Basic issues, classical vis-à-vis quantum include these:

• Linguistically definite articles [e.g., 'the'] aren't permitted in real quantum language systems. Why? Macroscopic quantum~uncertainty.
• Unitemporality [i.e., One Time Fits All, OTFA] isn't valid in real quantum systems and languages which describe them.
• Quantum~systems æv¤lve quintessentially via ubiquitous~perpetual scintillation of quanta. Therefore all quantum~evolution issi quantum~uncertain (classically indeterminate). Quantonics HotMeme™ "Quantum~evolution requires its adherents to gnostically embrace indetermination." Quantonics HotMeme™
• Classical Hamiltonian logic depends upon classical commutation which is invalid in real quantum systems. Indeed all classical 'equivalence relations' are invalid in real quantum systems.
• Classical operator mathematics are formal-mechanical and dialectical and thus their classical-evolutionary 'states' are scalars. This whole system of classical thingking is bogus, ersatz, facile, faux, pseudo, inutile, deceit, etc.

A classical notion of Hamiltonian Operator may now be remediated using a CeodE 2012 graphic image Doug created called EWing Ensembles. See that graphic.

Here is relevant text nearby that graphic: "Following Prigogine and Stengers' lead, Doug's graphic is a kind of quantum Hamiltonian, but non static,
dynamically everywherings-everywhenings quantum~fractal~recursive. See pp. 220-221 out of 349 total, Order Out of Chaos."

Recursion labels on that graphic represent quantum~fractal~hologra[[m][ph][il]]ic~stindyanic interrelationshipings among EWings composing ensemble qwfs. Those pluralities of comcurrent evolutionings imply indetermination (uncertainty), noncommutation, non identity, non equivalence, absence of any notions of 'scalar' holds-still-isms.

They imply presence of massively heterogeneous and coobsfective chance~choice~changings borne of perpetual quantization~scintillationings at each recursion instance.

Dialectics cannot offer any exegeses of pure quantum~dynamicity. State cannot explain: choice, chance, nor change.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• Classical eigenvalues are scalars. Often they are distilled to bivalency [zero or one]. Scalar and bivalent 'values' are of n¤ Value in real quantum~systems.
• Classical notions of 'energy levels' are simply bogus in real quantum systems since quantum~energy is flux, quantized and absolutely changing and evolving flux which may n¤t be classically sampled and held as ideally, Platonically stoppable state.
• Hamiltonian 'operators' do n¤t classically-determine anything. Quantum reality is macroscopically uncertain and in n¤ way is or can be classically deterministic. Quantum reality scintillates quanta which massively SO^rON ensemble~selection (quantadulation) of whatings happenings nextings [Peircean] abductively based upon evolving energy wellings in said quantal scintillation processings' l¤cal and n¤nl¤cal [as described in Bell's Theorem(s); bogusly described as "hidden variables" by retarded quantum-mechanics] comtextings. We see instead of classical idealism and positive realism, ensembles of evolving quantum energy wellings choosings, chancings, and changings many to many coobsfectively at up to Planck rates of quantum flux. There is n¤ monotime, and there is n¤ monodirection (trajectory). Doug - Rev'd. to add quantadulation - 7Jan2015.

Doug has been studying ancient texts and their associated language (Autiot~Gematria) with an intent of showing how those languages co~benchmark Doug's opus in Quantonics.

Doug has found that Autiot~Gematria (ideogram~numbers) benchmark both Quantonics and post~modern Quantum~Empiritheory and its attendant Quantum~Philosophy. Autiot~Gematria are supported philosophically by at least four other major areas of ancient thought: Sepher Yetsira, its Sefirot, Qabala, and various Gnoses like Chaldæan, Valentiniun, Essene, Naassene, Merovingian, et al. Doug, solipsistically, has chosen Chaldæan gnosis as his favorite benchmark of post~modern Quantum~Empiritheory.

Briefly, ideogram~numbers correlate quantons(wave,wavicles), quanton(¤,o), quanton(¤,~), and so on...

Using modern QED and QCD as scientific allegories of, respectively, transmutative evolution and atomic creation itself, Doug has shown that quantadulation is essence of both QED and QCD, and thus essence of all reality.

Correlation of ancient th~ought memes and post~modern QED and QCD as analogs of ontological quantum~reality provides, in Doug's opinion, support SEP_q of quantum~philosophical approaches using those ontological analogies.

Essence of all that is simply, evolution_q trumps state_c.

In studying those correlations and their detail comparisons, which Doug refers as 'vis-à-vis,' Doug uncovered something powerfully relevant a key aspect of equilibrium_q.

