orthodox.' Sound familiar? Further, anyone who believes this ne'erdowell malarkey deserves their self-entrapment in 'orthodoxy.'
    
    More specifically, as a selective example, catholic cardinals, bishops and popes have n¤ authority excepting that which they have self-declared. And we are showing you that is simply bogus self-validation and must be ignored and exposed for its satanic deceit (in any sense that their goal and desire is to control you and us; notice how Jews obeyed Nazi troops and boarded those thousands of box cars only to be taken to ovens for burning; had Jews outright rejected Nazi authority as only self-declared and thus invalid said "Holocaust" might not have happened; it is always important and noble and moral to reject 'other' authority! Actually, it is our duty as individuals to do so. Organized classical society will not and cannot do it for us! Why? Its 'leaders' always choose to do what, in their personal view, is better for them!).
    
    If we believe in any religion (or any institution), we may choose ("But Doug, that is heresy!") to cooperate with it, but never, never, never, give it or its leader(s) authority over your individualism and what you personally view as your individual human rights. Doug's response, "Individual power and courage to authorize one's own heresy (and thus one's own free will) — over any 'authority' which would deprive us of one's own heresy and free will — is one of G¤d's greatest gifts!"
    
    According to Schenke Jesus said, "You know that those who are supposed to rule over the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. But it shall not be so among you [Jesus' apostles]; but whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all." H. M. Schenke, Berlin 1958, Göttingen 1959. From E. Pagels' TGG, p. 7.
    
    In other words, Jesus insisted upon 'society' as servant, n¤t Lord.
    
    When Irenæus, Constantine, et al., expropriated Jesus' (Gnostic Christianity) quantum~Gn¤sis and reengineered it to unnatural, even satanic, Roman proclivities they inverted Jesus' own mandate! (Plus many others...) Pirsig's MoQ and Quantonics show us all how to put it back, much as ancients saw it prior to Roman 'rule.' Ancients' foundations for Jesus' (Gnostic Christianity) quantum~Gn¤sis valued aretê, individual excellence, philo sophia, individual wisdom, etc. Explanation: Doug's strike out of his January, 2006 "Gnostic Christianity." Doug's use of "Gnostic Christianity" occurred in very early stages of Doug's own learning of Jesus' quantum~Gn¤sis. We found out later in our studies that Jesus called those who referred him 'Christ,' said they were Satan for calling him that Roman abomination. This explicitly happened to Peter. Search www for <quantonics Peter Satan>. That search should take you to our Quantonics Classical vav Quantum Religion Recommended Reading page. Bottom line: do not use 'Christ' as a name for Jesus unless you want Jesus to call you "Satan." If you do your intellectual due diligence you will find that Paul (AKA King Saul, a renowned killer of people like you and me) engineered a pseudo Jesus and called it 'Christ.' Technically we can refer this as Paul, in agency of what Jesus called "[dead] father" [Juxtapose Jesus' "living Father" quanton(DQ,SQ) vis-à-vis his denigration of 'dead father' dichon(ESQ, ESQ). See Gospel of John for occurrences of these lower and upper case quotations of Jesus referring both "living Father," and demiurge dead 'father.' Observe that Elaine Pagels and others view John as the only or one of few gnostic books in New Testament. Unfortunately, Pagels and others saw some gnosis in Paul, but Paul named Jesus "a Christ." A great debate is underway now whether Paul actually had any gnostic training and from whom. James, Jesus brother, taught something more like modern classical dialectic, but Jesus taught Essene Gnosis which for Doug aligns his own hermeneutics of what he calls "quantum~Gn¤sis."] and many knowledgeable folk name 'demiurge,' attempting to remake Essene Jesus (Tribe Judah, Beth David, son of God BAWAM REIMAR son of man, child of Mary, "com pan ion" of Magdalen, etc.) into a Roman-Greek-Hebraic 'Christ' [manager]. Doug - 22Nov2008.
    
• quantum sophist~individual~wisdom pulls, compares, chooses (which orthodox authority refers as dialectical 'heresy'), and selects better

More of this to come in 2006 as we wade through Pagels, Yates, and Nag Hammadi Gospels, Gnostic (both pessimistic-dialectical and optimistic~quantum) and otherwise. Also, we shall continue our relevant studies in Priori de Sion and continue our Bohm, Hoffmann, VoRE, etc. reviews.

Happy New Year!

Want some relevant links? Try these: Bergson's "Negation is Subjective!," Bergson's "Never affirm a thing is not!," canon, choice, cohere, consensus, Doug's Bases of Judgment (especially SOM's), either-classical-individual-or-socialism vis-à-vis both~quantum~individual~and~socialism, individual, intellect, intelligence, judge, law, logic, memeo, negation, Newton, object, ontology, opposite, quanta, reality, reason, science, select, social vis-à-vis individual, Stein, subject, subjective, the, truth, value, What are Sophisms?, etc.

More about what's coming up in 2006, some GIF tease ...

Doug - 1Jan2006.

See you here again in early February, 2006!

Doug.