Chapter Two

"Innovating Talking Points Assessing Quantum FEP hyper Classical FEP: a move from CTMs to QTMs."
PDR

Doug's key assumptions in doing these comparisons include:

• Henri Louis Bergson's denigration of classical-reality's illusory assumptions:
  • reality is stable,
  • reality is objective,
  • objects are independent (classical middle-exclusion), and
  • classical negation is ideally objective.
• Gnosis' claims that "monism is deceit," and "principle rules something not itself."
• Pirsig's declaration that classical dialectic represents "...a genetic defect in human reason."
• David Bohm's assertion that reality isn't mechanical, rather is a holographic (thus pluralistic ensemble of islandicities) "implicate order." Affirmation of Bohm's assertion by Mae-wan Ho's "coherence of autonomies."
  • "Coherence" analogous Bohm's intra~implicate~order "pluralistic ensemblings," and
  • "Autonomies" autsimilar "islandicities."
• Heraclitus' quotes, for example, "dialectic is war," "classicists do not understand the logos," etc.
  
  
  • "On this account which holds forever men prove uncomprehending, both before hearing it and when first they have heard it." [B 1] (Diels Kranz B-Texts)
    
    Here Heraclitus exposes only a tip of one largest th~¤ught iceberg of cosmic understanding. When we have researched and studied well enough, we might begin to grasp what Doug just wrote about his quote of Heraclitus.
    
    What is "...this account?" Simply, the logos. Heraclitus is clearly a gnostic and Doug would even propound, "A quantum~Gn¤stic."
    
    Gn¤stics say, "Those who cann¤t find their inner do n¤t understand the logos, '...this account.'" In what general way can we refer these people who are lacking gnostic qua? They are dialecticians. They are stuck. They are dead. They are extinct. They are outside the logos. They do n¤t understand "...the account."
    
    Which of us do have qua to begin to understand the logos? Several appellatives suffice: (we must understand, we must standunder_q) Henri Bergson, William James, Mae-wan Ho, David Bohm, Robert Pirsig, Qabala (ref. Carlo Suares), Autiot (as a quantum~cosmic 'language' of energy), and cobenchmarkings of Quantonics' quantum~philosophy.
    
    "So, Doug, what is Heraclitus saying?" The logos holds forever. This account (especially given in Autiot and hermeneuted by Suares' Qabala), holds forever. Dialectical humans cann¤t comprehend the logos. Both with and without Bergsonian durational opportunity. Society relishes dialectic and thus acculturates its constituents to disable their individual qua to "understand the logos."
    
    This disabling of humans by dialectical society is thorough. They cann¤t cognize the logos let alone re cognize it.
    
    However, there is a new philosophy in town... Doug - 23Dec2010. See Doug's What is Gnosis? and his What is Qabala?
    
    
  • "For that reason you must follow what is common. But although the account is common, most men live as though they had an understanding of their own." [B 2] Ibid.
    
    We have a plethora of issues here, but I believe we can use perhaps both Bergson and Suares to make headway. Let's start with two of their key persuasions, one each.
    
    Bergson: "Flux is simple. State is complex." See Bergson's Time and Free Will Topic 29, p. 141.
    
    Suares: The logos AKA Heraclitus' "the account" is better described (quantum~omniscribed) by Qabala's cosmic energy language AKA Autiot. Suares paraphrased by Doug. Read his Trilogy and his Second Coming of Reb YhShWh.
    
    Both of these geniuses offer quantum~philosophy a multiverse of favors. Bergson shows us that we need at least two ways of describing reality: one for flux (quantum) and one for 'state' (classical). In our B2 quote of Heraclitus only two words he uses twice: is and common. Doug has spent a lot of time comparing classical 'is' and quantum issi. Doug cann¤t recall ever omnistinguishing classical 'common' from quantum c¤mm¤n other than to QELR consensus. Bergson and Suares in Doug's opine are suggesting an ostensible need to do so now.
    
    Bergson makes it easy! Classical 'common' is 'state-ic.' Quantum~c¤mm¤n is flux~ic. 'Common' is analytic and thus ideally dogmatic through its immutability. C¤mm¤n issi quantum~stindyanic over a full range of (only positive, n¤n negative) quantized Planck flux from almost zero change per unit reference up to Planck's rate and its harmonics.
    
    We already surmise Heraclitus' think_qing as essentially quantum since his "the account" describes cosmic energy as flux. Doug feels comfortable then in claiming we can hermeneut Heraclitus' uses of 'common' as c¤mm¤n. Key here is that his quote's intended semantic is one of quantum~flux, n¤t one of "men's own [dialectical, Error prone] understanding" of classical 'state.'
    
    Doug does n¤t want to put words in Heraclitus' mouth, n¤r his pen, but it is informative here to do so: "For that reason you must follow semasiologies of cosmic energy, cosmic flux. But although the account is one of cosmic flux, most men live as though they had a dialectical state-ic interpretation of their own." Our red bold is what other gn¤stics refer as Error in interpreting and understanding the logos.
    
    Doug - 29Dec2010. (Doug will direct his next few days of effort to creating a new web page primer entitled, How to Find Your Inner. We should return to a process of finishing Chapter 2's Segment 11 early in January, 2011.)
    
    
  • "War is father of all, king of all: some it shows as gods, some as [w¤]men; some it makes slaves, some free." [B 53] Ibid. Doug's brackets. Note too, we could substitute children for [wo]men.
    