That powerful relevance distills to this: equilibria_q issi peace_q. But, and there is always a but, classical ideas about equilibria_c as ideal state are bogus. Quantum memes about equilibria_q offer potential SEP_q validity.

Ancients revered Song of Songs from OT. Few have qua to grasp why. One of Doug's mentors in this regard is Carlo Suares. Suares' opus has helped Doug demonstrate how Quantoncs cobenchmarks quantum~enthymemes apparent in hermeneutics of Song of Songs' ancient text.

Verse one is about quantum~equilibrium. Is that amazing? It is to Doug.

Verse 1, in Autiot is very simply, "Shyar ha Shyareem Esher LeShalomoh."

Doug will avoid omniscussion of its current bogus translation involving Solomon. (Solomon isn't even remotely involved, period.)

Suares' Anglican interpretation of Verse 1, "Residue of Residues Witnesses~Confirms Her Peace."

Doug revises that slightly to, "Song of Songings Witnesses~Confirms Her Peace."

It is important to grasp that essence of Qabala is flux. Given that, then 'song' is flux, ostensed 'song' is a quantum~wave~function.

If that is an acceptable hermeneutic heuristic, then we can choose to see qwf of qwfings as a phase~phasings_q, flux~fluxings self-other interrelationshiping which assesses change~chaos, assesses gradience[ings]_q of uncertaintyings_q.

It is important from any quantum~comtextual venue to keep Suares' meme of residue associated with his meme of song. When we do quantum~measurement, we use phase~interrelationshipings to assess measurement as a signature_q of said phase relative measurement itself. Said signature is a qwf. It's energyings assess similarity of two or more qwfs being phase~interrelated.

Lower energyings shows they are more similar, and higher energyings shows they are less similar.

For example in any noise cancellation (Maxwell Smart's "zone of silence.") process, phase~interrelationshipings of environment background wave energy to itself are intentionally minimized. Bose makes earphones which partially achieve this quantum~affectation. Run~silent submarines need this as an imperative. Some aircraft too.

That kind of sound energy cancellation, just like light interference and cancellation requires entangled_q double energy corelatively inverted to make it happen. In this light_q we can think_q of silence_q as dark_q. Pasquale, "Mom, please turn the dark switch off." Keenly observe classical negation, classical minus sign is useless here. All quantum flux is positive and may NOT be classically negated!

Also we have to ponder mix of fluxings which compose said signature...so a kind of quantum~Fourier unentangling of several and possibly more flux primitives may be needed. This would be a very interesting quantum~project to endeavor, especially in attempting to make it general and n¤t application specific.

In a way, said signature is a gradient assessment of any interrelationshiping's evolving_q signature_q.

Again we see gradient~chaos as a master of how much uncertainty 'exists' in any phase~interrelationshipings we are assessing. (Doug isn't attempting clarity here. He is trying to capture his stream of comsciousness. Time will heal Doug's coarseness here. Recall Sam Seaborn in West Wing? :) Search for signature at Doug's QELR of cancel.

Quantum reality shows us in abundance that n¤ two songs are aver identical (in any classical sense). Any given song cann¤t be sung identically_c two or any number of times. Omnifferencings of those comparisons become 'residue.' Residue is phase comparison of any song against its reperformance. There is always a residue. Residue is another way of saying quantum~uncertainty.

So Suares' interpretation, "Residue of Residues witnesses~confirms Her Peace," can be linguistically_q evolved to, "Uncertainty of Uncertaintyings Con(m)firms Her Peace."

Doug startled self with a revelation_q of "Peace as uncertainty."

To classical minds peace is absence of change, ideal_c state_c, immutability (Newton for example), Keynesian centrally_c planned_c control_c of stability_c, etc.

To quantum~stagings peace is uncertainty. Uncertainty disables ideal classical determination.

Compare Heraclitus', "Dialectic is war." It's similar saying "Determinate assessment of other breeds conflict and war."

HotMeme™ "Uncertainty garners tolerance of other."™ HotMeme™

...a theme of Verse 1 of Song of Songs.

• Certainty borne of classical concrete linear absolute-state-determinism ushers war, vis-à-vis
• Uncertainty borne of quantum~absolute~change garners peace.

Simply, embrace uncertainty, eschew determinism.

Suares says-writes it like this, "Embrace indetermination." Gnosis agrees. Gnosis claims, "Monism [of absolute state] is deceit." Doug agrees.

A meme to ponder deeply,

Doug - 7Jan2015.