    Doug's take-away on this quote finds its bases in an obvious (perhaps only to Doug) quantum complementation by Heraclitus (whom Doug assumes is a gnostic) of complementationings(war,(gods,(humans(free,slaves)))). War makes gods. War makes humans both free and slaves.
    
    According to our [B 2] work just above most 'men' treat war as dialectical. So humans are then ideally, mathematically, formally, mechanically 'divided' by war as dichon(free, slave), either free or enslaved. Permit Doug to classify this as 'war_c.' War_c offers ideal bifurcation of classes of humanity: "You are either for us ('free') or you are against us ('enslaved')." As we can see, most 'men' have their own dialectical-static interpretation of war as 'war_c.' To Heraclitus this is an perfect exemplar of dialectic's Error of interpretation using 'oppositive' bivalent thing-king.
    
    5Jul2013 - Update:
    
    Obtain how "You are either for us ('free')..." actually is dialectic's free_c which is slavery_c to Error's OSFA dogma and tyranny. We may adeptly fathom a quantum Value~assessment tetragramation: free_c, free_q, slave_c, slave_q. See our QVH Table exegesis of Value. Also see our quantum~assessmentings of Value. Doug - 4Feb2016.
    
    But logos, account, Suares, quantum~reality all deny dialectic as invalid, failed, pseudo, facile, ersatz, bogus, etc. Suares would say that war isn't 'oppositional' dialectic, rather war_q is antinomialism_q. He would say further that war as antinomialism is nature attempting to understand Hærself. Nature is one (see [B 50] ibid.). Nature as one has only itself to compare, so nature heretically 'decided,' 'chose' to take Hær quanta and scintillation~compare (omnitor_q) them evolutionarily_q in ensembles of two. Recall Jesus in Thomas Gospel saying, "What will you do when you become two?" Answer, you will become able, capable of assessing self as relatively better and relatively worse: this is essentially what it means to be gnostic. HotMeme™ Gnosis self~assesses individually_q in imitative~reimagings of Hær. HotMeme™. (Doug is~as a self declared Chaldæan Quantum~Gnostic garners that HotMeme™.)
    
    Becoming two, according Suares, is antinomialism. It permits Hær to compare aspects of Hærself to (aut)similar aspects of Hærself. Why? To evolutionarily assess better. This kind of antinomialism_q assumes both flux and middle~inclusion (EIMA) of said flux quanta. This kind of antinomialism_q abets and betterships both logos and account.
    
    But most 'men' see antinomialism_c as simple dialectic. This kind of antinomialism_c assumes objective state and middle-exclusion (EEMD) of all static (dead: Yod without Hay) objects. This kind of antinomialism_c (actually pure dialectic) denies and hates change and choice as heresy.
    
    Gnostics view war_q as antinomialism_q of two in one. All dialecticians view war_c as hatred of heresy. Dialecticians hate Ch³ings.
    
    All quanta are antinomial_q all quanta! No two energy~welling packets of quanta are identical: their phasings_q (of scintillation) may be rqcs~assessed better and less so. Doug calls this "Value."
    
    War_q assesses Value_q! War_q is parentage of all perpetual~ubiquitous recursive evolutionary_q processings_q through antinomialism_q! Antinomialism is always and everywhere Value_q assessmentings.
    
    30Jun2013...
    
    Readers familiar with Doug's recent efforts de(omni)scribing Carl Jung's Red Book Plate 127: 'Love Triumphant' (AKA Libido Triumphant), may well perceive Doug's omniscriptionings of 'war' autsimilar Doug's omniscriptionings of Jung's artwork mnemonic of Libido. Doug offers several comparative exegetics:
    
    

    "...all quanta are antinomialq all quanta,..." e.g., quanton(libidoq,warq), Jung's Libido may be (E)wellings~omniscribed by Aleph's "wavings of lifeings" tough loveq (as warq) on Yod, Aleph's up to Planck rate GoG hammer (warq~chaosq) against Yod resting on Aleph's anvil (peaceq~equilibriumq), Metaenthymemetic comparisons, i.e., partial~quantum~complementary~antinomials, of: libidoc vaving warc and libidoq vaving warq, and libidoc vaving warq and libidoq vaving warc, etc. See if you can map vov, VoV, Vov, and voV onto those four libido~war metaenthymemes. Doug.

    
    
    Doug - 27-29Jun2013, 30Jun3013, 5Jul2013.
    
    
  • "Listening not to me but to the account, it is wise to agree that all things are one. " [B 60 see war and peace below quantons(peace,war) as quantum antinomial~complementarity, and too, perhaps B 53] Ibid.
    Thence, "[Dialectical men] They do not comprehend how, in differing, it agrees with itself -- a backward turning connection, like that of a bow and a lyre." [B51] Ibid.
    Too, "The path of up [good] and down [evil] is one and the same." [B 60] Ibid. See Doug's December, 2015 retranslation of Sepher Yetsira Chapter VI, Verse 2, Word 25, "A Lesson in Good and Evil."
    
    To any dialectical mind these quotes of Heraclitus seem oxymoronic, contradictory, paradoxical, even insane. Such is an indictment by classical mind at war with quantum~nous, quantum~stagings. What is a typical assessment we hear from said classical mind? "Absurd." Dialectical 'state' and 'stux' calling quantum~flux "absurd." 'State' assessing evolution's absolute change as "absurd." Plato, mimeing Parmenides, did this by claiming, "change is but an illusion."
    
    Allow Doug to put words in Heraclitus' pen and mouth again: "...it is wise to agree that all hologra[[il][m][ph]]ing EWings are both autonomous and coherent." [B 53] quantum~paraphrased.
    Doug would use Heraclitus' bow and lyre as exemplars and add a lyrist as agent of musical evolution: three in one, yet all autonomous, yet all coherent in making music. Ostensing that metaphor to all of Nature, "We are ihn Hær and Shæ issi ihn us, all coherent (one) and all autonomous (many)." All those coherent interrelationshipings are complementary_q antinomial_q one another "...up issi ihn down and down issi ihn up," Value~assessing one another perpetually, ubiquitously. Fathom Doug's usages of 'issi' as perpetually~evolving antinomial_q Value~assessing quantum~interrelationshipings of EWings.
    
    Doug - 6,8Jul2013.
    
    
  • "The path up and the path down is one and the same." [B 60] Ibid. Heraclitus issi showing us and telling us about quantum~antinomial~complementarity. This potent meme destroys dialectic, period! When we move into quantum~reality we denigrate classical opposition, contradiction, negation, logic, etc. Flux_q issi crux_q, stux_c sux_c! Doug - 10Dec2015.
    
    

Living issi ihn dying and dying issi ihn living.
(Think_q of chrysalisbutterflycaterpillarchrysalis life~death cyclings.)

• Carlo Suares' profundity re "...faith as direct experience of immortal consciousness" which says directly to Doug that reality is itself conscious and that is how Iht middle~includes all of us. Notice that this explains plainly how we have intrinsic qua to tap into reserve energy of our cosmos' immortal consciousness. Compare this to what Danah Zohar writes about "...classical 'physics' of reality being unable to describe consciousness." Compare Doug's quantum~empiritheory.
• Jesus' (the Jew AKA Reb YhShWh) farewell discourse omniscriptions of quantum~middle~inclusion as, "I am in you and you are in me. I am in God and God is in me. Therefore you are in God and God is in you."
• Doug's assumption of absolute change attended by melioration of quantum~uncertainty as stochastic and thus n¤t 'absolute.'
• Doug's assumption of absolute motion. See his Quantum Pendulum web page.
• Doug's assumptions of absolute change and motion driving his further assumptions regarding these key quantum~relevant features:
  • partiality,
  • enthymemeticity,
  • islandicity borne of,
    • quantum~heterogeneity and fractal~recursive wave~function autsimilarity absent any classical notions of, e.g., 'identity, contradiction, middle-exclusion, etc.,'
    • quantum~heterogeneities of all quantum~holographic EWings' ømnihtørings, (also see Doug's QELP of Mon prefixes)
    • etc.
  • gradiencings of wave~energyings interrelative (i.e., quantonic, thus Bohmian hologramic) autsimilarityings as quantum~reality's omnitorings of change and equilibria, (Doug - 8Sep2011)
    • memeos here of:
      • partial_qA absence of change,
      • partial_qP presence of change,
      • thus gradience of hologramic EWings' autsimilarityings of islandic_q, up to Planck rate, ensemblings of evolving quantons(scin,quan), key~enabling holographic:
        • cognition,
        • re cognition, and
        • omniscrimination,
        • etc.
      • from which we may infer gradience_qP of equilibria_qAP, (Doug's Second Plateau Goal in a sense...)
        • Allow Doug to clarify his use of subscripts here:
          • By "gradience_qP" Doug intends "quantum~presence of quantum~partial gradience."
          • By "equilibria_qAP" Doug intends "quantum~absence~and~presence" in regards equilibria.
          • Put them together as "quantum~presence of partial gradience of quantum~absence~and~presence of quantum~equilibria." We obtain quanton(partial_presence,partial_absence) of equilibria and their quantum gradiencings. Comsider an ensemble of quanta all having omniffering gradiencings of presence (local, islandic equilibrium) and omniffering gradiencings of absence (local, islandic chaos) of equilibria. Said ensemble has omniffering partial gradiencings of presence and absence across all of its comstitua.
            
            These quantum~comcepts carry massive import: strategic, tactical, and operational in terms of system theory. It shows us that ensemble systems may have islands of greatly varying combinations of chaos and equilibria. An example is, "Just because entire world's banking and money systems fail, doesn't mean said world itself fails." You have probably been around financial types who think finance is more important than Quality~manufacturing, ~marketing, ~staff, and ~management. LOL. Doug's view is we throw cartel banks away and we'll all individually be better off! Why? One size socialism doesn't fit all, and 'no one,' especially 'One World Order,' can impose it, regardless. When they attempt to impose it we're gonna have lots of fried green tomatoes. Sweeney Todd metastasis! Quantum 'V' for Vendetta. Elite [Eleat] Laura Soylent Green. Doug - 22,27Jul2012.
      • from which we may infer EWings' autsimilarityings' quantum~relativityings of NTE and FFE islands_q of equilibria_q,
      • etc.
  • reversibility only as (classical dogma's specific) local and intra island classical apparition belied by more general quantum assumptions of absolute motion and change,
  • general irreversibility as an assumed comsequence of absolute quantum~motion and quantum~change and quantum~evolution,
    • please do n¤t take this apparent 'generality' of irreversibility as a çatholiç, universal, 'sign of monism' as classicists [in]tend,
      • there is n¤ classical single 'arrow of time,'
      • there is n¤ classical 'globalism,' AKA 'universalism' like GUTs and ToEs,
      • there is n¤ 'One World Order,'
      • etc.
    • absence of classical 'monism,' AKA 'universality' in quantum~reality is a potent tell of quantum~heterogeneity, quantum~pluralisms of islandicities,
    • quantum~pluralityings have many timings, many spacings, many massings, many gravityings, many di(omni)rectionings, etc.
    • compound cycloidings of nature offer partial exegeses of quantum~reality's many ensembles of manyings,
      
                                          

      "Mixing All Things in All."