Note: Doug uses 'ostense' and its linguistic variants in a quantum sense of ostentation exposes evolution of memes as ostentation of memes, growth_q, stretching, transmuting... as ostentation_q.

Classical 'ideas' of ostentation depend upon static methods_c of 'reason.' Quantum memes of ostentation evolve_q, belying (giving the lie to) static reasoning based upon an (pre)assumed state-ic reality.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• Classical canon 'laws,' 'principles,' 'dogma,' and 'orthodoxy' are all without [f]lux essential Value in quantum reality. In quantum~reality they are ESQ, dead.
• Classical canon 'laws,' 'principles,' 'dogma,' and 'orthodoxy' depend upon a classical presumption of 'state,' 'stoppability,' 'zero momentum,' etc., in order to be 'classically valid.'
• "The wave function," appears to be saying one can specify, classically, an analytic lisr 'wave function.' Quantum wave functions are n¤t classically localable, isolable, separable, reducible. Quantum absolute change plus holographic middle inclusion deny essentially all classical lisr notions.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• How many ways can we think about this? Let's use two terms as representative of dialectical (SOM) thingking and two terms as representative of quantum think_qing. Dialectically let's use quantity and objective. Quantumly let's use quality and subjective. Then using text in a graphical way let's use dichon(~, o) to classically show its closed-continuous wave lisr duality as objective and quantitative (particulate). Similarly allow Doug to use quanton(~,¤) to quantumly show its open~quantized wave holographically EIMA complementarity as subjective and qualitative (fluxic). In summary, then:
  • dichon(~, o) represents classical wave-particle lisr duality, and
  • quanton(~,¤) represents quantum wave~wavicle complementarity.
    
• So Doug offers two vastly omniffering world views of classical wave-particle duality vis-à-vis quantum wave~wavicle complementarity.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• Classically 'wave amplitude' is a valid metric for energy. Quantumly only wave flux rate is a valid metric for energy.
• Classical maths only work with dichons(~, o): static middle-exclusion is required. Classical maths have no means of 'operating' on quantons(~,¤): fluxing middle~inclusion is mandatory.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• In general classical notions of reversibility are invalid in quantum~reality. Bosons and gluons may offer partial apparitions of reversibility, and that is all. Fermions and their CH³ings are quintessentially irreversible.
• In general classical notions of determinism are invalid in quantum~reality. Quantum~reality is stochastic which means we are always uncertain to greater and lessor extents. We are limited to probable, plausible, and likely stochastics of quantized "guessing." In some cases our guesses, though, can be very precise (n¤t necessarily 'accurate').

See Doug's QELRs of chance, change, and choice.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• There are n¤ 'classical trajectories' in quantum~reality.
• There is n¤ 'classical reversibility' in quantum~reality.
• etc.

It may k~now~ings be obvious to readers that quantization disables and invalidates classical notions of

• linearity,
• cause-effect,
• y=f(t) continuity,
• determination,
• trajectories,
• reversibility,
• stability (especially in any sense of social OSFA planning and state-ic equilibrium borne on such invalid notion of social planning),
• closure,
• monism,
• dualism,
• positivism,
• formal realism,
• dialectic, and
• so on...

Add 'so on...' link. Doug - 23Mar2014.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

• Static 'event' instances AKA 'occurrences' may n¤t be 'determined' in quantum~reality.
• Predication of 'previous' and 'subsequent' instances is always uncertain thus never classically determinate.

Basic issues, classical vav quantum include these:

Bold green is closest to a real quantum description Prigogine and Stengers uncloak in this paragraph. Overall though, their words belie countless classical SOM deceptions.

There is an abundance of learning to be had in this single paragraph. Don't waste it!

Doug feels obliged to list SOM's countless deceptions as they are relevant in this quoted text segment:

• classical atemporality is manifest Error compared to quantum~atæmp¤rality,
• quantum time is a (timings are) symptom(s) of quantum~flux,
• quantum time issi n¤t classically continuous, rather quantum timings aræ quantized,
• quantum timings aræ n¤t classical numbers, they aræ n¤t a classical monistic scalar stoppable measurable, quantum~timings aræ wave~functionings, quantized wave~functionings which aræ classically-concretely-stuxically-holdstillably immeasurable,
• quantum timings aræ always uncertain since they aræ gradiently~quantized and thus open,
• quantization of time guarantees its heterogeneity, unlike classical time which is assumed to be a monism: OSFA,
• quantum~timings experience both quantum~equilibria and quantum~chaos complementary interrelationshipings (see quantum~relative) as do all symptoms of quantum fluxings,
• etc.