      
      
      Fractal recursion should be apparent here in quantum manyings of manyings.
      
    • as we may begin to fathom our manyings are quantumly~fractal: gnostically both islandic~individual coherent and autonomous, autsimilar, yet un(omn)ique, even as ensembles,
    • we see ad occulos Mae-wan Ho's quanton(coherence,autonomy): both c¤herænce issi ihn autonomy and
      autonomy issi ihn c¤herænce.
    • Doug - 31Aug2011.
  • both large gradience evolutionary FFE changings in islandic quantum~equilibria and small gradience apparencies of evolutionary NTE 'stability' in islandic quantum~equilibria,
  • quantumists omnistinguish:
    • quantum~equilibria as absolute change, and
    • classical-equilibrium as absolute state. (Doug - 8Sep2011)
  • change_q can explain state_c; however, state_c cann¤t explain change_q, therefore:
    • equilibria_q can explain equilibrium_c; however, equilibrium_c cann¤t explain equilibria_q,
    • see Bergson, TaFW, topic 29, p. 141,
  • etc. Red text updates by Doug, 30Aug2011.
• Doug's assumption that Autiot is a quantum~energy language and scihænce omniscribing quantum~reality. Doug also assumes that Autiot's purpose is to quantum~omnify spiritual~beliefs and scihæntihfihc~beliefs.
• Doug's understanding that Essene Jesus' Autiot~grounded Gnosis is a benchmark of Doug's Quantonics, and vice-versa.
  • Autiot as a language of our cosmos' spiritual energy,
  • Quantonics' offering a English language remediation autsimilar Autiot (students note that Quantonics lacks Autiot's intrinsic Aut symbol~level quantum~self~other recursion (i.e., Aut symbols are self~other everywhere~associatively and holographically middle~including 'spelled' using self~other Aut symbols)...Doug views this as quanton(strength,weakness) of Quantonics),
  • Autiot and Quantonics as co-benchmarking, sorso~benchmarking quantum~modalities which:
    • help individuals find their inners, and thus
    • understand the logos (as Heraclitus would say, "...understand cosmos' account of its own conscious energy")
    • latter which assists one's inner to grasp both Gnosis and Suares' versions of Qabala.

Almost nothing about quantum~reality is classical. It omnistinguishes itself from classical notions in countless ways. For Doug, that is what these talking points are about, especially in terms of building cases for better ways of thinking about Value. Specifically, here, Economic Value.

Few absolutes 'exist' in quantum~reality. Classicists count among their dialectical mesmera many absolutes.

Some notable quantum quasi~absolutes include:

• change,
• middle~inclusion, and
• everywhere~associativity.

Change as an absolute simply destroys classicism's absolute of 'state.'

Middle~inclusion as an absolute wholly wilts classicism's absolutes of separability and independence.

Everywhere~associativity (a kind of absolute dynamic interrelationshipings holographicity) wipes clean classicism's slate of 1:1 determinate cause-effect y=f(t) 'interactions.' A great exemplar from recent history is CO₂ as a anthropogenic unit (1:1) cause of 'global warming.' Quantum~reality shows us directly that you have to be a complete moron to believe that.

Change shows us that static analyses are no longer generally valid tools.

Middle~inclusion replaces classical either-or with quantum both~and.

Everywhere~associativity AKA holographicity blends all things (i.e., all quantum~energies) including homogeneities (monisms) and heterogeneities (pluralisms). Gnostically this is referred, "Mixing all things in all." See Elaine Pagels' Johannine Gospel in Gnostic Exegesis. Biblical holographicity! Doug.

Quantumly then, we say, "Monisms are in pluralisms, and pluralisms are in monisms." These quantum blendings of fluxing (energy quanta) monisms and pluralisms aren't classically mechanical, formal, objective, etc.

In Quantonics script we write quantons(pluralism,monism). We see directly both~and middle~including holographic~interrelationshipings among all monisms and pluralisms.

Pure dialectical monism is impossible which elicits Gn¤sis' "Monism is deceit." Doug might add, "Monism per se is deceit."

Doug - 25Dec2010.

Classicists tend to view reality dialectically, so they perceive "either a monism, or a pluralism."

Classically, no way can reality be both a monism and a pluralism.

Non global unification (monism) within small and local groups is often better.

See Danah Zohar's Quantum Society, Chapters 11 and 12.

Local monism can easily conflict with other local monisms. Which monism is the monism?

Trouble here is that classicists appear incapable of grasping a larger means of organization as a plurality of many monisms. In a way this is essentially 'objective relativism,' however, its name breaks all classical 'principles' of dialectic.

To any classicist 'university' is superior any 'diversity,' any 'omniversity.'

Quintessentially, Planck's clock is what we mean by quantum~reality.

Quantum~reality is packets of quanta. Quanta are flux changing at up to Planck's frequency which we can approximate classically as 10⁴³ alternations per unit reference.

What makes quantum~reality so powerful, though, is that it is 'quantized' at up to Planck rates.

Each quantum is its own packetized island of energy. There are unlimited packets and this is what makes quantum~reality a pluralism, a vast heterogeneity of quanta.

These quanta come in at least four varieties of quantum~coherence and quantum~entropy. Iso variations are how Nature immeasurably hides from us. Co variations are bosonic. Deco variations are fermionic. Finally, we have enormous variations on mixtures of those.

We may view Iso variations as pure quantum~coherence. This is quantum~realities' ultimate monism which is also a pluralism of all possible flux rates isopacketized and isoquantized (latter two terms are pure Doug conjectural heuristics to help you understand).

Quantum~energy increases with flux rate, so, overly simplified, a Planck rate quantum is a highest energy packet, but we can have ensembles of those in unlimited amounts to provide unlimited energy. A single Planck rate quantum may be thought of as a 'quantum torpedo.' Our analogue here is 'photon torpedo' in Star Trek. A visible light photon torpedo is over 20 orders of magnitude lower energy than a Planck rate quantum torpedo.

All of this unlimited Planck energy and its harmonics and subharmonics are transformable and mutable. That is how quantum~evolutionary reality creates and discreates itself in Doug's Generation III Reality Loop.

Classicists assume that reality is a concrete immutable and objective monism.

This is pure and simple garbage, hylic stupidity.

Classicists are retarded, massively retarded. Pun intended. Witness "zero momentum."

Classicists all have "zero momentum." Ultimate ubiquitous stuckness.

It's a 'scientific' edict of 'stux sux forever.' Immutability forever.

Classical 'science' is dead and it isn't going anywhere. Witness Global Warming.

See Doug's QELR of state.

See Doug's very recent CeodE 2011 What Is Wrong with Classical State? Doug - 9Jan2011.

Quanta can select. Quanta do select. Individual quanta make choices. Ensemble quanta make choices.

Quantum~selection depends upon a quantum~stage's qua to complementaroceive quantum~reality.

Quantum minds AKA Quantum Stages add Value through complementaroception of reality.

If we look at a dictionary 'definition' of classical abstraction we see almost immediately, "abstraction apart from perception." See how classical abstraction is wholly antithetical Doug's quantum~stage qua of complementaroception? If you do n¤t see, Doug offers "abstract apart perception" as an classical linguistic exemplar of SOM's Wall. Quantum~reality, via middle~inclusion has n¤ walls! Holographic islandicity yæs, classical walls n¤. Doug - 21,24Dec2010.

A coherent class of fermionic selection is gravity. Here we see isocoherence and coherence mediating decoherent self~other mass ('material' flux) attraction.

Double and multiple slit experiments demonstrate photonic and atomic (bosonic and fermionic) complementation~mode selection of apparent unity vis-à-vis plurality of 'paths.'

See Wheeler's delayed choice photon experiment.

Classical objects are dumb. Classical objects cannot make choices.

Classical minds are canonically, mechanically, and dogmatically (polemically) objective.

Classical minds, especially social monists, use classical abstraction to remove [Vv]alue via Ockhamistic minimalism. Following Pirsig, Doug calls this "objective reification of Quality," i.e., turning quantons(DQ,SQ) into classical ESQ. Doug - 21Dec2010.

See Parmenides, Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Newton, and Einstein. All mechanical retards.

See Doug's QELR of 'determine.' Read segment just below TBD legacy.

Doug - 9Jan2011.

All quantum~flux issi ephemerally aware of all other quantum~flux.

Consider quantum~entanglement and quantum~interference borne of it.

Two lights making darkness via quantum~cancellation is a great exemplar of ephemeral quantum awareness.

Torque cancellation of fans in a jet engine and props on multi-engine aircraft are good examplars of quantum awareness too.

Imagine torque-canceling gyros, chain saws, and hocky pucks. Could you ride a torque-canceled bicycle?

What would happen to Earth's orbit if Earth's torque were canceled?

Classical objects are immutable and dumb.

Classical objects cannot entangle nor interfere one another except by mechanical 'interactions.'

Classical objects cannot think, they cannot even thingk.

Classical subjects can think, but they have to be carefully trained to only thingk objectively. Non objective thinking is forbidden.

See Doug's omniscription of quantum~affectation.

Quantum~reality asks us to stand at nowings and looking forward make individual choices regarding whatings happenings nextings.

Quantum-reality educes individual freedom of choice and desnouers classical cause-effect as mental "zero momentum" retardation.

See Doug's description of classical-effectation borne of classical cause.

Classical reality asks us to look backwards at a unit OSFA history and deduce and induce effects from historical causes. Classicists refer this "normality." Normality's effects on classical minds is formal objective putation as 'rules.'

Allow Doug to quote Peirce directly, "But there is no kind of inference which can lend the slightest probability to any such absolute denial of an unusual phenomenon." See p. 56, Philosophical Writings of Peirce, selected and edited by Justice Buchler, Dover, 1955 from orig. 1940 edition.

Peirce broaches at least two quantum~memes:

• Undeniability of macroscopic quantum~uncertainty, and
• Bergson's prescient, "negation is subjective."

So, now, it becomes even more obvious that classical dialectic is naught more than a passé and worn out anachronism.

Doug could add a third quantum~meme of a trichotomous codon of probability, plausibility, and likelihood attending its quantum~complementary trichotomous codon of pastings, nowings, futurings. In script, quanton(PPL,PNF).

See Chapter II [Ibid.] for Peirce's detail comparisons of induction, deduction, and abduction.

To distill Peirce's hermeneutics of abduction, paraphrased by Doug, "...preference of hypothetical choice based on uncertainty [a guess]." Simply, guessing is all we have, essentially. See page 151 [ibid.].

On page 304 [ibid.] Peirce describes abductivism's quantum~middle~inclusion as absence of any sharp analytical 'context.' This jibes Doug's omniscriptions (partially borrowed from Finkelstein of Georgia Tech) of quantum~comtextual islandicity elsewhere in this Segment 11, Chapter 2 effort.

As Peirce explains so well, classical notions of induction and deduction claim powers of factual legitimacy, certainty, exactness, and determinism all of which are now quantum~evidently bogus. See pp. 151-156 of Chapter II [ibid.].

Doug - 20Dec2010.

Quantum~coherence tolerates enormous ensembles of widely varying islandic autonomies. We call it, "Many Sizes Fit All," MSFA.

From Doug's quantum~complementarospectives, this is quintessence of A New QuPo, A N¤væl Quantum~Politics invented by Doug Renselle using Quantonic memeos. Doug - 18Dec2010.

For Doug, this root semantic emerges from his (unacknowledging) mentors including Robert M. Pirsig, Mae-wan Ho, Henri Louis Bergson, Danah Zohar, and David Bohm. Any protégé couldn't have better mentors than those...

Just FYI, this day, 18Dec2010, is 15^th anniversary of Beth Burnett's first MatchLine call to Doug. We were married 3May1997 and lived quite joyously until her passing this year 26Jul2010. This is a very special day for me! Doug - 18Dec2010.

Classically, social dogma has to be, by TPTB consensual thing-king OSFA.

This is essence of socialists' One Global Order. It is pristinely garbage intellect, similar Gore and McCain't on 'Global Warming.'

Society nor weather are classically unit-caused, determinate-effective. Nor are they 'ideas' which can have immutable semantics and consensual semasiologies.

TPTB - From ZeroHedge™ meaning The Powers That Be.

Our classical 'description' of this talking point has to illuminate classical linguistic troubles with each of those four words:

• equal
• social
• plan
• result

Technically 'classical equality' is Platonic identity. Ancient philosophers made 'identity' a founding axiom of formal geometry. 'Classical equality' is closed, ideally tautologous (closed circularity of thingking), and innately incapable of self-other evolution. 'Classical equality' 'designs out' evolution and all quantum~reality. See Doug's critique of Aristotle's 'identity.'

Static and status quo interpretations of Platonic ideality of 'equality' as geometric appear to Doug as classicists' bases for notions of 'classically social' as OSFA, cultural uniformity through cultural consensus (i.e., conned sensus), and brain wash acculturation-pogroming of society's constituents to dogmatic 'standards,' themselves based in Platonic idealities. Simply, 'classical socialism' may be well exemplified as Borg assimilation. Students may choose to ponder similarities of radically socialized 'christian' (especially Roman Çatholiç) fascism (including most Protestantism) with Hitlerean-Mussoliniesque flavors of nationalism.

Classical semantic for plan is expectational 'determination of results.' This is essentially why all classical plans always fail, ultimately. To grasp quintessence here we must understand that reality is quantum and quantum~reality is radically wave~stochastic and thus (specific plan detail-event-) indeterminate, so all static classical planning is always doomed to failure (in any sense of ideally achieving said plan) which is what we observe happening to Keynesian fractional reserve fiat banking as we write and read. All classical planning may be viewed then as corrupt in any sense of inevitability of fraudulent results...

Indeed, from any quantum~philosophical complementarospective, HotMeme™ "...all classical planning is corrupt." HotMeme™. Doug - 22Dec2010.

Readers should now be able to see that classical notions of expectational 'result' borne of classically-socially-determinate 'plan,' is itself a notion of intentional corruption. Here Doug echoes deliberately, and with some Doug malice against classical socialism, Friedrich A. Hayek's views in his Road to Serfdom.

Doug - 22-24Dec2010.

Readers may find this talking point quite challenging. Why? Doug re engineers a mostly ingrained psychological linguistic semasiology for a classical dialectical notion of 'projection.'

Freud, to some extent Jung, and Sartre use 'projection' as symptomatic of a human 'mental illness' defence mechanism for moving (projecting) psychological pain onto 'external' entities. All three brands of their psychologies are profoundly dialectical and thus self-disabled. Simply, their psychologies tend to use distorted thingking (dialectic) to remove distorted thoughts (those projected) from mentally disturbed patients.

Doug sees this as dialectically 'deranged psychiatrists' rearranging their deranged patients' dialectically-assessed deranged perceptions.

That kind of 'projection' is n¤t what Doug describes n¤r intends here.

Let's begin then by QELRing from classical 'projection' to quantum pr¤jæction.

Doug made a long list of assumptions at top of this segment. He needs to add a few more, including his assumption that since we are ihn nature and nature is ihn us, we may infer that we are ihn agency of nature and nature is ihn agency of us. One powerful implication of that: as nature creates, so too, yet to a lessor extent, humans create. Human creation, human creative qua is what Doug means by this quantum comparative's title: "quantum~evolutionary pr¤jæction of potentia."

Humans have powers to think_q about what is unsaid. From unlimited unsaids they may choose some which to them are better and proceed with turning them into saids. Quantum~transformation (quantum~evolutionary~emerscence) from unsaids to saids is what Doug means by quantum~pr¤jæction.

In script, quantum~pr¤jæction issi quanton(unsaid,said). Those of us who think_q can imagine, can role play on our quantum~stages our quanton's imagined unsaids evolving into selected actual saids.

It is a kind of mental prototyping (please carefully and thoroughly read Doug's review of Gary Taubes' Darwin's Chip) AKA quantum~holographic~pr¤jæction. In rare instances it is capable of creating novelty. More often we can routinely use it to incrementally evolve unsaids into existing saids.

We can fathom novel financial, economic, and political unsaids and create saids to replace current failing dialectical methods and models like Keynesianism. We see directly here "pr¤jæction of potentia."

Doug's reference for psychological comparisons above is Nothing I See Means Anything by David Parrish, MD, 2006, Sentient Publications. I thank Steven, my surrogate son, whom I inherited from Beth, for his seasonal gift to me of this marvelous text. It has a lot of dialectical content, but it balances with more quantum memes which are exceptional. I wish I had time to do a full review of this text for you. However, you can read it...right?

Doug - 28Dec2010.

Classical socialists simply rearrange existing saids and call their 'standard reusable parts' formal and objective production "new."

"Status quo is the way to go."

Some call it "manufacturing innovation."

See Doug's coinings of emerscenture and emerscitecture.

Doug - 28Dec2010.

Quantum~gn¤stics view individual hyper classical-society. Quantumists pneumatically perceive this new way of think_qing as byproduce of "finding their individual inner." [Doug will write A How to Find Your Inner primer during last few days of December, 2010.]

Where classical socialists emphasize 'stability via social consensus,' quantum~gnostics emphasize survivability through competitive individualism. When all individuals are competitive, regarding each individual's survival, said ensemble of individuals quantumly accrues gross survivability. This is what Mae-wan Ho implied by her quantum~coherence of quantum~autonomies in her fine text, the Rainbow and the Worm.

Survivability requires quantum~biological apoptosis of old and emergent replacement of it with new. Which old gets replaced by which new, as natural selection, is only possible via individual competitive evolution of local quanta, all of which are individuals. That coherent ensemble of individuals is what Doug and others mean by "Quantum Society."

Quantum society omniffers classical society in many ways, but a key one is another Danah Zohar meme: Quantum~society and quantum~individuals are inseparable memetically. That is, quantum~society issi ihn quantum~individuals and quantum~individuals aræ ihn quantum~society. This obviously is quantum~coherence of quantum~middle~inclusion of quantum~islandic individuals as quantum~autonomies.

This quantum~talking~point benudes essence of, quintessence of QuPo, A N¤væl Quantum~Politics.

Doug - 26Dec2010.

Classical-socialists self-deludedly view society hyper individual. This 'level' of thing-king is automatic to and in Keynesians.

Their notions of Total Quality Control reflect what Doug refers "classical socialist trickle down." They plan for composite-unified social benefits and believe those benefits will trickle down in common sense regularity, uniformity, and neutrality to individuals in a OSFA manner. This is what they intend when they say, "Replace equal individual opportunity with socially-planned equal results." For socialist believers this is their utopian holism. Keynesians behave (do their due) entirely based upon this core axiom of Harvard Marxist anti Hayekean anti von Mises thought.

This social hyper individual methodology communizes individuals as 'stable' social cogs in their TQCed utopia.

To Doug, this is socialism turning individual Value into social value. Social 'value' is status quo, period. Socialists plan for status quo. Status quo to them is stable and OSFA which explains their even more deluded desire for its globality: One World Order.

This whole method is OK if all of us believe in an immutable state of independent classically socialized 'subjects' as reified and separable classical objects.

"Doug why isn't classical-socialist method OK?" See CTMs.

Nature neither believes in nor practices separable 'static independence,' AKA 'non evolutionary strict deterministic state.'

Outcome of this stupid socialism is evident from a quantum perspective, as Danah Zohar wrote, "An individual ...a natural self--a free and responsive self--and its world, ultimately, will reflect the world of Nature. When it does not, that world will fail."

Doug - 26Dec2010

For Doug, this is quantum~simple. Fiat is only abstract symbolism.

To any self-proclaimed Keynesian, GDP is flow of fiat symbols.

Is it evident that fiat as only symbolic of value literally has "zero value?"

Today's digital computers can move fiat symbols around Earth in nanoseconds. Keynesians measure this movement of symbols and call it "GDP."

Please compare movement of symbols vav movement of real money, e.g., metals. No one can move metal in nanoseconds in Keynesians' classical world.

When Keynesians symbolize real money with valueless symbols, and then fractionally reserve real money at ratios of 100:1, 200:1, 300:1, etc. it becomes manifestly apparent how they debase real money symbolically. This is plain and simple fraud.

"How is it fraud Doug?"

It is fraud since when we all go to get our real value money...it isn't there for about 99.5% of us. Our world's banking cartel are corrupt thieves. They cannot deliver our metals to us when even 1% of us ask for delivery. Doug is assuming a greater than 100:1 fractional reserve ratio on metals.

Is real money virtual? Can we fractionally reserve it? Should we? Doug says "N¤!" Keynesians say, "Yes!" With whom do you agree?

What will you do when you go to withdraw your 'certified' real money and it isn't there and banksters offer you paper and a premium fiat fee in place of your hard won real money?

In Doug's view we must de virtualize real money and force a certified 1:1 reserve on all of it. Those who want to play with fiat must live in a world of debased lower value they have created for themselves. Doug wants naught to do with their Keynesian fraud.

If you have real money, banksters cannot defraud you! Why do you think they do not want you to physically hold real money? When you hold real money, fiat dies. As evidence, watch JPMorgan die as silver's price goes toward $1000 per troy ounce.

Rising metal prices are metrics of cartel fraud. That is why cartel members have spent last 30+ years attempting to control metal prices in global metal exchanges. Of course, that control itself is a criminal act. More cartel fraud...

Fiat as OSFA doesn't! Fiat's imminent failure is SEP that Doug's views are better.

Doug - 23Dec2010.

"Hence the many books and articles written about quantum physics and holism, quantum physics and Eastern mysticism, quantum physics and healing, quantum physics and psychic phenomena, and so on. All have been partial and groping attempts to articulate something that is in the air, something that answers people's need for a more coherent world picture--a need to find a unifying explanation of ourselves and our universe and a unifying foundation for our behavior. But none has really grounded this need itself in actual physics of consciousness, and thus none has been able to lay a solid, physical basis for a quantum world view.

"Once we have made this connection, once we have seen that the physics of human consciousness emerges from quantum processes within the brain and that in consequence human consciousness and the whole world of its creation shares a physics with everything else in this universe--with the human body, with all other living things and creatures, with the basic physics of matter and relationship, and with the coherent ground state of the quantum vacuum itself--it becomes impossible to imagine a single aspect of our lives that is not drawn into one coherent whole.

"The quantum world view transcends the dichotomy between mind and body, or between inner and outer, by showing us that the basic building blocks of mind (bosons) and the basic building blocks of matter (fermions) arise out of a common quantum substrate (the vacuum) and engaged in a mutually creative dialogue whose roots can be traced back to the very heart of reality creation. Crudely put, mind is relationship and matter is that which it relates. Neither, on its own, could evolve or express anything; together they give us ourselves and the world.

"The creative dialogue between mind and matter is the physical basis of all creativity in the universe and is also the physical basis of human creativity. The quantum self experiences no dichotomy between the inner and the outer because the two, the inner world of mind (of ideas, values, notions of goodness, truth, and beauty) and the outer world of matter (of facts), give rise to each other.

"The quantum world view transcends the dichotomy between the individual and relationship by showing us that people can only be the individuals they are within a context. I am my relationships--my relationships to the subselves within my own self (my past and my future), my relationships to others, and my relationships to the world at large.

"I am I, uniquely myself, because I am an utterly unique pattern of relationships, and yet I cannot separate this I who I am from those relationships. For the quantum self, neither individuality nor relationship is primary because both arise simultaneously and with equal 'weight' from the quantum substrate. In the case of individual persons and their relationships, that substrate is a Bose-Einstein condensate in the brain, in the case of individual particles and their relationships, that substrate is a Bose Einstein condensate in the quantum vacuum.

"The quantum self thus mediates between the extreme isolation of Western individualism and the extreme collectivism of Marxism or Eastern mysticism.

"Similarly, the quantum world view transcends the dichotomy between human culture and Nature, and indeed imposes the constraint of the natural upon the ultimate success of the cultural.

"The physics of consciousness that gives rise to the world of culture--to art, ideas, values, moralities, and even to religions--is the same physics that gives us the world of Nature. In both cases it is a physics driven by the need to maintain and increase ordered coherence in free response to the environment. The quantum self is, by the very mechanics of its consciousness, a natural self--a free and responsive self--and its world, ultimately, will reflect the world of Nature. When it does not, that world will fail.

"In summary, the quantum world view stresses dynamic relationship as the basis of all that is. It tells us that our world comes about through a mutually creative dialogue between mind and body (inner and outer, subject and object), between the individual and his personal and material context, and between human culture and the natural world. It gives us a view of the human self that is free and responsible, responsive to others and to its environment, essentially related and naturally committed, and at every moment creative."

Quotes transcribed by Doug from last two text pages, pp. 236-237, of her fine book, Quantum Self, 1990, Quill, 268 total pages including index.

As I wrote in my reviews of her work in Chapter One, Danah is very close to what Quantonics teaches. Doug's only gripes in this set of quotes are an (perhaps only partial~) absence of quantum~memes of middle~inclusion and quantum~vacuum as isoflux which for Doug is key to all that energy hiding itself from those of us who reside predominately in actuality. A major gripe, too, is her use of dichotomies even though she bemoans them. I also think Danah could benefit from exposure to Mae-wan Ho's memes of coherence (as a metaphor of Danah's 'holism'), and autonomy (a metaphor of Danah's islandic individuality) (the Rainbow and the Worm) as a quantum~cultural solution to many of our world's current troubles.

Danah's qualification of her use of 'physics' isn't thorough enough for Doug. Bohm, as Doug evidenced in Chapter One, has said (we infer) that a new physics, a new quantum physics, may n¤t be mechanical. Yet many of Danah's classical semantics and nomenclature appear to drag an anchor of classical mechanicity around with them. See Doug's QELR of 'physics.' With some arrogance and putrid hubris, Doug would replace all occurrences of Danah's 'physics' with his own remediation of it: physics. Said remediation suggests a New Way of Think_qing of 'physics' as n¤n analytic, n¤n material, n¤n objective, unconcrete, unstoppable, and n¤n quantitative (except perhaps for Peano~esque counting, especially wave number).

Quoted text remains unsullied by Doug. I did want to embolden her, "When it does not, that world will fail." Doug sees that as what is happening to Keynesianism and FRBanks nowings. This is some of 'the' best prose on quantum~reality Doug has ever read. That's why it seemed prudent to share it with you and encourage you to purchase this book and absorb it as well as you have qua. Doug - 19Nov2010.